Tc-99m mebrofenin hepatobiliary scintigraphy to assess future liver remnant function before major liver surgery.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Assessment of liver function is paramount before hepatectomy. This study aimed to assess future liver remnant function (FLR-F) using hepatobiliary scintigraphy (HBS) and to compare it to FLR volume (FLR-V) in the prediction of posthepatectomy liver failure (PHLF). The impact of volume and function gains were also assessed in patients undergoing portal vein embolization (PVE) or liver venous deprivation (LVD). METHODS: All consecutive patients undergoing major hepatectomy between 02/2018 and 09/2021 with preoperative HBS were included. FLR-V was expressed as percentage of total liver volume and analyzed using preoperative computed tomography. FLR-V and FLR-F gains after embolization were expressed in percentage. Receiver operating characteristic analysis was performed to compare both methods in predicting PHLF. RESULTS: Thirty-six patients were included. PVE and LVD were performed in 4 (11%) and 28 patients (78%), respectively. Overall, PHLF occurred in eight patients (22%). FLR-F gain after embolization showed significant ability to predict PHLF (area under the curve [AUC] = 0.789), with cut-off value of 150% showing a sensitivity of 1.00, a specificity of 0.42, and a negative predictive value of 1.00. CONCLUSION: Preoperative HBS shows a high sensitivity to predict PHLF when HBS is performed twice to measure the function gain after venous embolization.

Guidelines for Perioperative Care for Liver Surgery: Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) Society Recommendations 2022.

BACKGROUND: Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) has been widely applied in liver surgery since the publication of the first ERAS guidelines in 2016. The aim of the present article was to update the ERAS guidelines in liver surgery using a modified Delphi method based on a systematic review of the literature. METHODS: A systematic literature review was performed using MEDLINE/PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library. A modified Delphi method including 15 international experts was used. Consensus was judged to be reached when >80% of the experts agreed on the recommended items. Recommendations were based on the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluations system. RESULTS: A total of 7541 manuscripts were screened, and 240 articles were finally included. Twenty-five recommendation items were elaborated. All of them obtained consensus (>80% agreement) after 3 Delphi rounds. Nine items (36%) had a high level of evidence and 16 (64%) a strong recommendation grade. Compared to the first ERAS guidelines published, 3 novel items were introduced: prehabilitation in high-risk patients, preoperative biliary drainage in cholestatic liver, and preoperative smoking and alcohol cessation at least 4 weeks before hepatectomy. CONCLUSIONS: These guidelines based on the best available evidence allow standardization of the perioperative management of patients undergoing liver surgery. Specific studies on hepatectomy in cirrhotic patients following an ERAS program are still needed.

Tumor burden in patients with early and intermediate-stage hepatocellular carcinoma undergoing liver resection: a retrospective multicenter study on clinical and oncological outcomes.

BACKGROUND: According to the Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) staging system, liver resection (LR) is recommended for early-stage (BCLC-A) hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) but not for intermediate-stage (BCLC-B). This study aimed to assess the outcomes of LR in these patients using a subclassification tumour burden score (TBS). METHODS: All consecutive patients that underwent LR for BCLC-A and BCLC-B HCC between 01/2010 and 12/2020 in 4 tertiary referral centers were included. Clinical outcomes and overall survival (OS) were assessed in relation to TBS and BCLC stages. RESULTS: Among 612 patients included, 562 were classified as BCLC-A and 50 as BCLC-B. The incidence of overall postoperative complications (56.0 vs 41.5%, p = 0.053) and mortality (0 vs 1.6%, p = 1.000) were similar between BCLC-A and BCLC-B patients. OS was significantly higher for BCLC A/low TBS than BCLC B/low TBS (p = 0.009), while patients with medium and high TBS had similar OS, irrespective of BCLC stage (respectively p = 0.103 and p = 0.343). CONCLUSIONS: Patients with medium and high TBS had comparable OS and DFS, irrespective of BCLC A or B stage, and postoperative morbidity was comparable. These results highlight the need for refinement of the BCLC staging system, and LR could be considered for selected intermediate stage (BCLC-B) according to the tumour burden.

[Management of acute cholecystitis]. / Prise en charge de la cholécystite aiguë.

Acute cholecystitis is an inflammation of the gallbladder most often related to gallstones. The diagnostic and severity criteria are well described by the Tokyo criteria. Early laparoscopic cholecystectomy remains the treatment of choice. It can also be performed in elderly patients and in pregnant women during any trimester. For patients not eligible for surgery, percutaneous or echo-endoscopic gallbladder drainage (EUS-GBD) are effective treatment alternatives. The management of acute cholecystitis must therefore be adapted to each patient by carefully evaluating the risks and benefits associated with surgery.

La cholécystite aiguë est une inflammation de la vésicule biliaire le plus souvent liée à des calculs biliaires. Les critères diagnostiques et de sévérité sont bien décrits par les critères de Tokyo. La cholécystectomie laparoscopique précoce reste le traitement de choix. Elle peut être également réalisée chez les patients âgés et chez les femmes enceintes pendant n'importe quel trimestre. Pour les patients non éligibles à la chirurgie, les drainages de la vésicule biliaire par voie percutanée ou échoendoscopique (EUS-GBD) sont des alternatives thérapeutiques efficaces. La prise en charge de la cholécystite aiguë doit donc être adaptée à chaque patient en évaluant de façon attentive les risques et bénéfices associés à la chirurgie.

[Novelties on the management of alveolar echinococcosis]. / Nouveautés dans la prise en charge de l'échinococcose alvéolaire.

Alveolar echinococcosis is an endemic parasitosis in Switzerland. This pathology mainly infects the liver and develops similarly as a malignant tumor with its ability to spread into the hepatic parenchyma and its capacity of developing distant lesions via hematogenous dissemination. Treatment is based on complete surgical resection coupled with albendazole treatment. Recently, ex vivo liver resections with auto-transplantation have been shown to be feasible in case of end-stage alveolar echinococcosis. Moreover, new biomarkers such as programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1), a protein with immunomodulation property, have shown their potential impact on the treatment and follow-up of patients with alveolar echinococcosis.

L'échinococcose alvéolaire est une parasitose endémique en Suisse. Cette pathologie touche principalement le foie et se développe telle une tumeur maligne, par sa propension à envahir le parenchyme hépatique et par sa capacité à développer des lésions à distance par voie hématogène. Le traitement repose sur une exérèse chirurgicale complète couplée à un traitement d'albendazole. Récemment, des techniques de résection hépatique ex vivo avec auto-transplantation ont montré leur faisabilité en cas d'échinococcose alvéolaire avancée. De plus, de nouveaux marqueurs, comme le programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1), protéine jouant un rôle dans l'immunomodulation, ont montré leur potentiel impact pour le traitement et le suivi des patients atteints d'échinococcose alvéolaire.

Basic Science with Preclinical Models to Investigate and Develop Liquid Biopsy: What Are the Available Data and Is It a Fruitful Approach?

The molecular analysis of circulating analytes (circulating tumor-DNA (ctDNA), -cells (CTCs) and -RNA (ctRNA)/exosomes) deriving from solid tumors and detected in the bloodstream-referred as liquid biopsy-has emerged as one of the most promising concepts in cancer management. Compelling data have evidenced its pivotal contribution and unique polyvalence through multiple applications. These data essentially derived from translational research. Therewith, data on liquid biopsy in basic research with preclinical models are scarce, a concerning lack that has been widely acknowledged in the field. This report aimed to comprehensively review the available data on the topic, for each analyte. Only 17, 17 and 2 studies in basic research investigated ctDNA, CTCs and ctRNA/exosomes, respectively. Albeit rare, these studies displayed noteworthy relevance, demonstrating the capacity to investigate questions related to the biology underlying analytes release that could not be explored via translational research with human samples. Translational, clinical and technological sectors of liquid biopsy may benefit from basic research and should take note of some important findings generated by these studies. Overall, results underscored the need to intensify the efforts to conduct future studies on liquid biopsy in basic research with new preclinical models.

An aberrant right hepatic artery arising from the gastroduodenal artery: a pitfall encountered during pancreaticoduodenectomy.

PURPOSE: Among the variations of the right hepatic artery (RHA), the identification of an aberrant RHA arising from the gastroduodenal artery (GDA) is vital for avoiding damage to the RHA during surgery, since ligation of the GDA is necessary during pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD). However, this variation is not frequently reported. The purpose of this study was to focus on an aberrant RHA arising from the GDA, which was not noted in the classifications reported by Michels and Hiatt. METHODS: A total of 574 patients undergoing a PD between Jan 2001 and Dec 2015 at a tertiary care hospital in Switzerland (n = 366) and between Jan 2009 and May 2015 at a hospital in Japan (n = 208) were included in the analysis. Of these, preoperative CT angiography or/and MRI angiography findings were available for 532 patients. We retrospectively analyzed the hepatic artery variations, patient demographics, and surgical outcomes. RESULTS: Among the 532 patients who received a PD, an RHA originating from the GDA was observed in 19 cases (3.5%). Eleven patients (2.1%) had both an aberrant RHA and an aberrant left hepatic artery (LHA) (Hiatt Type 4). Six patients (1.2%) had a replaced CHA arising from the SMA (Hiatt Type 5). We could, therefore, correctly identify the aberration in all cases. CONCLUSIONS: We observed rarely reported but important aberrant RHA variations arising from the GDA. To prevent injury during PD in patients with this type of aberrant RHA, intensive preparations using CT and/or MRI imaging before surgery and intraoperative liver Doppler ultrasonography are considered to be essential.

[Preoperative liver venous deprivation]. / Embolisation portale et sus-hépatique combinée avant hépatectomie ma.

Some hepato-biliary cancers require major liver resections. Post hepatectomy liver failure is a complication that occurs when the remnant liver cannot maintain its synthetic and excretory functions. To overcome this issue, portal vein embolization has been developed to induce future remnant liver hypertrophy preoperatively. However, up to 20% of patients cannot proceed to the hepatectomy due to insufficient hypertrophy or tumor progression in the interval between the embolization and the planned surgery. Liver venous deprivation (LVD) is a technique that combine ipsilateral portal and hepatic vein embolization. With this technique, the hypertrophy seems to be faster and more important, with low complications rate and no mortality associated with the procedure.

Certains cancers hépatobiliaires nécessitent des résections hépatiques majeures. L'insuffisance hépatocellulaire est une complication postopératoire avec un risque de mortalité qui survient lorsque le foie restant ne peut maintenir ses fonctions de synthèse et d'excrétion. L'embolisation de la veine porte a été développée pour induire une hypertrophie du futur foie restant en préopératoire afin d'éviter cette complication. Cependant, 20 % des patients ne peuvent pas bénéficier de l'hépatectomie en raison d'une hypertrophie insuffisante ou d'une progression de la maladie oncologique dans l'intervalle entre l'embolisation et la chirurgie. L'embolisation portale et sus-hépatique combinée est une technique qui consiste à combiner durant le même geste l'embolisation de la veine porte et de la veine sus-hépatique ipsilatérale. Par cette technique, l'hypertrophie semble alors plus rapide et importante, avec peu de complications et aucune mortalité en lien avec la procédure.

Feasibility of an Enhanced Recovery Protocol for Elective Pancreatoduodenectomy: A Multicenter International Cohort Study.

BACKGROUND: The first enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) guidelines for pancreatoduodenectomy (PD) were developed in 2012. The study aimed to assess compliance and outcomes of an ERAS protocol for PD, to study correlation between compliance and outcomes, and to identify risk factors for complications. METHODS: Retrospective cohort analysis is based on a prospective database, including all consecutive patients undergoing elective PD within an ERAS program in four centers: Lausanne University Hospital (Switzerland), Carolinas Medical Center (United States), Edouard Herriot Hospital (France), and University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf (Germany). Patients' characteristics, postoperative outcome and ERAS compliance were assessed. Logistic regression analysis was performed to assess predictors of postoperative complications. RESULTS: Between October 2012 and June 2017, 404 consecutive patients underwent PD. Median length of stay was 14 days with 11.3% readmission rate. Mean overall compliance was 62%, with pre-, intra- and postoperative compliance of 93%, 80% and 30%, respectively. Overall compliance ≥ 70% versus < 70% was significantly associated with a reduction in complications (p = 0.029) and length of stay (p < 0.001). Avoidance of postoperative nasogastric tube (OR = 0.31, p = 0.043), mobilization on day of surgery (OR = 0.28, p = 0.043), and mobilization more than 6 h on postoperative day 2 (OR = 0.45, p = 0.001) were independent predictors of reduced overall complications. CONCLUSIONS: Implementation of enhanced recovery for PD is challenging, especially in the postoperative period. Overall compliance with ERAS protocol ≥ 70% was associated with decreased complications and length of stay. Specific ERAS elements, such as avoidance of postoperative nasogastric tube and early mobilization, independently improved outcomes.

Guidelines for Perioperative Care for Pancreatoduodenectomy: Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) Recommendations 2019.

BACKGROUND: Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) pathways are now implemented worldwide with strong evidence that adhesion to such protocol reduces medical complications, costs and hospital stay. This concept has been applied for pancreatic surgery since the first published guidelines in 2012. This study presents the updated ERAS recommendations for pancreatoduodenectomy (PD) based on the best available evidence and on expert consensus. METHODS: A systematic literature search was conducted in three databases (Embase, Medline Ovid and Cochrane Library Wiley) for the 27 developed ERAS items. Quality of randomized trials was assessed using the Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials statement checklist. The level of evidence for each item was determined using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment Development and Evaluation system. The Delphi method was used to validate the final recommendations. RESULTS: A total of 314 articles were included in the systematic review. Consensus among experts was reached after three rounds. A well-implemented ERAS protocol with good compliance is associated with a reduction in medical complications and length of hospital stay. The highest level of evidence was available for five items: avoiding hypothermia, use of wound catheters as an alternative to epidural analgesia, antimicrobial and thromboprophylaxis protocols and preoperative nutritional interventions for patients with severe weight loss (> 15%). CONCLUSIONS: The current updated ERAS recommendations for PD are based on the best available evidence and processed by the Delphi method. Prospective studies of high quality are encouraged to confirm the benefit of current updated recommendations.

Impact of ERAS compliance on the delay between surgery and adjuvant chemotherapy in hepatobiliary and pancreatic malignancies.

BACKGROUND: Multidisciplinary approach with adjuvant chemotherapy is the key element to provide optimal outcomes in pancreas and liver malignancies. However, post-operative complications may increase the interval between surgery and chemotherapy with negative oncologic effects. HYPOTHESIS AND STUDY AIM: The aim of the study was to analyse whether compliance to Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) pathway was associated with decreased interval to adjuvant chemotherapy. METHODS: Retrospective analysis of all consecutive ERAS patients with surgery for hepatobiliary or pancreatic malignancies at the University Hospital of Lausanne between 2012 and 2016. Multivariate analysis was performed to assess the impact of ERAS compliance on time to chemotherapy. RESULTS: A total of 133 patients with adjuvant chemotherapy were included (n = 44 liver and n = 89 pancreatic cancer). Median compliance to ERAS was 61% (IQR 55-67) for the study population, and median delay to chemotherapy was 49 days (IQR 39-61). Overall, compliance ≥ 67% to ERAS induced a significant reduction in the interval between surgery and chemotherapy for young patients (< 65 years old) with or without severe comorbidities (reduction of 22 and 10 days, respectively). High compliance in young ASA3 patients with liver colorectal metastases was associated with an increase of 481 days of DFS. CONCLUSIONS: ERAS compliance ≥ 67% tends to be associated with a reduction in the delay to adjuvant chemotherapy for young patients with hepatobiliary and pancreatic malignancies. More prospective studies with strict adhesion to the ERAS protocol are needed to confirm these results.

Feasibility and safety of liver transplantation or resection after transarterial radioembolization with Yttrium-90 for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma.

BACKGROUND: The benefit of transarterial radioembolization (TARE) in patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is increasingly evidenced. However, data on outcome of liver transplantation or resection after TARE remain scarce. This study aimed to assess the safety and feasibility of surgery after TARE in patients with unresectable HCC. METHODS: Patients exclusively undergoing TARE followed by either orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) or liver resection (LR) for HCC between 2012 and 2016 were included. Primary outcomes were postoperative morbidity and mortality. Secondary outcomes were overall survival (OS) and response to TARE. RESULTS: Among 349 patients with HCC treated with TARE, 32 (9%) underwent either OLT (n = 22) or LR (n = 10), which represent the study cohort. In this group, TARE induced decreased viable nodules (p < 0.001), an efficient downsizing (p < 0.001) as well as a significant downstaging based on BCLC classification (p < 0.001). Overall, major complications and mortality after surgery occurred in 5 (16%) and 1 (3%) patients, respectively. For the whole study cohort, OS was 47 months while survival rates at 1-, 3- and 5-years reached 97%, 86% and 86%, respectively. DISCUSSION: Liver surgery after TARE is feasible and safe. This strategy allows to offer a curative treatment in a subset of patients with unresectable HCC.

[Update in Surgical Oncology]. / Chirurgie viscérale.

In 2017, data from large multicentre randomized controlled trials assessed the safety of minimally invasive techniques for liver or esophagus resection with similar oncologic outcome compared to open approach. Patients also benefit from progress in medical oncology in particular with the development of new targeted therapies, offering surgery to patients with initially non-resectable disease. The increase in complete tumor response after neoadjuvant treatment allows more conservative approaches, like organ preserving surgery for rectal cancer. The constant improvement in perioperative care and enhanced recovery programs (Enhanced Recovery After Surgery - ERAS) reduce both length of hospital stay and costs, decrease the risk of postoperative complications, and offer better quality of life to the patients.

En 2017, des études multicentriques randomisées ont permis de préciser le rôle prépondérant des techniques mini-invasives pour la chirurgie de l'œsophage ou du foie avec des résultats oncologiques similaires à la chirurgie ouverte. Les patients bénéficient également de progrès en oncologie médicale suite au développement de l'immunothérapie permettant ainsi de proposer la chirurgie à des patients jugés initialement non résécables. L'amélioration de la réponse au traitement néoadjuvant permet d'appliquer des approches plus conservatrices, comme la préservation du rectum après radiochimiothérapie. Les avancées dans la gestion périopératoire du patient (Enhanced Recovery After Surgery - ERAS), rendent les durées d'hospitalisation plus courtes avec une réduction des coûts, diminuent le risque de survenue de complications et assurent une meilleure qualité de vie au patient.

Outcomes of Kidney Donors over 60 Years Old: A Single-Center Cohort Study.

AIM: To evaluate outcomes and post-donation kidney function of older living kidney donors (LKD). METHODS: Retrospective analysis of prospective database including all consecutive LKD undergoing laparoscopic nephrectomy in a single center (09/1998-12/2013). LKD aged ≥60 years were compared to younger LKD. Renal function assessed by creatinine levels and estimated glomerular filtration rates (eGFR). Surgical complications classified according to the Clavien-Dindo classification. Bivariate and multivariate analyses using linear mixed effect models were performed to determine factors (age, gender, hypertension status, BMI, choice of better functioning kidney for donation) that might impinge on renal function after donation. RESULTS: 213 LKD were identified: 49 older (median age: 66 years, range: 60-79) and 164 younger (median age: 46, range: 25-59). Mean operative time (149 vs. 152 min, p = 0.69), conversion to laparotomy (n = 1 vs. 3, p = 0.92), grade III-IV complications (n = 4 vs. 2, p = 0.36) were similar. Older had more grade I-II complications (n = 18 vs. 4, p < 0.001). Despite similar pre-donation eGFR (80 vs. 84 ml/min/1.73 m2), older donors presented significantly lower eGFR during inpatient period (46 vs. 51 ml/min/1.73 m2, p = 0.0003), at 1 month (51 vs. 58 ml/min/1.73 m2, p = 0.002) and at 1 year (54 vs. 62 ml/min/1.73 m2, p = 0.001). Multivariate analysis adjusted to gender, hypertension status, BMI and choice of better functioning kidney for donation showed that at 1 year, age ≥60 affected renal function by a coefficient of 0.91 (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Despite renal function improvement after discharge, LKD ≥ 60 years presented lower eGFR than younger at one year and had more grade I-II surgical complications.

[Current surgical treatment for hepatocellular carcinoma : critical appraisal of current guidelines]. / Traitement chirurgical du carcinome hépatocellulaire : les recommandations actuelles sont-elles trop restrictives ?

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) management has evolved in the last decades. Current available treatments include interventional radiology like radiofrequency ablation, transarterial chemoembolization or Yttrium 90 radioembolization. Surgery, when possible, has been proven to be the most effective treatment in reducing the risk of long-term local recurrence. American and European societies (AASLD, EASL, respectively) guidelines for the management of HCC endorse The Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) treatment allocation system. One drawback of the BCLC system is its restrictiveness regarding surgical indications. This present article aims in reviewing the indications of surgical resection for HCC.

La prise en charge du carcinome hépatocellulaire (CHC) s'est beaucoup développée au cours des deux dernières décennies. L'éventail des traitements disponibles inclut les techniques de radiologie interventionnelle telles que la radiofréquence, la chimio-embolisation intra-artérielle, et plus récemment, la radio-embolisation à l'Yttrium 90. La chirurgie, lorsqu'elle est possible, reste le traitement le plus efficace prouvé pour réduire le risque de récidive à long terme. Les recommandations actuelles suivies par les sociétés savantes européennes (EASL) et américaines (AASLD) pour la prise en charge des CHC se basent sur l'algorithme de la Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) qui est très restrictif au regard de la place du traitement chirurgical. Le but de cet article est de revoir les indications au traitement chirurgical du CHC.

Guidelines for Perioperative Care for Liver Surgery: Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) Society Recommendations.

BACKGROUND: Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) is a multimodal pathway developed to overcome the deleterious effect of perioperative stress after major surgery. In colorectal surgery, ERAS pathways reduced perioperative morbidity, hospital stay and costs. Similar concept should be applied for liver surgery. This study presents the specific ERAS Society recommendations for liver surgery based on the best available evidence and on expert consensus. METHODS: A systematic review was performed on ERAS for liver surgery by searching EMBASE and Medline. Five independent reviewers selected relevant articles. Quality of randomized trials was assessed according to the Jadad score and CONSORT statement. The level of evidence for each item was determined using the GRADE system. The Delphi method was used to validate the final recommendations. RESULTS: A total of 157 full texts were screened. Thirty-seven articles were included in the systematic review, and 16 of the 23 standard ERAS items were studied specifically for liver surgery. Consensus was reached among experts after 3 rounds. Prophylactic nasogastric intubation and prophylactic abdominal drainage should be omitted. The use of postoperative oral laxatives and minimally invasive surgery results in a quicker bowel recovery and shorter hospital stay. Goal-directed fluid therapy with maintenance of a low intraoperative central venous pressure induces faster recovery. Early oral intake and mobilization are recommended. There is no evidence to prefer epidural to other types of analgesia. CONCLUSIONS: The current ERAS recommendations were elaborated based on the best available evidence and endorsed by the Delphi method. Nevertheless, prospective studies need to confirm the clinical use of the suggested protocol.

Outcomes After Liver Resection for Hepatic Alveolar Echinococcosis: A Single-Center Cohort Study.

BACKGROUND: Switzerland is a region in which alveolar echinococcosis (AE) is endemic. Studies evaluating outcomes after liver resection (LR) for AE are scarce. The aim of this study was to assess the short- and long-term outcomes of AE patients after LR in a single tertiary referral center. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed data pertaining to all patients with liver AE who were treated with LR at our institution between January 1992 and December 2013. Patient demographics, intraoperative data, extent of LR procedures (major vs. minor LR), postoperative outcomes, and negative histological margin (R0) resection rate were recorded in a database. Recurrence rates after LR were analyzed. RESULTS: LR was performed in 59 patients diagnosed with hepatic AE (56 complete surgeries, 3 reduction surgeries). Postoperative morbidity and mortality were observed in 34 % (25 % grade I-II, 9 % grade III-IV) and 2 % of the patients, respectively. R0 (complete) resection rate was 71 % (n = 42), and R1/R2 resection rate was 29 % (n = 17). Extra-hepatic recurrence occurred in 1 case (lung) after R0 resection. In cases of R1/R2 resection, 7 intra-hepatic disease progressions occurred with a median time of 10 months (IQR 6-11 months). Long-term (more than 1 year) benzimidazole treatment stabilized the disease in 64 % (9/14) of patients with R1 status. The overall survival rate was 97 %. CONCLUSIONS: Liver AE can be safely and definitively treated with LR, provided that R0 resection is achieved. In cases of R1 resection, benzimidazole therapy seems to be effective in stabilizing the intra-hepatic disease and preventing extra-hepatic recurrence.