Identification of somatic TERT promoter mutations in familial nonmedullary thyroid carcinomas.

OBJECTIVE: The genes causing familial nonmedullary thyroid carcinoma (FNMTC) identified to date are only involved in a small fraction of the families. Recently, somatic mutations in TERT promoter region and in EIF1AX gene were reported in thyroid tumours of undefined familial status. The aim of this study was to investigate the role of TERT and EIF1AX mutations in familial thyroid tumours. DESIGN: The promoter region of TERT was sequenced in leucocyte DNA of the probands from 75 FNMTC families. In thyroid tumours from 54 familial cases, we assessed somatic TERT promoter, RAS and BRAF hotspot mutations, and the whole EIF1AX gene. RESULTS: No potentially pathogenic germline variants were identified in TERT in the 75 FNMTC families' probands. In the 54 carcinomas, we identified five cases (9%) with hotspot somatic TERT promoter mutations. BRAF mutations were found in 41% of the tumours. All TERT-positive samples were also positive for BRAF p.Val600Glu, and this co-occurrence was found to be statistically significant (P=.008). RAS mutations were detected in four tumours wild-type for TERT (7%). Evaluation of tumour mutation data together with the patients' clinicopathological features revealed a significant correlation between TERT plus BRAF mutations and advanced tumour stage (T4) (P=.020). No mutations were identified in EIF1AX. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study suggest that TERT promoter and EIF1AX mutations are not frequently involved in FNMTC aetiology. However, we show for the first time that TERT alterations are associated with familial thyroid tumour progression. Our data also suggest that TERT mutations are more often found in concomitance with BRAF mutations in advanced stages of FNMTC.

Familial vs sporadic papillary thyroid carcinoma: a matched-case comparative study showing similar clinical/prognostic behaviour.

OBJECTIVE: Familial non-medullary thyroid cancer has been proposed as an aggressive clinical entity. Our aim in this study is to investigate potential distinguishing features as well as the biological and clinical aggressiveness of familial vs sporadic papillary thyroid carcinoma (PTC). We assessed clinicopathological characteristics, outcome measures and DNA ploidy. DESIGN: A matched-case comparative study. METHODS: A series of patients with familial PTC (n=107) and two subgroups, one with three or more affected elements (n=32) and another including index cases only (n=61), were compared with patients with sporadic PTC (n=107), matched by age, gender, pTNM disease extension and approximate follow-up duration. Histological variant, extrathyroidal extension, vascular invasion, tumour multifocality and bilateral growth were evaluated. Ploidy pattern was analysed in available samples by DNA flow cytometry. The probabilities of disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) were estimated according to the Kaplan-Meier (K-M) method. RESULTS: No patient with familial PTC died of disease during follow-up (median, 72 months), contrarily to five patients (4.7%) (P=0.06) with sporadic PTC (median, 90 months). There was a significantly higher tumour multifocality in familial PTC (index cases subgroup) vs sporadic PTC (P=0.035), and a trend, in the familial PTC cohort with three or more affected elements, to show extrathyroidal extension (P=0.054) more frequently. No difference was observed in DNA ploidy status. The K-M analyses showed no significant differences between both entities in relation to DFS or OS. CONCLUSION: Apart from multifocality, familial PTC appears to have similar clinical/prognostic behaviour when compared with sporadic forms of the disease.