Plasma adiponectin levels and type 2 diabetes risk: a nested case-control study in a Chinese population and an updated meta-analysis.

Results from previous prospective studies assessing the relation between adiponectin and type 2 diabetes (T2D) were not entirely consistent, and evidence in Chinese population is scarce. Moreover, the last meta-analysis did not examine the impact of metabolic variables on the adiponectin-T2D association. Therefore, we prospectively evaluated the adiponectin-T2D association among 571 T2D cases and 571 age-sex-matched controls nested within the Singapore Chinese Health Study (SCHS). Furthermore, we conducted an updated meta-analysis by searching prospective studies on Pubmed till September 2016. In the SCHS, the odds ratio of T2D, comparing the highest versus lowest tertile of adiponectin levels, was 0.30 (95% confidence interval: 0.17, 0.55) in the fully-adjusted model. The relation was stronger among heavier participants (body mass index ≥23 kg/m2) compared to their leaner counterparts (P for interaction = 0.041). In a meta-analysis of 34 prospective studies, the pooled relative risk was 0.53 (95% confidence interval: 0.47, 0.61) comparing the extreme tertiles of adiponectin with moderate heterogeneity (I 2 = 48.7%, P = 0.001). The adiponectin-T2D association remained unchanged after adjusting for inflammation and dyslipidemia markers, but substantially attenuated with adjustment for insulin sensitivity and/or glycaemia markers. Overall evidence indicates that higher adiponectin levels are associated with decreased T2D risk in Chinese and other populations.

Aberrant Methylation of RASSF1A Closely Associated with HNSCC, a Meta-Analysis.

The RAS association domain family protein 1a (RASSF1A), a tumor suppressor gene at 3p21.3, plays a very important role in various cancers, including the head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC). Hypermethylation of CpG islands in the RASSF1A promoter region contribute to epigenetic inactivation. However, the association between RASSF1A promoter methylation and HNSCC remains unclear and controversial. Therefore, a meta-analysis was performed in the study to identify the association. We identified the eligible studies through searching PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, and China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI) databases with a systematic searching strategy. The information on characteristics of each study and prevalence of RASSF1A methylation were collected. Pooled odds ratios (ORs) with corresponding confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated. Meta-regression was performed to analyze heterogeneity and funnel plots were applied to evaluate publication bias. A total of 550 HNSCC patients and 404 controls from twelve eligible studies were included in the meta-analysis. Overall, a significant association was observed between RASSF1A methylation status and HNSCC risk under a random-effects model (OR = 2.93, 95% CI: 1.58-5.46). There was no significant publication bias observed. The meta-analysis suggested that there was a significant association between aberrant RASSF1A methylation and HNSCC.