RESUMEN
In hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer (HNPCC), patients' mismatch repair (MMR) gene mutations cause MMR deficiency, leading to microsatellite instability (MSI-H). MSI-H is also found in a substantial fraction of sporadic gastric carcinomas (SGC), mainly due to MLH1 promoter hypermethylation, although somatic mutations in MMR genes have been described. We aimed to investigate which MMR defects are present in SGC. Twenty-nine MSI-H SGC investigated previously for MLH1 promoter hypermethylation were screened for somatic mutations in MLH1, MSH2, MSH6, MLH3, and MBD4 by denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis and sequencing. Five truncating mutations (three in MSH6, one in MLH3, and one in MBD4) and one missense mutation (MLH1) were identified. Of these, three truncating mutations were in MSI-H cases that lack MLH1 hypermethylation. As all truncating mutations were found in the coding poly-A tracts, it seems likely that they result from the MSI phenotype rather than cause it. In summary, somatic mutations in MMR genes are rare in SGC and do not explain the development of these tumors reflecting, rather than causing, the mutator phenotype. Other MMR genes are probably involved in MSI-H gastric cancer without MLH1 hypermethylation.
Asunto(s)
Carcinoma/genética , Reparación de la Incompatibilidad de ADN , Mutación/fisiología , Neoplasias Gástricas/genética , Proteínas Adaptadoras Transductoras de Señales/genética , Secuencia de Bases , Proteínas Portadoras/genética , Metilación de ADN , Análisis Mutacional de ADN , Proteínas de Unión al ADN/genética , Endodesoxirribonucleasas/genética , Pruebas Genéticas , Humanos , Inestabilidad de Microsatélites , Homólogo 1 de la Proteína MutL , Proteínas MutL , Proteína 2 Homóloga a MutS/genética , Proteínas Nucleares/genética , Fenotipo , Regiones Promotoras GenéticasRESUMEN
MBD4 encodes a protein that interacts with the mismatch repair protein hMLH1. Therefore, it has been postulated that mutations in MBD4 may result in mismatch repair deficiency. Furthermore, it was shown that MBD4 is a target gene in mismatch repair-deficient tumors. We searched for mutations of MBD4 in sporadic gastric carcinomas (SGC) and compared them with the MSI status of the tumors by screening a series of 42 SGC [22 high microsatellte instability (MSI-H) and 20 microsatellite stable (MSS)] for mutations in both the poly(A)10 and (A)6 tracts of the gene as well as in its entire coding sequence. Mutations of the poly(A)10 tract of MBD4 were also screened in 126 MSI-H colon carcinomas. One of the 22 MSI-H gastric carcinomas and 12 of 126 MSI-H colon carcinomas showed MBD4 mutations in the poly(A)10 tract of exon 3. In addition, seven sequence variants were found in SGC, all of them having a polymorphic nature. We conclude that MBD4 mutations in the entire coding sequence, including the two poly(A) tracts, are rare in MSI gastric carcinomas. MBD4 is likely to be a bystander target gene in MSI-H tumors.
Asunto(s)
Carcinoma/genética , Endodesoxirribonucleasas/genética , Repeticiones de Microsatélite , Neoplasias Gástricas/genética , Adenosina/genética , Análisis Mutacional de ADN , Exones/genética , Humanos , Mutación , PolímerosRESUMEN
The MSH6 gene is one of the mismatch-repair genes involved in hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer (HNPCC). Three hundred sixteen individuals who were known or suspected to have HNPCC were analyzed for MSH6 germline mutations. For 25 index patients and 8 relatives with MSH6 variants, molecular and clinical features are described. For analysis of microsatellite instability (MSI), the five consensus markers were used. Immunohistochemical analysis of the MLH1, MSH2, and MSH6 proteins was performed. Five truncating MSH6 mutations, of which one was detected seven times, were found in 12 index patients, and 10 MSH6 variants with unknown pathogenicity were found in 13 index patients. Fourteen (54%) of 26 colorectal cancers (CRCs) and endometrial cancers showed no, or only weak, MSI. Twelve of 18 tumors of truncating-mutation carriers and 3 of 17 tumors of missense-mutation carriers showed loss of MSH6 staining. Six of the families that we studied fulfilled the original Amsterdam criteria; most families with MSH6, however, were only suspected to have HNPCC. In families that did not fulfill the revised Amsterdam criteria, the prevalence of MSH6 variants is about the same as the prevalence of those in MLH1/MSH2. Endometrial cancer and/or atypical hyperplasia were diagnosed in 8 of 12 female carriers of MSH6 truncating mutations. Most CRCs were localized distally in the colon. Although, molecularly, missense variants are labeled as doubtfully pathogenic, clinical data disclose a great resemblance between missense-variant carriers and truncating-mutation carriers. We conclude that, in all patients suspected to have HNPCC, MSH6-mutation analysis should be considered. Neither MSI nor immunohistochemistry should be a definitive selection criterion for MSH6-mutation analysis.