Outcome after tailored catheter ablation of atrial tachycardia using ultra-high-density mapping.

INTRODUCTION: Tailored catheter ablation of atrial tachycardias (ATs) is increasingly recommended as a potentially easy treatment strategy in the era of high-density mapping (HDM). As follow-up data are sparse, we here report outcomes after HDM-guided ablation of ATs in patients with prior catheter ablation or cardiac surgery. METHODS AND RESULTS: In 250 consecutive patients (age 66.5 ± 0.7 years, 58% male) with ATs (98% prior catheter ablation, 13% prior cardiac surgery) an HDM-guided catheter ablation was performed with the support of a 64-electrode mini-basket catheter. A total of 354 ATs (1.4 ± 0.1 ATs per patient; mean cycle length 304 ± 4.3 ms; 64% macroreentry, 27% localized reentry, and 9% focal) with acute termination of 95% were targeted in the index procedure. A similar AT as in the index procedure recurred in five patients (2%) after a median follow-up time of 535 days (interquartile range (IQR) 25th-75th percentile: 217-841). Tailored ablation of reentry ATs with freedom from any arrhythmia was obtained in 53% after a single procedure and in 73% after 1.4 ± 0.4 ablation procedures (range: 1-4). A total of 228 patients (91%) were free from any arrhythmia recurrence after 210 days (IQR: 152-494) when including optimal usual care. CONCLUSIONS: Tailored catheter ablation of ATs guided by HDM has a high acute success rate. The recurrence rate of the index AT is low. In patients with extensive atrial scaring further ablation procedures need to be considered to achieve freedom from any arrhythmia.

Local impedance guides catheter ablation in patients with ventricular tachycardia.

AIMS: Catheter contact and local tissue characteristics are relevant information for successful radiofrequency current (RFC)-ablation. Local impedance (LI) has been shown to reflect tissue characteristics and lesion formation during RFC-ablation. Using a novel ablation catheter incorporating three mini-electrodes, we investigated LI in relation to generator impedance (GI) in patients with ventricular tachycardia (VT) and its applicability as an indicator of effective RFC-ablation. METHODS AND RESULTS: Baseline impedance, Δimpedance during ablation and drop rate (Δimpedance/time) were analyzed for 625 RFC-applications in 28 patients with recurrent VT undergoing RFC-ablation. LI was lower in scarred (87.0 Ω [79.0-95.0]) compared to healthy myocardium (97.5 Ω ([82.75-111.50]; P = .03) while GI did not differ between scarred and healthy myocardium. ΔLI was higher (18 Ω [9.4-26.0]) for VT-terminating as compared to non-terminating RFC-ablation (ΔLI 13 Ω [8.85-18.0]; P = .03), but did not differ for ΔGI between terminating vs nonterminating RFC-ablation. Correspondingly, LI drop rate was higher for RFC-ablation terminating the VT compared with RFC-ablation not terminating the VT (0.63 Ω/s [0.52-0.76] vs 0.32 Ω [0.20-0.58]; P = .008) while there was no difference for GI drop rate. ΔLI was higher in patients with nonischemic cardiomyopathy vs patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy (16 Ω [11.0-20.0] vs 11.0 Ω [7.85-17.00]; P = .003). CONCLUSION: Our findings suggest that LI is a sensitive parameter to guide RFC-ablation in patients with VT. LI indicates differences in tissue characteristics and generally is higher in patients with nonischemic cardiomyopathy. Hence, the etiology of the underlying cardiomyopathy needs to be considered when adopting LI for monitoring catheter ablation of VT.

A novel assessment of local impedance during catheter ablation: initial experience in humans comparing local and generator measurements.

AIMS: A novel measure of local impedance (LI) has been found to predict lesion formation during radiofrequency current (RFC) catheter ablation. The aim of this study was to investigate the utility of this novel approach, while comparing LI to the well-established generator impedance (GI). METHODS AND RESULTS: In 25 consecutive patients with a history of atrial fibrillation, catheter ablation was guided by a 3D-mapping system measuring LI in addition to GI via an ablation catheter tip with three incorporated mini-electrodes. Local impedance and GI before and during RFC applications were studied. In total, 381 RFC applications were analysed. The baseline LI was higher in high-voltage areas (>0.5 mV; LI: 110.5 ± 13.7 Ω) when compared with intermediate-voltage sites (0.1-0.5 mV; 90.9 ± 10.1 Ω, P < 0.001), low-voltage areas (<0.1 mV; 91.9 ± 16.4 Ω, P < 0.001), and blood pool LI (91.9 ± 9.9 Ω, P < 0.001). During ablation, mean LI drop (△LI; 13.1 ± 9.1 Ω) was 2.15 times higher as mean GI drop (△GI) (6.1 ± 4.2 Ω, P < 0.001). Baseline LI correlated with △LI: a mean LI of 99.9 Ω predicted a △LI of 12.9 Ω [95% confidence interval (12.1-13.6), R2 0.41; P < 0.001]. This relationship was weak for baseline GI predicting △GI (R2 0.06, P < 0.001). Catheter movements were represented by rapid LI changes. The duration of an RFC application was not predictive for catheter-tissue coupling with no further change of △LI (P = 0.247) nor △GI (P = 0.376) during prolonged ablation. CONCLUSION: Local impedance can be monitored during ablation. Compared with the sole use of GI, baseline LI is a better predictor of impedance drops during ablation and may provide useful insights regarding lesion formation. However, further studies are needed to investigate if this novel approach is useful to guide catheter ablation.