Cancer of the gingiva.

Cancer of the gingiva is a rare disease in the Western World. It most commonly affects elderly population. Because of its rarity, the reporting on the disease is sparse and often grouped with other subsites of oral cancer, which makes conclusions difficult to interpret. The aim of this paper is to review the literature on gingival cancer as a specific subsite of oral cancer and report on published prognostic factors as well as treatment of local and regional disease. We also present differences between gingival cancer subgroups, mandibular and maxillary gingival cancer. In addition, both surgical and oncological treatments are reviewed. It seems that surgery is the preferred initial treatment approach for the majority of patients with gingival cancer, although adjuvant radiation, with or without chemotherapy, is commonly recommended to increase locoregional control.

"High-risk" tumors of the lip treated with external beam radiotherapy and high-dose-rate brachytherapy: Long-term outcome.

BACKGROUND: Radiotherapy is a well-established treatment for lip cancer, with external radiotherapy (EBRT) or brachytherapy (BT). METHODS: This study evaluated outcome, tumor control, and aesthetics, for 101 patients with carcinoma of the lip, not suitable for surgery, treated with combined EBRT and BT. RESULTS: Squamous cell carcinoma was seen in 78 patients, basal cell carcinoma in 15, and other histologies in 8 patients. Tumors were advanced: 73% in category T2-T4. Local control at 3 and 5 years was 89%. Local failure appeared in 4/56 patients (7%) with primary RT compared to 7/45 (16%) in those with prior surgery, regional recurrence in 5 patients. Toxicity was mild. Cosmetic outcome, 87 patients evaluated, was bad for 9/40 patients with upfront surgery compared to 1/47 for primary RT patients (p = 0.003). Seven patients died from lip cancer (7%), three with originally N+ disease (43%). CONCLUSIONS: Combined EBRT and BT could be considered for lip tumors not candidates for surgery.

Brachytherapy for rhabdomyosarcoma: Survey of international clinical practice and development of guidelines.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to address the lack of published data on the use of brachytherapy in pediatric rhabdomyosarcoma by describing current practice as starting point to develop consensus guidelines. MATERIALS AND METHODS: An international expert panel on the treatment of pediatric rhabdomyosarcoma comprising 24 (pediatric) radiation oncologists, brachytherapists and pediatric surgeons met for a Brachytherapy Workshop hosted by the European paediatric Soft tissue Sarcoma Study Group (EpSSG). The panel's clinical experience, the results of a previously distributed questionnaire, and a review of the literature were presented. RESULTS: The survey indicated the most common use of brachytherapy to be in combination with tumor resection, followed by brachytherapy as sole local therapy modality. HDR was increasingly deployed in pediatric practice, especially for genitourinary sites. Brachytherapy planning was mostly by 3D imaging based on CT. Recommendations for patient selection, treatment requirements, implant technique, delineation, dose prescription, dose reporting and clinical management were defined. CONCLUSIONS: Consensus guidelines for the use of brachytherapy in pediatric rhabdomyosarcoma have been developed through multicenter collaboration establishing the basis for future work. These have been adopted for the open EpSSG overarching study for children and adults with Frontline and Relapsed RhabdoMyoSarcoma (FaR-RMS).

Dose escalation in oropharyngeal cancer: a comparison of simultaneous integrated boost and brachytherapy boost.

BACKGROUND: Local recurrence is the most common pattern of failure in head and neck cancer. It can therefore be hypothesised that some of these patients would benefit from an intensified local treatment, such as radiation dose escalation of the primary tumour. This study compares treatment and toxicity outcomes from two different boost modalities in oropharyngeal cancer: simultaneous integrated boost (SIB) and brachytherapy boost. METHODS: Two hundred and forty-four consecutive patients treated with > 72 Gy for oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma between 2011 and 2018 at our institution were retrospectively analysed. Data on side effects were collected from a local quality registry and supplemented with a review of medical records. Patients receiving a brachytherapy boost first had external beam radiotherapy consisting of 68 Gy in 2 Gy fractions to the gross tumour volume (GTV), and elective radiotherapy to the neck bilaterally. The brachytherapy boost was typically given using pulsed dose rate, 15 fractions and 0.56-0.66 Gy per fraction [total dose in EQD2 = 75.4-76.8 Gy (α/ß = 10)]. The typical dose escalated radiotherapy with external beam radiotherapy only, was delivered using SIB with 74,8 Gy in 2.2 Gy fractions [EQD2 = 76.0 Gy (α/ß = 10)] to the primary tumour, 68 Gy in 2 Gy fractions to GTV + 10 mm margin and elective radiotherapy to the neck bilaterally. RESULTS: Dose escalation by SIB was given to 111 patients and brachytherapy boost to 134 patients. The most common type of cancer was base of tongue (55%), followed by tonsillar cancer (42%). The majority of patients had T3- or T4-tumours and 84% were HPV-positive. The 5-year OS was 72,4% (95% CI 66.9-78.3) and the median follow-up was 6.1 years. Comparing the two different dose escalation modalities we found no significant differences in OS or PFS and these results remained after a propensity-score matched analysis was performed. The analysis of grade ≥ 3 side effects showed no significant differences between the two different dose escalation techniques. CONCLUSIONS: We found no significant differences in survival or grade ≥ 3 side effects comparing simultaneous integrated boost and brachytherapy boost as alternative dose escalation modalities in the treatment of oropharyngeal cancer.

Dose Escalation of Oropharyngeal Cancer: Long-Time Follow-Up and Side Effects.

Previous studies on dose-escalated radiotherapy in head and neck cancer have shown mixed results, and it is not established which patients would benefit from dose escalation. Further, while dose escalation does not appear to increase late toxicity, this needs to be confirmed with longer follow-up. In this study, we analysed treatment outcome and toxicity in 215 patients with oropharyngeal cancer treated with dose-escalated radiotherapy (>72 Gy, EQD2, α/ß = 10 Gy, boost by brachytherapy or simultaneous integrated boost) and a matched cohort of 215 patients treated with standard dose external-beam radiotherapy (68 Gy) between 2011 and 2018 at our institution. The 5-year overall survival (OS) was 77.8% (72.4-83.6) and 73.7% (67.8-80.1) in the dose-escalated and standard dose group, respectively (p = 0.24). Median follow-up was 78.1 (49.2-98.4) and 60.2 (38.9-89.4) months in the dose-escalated and standard dose groups, respectively. Grade ≥3 osteoradionecrosis (ORN) and late dysphagia were more common in the dose-escalated group compared to the standard dose group, with 19 (8.8%) vs. 4 (1.9%) patients developing grade ≥3 ORN (p = 0.001), and 39 (18.1%) vs. 21 (9.8%) patients developing grade ≥3 dysphagia (p = 0.01). No predictive factors to help select patients for dose-escalated radiotherapy were found. However, the remarkably good OS in the dose-escalated cohort, despite a predominance of advanced tumour stages, encourages further attempts to identify such factors.

Brachytherapy and osteoradionecrosis in patients with base of tongue cancer.

BACKGROUND: Base of tongue cancer incidence and patient survival is increasing why treatment sequelae becomes exceedingly important. Osteoradionecrosis (ORN) is a late adverse effect of radiotherapy and brachytherapy (BT) could be a risk factor. Brachytherapy is used in three out of six health care regions in Sweden. AIMS: Investigate if patients treated in regions using BT show an increased risk for ORN and whether brachytherapy has any impact on overall survival. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We used data from the Swedish Head and Neck Cancer Register between 2008-2014. Due to the nonrandomized nature of the study and possible selection bias we compared the risk for ORN in brachy vs non-brachy regions. RESULTS: Fifty out of 505 patients (9.9%) developed ORN; eight of these were treated in nonbrachy regions (16%), while 42 (84%) were treated in brachy regions. Neither age, sex, TNM-classification/stage, p16, smoking, neck dissection, or chemotherapy differed between ORN and no-ORN patients. The risk for ORN was significantly higher for patients treated in brachy regions compared to non-brachy regions (HR = 2,63, p = .012), whereas overall survival did not differ (HR = 0.95, p = .782). CONCLUSIONS AND SIGNIFICANCE: Brachytherapy ought to be used cautiously for selected patients or within prospective randomized studies.

Radiotherapy-Dose Escalated for Large Volume Primary Tumors-And Cetuximab with or without Induction Chemotherapy for HPV Associated Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Head and Neck-A Randomized Phase II Trial.

The leading cause of death for patients with HPV associated squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (SCCHN) after treatment with chemoradiotherapy (CRT) nowadays is peripheral metastasis. This study investigated whether induction chemotherapy (IC) could improve progression free survival (PFS) and impact on relapse pattern after CRT. METHODS: Eligible patients in this multicenter, randomized, controlled, phase 2 trial had p16-positive locoregionally advanced SCCHN. Patients were randomized in a 1:1 ratio to either RT with cetuximab (arm B) versus the same regimen preceded by two cycles of taxotere/cisplatin/5-FU (arm A). The RT dose was escalated to 74.8 Gy for large volume primary tumors. Eligibility criteria included patients of 18-75 years, an ECOG performance status 0-1, and adequate organ functions. RESULTS: From January 2011 to February 2016, 152 patients, all with oropharyngeal tumors were enrolled, 77 in arm A and 75 in arm B. Two patients, one in each group, withdrew their consent after randomization, leaving 150 patients for the ITT analysis. PFS at 2 years was 84.2% (95% CI 76.4-92.8) in arm A and 78.4% (95% CI 69.5-88.3) in arm B (HR 1.39, 95% CI 0.69-2.79, p = 0.40). At the time of analysis, there were 26 disease failures, 9 in arm A and 17 in arm B. In arm A, 3 patients had local, 2 regional, and 4 distant relapses as first sites of recurrence, and in arm B, 4, 4, and 9 relapses in corresponding sites. Eight out of 26 patients with disease progression had salvage therapy and 7 were alive NED (no evidence of disease), at 2 years. Locoregional control was 96% in arm A and 97.3% in arm B and OS 93% and 90.5%, respectively. Local failure as first site of recurrence was low, in 4.6% of patients and was similar for T1/T2 and T3/T4 tumors (n.s). Nevertheless, out of 7 patients with primary local failures, 4 were treated with the escalated RT dose. Toxicity was low and similar in the treatment arms. There was one fatal event in arm A where the combined effects of the drugs used in chemotherapy and cetuximab could not be ruled out. CONCLUSIONS: PFS, locoregional control and toxicity did not differ between the two arms, OS was high, and there were few local relapses. In arm B, more than twice as many patients had distant metastasis as the first site of relapse compared to arm A. The response to IC was found to define 29% of patients in arm A who did not have a tumor relapse during follow-up. An escalated dose of 74.8 Gy could mitigate the negative impact of large tumor volume but for some patients, even this intensified treatment was insufficient.

Re-Irradiation for Head and Neck Cancer: Cumulative Dose to Organs at Risk and Late Side Effects.

Re-irradiation in head and neck cancer is challenging, and cumulative dose constraints and dose/volume data are scarce. In this study, we present dose/volume data for patients re-irradiated for head and neck cancer and explore the correlations of cumulative dose to organs at risk and severe side effects. We analyzed 54 patients re-irradiated for head and neck cancer between 2011 and 2017. Organs at risk were delineated and dose/volume data were collected from cumulative treatment plans of all included patients. Receiver-operator characteristics (ROC) analysis assessed the association between dose/volume parameters and the risk of toxicity. The ROC-curve for a logistic model of carotid blowout vs. maximum doses to the carotid arteries showed AUC = 0.92 (95% CI 0.83 to 1.00) and a cut-off value of 119 Gy (sensitivity 1.00/specificity 0.89). The near-maximum dose to bones showed an association with the risk of osteoradionecrosis: AUC = 0.74 (95% CI 0.52 to 0.95) and a cut-off value of 119 Gy (sensitivity 1.00/specificity 0.52). Our analysis showed an association between cumulative dose to organs at risk and the risk of developing osteoradionecrosis and carotid blowout, and our results support the existing dose constraint for the carotid arteries of 120 Gy. The confirmation of these dose-response relationships will contribute to further improvements of re-irradiation strategies.

Overlapping volumes in re-irradiation for head and neck cancer - an important factor for patient selection.

BACKGROUND: There is a lack of consensus concerning the definition of re-irradiation and re-irradiation volumes in head and neck cancer (HNC). The aim of the present study is to introduce a more strict definition of the re-irradiated volume that might better predict the risk of serious side-effects from treatment. METHODS: Fifty-four consecutive patients re-irradiated for HNC cancer were retrospectively analysed. CT images were deformably registered and the dose distributions accumulated after conversion to EQD2. Patients with a cumulative dose of ≥100 Gy in the overlapping volume (V100) were included in the study. Survival data and radiation-related acute and late toxicities were recorded. RESULTS: The overall survival of all included patients at 2 and 5 years was 42.6 and 27.3% respectively and the progression free survival at 2 and 5 years was 32.5 and 28.5% respectively. The overall rate of any event of severe (grade ≥ 3) acute and late toxicity was 26 and 51%, respectively. We found that severe acute toxicity was more common in patients who had a larger overlapping volume (V100 > mean) where 43% of the patients experienced grade ≥ 3 acute toxicity, compared to the patients with smaller overlapping volumes (V100 < mean) where only 11% had severe toxicity (p = 0.02). The seemingly high rates of late toxicity in the present study could be due to the use of a more strict definition of re-irradiation. In previous studies also patients with low dose overlap are included and our results imply that there is a risk that previous studies might have overestimated the risk-benefit ratio in re-irradiation of HNC. CONCLUSIONS: Our study describes the outcome of a patient material where a more strict definition of the re-irradiated volume is used. With this definition, which could better describe the volume of highest risk for serious complications, we found that larger such overlapping volumes result in an increase in severe acute side-effects. A clear definition of re-irradiation and re-irradiation volumes is of utmost importance for future studies of HNC to make results from different studies comparable.

Modeling of Xerostomia After Radiotherapy for Head and Neck Cancer: A Registry Study.

AIM: Data from a local quality registry are used to model the risk of late xerostomia after radiotherapy for head and neck cancer (HNC), based on dosimetric- and clinical variables. Strengths and weaknesses of using quality registry data are explored. METHODS: HNC patients treated with radiotherapy at the Karolinska University hospital are entered into a quality registry at routine follow up, recording morbidity according to a modified RTOG/LENT-SOMA scale. Other recorded parameters are performance status, age, gender, tumor location, tumor stage, smoking status, chemotherapy and radiotherapy data, including prescribed dose and organ-at-risk (OAR) dose. Most patients are entered at several time points, but at variable times after treatment. Xerostomia was modeled based on follow-up data from January 2014 to October 2018, resulting in 753 patients. Two endpoints were considered: maximum grade ≥2 (XERG≥2) or grade ≥3 (XERG≥3) late xerostomia. Univariate Cox regression was used to select variables for two multivariate models for each endpoint, one based on the mean dose to the total parotid volume (Dtot) and one based on the mean dose to the contralateral parotid (Dcontra). Cox regression allows the estimation of the risk of xerostomia at different time points; models were presented visually as nomograms estimating the risk at 9, 12, and 24 months respectively. RESULTS: The toxicity rates were 366/753 (49%) for XERG≥2 and 40/753 (5.3%) for XERG≥3. The multivariate models included several variables for XERG≥2, and dose, concomitant chemotherapy and age were included for XERG≥3. Induction chemotherapy and an increased number of fractions per week were associated with a lower risk of XERG≥2. However, since the causality of these relationships have limited support from previous studies, alternative models without these variables were also presented. The models based on the mean dose to the total parotid volume and the contralateral parotid alone were very similar. CONCLUSION: Late xerostomia after radiotherapy can be modeled with reasonable predictive power based on registry data; models are presented for different endpoints highly relevant in clinical practice. However, the risk of modeling indirect relationships, given the unavoidably heterogeneous registry data, needs to be carefully considered in the interpretation of the results.

Comparison of predicted and clinical response to radiotherapy: a radiobiology modelling study.

INTRODUCTION: A model to predict clinical outcome after radiation therapy would be a valuable aid in the effort of developing more tailored treatment regimes for different patients. In this work we evaluate the clinical utility of a model that incorporates the following individually measured radiobiology parameters: intrinsic radiosensitivity, proliferation and number of clonogenic cells. The hypothesis underlying the study was that the incorporation of individually measured tumour parameters in a model would increase its reliability in predicting treatment outcome compared with the use of average population derived data. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Forty-six patients with head and neck tumours were analyzed, the majority of whom received both external beam radiotherapy and brachytherapy. Eighteen patients received external beam treatment alone and statistical analyses were carried out on this subgroup. RESULTS: Four of the 18 patients had a >95% calculated probability of cure and none developed a local recurrence resulting in a negative predictive value of 100% (compared with 67% for population-derived data). The sensitivity of the model in predicting local recurrence was 75% (compared with 38% for population-derived data). Using a model that incorporated individually measured radiobiology data, there was a statistically significant difference in local control levels for patients with >95% and <5% predicted probability of local control (chi(2), p = 0.04). DISCUSSION: This study suggests, therefore, that incorporation of measured biological data within a radiobiological model improves its ability to predict radiation therapy outcome compared with the use of population-derived data.

The quality assurance process for the ARTSCAN head and neck study - a practical interactive approach for QA in 3DCRT and IMRT.

AIM: This paper describes the quality assurance (QA) work performed in the Swedish multicenter ARTSCAN (Accelerated RadioTherapy of Squamous cell CArcinomas in the head and Neck) trial to guarantee high quality in a multicenter study which involved modern radiotherapy such as 3DCRT or IMRT. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study was closed in June 2006 with 750 randomised patients. Radiation therapy-related data for every patient were sent by each participating centre to the QA office where all trial data were reviewed, analysed and stored. In case of any deviation from the protocol, an interactive process was started between the QA office and the local responsible clinician and/or physicist to increase the compliance to the protocol for future randomised patients. Meetings and workshops were held on a regular basis for discussions on various trial-related issues and for the QA office to report on updated results. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: This review covers the 734 patients out of a total of 750 who had entered the study. Deviations early in the study were corrected so that the overall compliance to the protocol was very high. There were only negligible variations in doses and dose distributions to target volumes for each specific site and stage. The quality of the treatments was high. Furthermore, an extensive database of treatment parameters was accumulated for future dose-volume vs. endpoint evaluations. CONCLUSIONS: This comprehensive QA programme increased the probability to draw firm conclusions from our study and may serve as a concept for QA work in future radiotherapy trials where comparatively small effects are searched for in a heterogeneous tumour population.

Long-term outcome of high dose rate brachytherapy in radiotherapy of localised prostate cancer.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: High dose rate brachytherapy (HDR-BT) in prostate cancer (PC) is receiving increasing interest. The steep dose gradient gives a possibility to escalate the dose to the prostate. If the alpha/beta ratio is low for PC, hypofractionation will be of advantage. A retrospective analysis of outcome in patients (pts) consecutively treated with combined HDR-BT and conformal external beam radiotherapy (ERT) was performed. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Data from 214 pts treated consecutively from 1988 to 2000 were analysed. The median age was 64 years (50-77). Median follow up was 4 years (12-165 months). Pre-irradiatory endocrine therapy was given to 150 pts (70%). The pts were divided into low-, intermediate- and high (80/87/47 pts) risk groups according to the occurrence of none, one, or more risk factors defined by T-classification, PSA and histopathology. ERT was given with 2 Gy fractions to 50 Gy. HDR-BT consisted of two 10 Gy fractions. RESULTS: Overall 5-year biochemical no evidence of disease (bNED) was 82%, and for the low-, intermediate-, and high-risk group bNED was 92, 88 and 61%, respectively. PSA-relapse was found in 17, local recurrence in 3 and distant metastases in 13 pts. Five pts died of PC. No recurrences were observed after 5 years. Severe late complications were few. Urethral stricture (13 pts) was the most frequent. No severe rectal complications were seen. CONCLUSION: Dose escalation with HDR-BT is safe and effective in radiotherapy of localised PC.

Preradiotherapy hemoglobin level but not microvessel density predicts locoregional control and survival in laryngeal cancer treated with primary radical radiotherapy.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the roles of preradiotherapy hemoglobin level and microvessel density (MVD) as predictive factors for tumor control and survival in patients with laryngeal cancer treated with primary radiotherapy. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: Two hundred and fourteen patients with stage I-IV laryngeal cancer were included in the analysis. Patients were treated with once daily fractionated radiotherapy over 6.5 weeks or twice daily fractionated radiotherapy over 4.5 weeks up to total doses of 62 to 68 Gy. Preradiotherapy hemoglobin levels were obtained from patient journals, and pretreatment tumor biopsies were stained with CD34 antibody for the counting of microvessels. The prognostic implication of preradiotherapy hemoglobin level and MVD on tumor control and survival was tested. RESULTS: Five-year locoregional control probability was 88.9% for patients with preradiotherapy hemoglobin levels >137.5 g/L (median) and 64.4% for patients with preradiotherapy hemoglobin levels <137.5 g/L (P = 0.01). The corresponding figures for disease-free survival were 87.8 and 62.8% (P = 0.007), respectively, and for overall survival 58.1 and 40.3% (P < 0.001), respectively. In multivariate analysis, tumor stage and preradiotherapy hemoglobin level were significant prognostic factors for locoregional control and disease-free survival, whereas tumor stage, preradiotherapy hemoglobin-level, gender, and age were significant prognostic factors for overall survival. No correlation was found between MVD and tumor control and survival. CONCLUSION: Preradiotherapy hemoglobin level, but not MVD, predicts locoregional control and survival in patients with laryngeal cancer treated with radiotherapy.

Longitudinal evaluation of patients with cancer in the oral tongue, tonsils, or base of tongue--does interstitial radiation dose affect quality of life?

PURPOSE: To evaluate health-related quality of life (HRQL) in patients with oral tongue, tonsil, or base of tongue cancer in a prospective longitudinal study and explore correlations between HRQL scores and interstitial radiation dose, dose rate, and volume of implant. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Ninety patients with oral tongue cancer (n=30) and tonsil or base of tongue cancer (n=60) were assessed with the European Organization of Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core-30 and the European Organization of Research and Treatment of Cancer Head and Neck module at diagnosis, and after 3, 12, and 36 months of starting treatment. RESULTS: The HRQL of all patients decreased during treatment. Most HRQL scores returned to baseline values after 3 years; however, 60% of patients with oral tongue cancer and 80% with tonsil and base of tongue cancer reported problems with dry mouth and half of the patients with tonsil and base of tongue cancer reported problems with swallowing solid food at the 3-year followup. No correlations between brachytherapy quality indices and HRQL scores were found. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with oral tongue, tonsil, or base of tongue cancer reported significant problems with dry mouth and swallowing solid food throughout this 3-year followup study.

Hyperfractionated-accelerated or conventionally fractionated radiotherapy for early glottic cancer.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the effect of shortening overall treatment time by hyperfractionated-accelerated radiotherapy for T2N(0)M(0) glottic carcinomas. Results for local control and survival were calculated and compared to those for T1N(0)M(0) tumors treated with a once-a-day fractionated schedule. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Between 1990 and 1998, 92 patients with T1N(0)M(0) and 45 patients with T2N(0)M(0) glottic cancers were treated with radical radiotherapy. The T1N(0)M(0) tumors were treated with a once-a-day fractionated schedule lasting 6.5 weeks to a total dose of 62.4 Gy. The T2N(0)M(0) tumors received a split-course hyperfractionated-accelerated treatment over a total of 4.5 weeks to a total dose of 64.6 Gy. RESULTS: The 5-year local control was 85% for T1N(0)M(0) and 88% for T2N(0)M(0), whereas the 5-year locoregional control was 85% for both groups. The 5-year overall survival was 70% and 53% for T1N(0)M(0) and T2N(0)M(0), respectively. No significant statistical difference was found between the two groups for the parameters analyzed. The number of serious late complications was few and comparable for the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: Hyperfractionated-accelerated radiotherapy proved beneficial for T2N(0)M(0) glottic cancer, giving local control rates comparable to those for T1N(0)M(0) tumors.

Systematic set-up errors for IMRT in the head and neck region: effect on dose distribution.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: There is a general concern about intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) treatments being more sensitive to patient positioning than conventional treatments. The aim of this study was to evaluate the International Commission on radiation units and measurements (ICRU) method for taking systematic set-up errors into account for IMRT treatments and to compare the effects on the dose distribution with the effects of conventional treatments. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A planning margin to account for set-up errors was added to the clinical target volumes and to the spinal cords, for three head and neck patients, according to the ICRU. No margin was added to organs at risk with mainly parallel structure if they were situated adjacent to the target volume, for example, the parotid glands. The effects of set-up errors in six IMRT plans and three conventional plans were simulated in the planning system and analysed with physical dose parameters. RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS: In general, the ICRU method of taking set-up errors into account works satisfactorily for IMRT treatments as well as for conventional treatments with no difference between the treatment techniques. The sensitivity to set-up errors regarding the target volume is dependent on the quality of the treatment plan, i.e. the part of the target covered with a dose >95 and <105% and the effect in the critical organs is dependent on the sharpness of the dose gradients outside the critical organ. However, the method makes it difficult to include organs at risk with mainly parallel structure if they are situated adjacent to the target volume.

Compromised quality of life in adult patients who have received a radiation dose towards the basal part of the brain. A case-control study in long-term survivors from cancer in the head and neck region.

BACKGROUND: Adult patients with hypothalamic-pituitary disorders have compromised quality of life (QoL). Whether this is due to their endocrine consequences (hypopituitarism), their underlying hypothalamic-pituitary disorder or both is still under debate. The aim of this trial was to measure quality of life (QoL) in long-term cancer survivors who have received a radiation dose to the basal part of the brain and the pituitary. METHODS: Consecutive patients (n=101) treated for oropharyngeal or epipharyngeal cancer with radiotherapy followed free of cancer for a period of 4 to10 years were identified. Fifteen patients (median age 56 years) with no concomitant illness and no hypopituitarism after careful endocrine evaluation were included in a case-control study with matched healthy controls. Doses to the hypothalamic-pituitary region were calculated. QoL was assessed using the Symptom check list (SCL)-90, Nottingham Health Profile (NHP), and Psychological Well Being (PGWB) questionnaires. Level of physical activity was assessed using the Baecke questionnaire. RESULTS: The median accumulated dose was 1.9 Gy (1.5-2.2 Gy) to the hypothalamus and 2.4 Gy (1.8-3.3 Gy) to the pituitary gland in patients with oropharyngeal cancer and 6.0-9.3 Gy and 33.5-46.1 Gy, respectively in patients with epipharyngeal cancer (n=2). The patients showed significantly more anxiety and depressiveness, and lower vitality, than their matched controls. CONCLUSION: In a group of long time survivors of head and neck cancer who hade received a low radiation dose to the hypothalamic-pituitary region and who had no endocrine consequences of disease or its treatment QoL was compromised as compared with well matched healthy controls.

Two-year results from a Swedish study on conventional versus accelerated radiotherapy in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma--the ARTSCAN study.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Studies on accelerated fractionation (AF) in head and neck cancer have shown increased local control and survival compared with conventional fractionation (CF), while others have been non-conclusive. In 1998 a national Swedish group decided to perform a randomised controlled clinical study of AF. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients with verified squamous cell carcinoma of the oral cavity, oropharynx, larynx (except glottic T1-T2, N0) and hypopharynx were included. Patients with prior chemotherapy or surgery were excluded. Patients were randomised to either CF (2Gy/day, 5days/week for 7 weeks, total dose 68Gy) or to AF (1.1Gy+2.0Gy/day, 5days/week for 4.5weeks, total dose 68Gy). An extensive quality assurance protocol was followed throughout the study. The primary end point was loco-regional tumour control (LRC) at two years after treatment. RESULTS: The study was closed in 2006 when 750 patients had been randomised. Eighty-three percent of the patients had stages III-IV disease. Forty eight percent had oropharyngeal, 21% laryngeal, 17% hypopharyngeal and 14% oral cancers. There were no significant differences regarding overall survival (OS) or LRC between the two regimens. The OS at two years was 68% for AF and 67% for CF. The corresponding figures for LRC were 71% and 67%, respectively. There was a trend towards improved LRC for oral cancers treated (p=0.07) and for large tumours (T3-T4) (p=0.07) treated with AF. The AF group had significantly worse acute reactions, while there was no significant increase in late effects. CONCLUSION: Overall the AF regimen did not prove to be more efficacious than CF. However, the trend towards improved results in AF for oral cancers needs to be further investigated.