Caregiver availability and patient access to hematopoietic cell transplantation: social worker perspectives inform practice.

PURPOSE: Hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) often involves a long hospitalization and recovery period, with patients generally required to have a caregiver. This study aimed to identify transplant center (TC) requirements for a caregiver, describe challenges that impact caregiver availability, and identify potential solutions. METHODS: An exploratory sequential mixed-methods approach was used. Qualitative data was obtained from focus groups of TC social workers in the United States (US) (three focus groups; n = 15 total participants). Results informed the development of a national, web-based survey that was administered to the primary social worker contact at TCs in the National Marrow Donor Program (NMDP)/Be The Match Network (n = 133). RESULTS: Respondents included social workers from adult (n = 47) and pediatric (n = 19) TCs (response rate = 49%). The majority (89%) of both adult and pediatric TCs required a caregiver for a patient to proceed to transplant, but requirements varied in length of time, formality, transplant type, and HCT setting. Regardless of transplant type or patient population, social workers identified loss of caregiver income as the greatest challenge to caregiver availability, with the most common solution being allowing patients to have multiple caregivers throughout the transplant course. DISCUSSION: Caregiver availability is an important concern for patients considering and receiving HCT, and may be a barrier proceeding to HCT when a caregiver is unavailable. Results from this study highlight caregiver availability barriers and solutions of TCs across the US. These results can inform TCs about other center experiences with caregiver availability and identify potential practice changes for individual TCs.

Patient housing barriers to hematopoietic cell transplantation: results from a mixed-methods study of transplant center social workers.

PURPOSE: Hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) is performed in select centers in the United States (U.S.), and patients are often required to temporarily relocate to receive care. The purpose of this study was to identify housing barriers impacting access to HCT and potential solutions. METHODS: A mixed-methods primary study of HCT social workers was conducted to learn about patient housing challenges and solutions in place that help address those barriers. Three telephone focus groups were conducted with adult and pediatric transplant social workers (n = 15). Focus group results informed the design of a national survey. The online survey was e-mailed to a primary social worker contact at 133 adult and pediatric transplant centers in the U.S. Transplant centers were classified based on the patient population cared for by the social worker. RESULTS: The survey response rate was 49%. Among adult programs (n = 45), 93% of centers had patients that had to relocate closer to the transplant center to proceed with HCT. The most common type of housing option offered was discounted hotel rates. Among pediatric programs (n = 20), 90% of centers had patients that had to relocate closer to the transplant center to proceed with HCT. Ronald McDonald House was the most common option available. CONCLUSIONS: This study is the first to explore housing challenges faced by patients undergoing HCT in the U.S. from the perspective of social workers and to highlight solutions that centers use. Transplant centers will benefit from this knowledge by learning about options for addressing housing barriers for their patients.

Speaking Up: How Patient and Physician Voices Shaped a Trial to Improve Goals-of-Care Discussions.

BACKGROUND: Patients with advanced cancer benefit from early goals-of-care (GoC) conversations, but few facilitators are known. OBJECTIVE: We describe the process and outcomes of involving patient and physician stakeholders in the design and development of a trial, funded by the Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute (PCORI), to enhance oncologists' communication skills and their propensity to facilitate productive, meaningful GoC discussions with patients with advanced cancer. METHODS: We recruited oncologists, palliative care physicians, and patient stakeholders to participate in proposal development, intervention design and modification, identification of outcome measures, and refinement of study tools. Formats for exchange included 1:1 structured interviews, workshops, and stakeholder meetings. RESULTS: Patient and physician voices helped craft and implement a study of an intervention to enhance oncologists' ability to facilitate GoC discussions with patients with advanced cancer. Physician inputs guided the creation of an oncologist and palliative care physician "joint visit" intervention at a turning point in disease management. Patient inputs impacted on the language used, outcome measures assessed, and approaches used to introduce patients to the intervention visit. CONCLUSIONS: Stakeholder input informed the development of a novel intervention that physicians seemed to find both valuable and in sync with their needs and their practice schedules. Where communication about difficult subjects and shared decision making are involved, including multiple stakeholder groups in study design, implementation, and outcomes measurement may have far-reaching effects.