Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Más filtros

Bases de datos
País/Región como asunto
Tipo del documento
País de afiliación
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Cryobiology ; 94: 32-39, 2020 06.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32389625

RESUMEN

This prospective study aimed to determine the effects of dry nitrogen cryostorage on human sperm characteristics in comparison with liquid nitrogen cryostorage. For this purpose, 42 men undergoing routine semen analysis (21 normozoospermia and 21 with altered semen parameters) were analyzed. After slow freezing, half of the straws of each sample were randomly stored in liquid and dry tanks, at the top and bottom levels of the latter. After 6 months storage, thawed samples were treated by density gradient centrifugation and sperm characteristics were compared. There was no difference in sperm progressive motility (15.1% ± 14.2% vs. 15.1% ± 12.7%; p = 0.76), sperm vitality (25.5% ± 17.7% vs. 26.2% ± 19%; p = 0.71), percentages of acrosome-reacted spermatozoa (38% ± 8.5% vs. 38.5% ± 7.4%; p = 0.53) and DNA fragmentation spermatozoa (27.3% ± 12.4% vs. 28.5% ± 12.9%, p = 0.47) after cryostorage in the dry or the liquid nitrogen tank. Moreover, we did not observe differences between either cryostorage system for normal and altered sperm samples. This lack of difference was also observed whatever the floor level of cryostorage in the dry tank. The temperature measurement of the dry tank showed a stable temperature at -194 °C throughout storage whatever the storage floor level, guaranteeing the stability of the low temperatures suitable for human sperm storage. Because of its greater safety, dry storage without contact with the liquid phase should be preferred and can be a useful alternative for the cryostorage of human sperm samples.


Asunto(s)
Criopreservación/métodos , Preservación de Semen/métodos , Espermatozoides , Adulto , Humanos , Masculino
2.
Andrology ; 9(6): 1790-1798, 2021 11.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34236139

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Many studies reported that reproductive desire could be high among transgender individuals. In France, fertility preservation and sperm donation were very little proposed to transgender individuals until recently, mainly because the Bioethics Law allows the use of assisted reproductive technologies only in infertile couples and prohibits surrogacy. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the distribution of care on the French territory concerning fertility preservation and sperm donation in transgender individuals. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A multicentric national survey was carried out between January 2019 and October 2020 in 28 assisted reproductive technology centres of the French CECOS (Centres d'Etudes et de Conservation des Oeufs et du Sperme) network. Each centre was questioned to find out how many transgender individuals came, were informed and cared for fertility preservation and sperm donation. RESULTS: Concerning fertility preservation, 71.4% of centres received transgender individuals and performed gamete cryopreservation; 581 transgender individuals consulted for fertility preservation. Transgender women were more likely to desire (p < 0.0001) and achieve (p < 0.0001) fertility preservation than transgender men. Concerning sperm donation in couples including a transgender man, 68% of centres offer the complete course from the first consultation to the completion of the assisted reproductive technology cycles; 122 offsprings have been conceived with sperm donation in couples including a transgender man since 1999. DISCUSSION: Our results showed that even if all centres do not propose fertility preservation or sperm donation in transgender individuals, these assisted reproductive technologies are present throughout the French territory. The major point is that both fertility preservation and sperm donation in transgender individuals have grown significantly and that the care of these patients is improving year after year. CONCLUSION: In France, most of CECOS centres can take care of transgender individuals for fertility preservation and sperm donation. The French Bioethics Law allows these latter, and transgender individuals can benefit from a financial support of the national health care insurance for fertility preservation and sperm donation.


Asunto(s)
Preservación de la Fertilidad/estadística & datos numéricos , Aceptación de la Atención de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Técnicas Reproductivas Asistidas/estadística & datos numéricos , Recuperación de la Esperma/estadística & datos numéricos , Transexualidad/terapia , Adulto , Femenino , Francia , Servicios de Salud para las Personas Transgénero/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Masculino
3.
BMJ Open ; 4(3): e004449, 2014 Mar 24.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24662448

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether copeptin-us can rule out diagnosis of non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) without prolonged monitoring and serial blood sampling in patients with high-sensitive cardiac troponin I (hs-cTnI) below the 99th centile at presentation to the emergency department (ED) [corrected]. DESIGN: Prospective, non-randomised, individual blinded diagnostic accuracy study. SETTING: Two EDs of a rural region of France. PARTICIPANTS: Patients with chest pain suspected of NSTEMI with onset within the last 12 h were considered for enrollment. INTERVENTIONS: Serial clinical, electrographical and biochemical investigations were performed at admission and after 2, 4, 6 and 12 h. Hs-cTnI was measured using an assay with Dimension VISTA, Siemens [corrected]. Copeptin was measured by the BRAHMS copeptin-us assay on the KRYPTOR Compact Plus system. The follow-up period was 90 days. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: Copeptin, troponin, myoglobin and creatine kinase values. Clinical and paraclinical events. The final diagnosis was adjudicated blinded to copeptin result. RESULTS: During 12 months, 102 patients were analysed. Final diagnosis was NSTEMI for 7.8% (n=8), unstable angina for 3.9% (n=4), cardiac but non-coronary artery disease for 8.8% (n=9), non-cardiac chest pain for 52% (n=53) and unknown for 27.5% (n=28). There was no statistical difference for copeptin values between patients with NSTEMI and others (respectively 5.5 pmol/L IQR (3.1-7.9) and 6.5 pmol/L IQR (3.9-12.1), p=0.49). Only one patient with NSTEMI had a copeptin value above the cut-off of 95th centile at admission. CONCLUSIONS: In this study, copeptin does not add a diagnostic value at admission to ED for patients with suspected acute coronary syndrome without ST-segment elevation and with hs-cTnI below the 99th centile [corrected]. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: Clinicaltrials.gov identifier: NCT01334645.

SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA