Prognostic impact of cytoreductive surgery conducted with primary intent, versus cytoreductive surgery after neoadjuvant chemotherapy, in the management of patients with advanced epithelial ovarian cancers: a multicentre, propensity score-matched study from the FRANCOGYN group.

OBJECTIVE: To compare survival and morbidity rates between primary cytoreductive surgery (pCRS) and interval cytoreductive surgery (iCRS) for epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC), using a propensity score. DESIGN: We conducted a propensity score-matched cohort study, using data from the FRANCOGYN cohort. SETTING: Retrospective, multicentre study of data from patients followed in 15 French department specialized in the treatment of ovarian cancer. SAMPLE: Patients included were those with International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) stage III or IV EOC, with peritoneal carcinomatosis, having undergone CRS. METHODS: The propensity score was designed using pre-therapeutic variables associated with both treatment allocation and overall survival (OS). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcome was OS. Secondary outcomes included recurrence-free survival (RFS), quality of CRS and other variables related to surgical morbidity. RESULTS: A total of 513 patients were included. Among these, 334 could be matched, forming 167 pairs. No difference in OS was found (hazard ratio, HR = 0.8, p = 0.32). There was also no difference in RFS (median = 26 months in both groups) nor in the rate of CRS leaving no macroscopic residual disease (pCRS 85%, iCRS 81.4%, p = 0.76). The rates of gastrointestinal tract resections, stoma, postoperative complications and hospital stay were significantly higher in the pCRS group. CONCLUSIONS: Analysis of groups of patients made comparable by propensity score matching showed no difference in survival, but lower postoperative morbidity in patients treated with iCRS.

Highly Specific Droplet-Digital PCR Detection of Universally Methylated Circulating Tumor DNA in Endometrial Carcinoma.

BACKGROUND: No circulating biomarker is available for endometrial carcinoma (EC). We aimed to identify DNA positions universally hypermethylated in EC, and to develop a digital droplet PCR (ddPCR) assay for detection of hypermethylated circulating tumor DNA (meth-ctDNA) in plasma from patients with EC. METHODS: DNA positions hypermethylated in EC, and without unspecific hypermethylation in tissue/cell types releasing circulating cell-free DNA in plasma, were identified in silico from TCGA/Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) data. A methylation-specific ddPCR (meth-ddPCR) assay following bisulfite conversion of DNA extracted from plasma was optimized for detection of meth-ctDNA according to dMIQE guidelines. Performances were validated on a retrospective cohort (n = 78 tumors, n = 30 tumor-adjacent tissues), a prospective pilot cohort (n = 33 stage I-IV patients), and 55 patients/donors without cancer. RESULTS: Hypermethylation of zinc finger and SCAN domain containing 12 (ZSCAN12) and/or oxytocin (OXT) classified EC samples from multiple noncancer samples with high diagnostic specificity/sensitivity [>97%; area under the curve (AUC) = 0.99; TCGA/GEO tissues/blood samples]. These results were confirmed in the independent retrospective cohort (AUC = 0.99). Meth-ddPCR showed a high analytical specificity (limit of blank = 2) and sensitivity (absolute lower threshold of detection = 50 pgmethDNA/mLplasma). In the pilot cohort, meth-ctDNA was detected in pretreatment plasma samples from 9/11 and 5/20 patients with advanced and non-advanced EC, respectively. 2 of 9 patients had ctDNA detected after macroscopic complete surgery and experienced progression within 6 months. No healthy donors had any copy of hypermethylated DNA detected in plasma. CONCLUSIONS: Meth-ddPCR of ZSCAN12/OXT allows a highly specific and sensitive detection of ctDNA in plasma from patients with EC and appears promising for personalized approaches for these patients.

Development and validation of a RNAseq signature for prognostic stratification in endometrial cancer.

BACKGROUND: Despite recent advances in endometrial carcinoma (EC) molecular characterization, its prognostication remains challenging. We aimed to assess whether RNAseq could stratify EC patient prognosis beyond current classification systems. METHODS: A prognostic signature was identified using a LASSO-penalized Cox model trained on TCGA (N = 543 patients). A clinically applicable polyA-RNAseq-based work-flow was developed for validation of the signature in a cohort of stage I-IV patients treated in two Hospitals [2010-2017]. Model performances were evaluated using time-dependent ROC curves (prediction of disease-specific-survival (DSS)). The additional value of the RNAseq signature was evaluated by multivariable Cox model, adjusted on high-risk prognostic group (2021 ESGO-ESTRO-ESP guidelines: non-endometrioid histology or stage III-IVA orTP53-mutated molecular subgroup). RESULTS: Among 209 patients included in the external validation cohort, 61 (30%), 10 (5%), 52 (25%), and 82 (40%), had mismatch repair-deficient, POLE-mutated, TP53-mutated tumors, and tumors with no specific molecular profile, respectively. The 38-genes signature accurately predicted DSS (AUC = 0.80). Most disease-related deaths occurred in high-risk patients (5-years DSS = 78% (95% CI = [68%-89%]) versus 99% [97%-100%] in patients without high-risk). A composite classifier accounting for the TP53-mutated subgroup and the RNAseq signature identified three classes independently associated with DSS: RNAseq-good prognosis (reference, 5-years DSS = 99%), non-TP53 tumors but with RNAseq-poor prognosis (adjusted-hazard ratio (aHR) = 5.75, 95% CI[1.14-29.0]), and TP53-mutated subgroup (aHR = 5.64 [1.12-28.3]). The model accounting for the high-risk group and the composite classifier predicted DSS with AUC = 0.84, versus AUC = 0.76 without (p = 0.01). CONCLUSION: RNA-seq profiling can provide an additional prognostic information to established classification systems, and warrants validation for potential RNAseq-based therapeutic strategies in EC.

A Suggested Modification to FIGO Stage IV Epithelial Ovarian Cancer.

International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) staging classification for stage IV epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) separates stages IVA (pleural effusion) and IVB (parenchymal and/or extra-abdominal lymph node metastases). We aimed to evaluate its prognostic impact and to compare survival according to the initial metastatic location. We conducted a multicenter study between 2000 and 2020, including patients with a FIGO stage IV EOC. Primary endpoint was overall survival (OS). The secondary endpoints were progression-free survival (PFS) and recurrence rates. We included 307 patients: 98 (32%) had FIGO stage IVA and 209 (68%) had FIGO stage IVB. The median OS and PFS of stage IVA patients were significantly lower than those of stage IVB patients (31 versus 45 months (p = 0.02) and 18 versus 25 months (p = 0.01), respectively). Recurrence rate was higher in stage IVA than IVB patients (65% versus 47% (p = 0.004)). Initial pleural involvement was a poor prognostic factor with a median OS of 35 months versus 49 months for patients without initial pleural involvement (p = 0.024). Patients with FIGO stage IVA had a worse prognosis than patients with FIGO stage IVB EOC. Pleural involvement appears to be relevant for predicting survival. We suggest a modification of the current FIGO staging classification.