RESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To assess the feasibility and accuracy of fetal sex identification during the first trimester ultrasound exam. METHODS: A prospective study was carried out on 312 fetuses at 11-14 weeks' gestation. The genital region was examined by transabdominal ultrasound. The angle of the genital tubercle to a horizontal line through the lumbosacral skin was measured. Fetal gender was assigned as male if this angle was > 30 degrees and female when it was < 10 degrees . RESULTS: Sex assignment was feasible in 89.7% and accurate in 85.7% of fetuses. Accuracy was similar in males as in females (87.9% vs 83.3%; NS). However, accuracy increased significantly during the gestational age period in male (Chi-square for trend P = 0.03) but not in female (P = 0.41) fetuses. Compared with singletons, presence of multiple fetuses (n = 12) did not influence feasibility or accuracy (89.2% vs 96% and 85.6% vs 86.4% respectively). In male fetuses, there was a significant increase in the angle of the genital tubercle with increasing crown-rump length(CRL) (r = 0.667; p = 0.025), while in females the angle did not significantly change with increasing gestation. CONCLUSION: Sonographic first trimester sex assignment is highly feasible and accurate.
Asunto(s)
Primer Trimestre del Embarazo , Análisis para Determinación del Sexo/métodos , Ultrasonografía Prenatal/métodos , Pesos y Medidas Corporales/métodos , Estudios de Factibilidad , Femenino , Feto/anatomía & histología , Humanos , Masculino , Embarazo , Sensibilidad y Especificidad , TúnezRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To study epidemiologic and clinical features of pelvic hydatid disease and discuss its management. METHOD: A retrospective analysis of 11 cases of pelvic hydatid disease managed over 7 years and 8 months at the Maternity and Neonatalogy Unit, Tunisian Medical Center La Rabta, Tunis, Tunisia. All cases were identified from histopathologic reports. RESULTS: The 11 affected patients had a mean age of 41.6years (range, 22-79 years), 6 had a history of surgery for hydatid disease, 8 presented for chronic pelvic pain, and 1 was admitted for acute surgical abdomen. On physical examination, 6 had a pelvic mass. An ultrasound examination suggested the diagnosis preoperatively in 6. All were treated surgically. Primary laparoscopy was performed in 5 patients. Unroofing (or partial cystectomy) was performed in 6 patients and complete cystectomy in 4. The postoperative course was uneventful in all cases. Recurrence occurred only in 1 patient, 6 months after initial surgery. CONCLUSION: Pelvic hydatid disease is rare and its diagnosis often difficult preoperatively. The treatment mainstay is surgery. The laparoscopic approach seems to be safe and effective, and may increasingly replace laparotomy.