EPHX1 gene polymorphisms and individual susceptibility to lung cancer.

We investigated the roles of EPHX1 Tyr113His and His139Arg polymorphisms in lung cancer susceptibility in a Finnish study population comprising of 230 lung cancer cases and a large control group (n=2105). The controls were distributed into five age strata, which enabled us to examine the potential age-related changes in the putative EPHX1 at-risk genotypes in the cancer free population. Although the exon 3 slow activity associated allele (His113) containing genotypes posed a decreased lung cancer risk compared with the homozygous wild-type Tyr113/Tyr113 genotype (OR, 0.68; 95% CI, 0.49-0.94), no association was seen for the EPHX1 phenotypes interpreted from the combined exons 3 and 4 genotype data. Neither was any difference seen in the prevalence of the EPHX1 Tyr113His genotypes or interpreted EPHX1 phenotypes in the different age groups.

XRCC1 and XPD genetic polymorphisms, smoking and breast cancer risk in a Finnish case-control study.

INTRODUCTION: It has been suggested that individuals with reduced DNA repair capacities might have increased susceptibility to environmentally induced cancer. In this study, we evaluated if polymorphisms in DNA repair genes XRCC1 (Arg280His, Arg399Gln) and XPD (Lys751Gln) modify individual breast cancer risk, with emphasis on tobacco smoking. METHODS: The study population consisted of 483 incident breast cancer cases and 482 population controls of Finnish Caucasian origin. The genotypes were determined by PCR-RFLP-based methods. Odds ratio (OR) and confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated by unconditional logistic regression analyses. RESULTS: No statistically significant overall effect in the breast cancer risk was seen for any of the studied polymorphisms. However, a significant increase in breast cancer risk was seen among ever smoking women if they carried at least one XRCC1-399 Gln allele (OR 2.33, 95% CI 1.30-4.19, pint 0.025) or XPD-751 Gln/Gln genotype (OR 2.52, 95% CI 1.27-5.03, pint 0.011) compared to smoking women not carrying these genotypes. The risks were found to be confined to women smoking at least five pack-years; the respective ORs were 4.14 (95% CI 1.66-10.3) and 4.41 (95% CI 1.62-12.0). Moreover, a significant trend of increasing risk with increasing number of the putative at-risk genotypes (p for trend 0.042) was seen. Women with at least two at-risk genotypes had an OR of 1.54 (95% CI 1.00-2.41) compared to women with no at-risk genotypes. Even higher estimates were seen for ever actively smoking women with at least two at-risk genotypes. CONCLUSION: Our results do not indicate a major role for XRCC1 and XPD polymorphisms in breast cancer susceptibility, but suggest that they may modify the risk especially among smoking women.

CYP1A1 and CYP1B1 genetic polymorphisms, smoking and breast cancer risk in a Finnish Caucasian population.

We investigated the associations between two CYP1A1 polymorphisms (Ile462Val and Thr461Asn) and one CYP1B1 polymorphism (Leu432Val) and breast cancer risk. The study population consisted of 483 breast cancer patients and 482 healthy population controls, all of homogenous Finnish origin. No statistically significant overall associations were found between the CYP1A1 and CYP1B1 genotypes and breast cancer risk. However, a significant increase in the breast cancer risk was seen for women who had smoked 1-9 cigarettes/day and carried the CYP1B1 432Val allele; the OR was 2.6 (95% CI 1.07-6.46) for women carrying the Leu/Val genotype and 5.1 (95% CI 1.30-19.89, P for trend 0.005) for women with the Val/Val genotype compared to similarly smoking women homozygous for the 432Leu allele. Furthermore, when CYP1B1 genotypes were combined with the previously analyzed N-acetyl transferase (NAT2) genotypes, a significant increase in breast cancer risk was found among women who had at least one CYP1B1 432Val allele together with the NAT2 slow acetylator genotype (OR 1.52; 95% CI 1.03-2.24) compared to women carrying a combination of CYP1B1 Leu/Leu and NAT2 rapid acetylator genotypes. This risk was seen to be confined to ever smokers; the OR was 2.46 (95% CI 1.11-5.45) for ever smokers carrying at least one CYP1B1 432Val allele together with the NAT2 slow acetylator genotype compared to ever smokers with the CYP1B1 Leu/Leu and NAT2 rapid acetylator genotype combination. Our results suggest that the CYP1B1 polymorphism may be an important modifier of breast cancer risk in Finnish Caucasian women who have been exposed to tobacco smoke and/or carry the NAT2 slow acetylator genotype.

Distribution of glutathione S-transferase M1, P1 and T1 genotypes in different age-groups of Finns without diagnosed cancer.

BACKGROUND: Xenobiotic metabolizing enzymes (XMEs) are important detoxifiers of hazardous environmental agents, and their polymorphisms may therefore modify the risk of environmentally induced cancers. Consequently, the XME polymorphisms have been extensively studied in this context during recent years. Particular attention has been given to the polymorphisms of glutathione S-transferase (GST) M1, P1 and T1 genes. Previous studies have provided abundant data indicating these polymorphisms as important modifiers of individual susceptibility to cancers of environmental origin. It can be postulated that if the at-risk genotypes of these genes were real risk factors for the environmental cancers, their prevalence would presumably decrease with age in cancer-free part of the population. METHODS: We tested the hypothesis in a population based group of 2105 Finns (1,051 men, 1,054 women) in five age strata (27, 37, 47, 57 and 67 years of age), all without clinically diagnosed cancer. RESULTS: For GSTM1 genotype, a significant interaction was seen between gender and age among never smokers (p=0.003). Currently smoking men tended to be less likely (OR 0.57, 95% CI 0.31-1.03), and currently smoking women more likely (OR 1.70, 95% CI 0.97-2.97) homozygotes for the GSTP1*B allele compared with never smokers. Moreover, the likelihood of being a concurrent carrier of the putatively protective genotypes of all of the three studied GSTs was almost three-fold (OR 2.80, 95% CI 1.10-7.12) in heavy smokers in the two oldest age-groups compared with the other genotypes. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings based on a novel study design provide support to the previous case-control studies suggesting that GST genotypes modify individual risk of environmentally-induced cancers.