Cholangitis Induced by Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors: Analysis of Pharmacovigilance Data.

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are remarkable anticancer therapies that have revolutionized the oncological prognosis of many cancers.1 The considerable efficacy of ICIs is associated with the onset of more- or less-serious, immune-related adverse effects (irAEs) affecting several organs, which can concern up to 70% of patients, owing to a loss of self-tolerance during the restoration of antitumor immunity.2 Checkpoint inhibitor-induced liver injury (CHILI), which may occur in up to 25% of patients, is treated with steroids as first-line treatment, and immunosuppressive drugs as second-line treatment.3 Recently, ICI-induced cholangitis was described as an emerging irAE. Hence, Pi et al4 reviewed all 53 published cases of ICI-induced cholangitis and compared the different types of bile duct involvement. We recently described CHILI according to the biological profile: cholestatic, hepatocellular, or mixed.5 Cholestatic profiles were associated with macroscopic and/or microscopic bile duct damage, and time to resolution was significantly longer. More recently, Onoyama et al6 and Parlati et al7 described a poorer response to steroids in cases of biliary histologic damage or ICI-induced sclerosing cholangitis. The latest European Society for Medical Oncology guidelines include the management of cholangitis, which is succinct and still poorly documented.3 The aim of this study therefore was to analyze the cases of ICI-induced cholangitis reported in the French pharmacovigilance system to describe their clinical characteristics, evolution, and outcome.

Diagnosis and management of hepatic encephalopathy: The French recommendations.

Hepatic encephalopathy (HE) is a frequent and severe complication of liver disease with poor patient outcomes. However, it is a poorly understood complication, with no consensus for diagnosis. Therefore, HE is often underdiagnosed. Differential diagnosis may be cumbersome because of non-specific symptoms, such as confusion, cognitive disorders, the aetiological factors of cirrhosis and comorbidities, which are often observed in cirrhotic patients. Therefore, an overt or covert form of HE should be systematically investigated. Advice is provided to drive patient work-up. Effective treatments are available to prevent or treat HE bouts, but the issue of single or combination therapy has not been resolved. Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) placement largely improved the prognosis of cirrhotic patients, but HE occurrence of HE is often a fear, even when post-TIPS HE can be avoided by a careful selection of patients and preventive treatment. HE is an indication of liver transplantation. However, its reversibility post-transplantation and the consequences of transplantation in patients with other causes of neurological disorders remain controversial, which supports the performance of an extensive work-up in expert centres for this subset of patients. The present guidelines assist clinicians in the diagnosis of the overt or covert form of HE to implement curative and preventive treatments and clarify which patients require referral to expert centres for consideration for liver transplantation. These guidelines are very clinically oriented and address different frequent clinical issues to help physicians make bedside decisions.

Hepatotoxicity of Drugs Used in Multiple Sclerosis, Diagnostic Challenge, and the Role of HLA Genotype Susceptibility.

Multiple sclerosis (MS) is a chronic demyelinating disease of the central nervous system and the association with other autoimmune diseases is well-documented. There are many therapeutic options for the treatment of MS. Most of the available drugs cause drug-induced liver injury (DILI) to variable extents with heterogeneous clinical and biological manifestations, including liver injury with or without signs of hypersensitivity and autoimmunity. The diagnosis of DILI may be particularly difficult because MS is frequently associated with idiopathic autoimmune hepatitis. Recent advances suggest that MS and immune-mediated DILI could be promoted by genetic factors, including HLA genotype. In addition, some of these drugs may promote hepatitis B virus reactivation. This review explores the potential hepatotoxicity of drugs used to treat MS and the criteria to distinguish DILI from idiopathic autoimmune hepatitis associated with MS. The role of susceptible genes both promoting MS and causing the hepatotoxicity of the drug used for MS treatment is also discussed.

Location and allocation: Inequity of access to liver transplantation for patients with severe acute-on-chronic liver failure in Europe.

There is growing evidence that liver transplantation (LT) is the most effective treatment for acute-on-chronic liver failure grade-3 (ACLF-3). This study examines whether and how this evidence translates into practice by analyzing the variability in intensive care unit (ICU) admissions, listing strategies, and LT activity for patients with ACLF-3 across transplantation centers in Europe. Consecutive patients who were admitted to the ICU with ACLF-3, whether or not they were listed and/or transplanted with ACLF-3, between 2018 and 2019 were included across 20 transplantation centers. A total of 351 patients with ACLF-3 were included: 33 had been listed prior to developing ACLF-3 and 318 had not been listed at the time of admission to the ICU. There was no correlation between the number of unlisted patients with ACLF-3 admitted to the ICU and the number listed or transplanted while in ACLF-3 across centers. By contrast, there was a correlation between the number of patients listed and the number transplanted while in ACLF-3. About 21% of patients who were listed while in ACLF-3 died on the waiting list or were delisted. The percentage of LT for patients with ACLF-3 varied from 0% to 29% for those transplanted with decompensated cirrhosis across centers (average = 8%), with an I2 index of 68% (95% confidence interval, 49%-80%), showing substantial heterogeneity among centers. The 1-year survival for all patients with ACLF-3 was significantly higher in centers that listed and transplanted more patients with ACLF-3 (>10 patients) than in centers that listed and transplanted fewer: 36% versus 20%, respectively (p = 0.012). Patients with ACLF-3 face inequity of access to LT across Europe. Waitlisting strategies for patients with ACLF-3 influence their access to LT and, ultimately, their survival.

Mycophenolate mofetil decreases humoral responses to three doses of SARS-CoV-2 vaccine in liver transplant recipients.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: After 2 doses, the efficacy of anti-SARS-CoV-2 vaccination seems to be lower in solid organ transplant recipients than in the immunocompetent population. The objective of this study was to determine the humoral response rate after vaccination, including with a booster dose, and to identify risk factors for non-responsiveness in liver transplant recipients. METHODS: We included all patients seen in consultation in two French liver transplant centres between January 1, 2021, and March 15, 2021. RESULTS: 598 liver transplant recipients were enrolled and 327 were included for analysis. Sixteen patients received one dose, 63 patients two doses and 248 patients three doses. Anti-SARS-Cov-2 antibodies were detected in 242 out of 327 (74.0%) liver transplant patients after vaccination. Considering an optimal serologic response defined as an antibody titre >260 BAU/ml, 172 patients (52.6%) were responders. Mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) treatment was an independent risk factor for a failure to develop anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibodies after vaccination (OR 0.458; 95%CI 0.258-0.813; p = .008). Conversely, male gender (OR 2.247, 95%CI 1.194-4.227; p = .012) and receiving an mRNA vaccine (vs a non-mRNA vaccine) (OR 4.107, 95%CI 1.145-14.731; p = .030) were independent predictive factors for developing an optimal humoral response after vaccination. None of the patients who received the vaccine experienced any serious adverse events. CONCLUSIONS: Even after a third booster dose, response rate to vaccination is decreased in liver transplant recipients. MMF appears to be a major determinant of seroconversion and optimal response to vaccination in these patients.

Liver transplantation for patients with acute-on-chronic liver failure (ACLF) in Europe: Results of the ELITA/EF-CLIF collaborative study (ECLIS).

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Liver transplantation (LT) has been proposed as an effective salvage therapy even for the sickest patients with acute-on-chronic liver failure (ACLF). This large collaborative study was designed to assess the current clinical practice and outcomes of patients with ACLF who are wait-listed for LT in Europe. METHODS: This was a retrospective study including 308 consecutive patients with ACLF, listed in 20 centres across 8 European countries, from January 2018 to June 2019. RESULTS: A total of 2,677 patients received a LT: 1,216 (45.4%) for decompensated cirrhosis. Of these, 234 (19.2%) had ACLF at LT: 58 (4.8%) had ACLF-1, 78 (6.4%) had ACLF-2, and 98 (8.1%) had ACLF-3. Wide variations were observed amongst countries: France and Germany had high rates of ACLF-2/3 (27-41%); Italy, Switzerland, Poland and the Netherlands had medium rates (9-15%); and the United Kingdom and Spain had low rates (3-5%) (p <0.0001). The 1-year probability of survival after LT for patients with ACLF was 81% (95% CI 74-87). Pre-LT arterial lactate levels >4 mmol/L (hazard ratio [HR] 3.14; 95% CI 1.37-7.19), recent infection from multidrug resistant organisms (HR 3.67; 95% CI 1.63-8.28), and renal replacement therapy (HR 2.74; 95% CI 1.37-5.51) were independent predictors of post-LT mortality. During the same period, 74 patients with ACLF died on the waiting list. In an intention-to-treat analysis, 1-year survival of patients with ACLF on the LT waiting list was 73% for ACLF-1 or -2 and 50% for ACLF-3. CONCLUSION: The results reveal wide variations in the listing of patients with ACLF in Europe despite favourable post-LT survival. Risk factors for mortality were identified, enabling a more precise prognostic assessment of patients with ACLF. LAY SUMMARY: Acute-on-chronic liver failure (ACLF) is a severe clinical condition for which liver transplantation is an effective therapeutic option. This study has demonstrated that in Europe, referral and access to liver transplantation (LT) for patients with ACLF needs to be harmonised to avoid inequities. Post-LT survival for patients with ACLF was >80% after 1 year and some factors have been identified to help select patients with favourable outcomes.

Alcohol Consumption the Day of Liver Transplantation for Alcohol-Associated Liver Disease Does Not Affect Long-Term Survival: A Case-Control Study.

Alcohol abstinence before liver transplantation (LT) for alcohol-associated liver disease (ALD) is required for every candidate. Some listed patients might relapse, resulting in LT for patients nonabstinent during the pretransplant period. Long-term survival outcomes of these patients have never been studied. We sought to determine whether alcohol consumption on the day of the LT influenced long-term survival after LT. We conducted a retrospective case-control study among French LT centers. Cases were defined as recipients between January 1995 and December 2007 having positive blood and/or urine alcohol levels the day of LT. Each case was paired with 2 controls corresponding to patients transplanted for ALD during the same trimester. Patients were classified into 3 categories per alcohol consumption: abstainers, occasional or transitory excessive consumers, or patients with a sustained excessive consumption (daily consumption >20-30 g/day). During the study period, 3052 LTs for ALD were conducted in France. We identified 42 cases paired with 84 controls. Median blood alcohol level was 0.4 g/L (range 0.1-4.1 g/L) and median urine alcohol level was 0.2 g/L (range 0.1-2.0 g/L). Median follow-up period until death or censoring was 12.9 years (CI95% = [12.3; 13.6]). Long-term survival was not different between the groups. Relapse to any alcohol consumption rate was higher in the case group (59.5%) than in the control group (38.1%, odds ratio 2.44; CI95% = [1.13; 5.27]), but sustained excessive consumption was not significantly different between the groups (33.3% versus 29.8% in case and control groups respectively, χ2  = 0.68). Rates of recurrent cirrhosis and cirrhosis-related deaths were more frequent in the case group. Liver transplantation for nonabstinent patients during the immediate pretransplant period does not result in impaired long-term survival despite higher relapse and recurrent cirrhosis rates.

Can We Predict Individual Concentrations of Tacrolimus After Liver Transplantation? Application and Tweaking of a Published Population Pharmacokinetic Model in Clinical Practice.

BACKGROUND: Various population pharmacokinetic models have been developed to describe the pharmacokinetics of tacrolimus in adult liver transplantation. However, their extrapolated predictive performance remains unclear in clinical practice. The purpose of this study was to predict concentrations using a selected literature model and to improve these predictions by tweaking the model with a subset of the target population. METHODS: A literature review was conducted to select an adequate population pharmacokinetic model (L). Pharmacokinetic data from therapeutic drug monitoring of tacrolimus in liver-transplanted adults were retrospectively collected. A subset of these data (70%) was exploited to tweak the L-model using the $PRIOR subroutine of the NONMEM software, with 2 strategies to weight the prior information: full informative (F) and optimized (O). An external evaluation was performed on the remaining data; bias and imprecision were evaluated for predictions a priori and Bayesian forecasting. RESULTS: Seventy-nine patients (851 concentrations) were enrolled in the study. The predictive performance of L-model was insufficient for a priori predictions, whereas it was acceptable with Bayesian forecasting, from the third prediction (ie, with ≥2 previously observed concentrations), corresponding to 1 week after transplantation. Overall, the tweaked models showed a better predictive ability than the L-model. The bias of a priori predictions was -41% with the literature model versus -28.5% and -8.73% with tweaked F and O models, respectively. The imprecision was 45.4% with the literature model versus 38.0% and 39.2% with tweaked F and O models, respectively. For Bayesian predictions, whatever the forecasting state, the tweaked models tend to obtain better results. CONCLUSIONS: A pharmacokinetic model can be used, and to improve the predictive performance, tweaking the literature model with the $PRIOR approach allows to obtain better predictions.

Abnormal liver tests in patients hospitalized with Coronavirus disease 2019: Should we worry?

While several studies from China have reported COVID-19-related liver injury, there are currently no data on liver dysfunction in hospitalized COVID-19 patients in Europe. The aim of this study was to describe the prevalence and predictive value of abnormal liver function in patients hospitalized with COVID-19. This was a retrospective cohort study of confirmed COVID-19 patients hospitalized in two referral hospitals in France. Clinical, biological and radiological data were collected and analysed. In all, 234 patients confirmed to have COVID-19 by RT-PCR were included. Liver function was abnormal in 66.6% of patients on admission. In multivariate logistic regression, abnormal liver test on admission were associated with in-hospital aggravation (OR = 4.1, 95% CI 1.5-10.8; P = .004) and mortality (OR 3.3; 95% CI = 1.04-10.5; P = .04). This study of liver tests in a European COVID-19 population confirms a high prevalence of abnormal liver tests on admission that are predictive of severe disease course and higher in-hospital mortality.

Chemotherapy-associated steatohepatitis.

Some drugs may induce hepatotoxic lesions, such as steatosis or steatohepatitis found in Non-Alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease (NAFLD). Among these drugs there are some anti-tumoral molecules, such as methotrexate, 5-fluorouracil, irinotecan, tamoxifen and l-asparaginase. The hepatotoxic phenotype developed from treatment with such drugs is known as "CASH" for "Chemotherapy-induced Acute Steatohepatitis". The mechanism of toxicity is essentially based on mitochondrial toxicity. These lesions are chronic and often reversible when the treatment is stopped. Contributing factors related to the patient, the disease or the treatment play a major role in the emergence of CASH. It is important to identify chemotherapies with steatosis or steatohepatitis as risk factors in order to improve control of the metabolic risk factors associated with the patient and to reinforce monitoring during treatment. In the particular context of neo-adjuvant chemotherapy for metastatic colorectal cancer, a short duration of chemotherapy and a few-weeks delay between chemotherapy and surgery could reduce postoperative morbidity and mortality.

Pantoprazole-induced autoimmune chronic hepatitis.

BACKGROUND: Although very rare, pantoprazole can result in acute hepatitis. It has yet to be reported, however, that it can also cause chronic autoimmune hepatitis. AIM, METHOD AND RESULTS: We report the case of a patient in whom pantoprazole administration for 2 months was followed by acute liver injury with severe jaundice and features of autoimmunity. A liver biopsy revealed acute hepatocellular lesions associated with cholestasis, acute cholangitis and polymorphous inflammatory infiltration suggestive of drug-induced liver injury. The jaundice disappeared following discontinuation of the pantoprazole. There was, however, chronic autoimmune liver injury, with the occurrence of extensive liver fibrosis within a few months. This led to the administration of immunosuppressive agents, which led to progressive and complete recovery associated with the disappearance of autoantibodies. CONCLUSION: This observation further supports the notion that pantoprazole can induce acute hepatocellular hepatitis, and it strongly suggests that it may trigger acute cholangitis and autoimmune liver injury. This case also helps document that some drugs can induce chronic autoimmune hepatitis that can resolve with immunosuppressive treatment.

Recent Advances in Hepatotoxicity of Non Steroidal Anti-Inflammatory Drugs.

Non-steroidal-anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) make a heterogenous pharmaco-therapeutic class of drugs among the most used drugs worldwide with various indications, modes of administration and increasing automedication. NSAIDs can cause acute liver injury with variable severity. The recent identification of genetic markers might facilitate the diagnosis and the prediction of hepatotoxicity risk.

Liver Biopsy in Chronic Liver Diseases: Is There a Favorable Benefit: Risk Balance?

Liver biopsy is still useful in selected clinical situations in which it is the only tool to obtain information necessary for the diagnosis, the prognosis, and the decision for treatment. Main examples are viral hepatitis with confounding co-morbidities, non alcoholic fatty liver disease, and autoimmune liver diseases.