Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 5 de 5
Filtrar
1.
Clin Transplant ; 30(10): 1366-1369, 2016 10.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27411162

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Traumatic biliary neuromas (TBNs) represent a rare cause of biliary stricture (BS) after orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT). Diagnosis is challenging preoperatively and is most often made at pathology after resection. Herein, we report a 20-year experience of TBN-related BS. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Medical records of 1030 adult patients undergoing OLT from 1991 to 2014 were reviewed. Patients with histologically proven TBN were identified among those presenting a BS. RESULTS: Over the study period, 52 patients developed an anastomotic BS. Of these, 17 had repeat surgery and specimen examination identified TBN in five instances. All five patients with TBN had a duct-to-duct biliary reconstruction during OLT. Median delay from OLT to onset of symptoms was 69 months (range 4-239). Preoperative imaging showed a compressive mass in one patient. Four patients underwent TBN resection combined with hepaticojejunostomy and had an uneventful postoperative course. One patient underwent TBN resection and duct-to-duct reconstruction; he died from acute pancreatitis on postoperative day 21. After a median follow-up of 40.5 months (range 10-54), no recurrent BS occurred. CONCLUSION: Traumatic biliary neuromas represent a possible diagnosis for unexplained anastomotic BS after OLT. Surgical excision combined with hepaticojejunostomy is effective, allows histological diagnosis, and prevents from recurrence.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias de los Conductos Biliares/etiología , Conductos Biliares/cirugía , Colestasis/etiología , Trasplante de Hígado/efectos adversos , Neuroma/etiología , Complicaciones Posoperatorias , Anastomosis Quirúrgica , Neoplasias de los Conductos Biliares/diagnóstico , Neoplasias de los Conductos Biliares/cirugía , Conductos Biliares/lesiones , Colestasis/diagnóstico , Colestasis/cirugía , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Neuroma/diagnóstico , Neuroma/cirugía , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/diagnóstico , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/cirugía , Estudios Retrospectivos , Trasplante Homólogo , Resultado del Tratamiento
2.
HPB (Oxford) ; 17(10): 881-8, 2015 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26227804

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Small-for-size syndrome (SFSS) is a feared complication of extended liver resection and partial liver transplantation. Swine models of extended hepatectomy have been developed for studying SFSS and its different treatment options. Although portal inflow modulation (PIM) by splenectomy or splenic artery ligation (SAL) has been proposed in humans to prevent SFSS, such procedures have not yet been evaluated in swine. OBJECTIVES: The present study was designed to evaluate modifications in splanchnic haemodynamics yielded by extended hepatectomy with and without PIM in swine. METHODS: Nineteen animals underwent 70% hepatectomy (H70, n = 7), 90% hepatectomy (H90, n = 7) or sham laparotomy (H0, n = 5). Haemodynamic measurements were performed at baseline, after hepatectomy and after PIM by SAL and splenectomy. RESULTS: Portal vein flow increased after both H70 (273 ml/min/100 g versus 123 ml/min/100 g; P = 0.016) and H90 (543 ml/min/100 g versus 124 ml/min/100 g; P = 0.031), but the hepatic venous pressure gradient (HVPG) increased only after H90 (10.0 mmHg versus 3.7 mmHg; P = 0.016). Hepatic artery flow did not significantly decrease after either H70 or H90. In all three groups, neither splenectomy nor SAL induced any changes in splanchnic haemodynamics. CONCLUSIONS: Subtotal hepatectomy of 90% in swine is a reliable model for SFSS inducing a significant increase in HVPG. However, in view of the relevant differences between swine and human splanchnic anatomy, this model is inadequate for studying the effects of PIM by SAL and splenectomy.


Asunto(s)
Hepatectomía/métodos , Circulación Hepática/fisiología , Hígado/irrigación sanguínea , Presión Portal/fisiología , Vena Porta/cirugía , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/fisiopatología , Flujo Sanguíneo Regional/fisiología , Animales , Modelos Animales de Enfermedad , Femenino , Hígado/cirugía , Tamaño de los Órganos , Vena Porta/fisiopatología , Arteria Esplénica/cirugía , Porcinos , Síndrome
3.
Ann Surg ; 260(5): 764-70; discussion 770-1, 2014 Nov.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25379847

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: To assess the impact of neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (NCRT) on anastomotic leakage (AL) and other postoperative outcomes after esophageal cancer (EC) resection. BACKGROUND: Conflicting data have emerged from randomized studies regarding the impact of NCRT on AL. METHODS: Among 2944 consecutive patients operated on for EC between 2000 and 2010 in 30 European centers, patients treated by NCRT after surgery (n=593) were compared with those treated by primary surgery (n=1487). Multivariable analyses and propensity score matching were used to compensate for the differences in some baseline characteristics. RESULTS: Patients in the NCRT group were younger, with a higher prevalence of male sex, malnutrition, advanced tumor stage, squamous cell carcinoma, and surgery after 2005 when compared with the primary surgery group. Postoperative AL rates were 8.8% versus 10.6% (P=0.220), and 90-day postoperative mortality and morbidity rates were 9.3% versus 7.2% (P=0.110) and 33.4% versus 32.1% (P=0.564), respectively. Pulmonary complication rates did not differ between groups (24.6% vs 22.5%; P=0.291), whereas chylothorax (2.5% vs 1.2%; P=0.020), cardiovascular complications (8.6% vs 0.1%; P=0.037), and thromboembolic events (8.6% vs 6.0%; P=0.037) were higher in the NCRT group. After propensity score matching, AL rates were 8.8% versus 11.3% (P=0.228), with more chylothorax (2.5% vs 0.7%; P=0.030) and trend toward more cardiovascular and thromboembolic events in the NCRT group (P=0.069). Predictors of AL were high American Society of Anesthesiologists scores, supracarinal tumoral location, and cervical anastomosis, but not NCRT. CONCLUSIONS: Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy does not have an impact on the AL rate after EC resection (NCT 01927016).


Asunto(s)
Quimioradioterapia , Neoplasias Esofágicas/terapia , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/epidemiología , Adenocarcinoma/patología , Adenocarcinoma/terapia , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Fuga Anastomótica/epidemiología , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas/patología , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas/terapia , Diagnóstico por Imagen , Neoplasias Esofágicas/patología , Europa (Continente)/epidemiología , Femenino , Humanos , Metástasis Linfática , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Terapia Neoadyuvante , Puntaje de Propensión , Factores de Riesgo , Resultado del Tratamiento
4.
Exp Clin Transplant ; 15(4): 420-424, 2017 Aug.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28350292

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: Management of hepatic arterial complications after liver transplant remains challenging. The aim of our study was to assess the efficacy of rescue arterial revascularization using cryopreserved iliac artery allografts in this setting. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Medical records of patients with liver transplants who underwent rescue arterial revascularization using cryopreserved iliac artery allografts at a single institution were reviewed. RESULTS: From 1992 to 2015, 7 patients underwent rescue arterial revascularization using cryopreserved iliac artery allografts for hepatic artery pseudoaneurysm (3 patients), thrombosis (2 patients), aneurysm (1 patient), or stenosis (1 patient). Two patients developed severe complications, comprising one biliary leakage treated percutaneously, and one acute necrotizing pancreatitis causing death on postoperative day 29. After a median follow-up of 75 months (range, 1-269 mo), 2 patients had an uneventful long-term course, whereas 4 patients developed graft thrombosis after a median period of 120 days (range, 2-488 d). Among the 4 patients who developed graft thrombosis, 1 patient developed ischemic cholangitis, 1 developed acute ischemic hepatic necrosis and was retransplanted, and 2 patients did not develop any further complications. CONCLUSIONS: Despite a high rate of allograft thrombosis, rescue arterial revascularization using cryopreserved iliac artery allografts after liver transplant is an effective and readily available approach, with a limited risk of infection and satisfactory long-term graft and patient survival.


Asunto(s)
Aneurisma Falso/cirugía , Arteriopatías Oclusivas/cirugía , Criopreservación , Arteria Hepática/cirugía , Arteria Ilíaca/trasplante , Trasplante de Hígado/efectos adversos , Trombosis/cirugía , Injerto Vascular/métodos , Adulto , Aloinjertos , Aneurisma Falso/etiología , Aneurisma Falso/mortalidad , Aneurisma Falso/fisiopatología , Arteriopatías Oclusivas/etiología , Arteriopatías Oclusivas/mortalidad , Arteriopatías Oclusivas/fisiopatología , Constricción Patológica , Femenino , Francia , Supervivencia de Injerto , Arteria Hepática/fisiopatología , Humanos , Trasplante de Hígado/mortalidad , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Terapia Recuperativa , Trombosis/etiología , Trombosis/mortalidad , Trombosis/fisiopatología , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del Tratamiento , Injerto Vascular/efectos adversos , Injerto Vascular/mortalidad , Grado de Desobstrucción Vascular
5.
Clin Res Hepatol Gastroenterol ; 36(6): e126-30, 2012 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22749693

RESUMEN

Although the feasibility of oral tacrolimus administration in the presence of jejunostomy has already been reported, few studies monitoring tacrolimus trough blood levels have been analyzed in detail, either during or after a jejunostomy closure. We report on our experience with a 34-year-old patient who underwent liver transplantations, with a proximal jejunostomy constructed a few days prior to the second transplantation. He was administered tacrolimus by a predominantly oral route, and less frequently received it by jejunostomy. The aim of this paper is to discuss this administration strategy and whether a different method could have been more suitable. This case report highlights that during the jejunostomy period, the tacrolimus doses that were required to maintain trough concentrations within the therapeutic range were four times higher than those administered after the closure of the jejunostomy. We observed an increase in the Dose-Normalized Trough Concentration (DNTC) values when tacrolimus was administered for 4 consecutive days by jejunostomy as compared to oral administration, indicating that the relative bioavailability of tacrolimus increased. Moreover, when returning to oral administration, the subsequent DNTC value was halved, highlighting a reduction in the tacrolimus bioavailability. Thus, in such a case, administration by jejunostomy could be more appropriate.


Asunto(s)
Inmunosupresores/administración & dosificación , Yeyunostomía , Trasplante de Hígado , Tacrolimus/administración & dosificación , Adulto , Humanos , Masculino , Atención Perioperativa
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA