Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 32
Filtrar
Más filtros

Bases de datos
País/Región como asunto
Tipo del documento
País de afiliación
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Medicina (Kaunas) ; 57(5)2021 Apr 28.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33925171

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Twenty percent of the patients affected with stage IV antropyloric stomach cancer are hospitalized with a gastric outlet obstruction syndrome (GOOS) requiring its resolution to improve the quality of life (QoL). We present our preliminary short- and mid-term results regarding the influence of endoscopic placement of self-expandable metal stent (SEMS) or open stomach-partitioning gastrojejunostomy in QoL. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this prospective randomized longitudinal cohort trial, we randomly assigned 27 patients affected with stage IV antropyloric stomach cancer into two groups: Group 1 (13 patients) who underwent SEMS positioning and Group 2 (14 patients) in whom open stomach-partitioning gastrojejunostomy was performed. The Karnofsky performance scale and QoL assessment using the EQ-5D-5L™ questionnaire was administered before treatment and thereafter at 1, 3, and 6 months. Results: At 1-month, index values showed a statistically significant deterioration of the QoL in patients of Group 2 when compared to those of Group 1 (p = 0.004; CI: 0.04 to 0.21). No differences among the groups were recorded at 3-month; whereas, at 6-month, the index values showed a statistically significant deterioration of the QoL in patients of Group 1 (p = 0.009; CI: -0.25 to -0.043). CONCLUSIONS: Early QoL of patients affected with stage IV antropyloric cancer and symptoms of GOOS is significantly better in patients treated with SEMS positioning but at 6-month the QoL significantly decrease in this group of patients. We explained the reasons of this fluctuation with the higher risk of re-hospital admission in the SEMS group.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Gástricas , Humanos , Cuidados Paliativos , Estudios Prospectivos , Calidad de Vida , Estudios Retrospectivos , Stents , Neoplasias Gástricas/complicaciones , Neoplasias Gástricas/cirugía , Resultado del Tratamiento
2.
Surg Innov ; 24(6): 557-565, 2017 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28748737

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Hartmann's procedure (HP) followed by reversal restoration is the first choice for treatment of diffuse diverticular peritonitis. There is no unanimous consensus regarding the use of laparoscopy to treat the same condition. METHODS: Data from 60 patients with diverticular diffuse peritonitis who underwent urgent HP followed by laparoscopic reversal were retrospectively analyzed. Patients were divided into 2 groups according to the open or laparoscopic HP (OHP, 24 patients; LHP, 36 patients). Outcomes were measured in terms of functional recovery, morbidity, mortality, and length of hospital stay. RESULTS: HPs showed no differences among the groups in terms of operative time, blood loss, and length of intensive care unit stay. Overall morbidity was significantly lower in LHP than in OHP, corresponding to 33.3% and 66.7% respectively ( P = .018). The incidence of both surgical and medical complications was higher in OHP than in LHP (41.7% vs 22.2% [ P = .044] and 45.8% vs 24.3% [ P = .023], respectively). Mortality was 16.6% for each group. LHP showed a faster return to bowel movements and a shorter hospital stay than OHP. The secondary intestinal reversal was possible in 92% of cases, successfully completed laparoscopically in 91.3%. No patients of LHP group required a conversion to open intestinal reversal. CONCLUSION: LHP for treatment of diverticular diffuse peritonitis showed significantly lower morbidity, faster recovery, shorter hospital stay, and higher rates of successful laparoscopic reversal when compared with OHP.


Asunto(s)
Colectomía , Colon Sigmoide/cirugía , Colostomía , Diverticulitis/cirugía , Laparoscopía , Peritonitis/cirugía , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Estudios de Cohortes , Femenino , Humanos , Tiempo de Internación , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/epidemiología , Recuperación de la Función , Reoperación , Resultado del Tratamiento
3.
World J Surg ; 40(10): 2353-8, 2016 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27216807

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Percutaneous central venous port (CVP) placement using ultrasound-guidance (USG) via right internal jugular vein is described as a safe and effective procedure. The aim of this study is to determine whether intraoperative fluoroscopy (IF) and/or postoperative chest X-ray (CXR) are required to confirm the correct position of the catheter. METHODS: Between January 2012 and December 2014, 302 adult patients underwent elective CVP system placement under USG. The standard venous access site was the right internal jugular vein. The length of catheter was calculated based on the height of the patient. IF was always performed to confirm US findings. RESULTS: 176 patients were men and 126 were women and average height was 176.2 cm (range 154-193 cm). The average length of the catheter was 16.4 cm (range 14-18). Catheter malposition and pneumothorax were observed in 4 (1.3 %) and 3 (1 %) patients, respectively. IF confirmed the correct position of the catheter in all cases. Catheter misplacement (4 cases) was previously identified and corrected on USG. Our rates of pneumothorax are in accordance with those of the literature (0.5-3 %). CONCLUSION: Ultrasonography has resulted in improved safety and effectiveness of port system implantation. The routine use of CXR and IF should be considered unnecessary.


Asunto(s)
Cateterismo Venoso Central/métodos , Fluoroscopía , Radiografía Torácica , Ultrasonografía Intervencional , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Cateterismo Venoso Central/instrumentación , Catéteres , Femenino , Humanos , Venas Yugulares , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Retrospectivos , Rayos X
5.
Surg Innov ; 21(1): 52-8, 2014 Feb.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23657477

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Deep pelvic endometriosis is a complex disorder that affects 6% to 12% of all women in childbearing age. The incidence of bowel endometriosis ranges between 5.3% and 12%, with rectum and sigma being the most frequently involved tracts, accounting for about 80% of cases. It has been reported that segmental colorectal resection is the best surgical option in terms of recurrence rate and improvement of symptoms. The aim of this study is to analyze indications, feasibility, limits, and short-term results of robotic (Da Vinci Surgical System)-assisted laparoscopic rectal sigmoidectomy for the treatment of deep pelvic endometriosis. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between January 2006 and December 2010, 19 women with bowel endometriosis underwent colorectal resection through the robotic-assisted laparoscopic approach. Intraoperative and postoperative data were collected. All procedures were performed in a single center and short-term complications were evaluated. RESULTS: Nineteen robotic-assisted laparoscopic colorectal resections for infiltrating endometriosis were achieved. Additional procedures were performed in 7 patients (37%). No laparotomic conversion was performed. No intraoperative complications were observed. The mean operative time was 370 minutes (range = 250-720 minutes), and the estimated blood loss was 250 mL (range = 50-350 mL). The overall complication rate was 10% (2 rectovaginal fistulae). CONCLUSIONS: Deep pelvic endometriosis is a benign condition but may have substantial impact on quality of life due to severe pelvic symptoms. We believe that robotic-assisted laparoscopic colorectal resection is a feasible and relatively safe procedure in the context of close collaboration between gynecologists and surgeons for treatment of deep pelvic endometriosis with intestinal involvement, with low rates of complications and significant improvement of intestinal symptoms.


Asunto(s)
Endometriosis/cirugía , Laparoscopía/métodos , Enfermedades del Recto/cirugía , Recto/cirugía , Robótica , Adulto , Pérdida de Sangre Quirúrgica/estadística & datos numéricos , Femenino , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Tempo Operativo , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/epidemiología , Resultado del Tratamiento
6.
Expert Rev Anticancer Ther ; 24(7): 581-587, 2024 Jul.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38676281

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: The classic paradigm for the management of locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) consists of (chemo)radiotherapy (C)RT), total mesorectal excision, and adjuvant chemotherapy (CHT). At present, due to the high rate of distant metastasis (up to 30%), the total neoadjuvant therapy (TNT) with the administration of systemic CHT in the neoadjuvant setting has gained acceptance as standard of care.Our aim is to critically review the current literature on LARC management and summarize the different approaches recently proposed to improve clinical outcomes. It represents a starting step to develop an effective strategy that ultimately could harmonize the standard of care in daily clinical practice. AREAS COVERED: Studies reporting the impact of TNT approaches were deemed eligible. De-escalation strategies, including non-operative management (NOM) after TNT, as well as RT omission or systemic therapy alone, were also investigated. EXPERT OPINION: The year 2020 has seen promising new data from randomized phase III trials in the field of LARC management. Nowadays, TNT strategy has been accepted as the primary treatment for LARC. The role of de-escalation strategies is still unknown. The goal is to achieve better survival outcomes with improving quality of life. Only selected patients are likely to benefit from NOM or immunotherapy alone.


Asunto(s)
Terapia Neoadyuvante , Calidad de Vida , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto , Neoplasias del Recto , Humanos , Neoplasias del Recto/terapia , Neoplasias del Recto/patología , Terapia Neoadyuvante/métodos , Quimioterapia Adyuvante/métodos , Terapia Combinada , Tasa de Supervivencia
7.
J Pers Med ; 14(6)2024 May 28.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38929801

RESUMEN

Acute severe ulcerative colitis (ASUC) is a life-threatening medical emergency with considerable morbidity. Despite recent advances in medical IBD therapy, colectomy rates for ASUC remain high. A scoping review of published articles on ASUC was performed. We collected data, such as general information of the disease, diagnosis and initial assessment, and available medical and surgical treatments focusing on technical aspects of surgical approaches. The most relevant articles were considered in this scoping review. The management of ASUC is challenging; currently, personalized treatment for it is unavailable. Sequential medical therapy should be administrated, preferably in high-volume IBD centers with close patient monitoring and indication for surgery in those cases with persistent symptoms despite medical treatment, complications, and clinical worsening. A total colectomy with end ileostomy is typically performed in the acute setting. Managing rectal stump is challenging, and all individual and technical aspects should be considered. Conversely, when performing elective colectomy for ASUC, a staged surgical procedure is usually preferred, thus optimizing the patients' status preoperatively and minimizing postoperative complications. The minimally invasive approach should be selected whenever technically feasible. Robotic versus laparoscopic ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA) has shown similar outcomes in terms of safety and postoperative morbidity. The transanal approach to ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (Ta-IPAA) is a recent technique for creating an ileal pouch-anal anastomosis via a transanal route. Early experiences suggest comparable short- and medium-term functional results of the transanal technique to those of traditional approaches. However, there is a need for additional comparative outcomes data and a better understanding of the ideal training and implementation pathways for this procedure. This manuscript predominantly explores the surgical treatment of ASUC. Additionally, it provides an overview of currently available medical treatment options that the surgeon should reasonably consider in a multidisciplinary setting.

8.
Ann Ital Chir ; 82(3): 225-8, 2011.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21780566

RESUMEN

Desmoplastic fibroblastoma (DF) is an extremely rare benign soft tissue tumor, prevalent in adult men, mostly arising in deep regions of extremities. The tumor presents with a slowly growing and no recurrence or metastases after surgical excision. Histologically, DF is characterized by a collagenous stroma that contains spindle- and stellated-shaped fibroblastic cells positive for vimentin. Differential diagnosis with locally aggressive soft tissue tumors could be difficult. This case report deals with the clinical pathological and immunoistochemical features of a DF of the left thigh in a 63-years old man.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias de los Tejidos Blandos , Muslo , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Neoplasias de los Tejidos Blandos/diagnóstico
9.
Ann Ital Chir ; 82(2): 117-23, 2011.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21682101

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: We thought to determine the influence of anastomotic leakages (AL) and septic complications (SC) on the incidence of local recurrence (LR) in patients undergoing curative surgery for rectal cancer. METHODS: The records of 479 patients (286 male, 193 female; median age 67 years) who received, between 1966 and 1975 (Group A) and 1976 and 1985 (Group B), curative surgery for middle to low rectal cancer were retrospectively reviewed. All patients received mesorectal excision in the course of abdominoperineal excision (Group A) and of anterior resection with colorectal anastomosis (Group B). The outcome of SC in both groups and that of AL in Group B were investigated. AL were divided into clinical leaks (CL) and radiological leaks (RL). All patients surviving surgery were followed up for a mean period of 71 months. The development of pelvic recurrence was registered. The effect of SC and AL on LR was statistically analyzed. RESULTS: LR was diagnosed in 24 (9.3%) patients of Group A. No difference was detected between patients with SC (9.3%) and those without (9.3%). In Group B, LR occurred in 28 (12.7%) patients: 12.5% without SC and 12.7% with SC. A significant difference in the prevalence of LR was found between patients with CL (14.2%) and those with RL (30.0%). When CL were excluded, RL resulted as an independent predictor of LR. DISCUSSION: Many factors have been shown to affect the rate of LR, including operative technique and surgeon expertise as well as margins of clearance and tumor stage. In our study, overall LR rate of Group B was 13.2%. The incidence of this event in patients with AL (24%) was significantly higher than that in the nonleakage group (11.1%). Correspondent results have been reported by some authors who evidenced RL as a negative prognostic factor for higher rates of LR. The mechanism by which AL affects LR remains to be elucidated. CONCLUSIONS: All were found to be associated with higher rates of LR, especially if associated with prolonged inflammatory local reaction.


Asunto(s)
Fuga Anastomótica/epidemiología , Colectomía/efectos adversos , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia/epidemiología , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia/etiología , Neoplasias del Recto/cirugía , Infección de la Herida Quirúrgica/epidemiología , Infección de la Herida Quirúrgica/etiología , Anciano , Fuga Anastomótica/diagnóstico , Fuga Anastomótica/prevención & control , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Incidencia , Italia/epidemiología , Masculino , Sistemas de Registros Médicos Computarizados , Persona de Mediana Edad , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia/prevención & control , Prevalencia , Pronóstico , Neoplasias del Recto/patología , Estudios Retrospectivos , Infección de la Herida Quirúrgica/diagnóstico , Infección de la Herida Quirúrgica/prevención & control
10.
Ann Ital Chir ; 82(1): 41-8, 2011.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21657154

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: Aim of our study was to identij5 the risk factors for operative morbility and mortality after urgent surgery for complicated sigmoid diverticulitis. A further end point was define the adequate surgical approach in these patients. METHODS: Data fJom 118 patients who were admitted for emergency surgery between 2000 and 2009 for non-haemorrhagic complicated diverticulitis of the sigmoid colon were retrospectively evaluated and analysed. Operative options included resection with primary anastomoses (PA), Hartmann's procedure (HP) and colostomy. All operative complications were noted and potential risk factors listed. RESULTS: One hundred eighteen patients were enrolled in this study. Surgery for peritonitis was indicated for 102 patients and for intestinal obstruction in the remainder. Overall morbidity and mortality rates were 37.3% and 9.3%, respectively. Primary resection was performed on 113 patients (95.8%). Age greater than 70 years, diffuse peritonitis, Mannheim Peritonitis Index (MPI) above 18, and symptoms lasting longer than 24 hours are considered as independent risk factors for operative morbidity and mortality. DISCUSSION: Our results confirmed that while age older than 70 years and delaying treatment (>24h) are independent risk factors for operative morbidity and mortality, comorbidity is not. According to general guidelines, first target of surgery was to attempt a primary resection of the diseased colon (95.8% of our patients). In our series an high rate of Hartmann procedure (HP) in Hinchey's class 2 patients was observed. This unusually high number is explained by the rate (68.4%) of pelviperitonitis diagnosed in these patients. Extended pelvic peritonitis is generally defined as a local peritonitis (class 2 Hinchey), which is not accurate. Colonic resection in these cases would not completely remove peritoneal contamination and renders the indication for PA questionable. CONCLUSIONS: Emergency surgery for complicated diverticulitis is characterised by high rates of morbidity and mortality. Age greater than 70 years, symptoms lasting longer than 24 hours, MPI above 18, and diffuse peritonitis were significant predictors. Early eradication of septic focus is the main goal of surgery. Primary anastomosis is recommended only if sepsis is completely removed.


Asunto(s)
Diverticulitis/cirugía , Tratamiento de Urgencia , Enfermedades del Sigmoide/cirugía , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Retrospectivos
11.
Anticancer Res ; 41(4): 1945-1950, 2021 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33813400

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND/AIM: Endoluminal self-expanding metallic stents (SEMS) may overcome the risk of mortality and morbidity of acute intestinal obstruction because of stage IV colon (CC) or rectal (RC) cancer. We evaluated the QoL in these groups of patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Forty-eight patients were enrolled in a prospective longitudinal cohort single-center trial to undergo SEMS positioning. Twenty-five patients had a CC and 23 RC. Karnofsky performance scale, Visual Analogue Scale and the EQ-5D- 5L™ questionnaire were administered before treatment and at 1, 3 and 6 months. RESULTS: Harmonized to the Italian population, the index values showed a statistically significant deterioration of the QoL in patients with RC when compared to those with CC at 1-, 3- and 6-months (1 month: p=0.001; 3- month: p=0.001; 6-month: p=0.045). Similarly, Visual Analogue Scale showed variations at 1- (p=0.008), 3- (p=0.001) and 6-months (p=0.020). Rectal stent deployment was the only independent predictor for a worse QoL in all domains (p<0.017; OR=0.196; 95%CI=0.51-0.749). CONCLUSION: Patients affected with stage IV CC had a better QoL after SEMS placement when compared to those affected with RC. The persistency of the primary tumor at the rectal level, even if irradiated, might negatively affect QoL.


Asunto(s)
Adenocarcinoma/cirugía , Neoplasias del Colon/cirugía , Calidad de Vida , Neoplasias del Recto/cirugía , Stents Metálicos Autoexpandibles , Adenocarcinoma/patología , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Neoplasias del Colon/patología , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos del Sistema Digestivo/efectos adversos , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos del Sistema Digestivo/instrumentación , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos del Sistema Digestivo/métodos , Progresión de la Enfermedad , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Obstrucción Intestinal/etiología , Obstrucción Intestinal/patología , Obstrucción Intestinal/cirugía , Estudios Longitudinales , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estadificación de Neoplasias , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/etiología , Neoplasias del Recto/patología , Stents Metálicos Autoexpandibles/efectos adversos , Resultado del Tratamiento
12.
Updates Surg ; 71(2): 237-246, 2019 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30097970

RESUMEN

The surgical treatment for patients with generalized peritonitis complicating sigmoid diverticulitis is currently debated; particularly in case of diffuse purulent contamination (Hinchey 3). Laparoscopic lavage and drainage (LLD) has been proposed by some authors as a safe and effective alternative to single- or multi-stage resective surgery. However, among all the different studies on LLD, there is no uniformity in terms of surgical technique adopted and data show significant differences in postoperative outcomes. Aim of this review was to analyze the differences and similarities among the authors in terms of application, surgical technique and outcomes of LLD in Hinchey 3 patients. A bibliographical research was performed by referring to PubMed and Cochrane. "Purulent peritonitis", "Hinchey 3 diverticulitis", "acute diverticulitis", "colonic perforation" and "complicated diverticulitis" were used as key words. Twenty-eight papers were selected, excluding meta-analysis, reviews and case reports with a very small number of patients. The aim of this review was to establish how LLD should be done, suggesting important technical tricks. We found agreement in terms of indications, preoperative management, ports' positioning, antibiotics, enteral feeding and drain management. On the contrast, different statements regarding indications, adhesiolysis and management of colonic hole and failure of laparoscopic lavage are reported. A widespread diffusion of LLD and standardization of its technique are impossible because of data heterogeneity and selection bias in the limited RCTs. It is necessary to wait for long terms results from randomized clinical trials (RCTs) in progress to establish the efficacy and safety of this technique. More importantly, an increased number of highly skilled and dedicated colorectal laparoscopic surgeons are required to standardized the procedure.


Asunto(s)
Diverticulitis del Colon/cirugía , Drenaje/métodos , Laparoscopía/métodos , Peritonitis/cirugía , Enfermedades del Sigmoide/cirugía , Irrigación Terapéutica/métodos , Enfermedad Aguda , Diverticulitis del Colon/complicaciones , Humanos , Peritonitis/complicaciones
13.
Liver Int ; 28(1): 88-94, 2008 Jan.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17971094

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the accuracy of intra-operative ultrasound (IOUS) imaging in detecting liver secondaries at the time of primary colorectal surgery and to evaluate the impact of IOUS on patient management. METHODS: Data from 167 patients with primary colorectal cancer who were admitted for elective surgery between January 1995 and December 2003 were prospectively evaluated and analysed. All patients underwent pre-operative abdominal ultrasonography (US) and computed tomography (CT), as well as IOUS. The final diagnosis of liver metastases was made by means of histological examination of either biopsy or surgical specimens. The sensitivities of pre-operative US and CT were compared with the sensitivity of IOUS, referred to histology. Changes in surgical management owing to IOUS findings were noted. RESULTS: IOUS supplied additional information in the case of 31 patients. In 28 of these patients, this information had a major impact on the intra-operative strategy, in that the procedure was altered. CONCLUSIONS: IOUS is safe, simple to perform and more accurate than pre-operative imaging. It reduces the number of patients subjected to superfluous surgery. The use of IOUS is therefore encouraged during colorectal cancer surgery.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Colorrectales/patología , Neoplasias Hepáticas/diagnóstico por imagen , Neoplasias Hepáticas/secundario , Anciano , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Cuidados Preoperatorios , Sensibilidad y Especificidad , Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos X , Ultrasonografía
14.
Int J Surg ; 49: 22-26, 2018 Jan.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29233788

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Day-case laparoscopic cholecystectomy (DCLC) is not universally adopted and its use is limited to patients selected by non-standardized criteria. Since laparoscopic cholecystectomy is considered technically more difficult in obese patients, a high body mass index (BMI) is often considered an exclusion criterion for DCLC. The aim of this research is to define the feasibility and safety of day case laparoscopic cholecystectomy in obese patients. PRESENTATION OF CASE: Data from 730 consecutive patients preoperatively considered suitable for DCLC were analysed. BMI was not considered as parameter of selection and patients were divided in two groups (Obese, 294; Non-obese, 436) according to a BMI ≥ 30 or < 30 kg/m2, respectively. Outcomes measured were morbidity, open conversion rates, hospitalization rates, length of hospital stay and readmission. Overall morbidity and open conversion rates were similar in both groups. No significant differences were observed among the two groups in terms of hospitalization rates (p 0.0533), early complications (p 0.2536), length of hospital stay (p 0.3780) and readmission rates (p 0.4286). DISCUSSION: Day case laparoscopic cholecystectomy is a widely used surgical technique despite not routinely used in every health system. However, many factors related to the patient and procedure, as well as the expertise of surgical-anesthesiologist team, can influence the feasibility of DCLC. Moreover a well-organized health community system is necessary to protect and follow the patients up. Our readmission and complication rates showed how a day case laparoscopic cholecystectomy, if performed in the right setting, is a safe procedure also for patient with a raised BMI. We enrolled a large population of patients and the statistical analysis demonstrated no significant differences among the obese and non-obese patient regarding the primary and secondary endpoints. CONCLUSIONS: DCLC is a safe and effective procedure in obese patients with morbidity, hospital admission and readmission rates similar to those observed in non-obese patients.


Asunto(s)
Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Ambulatorios/efectos adversos , Colecistectomía Laparoscópica/efectos adversos , Obesidad/complicaciones , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/etiología , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Ambulatorios/métodos , Índice de Masa Corporal , Colecistectomía Laparoscópica/métodos , Estudios de Factibilidad , Femenino , Hospitalización/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Obesidad/cirugía , Reoperación/estadística & datos numéricos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Adulto Joven
15.
Updates Surg ; 69(4): 471-477, 2017 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28474219

RESUMEN

Nowadays laparoscopic approach is accepted as a valid alternative to open surgery for the treatment of colorectal cancer. Several studies consider this approach to be safe and feasible also in obese patients, even if dissection in these patients may require a longer operative time and involve higher blood loss. To facilitate laparoscopic approach, more difficult in these patients, several energy sources for laparoscopic dissection and sealing, has been adopted recently. The aim of this study is to investigate the possible intraoperative advantages of radiofrequency energy in terms of blood loss and operative time in obese patients undergoing laparoscopic resection for cancer. All patients who underwent laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer from January 2010 to December 2015 were registered in a prospective database. Patients with a body mass index BMI (kg/m2) ≥30 were defined as obese, and patients with a BMI (kg/m2) <30 were defined as non-obese. All 136 obese patients observed were divided retrospectively into 2 groups according to the devices used for dissection: 83 patients (Historical group: B) on whom dissection and coagulation were performed using other energy sources (monopolar electrocautery scissors, bipolar electrical energy, ultrasonic coagulating shears) and 53 patients who were treated with electrothermal bipolar vessel sealing (Caiman group: A). In group A, the Laparoscopic Caiman 5 (Aesculap AG, Tuttlingen, Germany) was the only instrument employed in the whole procedure. The study examined only three types of operation: right colectomy (RC), left colectomy (LC), and anterior resection (AR). Preoperative data were similar for RC, LC, and AR in both groups (A and B). The mean operative time was statistically shorter in the Caiman group than in the Historical group [104 vs 124 min (p 0.004), 116 vs 140 min (p 0.004), and 125 vs 151 min (p 0.003) for RC, LC, and AR between group A and B, respectively]. Also intraoperative blood loss results significantly lower in the Caiman group than in the historical one [52 ml vs 93 for RC (p 0.003); 65 vs 120 ml for LC (p 0.001); 93 vs 145 ml for AR (p 0.002) between group A and B, respectively]. No intraoperative complications were recorded in either group. The mean conversion rate was 4.4% (6 patients). There were no statistical differences in intensive care unit (ICU) stay, functional outcomes, mean hospital stay and overall morbidity rate between the two groups. There was no mortality in either group. The use of the Caiman EBVS instrument shows significant advantages with respect to a small number of intraoperative parameters. We can conclude that use of this radiofrequency device, in the laparoscopic approach, offers advantages in terms of lower intraoperative blood loss and shorter operative time in obese patients with colorectal cancer.


Asunto(s)
Ablación por Catéter/métodos , Colectomía/métodos , Neoplasias Colorrectales/complicaciones , Laparoscopía/métodos , Obesidad/complicaciones , Anciano , Ablación por Catéter/efectos adversos , Neoplasias Colorrectales/cirugía , Femenino , Humanos , Periodo Intraoperatorio , Masculino , Estudios Retrospectivos
16.
Arch Surg ; 141(2): 137-42, 2006 Feb.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16490889

RESUMEN

HYPOTHESIS: The treatment of cancer in elderly patients has become a global clinical issue, considering the increasingly longer life expectancy. Three quarters of patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma are older than 60 years. Surgical resection is the only chance of cure, and early outcome of pancreaticoduodenectomy in elderly patients is comparable with that obtained in a younger population. DESIGN: During an 11-year period, 166 patients underwent curative pancreaticoduodenectomy for pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Clinical and demographic factors were evaluated by univariate and multivariate analyses to test their effect on early outcome. SETTING: State university medical school tertiary care center. PATIENTS: One hundred sixty-six patients underwent curative pancreaticoduodenectomy for pancreatic adenocarcinoma. They were divided into 2 groups according to age (group A for patients older than 70 years, group B for patients younger than 70 years). INTERVENTION: Pancreaticoduodenectomy was performed using a Whipple procedure. An end-to-end pancreaticojejunostomy was constructed. Lymphadenectomy was carried out along the hepatoduodenal ligament, common hepatic artery, vena cava, superior mesenteric vein, and along the right side of the superior mesenteric artery. Four abdominal drainage sites were routinely used. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The postoperative hospital stay was calculated and morbidity and mortality were assessed. RESULTS: Significantly higher operative morbidity and mortality were observed in group A (group A, 49.1% vs group B, 45.8% and 10.5% vs 3.7%, respectively). Underlying comorbid conditions in group B patients influenced postoperative morbidity but not mortality. Rate and nature of surgical complications were indicated as causes of significant higher mortality in group B patients. CONCLUSIONS: An aggressive surgical approach is justified for elderly patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma. However, surgical complications that lead to reoperation are responsible for a high mortality in elderly patients. In addition to general causes, such as concomitant disorders, reduced functional reserve, poor tolerance to stress, and the texture of the pancreatic remnant, there are specific prognostic factors affecting pancreaticojejunostomy leakage and related mortality.


Asunto(s)
Adenocarcinoma/cirugía , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/cirugía , Pancreaticoduodenectomía/métodos , Adenocarcinoma/patología , Adulto , Factores de Edad , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estadificación de Neoplasias , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/patología , Estudios Retrospectivos , Resultado del Tratamiento
17.
Anticancer Res ; 25(3c): 2417-21, 2005.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16080468

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Giant intramuscular hemangioma (GIH) is a rare, progressively enlarging benign tumor, characterized by variable presentation and usually initially diagnosed in childhood. Large volume, rapid enlargement and particular radiologic imaging create suspicion of malignancy. Radiologic investigations and needle or small excisional biopsy are not always reliable for an accurate diagnosis; therefore, histology on a large surgical specimen is often requested. The timing and modality of treatment of these tumors is a matter of debate. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Data on 3 patients with GIH of the upper trunk and neck are reported. Associated vascular anomalies were found in all patients. All 3 patients had surgery because of the effect of the growth on their function, the severe symptoms and suspicion of malignancy. RESULTS: A one-step excision of an enormous tumor was carried out in one patient, who died from severe postoperative complications. A second patient was successfully treated by a multistep surgical and multidisciplinary approach. An uneventful removal of part of the tumor was performed on the third patient, who is currently in follow-up for completion of treatment. CONCLUSION: Surgery remains the most effective mode of treatment for GIH and often results in permanent cure. The authors suggest performing the surgical removal of these tumors at first diagnosis, when their smaller size requires less demanding procedures, presents lower rates of morbidity and offers a better chance of complete excision.


Asunto(s)
Hemangioma/cirugía , Neoplasias de los Músculos/cirugía , Adulto , Hemangioma/diagnóstico , Humanos , Masculino , Neoplasias de los Músculos/diagnóstico
18.
Arch Surg ; 137(2): 154-8, 2002 Feb.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11822951

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Management options for symptomatic nonparasitic hepatic cysts (SNHC) lack verification through comparative studies with respect to safety and long-term effectiveness. HYPOTHESIS: Open cystectomy is the treatment of choice for patients with SNHC. SETTING: University hospital department of surgery. PATIENTS: Data were retrospectively analyzed from the clinical charts of 34 patients (26 women and 8 men) undergoing surgery for SNHC from January 1, 1975, through January 1, 1999. Charts were obtained from the original hospital referral. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Morbidity rates and long-term recurrence. We considered the following variables for analysis: age, sex, hepatic cyst location, diameter of the cyst at primary surgery, symptoms, surgical procedure, postoperative morbidity and mortality, length of postoperative hospital stay, and long-term outcome. RESULTS: The 34 patients underwent 47 operations for SNHC (mean diameter, 15.0 cm), with a mean follow-up of 50.0 months. Ten patients underwent open and 8, laparoscopic deroofing of the cyst. Enucleation of the cyst and hepatic resections were performed as primary procedures in 4 and 2 patients, respectively, and as secondary procedures in 6 and 7 patients, respectively. Two recurrences (25%) were found after laparoscopic deroofing and 3 (30%) after open deroofing. Two (50%) and 6 (100%) recurrences were found after cystojejunostomy and needle aspiration, respectively. No symptomatic recurrences occurred after 10 cystectomies and 9 hepatectomies. One operative death (3%) occurred; however, morbidity rates were 18% (6/34) and 15% (2/13) after primary and secondary surgery, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: These results support our policy of performing open radical procedures in the treatment of SNHC; cystectomy is performed for primary surgery and hepatic resections for recurrences and complications. Conservative procedures have shown higher rates of recurrence and the need for further surgery. Only further technological improvements will allow a systematic and safe use of laparoscopy for radical surgery for SNHC.


Asunto(s)
Quistes/cirugía , Hepatopatías/cirugía , Adulto , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Complicaciones Posoperatorias , Recurrencia , Estudios Retrospectivos , Resultado del Tratamiento
19.
Arch Surg ; 138(1): 80-5, 2003 Jan.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12511157

RESUMEN

HYPOTHESIS: To verify the adequacy of duodenal segmentectomy after intestinal derotation in the treatment of primary adenocarcinoma of the third and fourth portions of the duodenum. DESIGN: A retrospective review of the surgical management of patients who underwent derotation of the third and fourth portions of the duodenum was undertaken to determine long-term outcome. SETTING: Departments of surgery in 3 university hospitals. PATIENTS: Between January 1, 1980, and December 31, 2000, 47 patients with primary adenocarcinoma of the third and fourth portions of the duodenum were surgically treated at 3 different institutions. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Details of primary surgery were abstracted from clinical records of the original hospital referral. Postoperative clinical course and long-term outcome were evaluated by a review of the hospital records and follow-up. RESULTS: The results of a barium swallow test series was positive in 38 cases (80.8%) and esophagogastroduodenoscopy was primarily diagnostic in 30 patients (63.8%). In all cases duodenal segmentectomy was attempted. Twenty-two patients underwent palliative gastrojejunal bypass and in 9 patients pancreaticoduodenectomy was performed. In 16 cases duodenal segmentectomy was performed after intestinal derotation. Anastomoses were performed manually in all cases. Fifteen of the resected patients died of recurrent disease. A median (SD) disease-free survival of 36 (23.6) months (range, 6-85 months) was observed. The median (SD) overall survival was 37.5 (23.9) months (range, 11-85 months), the overall 5-year survival rate was 23% (11 patients), and the actuarial 5-year survival rate was 51% (24 patients). CONCLUSIONS: Duodenal segmentectomy associated with intestinal derotation was shown to be a straightforward, safe procedure for the treatment of the primary adenocarcinoma of the third and fourth portions of the duodenum. This surgical procedure should be preferred to pancreaticoduodenectomy because it is associated with negligible rates of morbidity and mortality, while allowing for satisfactory margin clearance and adequate lymphadenectomy.


Asunto(s)
Adenocarcinoma/cirugía , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos del Sistema Digestivo/métodos , Neoplasias Duodenales/cirugía , Pancreaticoduodenectomía/métodos , Adulto , Anciano , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos del Sistema Digestivo/normas , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Retrospectivos , Resultado del Tratamiento
20.
World J Gastroenterol ; 20(14): 3889-904, 2014 Apr 14.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24744579

RESUMEN

Gastric cancer is one of the leading causes of death for cancer worldwide, although geographical variations in incidence exist. Over the last decades, its incidence and mortality have gradually decreased in Western countries, while these have increased, or remained stable, in the other world regions. Gastric cancer is often diagnosed at an advanced stage, with the only notable exception of Japan, where nationwide screening programs are enforced, due to local high incidence. Curative- intent surgery (i.e., gastrectomy, total or partial, and lymphadenectomy) remains the cornerstone of treatment of gastric cancer. Much has been debated about the extent of lymph node dissection and, although it is a valuable contribution to staging and cure, operative treatment only represents one aspect of overall effective management, as the risk of both locoregional and distant recurrences are high, and bear a poor prognosis. As a matter of fact, surgery, as a single modality treatment, has probably achieved its maximum efficacy for local control and survival, while other accompanying nonsurgical treatment modalities have to be taken into account, although their role is still the subject of considerable debate. The authors in this review present an update on the outcome of treatment of gastric cancer in relation to the extent of lymphadenectomy and of various nonsurgical preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative strategies.


Asunto(s)
Escisión del Ganglio Linfático , Neoplasias Gástricas/cirugía , Antineoplásicos/uso terapéutico , Quimioterapia Adyuvante , Gastrectomía , Humanos , Infusiones Parenterales , Japón , Metástasis Linfática , Terapia Neoadyuvante , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia/cirugía , Periodo Perioperatorio , Periodo Posoperatorio , Periodo Preoperatorio , Radioterapia , Estómago/patología
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA