Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 118
Filtrar
Más filtros

Bases de datos
País/Región como asunto
Tipo del documento
Intervalo de año de publicación
2.
Ann Oncol ; 28(11): 2820-2826, 2017 Nov 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28950305

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: B490 (EudraCT# 2011-002564-24) is a randomized, phase 2b, noninferiority study investigating the efficacy and safety of first-line cetuximab plus cisplatin with/without paclitaxel (CetCis versus CetCisPac) in patients with recurrent and/or metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (R/M SCCHN). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Eligible patients had confirmed R/M SCCHN (oral cavity/oropharynx/larynx/hypopharynx/paranasal sinus) and no prior therapy for R/M disease. Cetuximab was administered on day 1 (2-h infusion, 400 mg/m2), then weekly (1-h infusions, 250 mg/m2). Cisplatin was given as a 1-h infusion (CetCis arm: 100 mg/m2; CetCisPac arm: 75 mg/m2) on day 1 of each cycle for a maximum of six cycles. Paclitaxel was administered as a 3-h infusion (175 mg/m2) on day 1 of each cycle. After six cycles, maintenance cetuximab was administered until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. The primary end point was progression-free survival (PFS). We assumed a noninferiority margin of 1.40 as compatible with efficacy. RESULTS: A total of 201 patients were randomized 1 : 1 to each regimen; 191 were assessable. PFS with CetCis (median, 6 months) was noninferior to PFS with CetCisPac (median, 7 months) [HR for CetCis versus CetCisPac 0.99; 95% CI: 0.72-1.36, P = 0.906; margin of noninferiority (90% CI of 1.4) not reached]. Median overall survival was 13 versus 11 months (HR = 0.77; 95% CI: 0.53-1.11, P = 0.117). The overall response rates were 41.8% versus 51.7%, respectively (OR = 0.69; 95% CI: 0.38-1.20, P = 0.181). Grade ≥3 adverse event rates were 76% and 73% for CetCis versus CetCisPac, respectively, while grade 4 toxicities were lower in the two-drug versus three-drug arm (14% versus 33%, P = 0.015). No toxic death or sepsis were reported and cardiac events were negligible (1%). CONCLUSION: The two-drug CetCis regimen proved to be noninferior in PFS to a three-drug combination with CetCisPac. The median OS of both regimens is comparable with that observed in EXTREME, while the life-threatening toxicity rate appeared reduced. CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER: EudraCT# 2011-002564-24.


Asunto(s)
Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapéutico , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias de Cabeza y Cuello/tratamiento farmacológico , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia/tratamiento farmacológico , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas/secundario , Cetuximab/administración & dosificación , Cisplatino/administración & dosificación , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Neoplasias de Cabeza y Cuello/patología , Humanos , Metástasis Linfática , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia/patología , Paclitaxel/administración & dosificación , Pronóstico , Tasa de Supervivencia
3.
Ann Oncol ; 28(3): 555-561, 2017 03 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27864220

RESUMEN

Background: Regorafenib and TAS-102 have recently demonstrated statistically significant survival gains in patients with refractory metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). Life expectancy ≥12 weeks was an inclusion criterion in registrative trials, and the identification of proper clinical selection tools for the daily use of these drugs in heavily pre-treated patients is needed to improve the cost-benefit ratio. We aimed at building a nomogram able to predict death probability within 12 weeks from the date of assessment of refractory mCRC. Patients and methods: Four hundred eleven refractory mCRC patients with ECOG performance status (PS) ≤2 receiving regorafenib, TAS-102 or other treatments were used as developing set. Putative prognostic variables were selected using a random forest model and included in a binary logistic model from which the nomogram was developed. The nomogram was externally validated and its performance was evaluated by examining calibration (how close predictions were to the actual outcome) and discriminative ability (Harrell C index) both on developing (internal validation) and validating (external validation) sets. Results: Four variables were selected and included in the nomogram: PS (P < 0.0001), primary tumor resection (P = 0.027), LDH value (P = 0.0001) and peritoneal involvement (P = 0.081). In the developing set, the nomogram discriminative ability was high (C = 0.778), and was confirmed in the validating set (C = 0.778), where the overall outcome was better as a consequence of the enrichment in patients receiving regorafenib or TAS-102 (46% versus 34%; P < 0.0001). Conclusions: Our nomogram may be a useful tool to predict the probability of death within 12 weeks in patients with refractory mCRC. Based on four easy-to-collect variables, the 'Colon Life' nomogram and free app for smartphones may improve mCRC patients' selection for later-line therapies and assist researchers for the enrollment in clinical trials in this setting.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Colorrectales/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias Colorrectales/patología , Análisis Costo-Beneficio , Nomogramas , Anciano , Colon/efectos de los fármacos , Colon/patología , Neoplasias Colorrectales/mortalidad , Supervivencia sin Enfermedad , Combinación de Medicamentos , Femenino , Humanos , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Metástasis de la Neoplasia , Compuestos de Fenilurea/administración & dosificación , Pronóstico , Modelos de Riesgos Proporcionales , Piridinas/administración & dosificación , Pirrolidinas , Timina , Trifluridina/administración & dosificación , Uracilo/administración & dosificación , Uracilo/análogos & derivados
4.
Pharmacogenomics J ; 17(4): 331-336, 2017 07.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27001121

RESUMEN

Single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) related to hereditary thrombophilia were investigated as risk factors for thromboembolism in cancer patients. Their effect in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) has never been explored so far. Our aim was to analyse the effect of coagulation factor V (FVL G1691A), prothrombin (PT G20210A), methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase (MTHFR C677T and A1298C) and plasminogen activator inhibitor type 1 (PAI-1 5G/4G) allelic variants in this setting. Fifty-two patients treated with first-line chemotherapy plus bevacizumab who developed a thromboembolic event in their lifetime were initially genotyped. A contemporary cohort of 127 patients who did not experience any thromboembolic event was also analysed. DNA was extracted from peripheral blood and genotypes were determined by real-time PCR, using LightSNiP (TIB MOLBIOL) on LightCcler 480 (Roche). The association between thromboembolism and SNPs was investigated by univariable and multivariable analyses. All SNPs were in Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium (χ2 test P>0.20). FVL G1691A and PT G20210A were present only in heterozygosis in 4 (2.2%) and 7 (3.9%) patients, respectively; MTHFR C677T in homozygosis in 29 (16.2%), MTHFR A1298C in homozygosis in 13 (7.3%); PAI-1 5G/4G in 98 (54.7%) and 4G/4G in 41 (23%) patients. At univariable analysis, treatment duration was significantly associated with thromboembolism (P<0.001), whereas gender, age, obesity, platelets count and chemotherapy backbone were not. Similarly, FVL G1691A and PT G20210A as well as MTHFR C677T and PAI-1 4G allele were significantly associated, whereas MTHFR A1298C was not. At multivariable model including PT G20210A, MTHFR C677T and PAI-1 4G (age, obesity, treatment duration and chemotherapy backbone were included as adjustment factors), the three SNPs were significantlty associated with higher risk of thromboembolism (P=0.025, <0.0001 and P=0.033, respectively). Further validation studies are warranted in order to design a prospective trial of thromboprophylaxis in mCRC patients with high-risk genotypes.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Colorrectales/genética , Factor V/genética , Metilenotetrahidrofolato Reductasa (NADPH2)/genética , Inhibidor 1 de Activador Plasminogénico/genética , Polimorfismo de Nucleótido Simple/genética , Protrombina/genética , Tromboembolia/genética , Adulto , Anciano , Alelos , Bevacizumab/uso terapéutico , Neoplasias Colorrectales/tratamiento farmacológico , Femenino , Predisposición Genética a la Enfermedad/genética , Genotipo , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Prospectivos , Riesgo
5.
Am J Transplant ; 16(10): 2892-2902, 2016 10.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27134017

RESUMEN

Selection criteria and benefit of liver transplantation for hepatic metastases from neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) remain uncertain. Eighty-eight consecutive patients with metastatic NETs eligible for liver transplantation according to Milan-NET criteria were offered transplant (n = 42) versus nontransplant options (n = 46) depending on list dynamics, patient disposition, and age. Tumor burden between groups did not differ. Transplant patients were younger (40.5 vs. 55.5 years; p < 0.001). Long-term outcomes were compared after matching between groups made on multiple Cox models adjusted for propensity score built on logistic models. Survival benefit was the difference in mean survival between transplant versus nontransplant options. No patients were lost or died without recurrence. Median follow-up was 122 months. The transplant group showed a significant advantage over nontransplant strategies at 5 and 10 years in survival (97.2% and 88.8% vs. 50.9% and 22.4%, respectively; p < 0.001) and time-to-progression (13.1% and 13.1% vs. 83.5% and 89%; p < 0.001). After adjustment for propensity score, survival advantage of the transplant group was significant (hazard ratio = 7.4; 95% confidence interval (CI): 2.4-23.0; p = 0.001). Adjusted transplant-related survival benefit was 6.82 months (95% CI: 1.10-12.54; p = 0.019) and 38.43 months (95% CI: 21.41-55.45; p < 0.001) at 5 and 10 years, respectively. Liver transplantation for metastatic NETs under restrictive criteria provides excellent long-term outcome. Transplant-related survival benefit increases over time and maximizes after 10 years.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Hepáticas/terapia , Trasplante de Hígado , Tumores Neuroendocrinos/patología , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Supervivencia de Injerto , Humanos , Neoplasias Hepáticas/secundario , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Tumores Neuroendocrinos/cirugía , Selección de Paciente , Pronóstico , Estudios Prospectivos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Tasa de Supervivencia , Adulto Joven
6.
Ann Oncol ; 27(1): 49-61, 2016 Jan.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26487582

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The efficacy and safety of a combination of chemotherapeutic agent compared with single-agent chemotherapy in the second-line setting of advanced urothelial carcinoma (UC) are unclear. We aimed to study the survival impact of single-agent compared with doublet chemotherapy as second-line chemotherapy of advanced UC. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Literature was searched for studies including single-agent or doublet chemotherapy in the second-line setting after platinum-based chemotherapy. Random-effects models were used to pool trial-level data according to treatment arm, including median progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), objective response rate (ORR) probability, and grade 3-4 toxicity. Univariable and multivariable analyses, including sensitivity analyses, were carried out, adjusting for the percent of patients with ECOG performance status ≥1 and hepatic metastases. RESULTS: Forty-six arms of trials including 1910 patients were selected: 22 arms with single agent (n = 1202) and 24 arms with doublets (n = 708). The pooled ORR with single agents was 14.2% [95% confidence interval (CI) 11.1-17.9] versus 31.9% [95% CI 27.3-36.9] with doublet chemotherapy. Pooled median PFS was 2.69 and 4.05 months, respectively. The pooled median OS was 6.98 and 8.50 months, respectively. Multivariably, the odds ratio for ORR and the pooled median difference of PFS were statistically significant (P < 0.001 and P = 0.002) whereas the median difference in OS was not (P = 0.284). When including single-agent vinflunine or taxanes only, differences were significant only for ORR (P < 0.001) favoring doublet chemotherapy. No statistically significant differences in grade 3-4 toxicity were seen between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: Despite significant improvements in ORR and PFS, doublet regimens did not extend OS compared with single agents for the second-line chemotherapy of UC. Prospective trials are necessary to elucidate the role of combination chemotherapy, with or without targeted agents, in the salvage setting. Currently, improvements in this field should be pursued considering single-agent chemotherapy as the foundation for new more active combinations.


Asunto(s)
Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapéutico , Carcinoma de Células Transicionales/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias de la Vejiga Urinaria/tratamiento farmacológico , Carcinoma de Células Transicionales/mortalidad , Carcinoma de Células Transicionales/secundario , Supervivencia sin Enfermedad , Humanos , Terapia Recuperativa , Resultado del Tratamiento , Neoplasias de la Vejiga Urinaria/mortalidad , Neoplasias de la Vejiga Urinaria/patología
7.
Br J Surg ; 102(9): 1079-87, 2015 Aug.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26041724

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: More than 60 per cent of patients treated surgically for primary retroperitoneal sarcoma survive for at least 5 years. Extended surgical resection has been proposed for primary disease, but long-term morbidity data are lacking. A cross-sectional study was conducted to assess the long-term morbidity of patients undergoing surgery for retroperitoneal sarcoma. METHODS: Patients operated on between January 2002 and December 2011 were eligible for the study. Long-term morbidity was evaluated based on a semistructured clinical interview. Lower limb function was assessed by means of the Lower Extremity Functional Scale (LEFS), a self-report questionnaire with a total score ranging from 0 (low functioning) to 80 (high functioning). Pain was investigated by means of the Brief Pain Inventory--Short Form, with pain intensity scores reported on a scale from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst pain). RESULTS: Some 243 patients underwent surgery, and 101 of 160 patients who were alive at the time of the investigation responded to the study invitation letter. Finally, 95 patients were enrolled in the study. Sensory impairment of the limbs was reported in 72 patients (76 per cent). The median LEFS score was 60 (i.q.r. 43-73). Mean scores for the pain intensity items varied from 1.23 to 2.68. In multivariable analysis, there was no difference in median levels of creatinine at survey between patients who did or did not undergo nephrectomy (difference between median values 13 (95 per cent c.i. -4 to 30) µmol/l; P = 0.170). CONCLUSION: Severe chronic pain and lower limb motor impairment after multivisceral resection for retroperitoneal sarcomas are rare. Long-term renal function is not significantly impaired when nephrectomy is performed.


Asunto(s)
Complicaciones Posoperatorias/epidemiología , Neoplasias Retroperitoneales/cirugía , Sarcoma/cirugía , Adulto , Dolor Crónico/diagnóstico , Dolor Crónico/epidemiología , Dolor Crónico/etiología , Estudios Transversales , Evaluación de la Discapacidad , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Entrevistas como Asunto , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Dimensión del Dolor , Dolor Postoperatorio/diagnóstico , Dolor Postoperatorio/epidemiología , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/diagnóstico , Estudios Retrospectivos , Encuestas y Cuestionarios
8.
Ann Oncol ; 25(3): 694-699, 2014 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24510315

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: To date, no treatment modality has been identified as more effective for oropharyngeal cancer (OPC), and no predictive factors are known to guide treatment decision for this disease. This retrospective study evaluates the differential effects of diverse treatment options for OPC according to patient risk profiles. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We considered two series of locally advanced squamous cell OPC patients treated with either surgery followed by radiotherapy (surgical series) or chemoradiation (CRT) with/without induction docetaxel, cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil (TPF) chemotherapy (CRT series). Smoking habits, tumor p16 expression/human papillomavirus (HPV) status and T and N stage were analyzed to stratify the patients according to Ang's risk profile (low, intermediate and high risk). Overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival were calculated with the Kaplan-Meier method. RESULTS: Globally, 171 patients were considered, 56 in surgical and 115 in CRT series. Patients were stratified in low- (20% of surgical and CRT groups), intermediate- (23% and 41%) and high-risk (57% and 39%) groups. In the surgical series, 5-year OS was 54.5%, 46.9% and 40.0% in low, intermediate and high Ang's risk profiles, respectively, whereas in the CRT series those were 100%, 78.9% and 46.7%, respectively. In the multivariable analyses, adjusting for inhomogeneity between the treatment group, the CRT effect was significantly higher in the low- and intermediate-risk groups (P-value for the interaction treatment risk group = 0.034 in the OS analysis). CONCLUSIONS: In this retrospective analysis, low- and intermediate-risk OPC patients had a better survival when treated with CRT compared with open surgery followed by radiation therapy. These data suggest that different treatment approaches might be essential in determining outcome results.


Asunto(s)
Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapéutico , Neoplasias Orofaríngeas/radioterapia , Neoplasias Orofaríngeas/cirugía , Infecciones por Papillomavirus/patología , Anciano , Antimetabolitos Antineoplásicos/uso terapéutico , Antineoplásicos/uso terapéutico , Quimioradioterapia , Cisplatino/uso terapéutico , Inhibidor p16 de la Quinasa Dependiente de Ciclina/biosíntesis , Supervivencia sin Enfermedad , Docetaxel , Femenino , Fluorouracilo/uso terapéutico , Humanos , Estimación de Kaplan-Meier , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estadificación de Neoplasias , Papillomaviridae/aislamiento & purificación , Estudios Retrospectivos , Taxoides/uso terapéutico , Centros de Atención Terciaria , Resultado del Tratamiento
9.
medRxiv ; 2024 May 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38746112

RESUMEN

Background: Although enlargement of the lateral ventricles was previously observed in individuals with mood disorders, the link between ventricular size and asymmetry with other indices of brain structure remains underexplored. In this study, we examined the association of lateral ventricular size and asymmetry with cortical myelin content in individuals with bipolar (BD) and depressive (DD) disorders compared to healthy controls (HC). Methods: Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) was used to obtain T1w and T2w images from 149 individuals (age=27.7 (SD=6.1) years, 78% female, BD=38, DD=57, HC=54). Cortical myelin content was calculated using the T1w/T2w ratio. Elastic net regularized regression identified brain regions whose myelin content was associated with ventricular size and asymmetry. A post-hoc linear regression examined how participants' diagnosis, illness duration, and current level of depression moderated the relationship between the size and asymmetry of the lateral ventricles and levels of cortical myelin in the selected brain regions. Results: Individuals with mood disorders had larger lateral ventricles than HC. Larger ventricles and lower asymmetry were observed in individuals with BD who had longer lifetime illness duration and more severe current depressive symptoms. A greater left asymmetry was observed in participants with DD than in those with BD (p<0.01). Elastic net revealed that both ventricular enlargement and asymmetry were associated with altered myelin content in cingulate, frontal, and sensorimotor cortices. In BD, but not other groups, ventricular enlargement was related to altered myelin content in the right insular regions. Conclusions: Lateral ventricular enlargement and asymmetry are linked to myelin content imbalance, thus, potentially leading to emotional and cognitive dysfunction in mood disorders.

10.
Ann Oncol ; 24(12): 2967-71, 2013 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24063860

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The ROSORC trial, a randomised, phase II trial comparing sorafenib plus interleukin (IL-2) versus sorafenib alone as first-line treatment of metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) failed to demonstrate differences in progression-free survival (PFS). Updated overall survival (OS) results are reported. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In this study, 128 patients were randomised to receive sorafenib 400 mg twice daily plus subcutaneous IL-2 4.5 million international units (MIU) five times per week for 6 weeks every 8 weeks (arm A) or sorafenib alone (arm B). OS was estimated with the Kaplan-Meier method and compared with the two-sided log-rank test. RESULTS: After a median follow-up of 58 months (interquartile range: 28-63 months), the median OS was 38 and 33 months in arms A and B, respectively (P = 0.667). The 5-year OS was 26.3% [95% confidence interval (CI) 15.9-43.5) and 23.1% (95% CI 13.2-40.5) for the combination- and single-agent arm, respectively. Most of the patients who were refractory to first-line treatment were subsequently treated with different targeted agents; they had a median survival greater than expected. CONCLUSIONS: This outcome suggests a synergistic effect of the subsequent therapies following sorafenib failure. CLINICALTRIALSGOV IDENTIFIER: NCT00609401.


Asunto(s)
Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapéutico , Carcinoma de Células Renales/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias Renales/tratamiento farmacológico , Anciano , Carcinoma de Células Renales/mortalidad , Carcinoma de Células Renales/secundario , Supervivencia sin Enfermedad , Femenino , Humanos , Interleucina-2/administración & dosificación , Estimación de Kaplan-Meier , Neoplasias Renales/mortalidad , Neoplasias Renales/patología , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Niacinamida/administración & dosificación , Niacinamida/análogos & derivados , Compuestos de Fenilurea/administración & dosificación , Modelos de Riesgos Proporcionales , Sorafenib , Resultado del Tratamiento
11.
Ann Oncol ; 24(8): 2181-9, 2013 Aug.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23562930

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Head and neck soft tissue sarcomas (STS) represent a rare disease. PATIENTS AND METHODS: One hundred and sixty-seven patients underwent surgery at our institution with an eradicating intent between 1990 and 2010. Local recurrence (LR), distant metastasis (DM) and disease-specific mortality (DSM) incidence were studied along with clinicopathological prognostic factors. RESULTS: Ten-year crude cumulative incidence (CCI) of LR, DM and DSM were 19%, 11% and 26%, respectively (median follow-up 66 months). Independent prognostic factors for DSM were tumor size (P < 0.001) and grade (P = 0.032), while surgical margins obtained a border-line significance (0.070); LR was affected by the tumor size (P = 0.001), while DM only by grade (P = 0.047). The median survival after LR and DM were 14 months and 7 months, respectively. Tumors sited in the paranasal sinus and supraclavicular region had the worst survival. CONCLUSIONS: Head and neck represent a very critical anatomical site for STS. Achievement of local disease control appears to be crucial, since even LR could be a life-threatening event.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias de Cabeza y Cuello/mortalidad , Metástasis de la Neoplasia , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia/mortalidad , Sarcoma/mortalidad , Supervivencia sin Enfermedad , Neoplasias de Cabeza y Cuello/radioterapia , Neoplasias de Cabeza y Cuello/cirugía , Humanos , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia/radioterapia , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia/cirugía , Estudios Retrospectivos , Sarcoma/radioterapia , Sarcoma/cirugía , Sobrevida , Resultado del Tratamiento
12.
ESMO Open ; 8(3): 101578, 2023 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37270870

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Transgender and gender-diverse (TGD) population represents an underserved group across the cancer care continuum. To assess the perspective of both oncology health care providers (OHPs) and TGD individuals in Italy, we conducted two national surveys: one among 2407 OHPs about their attitudes, knowledge and behavior toward TGD patients, and one among TGD persons about their health needs, experiences and barriers encountered in the use of health services across the cancer continuum. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The surveys were self-compiled web-based computer-aided web interview, conducted in Italy within the 'OncoGender-Promoting Inclusion in Oncology' project, led by the Italian national cancer society [Associazione Italiana di Oncologia Medica (AIOM)]-associated researchers. All members of AIOM were invited by e-mail to participate in the OHP survey. TGD persons were reached through advocacy groups and consumers' panel. The recruitment was completed on a voluntary basis. Survey data were collected and managed using an online platform managed by ELMA Research, an independent pharmaceutical marketing agency. RESULTS: A total of 305 OHPs (13% of AIOM members) and 190 TGD individuals participated in the surveys. Only 19% of OHPs felt competent in providing care to TGD patients and 21% declared not to feel comfortable in treating TGD patients. Seventy-one percent of TGD persons reported that they had never joined any cancer screening program; 32% reported one or more acts of discrimination by health care providers. Seventy-two percent of OHPs recognized the lack of specific education on cancer care for TGD patients and deemed it necessary to receive adequate training. CONCLUSIONS: A general lack of knowledge among OHPs about TGD health issues seems to be the main driver of difficulties in providing assistance and of discriminatory attitudes against TGD individuals. Ultimately, this whole issue generates access barriers and contributes to lack of trust in health care services. Educational interventions and an implementation of person-centric cancer policies are urgently needed.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias , Personas Transgénero , Humanos , Identidad de Género , Accesibilidad a los Servicios de Salud , Servicios de Salud , Oncología Médica , Neoplasias/terapia
13.
Ann Oncol ; 23(4): 1067-73, 2012 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21765179

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The purpose of the study was to retrospectively reassess in our institutional series at a longer follow-up the value of a systematic attempt to carry out wide resections in retroperitoneal soft tissue sarcoma. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Three hundred and thirty-one consecutive patients surgically treated were analyzed. Since a shift toward a systematic more extended surgical approach took place starting from 2002, patients were divided in two groups according to the time of surgery. Overall survival (OS), crude cumulative incidence of local recurrence (LR) and distant metastases (DMs) were estimated. Cox model multivariate analysis was carried out. RESULTS: Five-year OS of patients operated in the recent period was 66%, compared with 48% for those operated in the previous period. This was associated with less LR (28% versus 49%), while the number of DMs was higher in the recent group (25% versus 12%). Beside the treatment period, the only independent determinant for survival was histological grade. CONCLUSIONS: The adoption of a policy of more liberal visceral en bloc resections was associated with a higher local control and OS. This benefit was evident in patients with grade I-II tumors, while DMs were a limiting factor in high-grade ones. New therapies are needed to control systemic disease as local surgery may improve local control.


Asunto(s)
Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia , Neoplasias Retroperitoneales/cirugía , Sarcoma/cirugía , Anciano , Femenino , Humanos , Estimación de Kaplan-Meier , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Análisis Multivariante , Modelos de Riesgos Proporcionales , Neoplasias Retroperitoneales/mortalidad , Neoplasias Retroperitoneales/patología , Estudios Retrospectivos , Sarcoma/mortalidad , Sarcoma/patología
14.
Ann Oncol ; 23(7): 1832-7, 2012 Jul.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22115925

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Tumor human papillomavirus (HPV) status strongly affects overall survival (OS) of oropharyngeal cancer (OPC) patients. Recently, three groups with different outcomes were identified based on HPV status, smoking history and tumor stage. Our objective was to validate this model using a single-institutional retrospective database. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients (n=120) diagnosed with OPC at our institution, treated with concomitant cisplatin plus radiotherapy (RT) (n=64), induction chemotherapy followed by concomitant chemoradiation (n=39) or RT alone (n=17), were stratified in three groups with respect to the risk of death (low 26, intermediate 46 and high 49 patients) according to tumor p16 expression as surrogate of HPV status, pack-years of tobacco smoking and nodal/tumor stage. Group-stratified Kaplan-Meier OS curves were estimated and compared using the log-rank test. RESULTS: The 2-year OS estimates were 100%, 86% and 70%, respectively. The difference between the survival curves was statistically significant (P=0.009). The Harrell's concordance index was 0.70. The calibration plot showed a good concordance between our results and those observed in the original study. CONCLUSIONS: This study validates the risk grouping previously identified. Risk-driven clinical decision making and trial designs will help in better defining the most appropriate treatment in OPC patients.


Asunto(s)
Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapéutico , Neoplasias Orofaríngeas/patología , Neoplasias Orofaríngeas/virología , Infecciones por Papillomavirus/complicaciones , Fumar/efectos adversos , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Quimioradioterapia , Supervivencia sin Enfermedad , Femenino , Genes p16 , Humanos , Quimioterapia de Inducción , Estimación de Kaplan-Meier , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estadificación de Neoplasias , Neoplasias Orofaríngeas/mortalidad , Neoplasias Orofaríngeas/terapia , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Riesgo
15.
Ann Surg Oncol ; 19(11): 3361-7, 2012 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22843188

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The duodenum is a rare site of primary gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST). Overall (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) after limited resection (LR) versus pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) were studied. METHODS: All patients who underwent surgery for primary, localized duodenal GIST between 2000 and 2011 were identified from four prospective institutional databases. OS and DFS were calculated by Kaplan-Meier method. Univariate analysis was performed. RESULTS: Eighty-four patients (median follow-up 42 months) underwent LR (n = 56, 67%) or PD (n = 28, 33%). Patients in the PD group had a larger median tumor size (7 cm vs. 5 cm, p = 0.024) and higher mitotic count (39% vs. 19% >5/50 high-power fields, p = 0.05). Complications were observed in five patients (9%) in the LR group and ten patients (36%) in the PD group. OS and DFS for the entire cohort were 89% and 64% at 5 years, respectively. No difference in outcome between LR and PD were observed. Eleven patients were treated with preoperative IM. A major RECIST response was obtained in nine (80%), whereas two had stable disease. Twenty-three patients received postoperative Imatinib (IM). A trend toward a better OS in IM-treated patients could be detected only in the high-risk group. CONCLUSIONS: Type of duodenal resection does not impact outcome. The choice should be determined by duodenal site of origin and tumor size. IM may be considered in cases at high risk of recurrence; in neoadjuvant setting, IM might facilitate resection and possibly increase the chance of preserving normal biliary and pancreatic anatomy.


Asunto(s)
Antineoplásicos/uso terapéutico , Neoplasias Duodenales/patología , Neoplasias Duodenales/terapia , Tumores del Estroma Gastrointestinal/patología , Tumores del Estroma Gastrointestinal/terapia , Piperazinas/uso terapéutico , Pirimidinas/uso terapéutico , Adulto , Anciano , Benzamidas , Quimioterapia Adyuvante , Supervivencia sin Enfermedad , Femenino , Humanos , Mesilato de Imatinib , Estimación de Kaplan-Meier , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Índice Mitótico , Pancreaticoduodenectomía/efectos adversos , Modelos de Riesgos Proporcionales , Estudios Retrospectivos
16.
J Cancer Res Clin Oncol ; 148(4): 775-781, 2022 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35037102

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Mammographic density (MD) is a risk factor for breast cancer (BC) development, and recurrence. However, its predictive value has been less studied. Herein, we challenged MD as a biomarker associated with response in patients treated with neoadjuvant therapy (NAT). METHODS: Data on all NAT treated BC patients prospectively collected in the registry of Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milano, Italy (2009-2019) were identified. Diagnostic mammograms were used to evaluate and score MD as categorized by the Breast Imaging-Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS), which identifies 4 levels of MD in keeping with relative increase of fibro-glandular over fat tissue. Each case was classified according to the following categories a (MD < 25%), b (26-50%), c (51-75%), and d (> 75%). The association between MD and pathological complete response (pCR), i.e., absence of BC cells in surgical specimens, was analyzed in multivariable setting used logistic regression models with adjustment for clinical and pathological variables. RESULTS: A total of 442 patients were analyzed, 120 of which (27.1%) attained a pCR. BI-RADS categories a, b, c, and d accounted for 10.0%, 37.8%, 37.1% and 15.2% of cases. Corresponding pCR were 20.5%, 26.9%, 30.5%, 23.9%, respectively. At multivariable analysis, when compared to cases classified as BI-RADS a, those with denser breast showed an increased likelihood of pCR with odds ratio (OR) of 1.70, 2.79, and 1.47 for b, c and d categories, respectively (p = 0.0996), independently of age, BMI [OR underweight versus (vs) normal = 3.76], clinical nodal and tumor status (OR T1/Tx vs T4 = 3.87), molecular subtype (HER2-positive vs luminal = 10.74; triple-negative vs luminal = 8.19). In subgroup analyses, the association of MD with pCR was remarkable in triple-negative (ORs of b, c and d versus a: 1.85, 2.49 and 1.55, respectively) and HER2-positive BC cases (ORs 2.70, 3.23, and 1.16). CONCLUSION: Patients with dense breast are more likely to attain a pCR at net of other predictive factors. The potential of MD to assist decisions on BC management and as a stratification factor in neoadjuvant clinical trials should be considered.


Asunto(s)
Densidad de la Mama , Neoplasias de la Mama , Neoplasias de la Mama/diagnóstico por imagen , Neoplasias de la Mama/tratamiento farmacológico , Femenino , Humanos , Mamografía , Terapia Neoadyuvante , Oportunidad Relativa , Receptor ErbB-2
17.
Br J Cancer ; 104(8): 1256-61, 2011 Apr 12.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21448165

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Preclinical investigations support combining sorafenib with IL-2 in the treatment of metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC). METHODS: In this open-label, phase II study, 128 patients with mRCC were randomised to receive oral sorafenib, 400 mg twice daily, plus subcutaneous IL-2, 4.5 million international units (MIU) five times per week for 6 in every 8 weeks, or sorafenib alone. After enrolment of the first 40 patients, IL-2 dose was reduced to improve the tolerability. RESULTS: After a median follow-up of 27 months, median progression-free survival (PFS) was 33 weeks with sorafenib plus IL-2, and 30 weeks with sorafenib alone (P=0.109). For patients receiving the initial higher dose of IL-2, median PFS was 43 weeks vs 31 weeks for those receiving the lower dose. The most common adverse events were asthenia, hand-foot syndrome, hypertension, and diarrhoea. Grade 3-4 adverse events were reported for 38 and 25% of patients receiving combination and single-agent treatment, respectively. CONCLUSION: The combination of sorafenib and IL-2 did not demonstrate improved efficacy vs sorafenib alone. Improvements in PFS appeared greater in patients receiving higher-dose IL-2.


Asunto(s)
Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapéutico , Bencenosulfonatos/administración & dosificación , Carcinoma de Células Renales/tratamiento farmacológico , Interleucina-2/administración & dosificación , Neoplasias Renales/tratamiento farmacológico , Piridinas/administración & dosificación , Anciano , Algoritmos , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/efectos adversos , Bencenosulfonatos/efectos adversos , Carcinoma de Células Renales/patología , Supervivencia sin Enfermedad , Femenino , Humanos , Interleucina-2/efectos adversos , Neoplasias Renales/patología , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Metástasis de la Neoplasia , Niacinamida/análogos & derivados , Compuestos de Fenilurea , Piridinas/efectos adversos , Sorafenib , Resultado del Tratamiento
18.
Ann Oncol ; 22(7): 1675-1681, 2011 Jul.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21242585

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: To assess changes in survival over time of extremity soft tissue sarcoma (ESTS) patients treated at a single reference institution. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with primary localized adult-type ESTS surgically treated at our institution between 1987 and 2007 were retrospectively reviewed. Patients were categorized into four 5-year groups according to the timing of their first operation. Crude cumulative incidence (CCI) of sarcoma-specific mortality (SSM), local recurrence (LR), and distant metastases (DMs) were calculated for each time period. RESULTS: A total of 1094 patients were identified. Median follow-up was 81 months. CCI of SSM and LR were significantly better in period 4 in comparison to periods 1-3 (P < 0.001 for both end points), dropping, respectively, from 15% to 6% and from 23% to 9%. An overall improvement of DMs-free survival at 5 years could be detected in the latter period, as well as a better postmetastasis survival. CONCLUSIONS: Reference institutions for sarcomas may have improved their outcome in the last years. Although biases of retrospective analyses as well as the effect of institutional learning curves need to be discounted, it is possible that optimal exploitation of a series of subtle improvements in sarcoma treatment may make a difference in results currently achievable.


Asunto(s)
Extremidades , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia/mortalidad , Sarcoma/mortalidad , Adulto , Anciano , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Incidencia , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Metástasis de la Neoplasia , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia/patología , Estadificación de Neoplasias , Estudios Prospectivos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Sarcoma/patología , Tasa de Supervivencia
19.
Ann Oncol ; 22(11): 2495-2500, 2011 Nov.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21398385

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: This monocentric study evaluates the activity and tolerability of docetaxel (Taxotere), cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) (TPF) induction chemotherapy followed by intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) concurrent with high-dose cisplatin in Epstein-Barr virus -related locally advanced undifferentiated nasopharyngeal cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the records of patients who received induction docetaxel 75 mg/m(2) and cisplatin 75 mg/m(2) on day 1, and 5-FU 750 mg/m(2)/day (96-h continuous infusion). Following induction, patients received full doses of IMRT concurrently with cisplatin 100 mg/m(2) every 21 days for three cycles. RESULTS: Thirty patients received three TPF cycles (median). Induction was well tolerated; the main toxicity was neutropenia (33%, grade 3-4). During chemoradiotherapy, neutropenia (40%) and mucositis (43%) were the most frequent grade 3-4 adverse events. Mean dose of IMRT was 68.8 Gy. Worst late toxicity was xerostomia. Complete response rate was 93%. At 35 months, two patients had locoregional recurrence, three had distant metastases, and one had both. Three-year progression-free survival and overall survival were 79% [95% confidence interval (CI) 64% to 94%] and 87% (95% CI 74%- to 100%), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: In this high-stage nonendemic cancer population, TPF followed by high-dose cisplatin IMRT was promising; this treatment approach deserves evaluation in randomized trials.


Asunto(s)
Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapéutico , Infecciones por Virus de Epstein-Barr/complicaciones , Neoplasias Nasofaríngeas/terapia , Neoplasias Nasofaríngeas/virología , Adulto , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/efectos adversos , Cisplatino/administración & dosificación , Cisplatino/efectos adversos , Terapia Combinada , Supervivencia sin Enfermedad , Docetaxel , Femenino , Fluorouracilo/administración & dosificación , Fluorouracilo/efectos adversos , Humanos , Quimioterapia de Inducción , Metástasis Linfática , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Neoplasias Nasofaríngeas/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias Nasofaríngeas/radioterapia , Radioterapia de Intensidad Modulada/efectos adversos , Radioterapia de Intensidad Modulada/métodos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Tasa de Supervivencia , Taxoides/administración & dosificación , Taxoides/efectos adversos
20.
Expert Rev Clin Pharmacol ; 14(2): 261-268, 2021 Feb.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33472450

RESUMEN

Background: The RESORT trial showed no longer relapse free survival (RFS) with sorafenib following radical metastasectomy in metastatic renal cell carcinoma. We present the updated 42-month follow-up data.Methods: The phase II RESORT trial randomized patients to sorafenib or observation within 12 weeks from surgery. RFS was the primary endpoint.Results: We analyzed 68 patients (32 in sorafenib and 36 in the observation arm), randomized between November 2012 and November 2017. Eighty-one percent in the sorafenib arm and 80% in the observation arm had one metastasis . At a median follow-up of 42 months (interquartile range 31-58), in the observation arm the median RFS was 35 months, RFS probability was 57% (95% CI 42-76%) at 24 and 44% (95% CI 30-65%) at 48 months. In the sorafenib arm, median RFS was 21 months, RFS probability was 50% (95% CI 34-71%) at 24 and 32% (95% CI 18-57%) at 48 months (p = 0.342;HR 1.35;95% CI 0.72-2.54). Forty-seven percent and 37.5% of the patients in the two arms, respectively, are disease free. The site of relapses was independent of the previous metastasectomy site.Expert commentary: Sorafenib after metastasectomy did not improve RFS, but surgery in selected patients should be considered in order to potentially improve survival.Clinical trial registration: www.clinicaltrials.gov identifier is NCT0144480.


Asunto(s)
Carcinoma de Células Renales/terapia , Neoplasias Renales/terapia , Metastasectomía/métodos , Sorafenib/administración & dosificación , Antineoplásicos/administración & dosificación , Carcinoma de Células Renales/patología , Supervivencia sin Enfermedad , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Neoplasias Renales/patología , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia , Probabilidad
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA