A population pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic analysis of single doses of clenoliximab in patients with rheumatoid arthritis.

Clenoliximab (IDEC-151) is a macaque-human chimeric monoclonal antibody (immunoglobulin G4) specific for the CD4 molecule on the surface of T lymphocytes. It is being studied in patients with rheumatoid arthritis in which T cell activation orchestrates inflammation and tissue damage. In this initial study in humans, the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of clenoliximab were investigated after single intravenous infusion. Blood was collected up to 12 weeks after dose administration to measure clenoliximab concentration, CD4+ T-cell count, CD4 antigen coating, and CD4 cell surface density. Clenoliximab displayed nonlinear pharmacokinetic behavior and caused an 80% reduction in CD4 density for up to 3 weeks, without depleting T cells. A pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic model was developed that described the relationship between antibody concentration, antigen coating, and the observed decreases in CD4 cell surface density. This was used to anticipate the effects of clenoliximab in untested regimens and optimize the design of future clinical trials.

The pharmacokinetics of topotecan and its carboxylate form following separate intravenous administration to the dog.

PURPOSE: To determine the relationship between topotecan and its ring opened hydrolysis product (SK&F 105,992) following intravenous administration of the two agents separately, and to determine the bio-availability of topotecan in female beagle dogs. METHODS: The pharmacokinetics of topotecan and SK&F 105,992 were determined following separate administration as 30 minute intravenous infusions in a cross-over design. Topotecan was also administered orally to the same dogs. RESULTS: When administered intravenously to dogs, SK&F 105,992 underwent interconversion to topotecan. Plasma concentrations of both topotecan and SK&F 105,992 appeared to decline multi-exponentially following i.v. infusion of either compound. A 2-compartment model was found to adequately characterize the data. CONCLUSIONS: The clearance of topotecan by other routes proceeded at a faster rate than its interconversion to SK&F 105,992, whereas the clearance of SK&F 105,992 by other routes was slower than the rate of its interconversion to topotecan. Any SK&F 105,992 formed in the GI tract did not appear to be well absorbed following oral administration of topotecan to dogs. The steady-state volume of distribution for topotecan was approximately 8- to 9-fold greater than that for SK&F 105,992 in the dog. After intravenous administration of topotecan, the amount of topotecan in the dog was much greater than that of the carboxylate, even though their respective plasma concentrations were similar. The bioavailability of topotecan, calculated from oral topotecan data or from SK&F 105,992 data, was approximately 50%.