Diagnostic performance of whole-body [18F]FDG PET/MR in cancer M staging: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVES: To calculate the pooled diagnostic performances of whole-body [18F]FDG PET/MR in M staging of [18F]FDG-avid cancer entities. METHODS: A diagnostic meta-analysis was conducted on the [18F]FDG PET/MR in M staging, including studies: (1) evaluated [18F]FDG PET/MR in detecting distant metastasis; (2) compared[ 18F]FDG PET/MR with histopathology, follow-up, or asynchronous multimodality imaging as the reference standard; (3) provided data for the whole-body evaluation; (4) provided adequate data to calculate the meta-analytic performances. Pooled performances were calculated with their confidence interval. In addition, forest plots, SROC curves, and likelihood ratio scatterplots were drawn. All analyses were performed using STATA 16. RESULTS: From 52 eligible studies, 2289 patients and 2072 metastases were entered in the meta-analysis. The whole-body pooled sensitivities were 0.95 (95%CI: 0.91-0.97) and 0.97 (95%CI: 0.91-0.99) at the patient and lesion levels, respectively. The pooled specificities were 0.99 (95%CI: 0.97-1.00) and 0.97 (95%CI: 0.90-0.99), respectively. Additionally, subgroup analyses were performed. The calculated pooled sensitivities for lung, gastrointestinal, breast, and gynecological cancers were 0.90, 0.93, 1.00, and 0.97, respectively. The pooled specificities were 1.00, 0.98, 0.97, and 1.00, respectively. Furthermore, the pooled sensitivities for non-small cell lung, colorectal, and cervical cancers were 0.92, 0.96, and 0.86, respectively. The pooled specificities were 1.00, 0.95, and 1.00, respectively. CONCLUSION: [18F]FDG PET/MR was a highly accurate modality in M staging in the reported [18F]FDG-avid malignancies. The results showed high sensitivity and specificity in each reviewed malignancy type. Thus, our findings may help clinicians and patients to be confident about the performance of [18F]FDG PET/MR in the clinic. CLINICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT: Although [18F]FDG PET/MR is not a routine imaging technique in current guidelines, mostly due to its availability and logistic issues, our findings might add to the limited evidence regarding its performance, showing a sensitivity of 0.95 and specificity of 0.97. KEY POINTS: • The whole-body [18F]FDG PET/MR showed high accuracy in detecting distant metastases at both patient and lesion levels. • The pooled sensitivities were 95% and 97% and pooled specificities were 99% and 97% at patient and lesion levels, respectively. • The results suggested that 18F-FDG PET/MR was a strong modality in the exclusion and confirmation of distant metastases.

Eye-Related Adverse Events After I-131 Radioiodine Therapy: A Systematic Review of the Current Literature.

OBJECTIVE: Although I-131 is relatively safe, there is limited focus on probable eye-related side effects after radioactive iodine (RAI) therapy. Thus, we aimed to provide evidence for the adverse outcomes of I-131, exclusively in patients with thyroid cancer. METHODS: A systematic review based on the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines was designed to examine the ocular complications of RAI therapy. Databases including PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science were searched until October 2023 with specific thyroid neoplasms, ophthalmology and iodine terms. After thorough screening and review, relevant data were extracted. RESULTS: The database search yielded 3434 articles, which resulted in the final 28 eligible studies. These studies investigated ophthalmic symptoms following RAI therapy, classifying them as obstructive diseases (for example, nasolacrimal duct obstruction; median incidence rate: 6.8%), inflammatory symptoms (median incidence rate: 13%), and cataracts (median incidence rate: 2.5 and 5%). The most common time interval between RAI therapy and the onset of symptoms was within the first 12 months and then declined in the preceding years. A strong positive correlation was observed between higher I-131 doses of more than 100 to 150 mCi (3.7-5.55 GBq) and the risk of symptom development. Ages older than 45 also showed a significant association with nasolacrimal duct obstruction. CONCLUSION: The risk of ophthalmic complications is associated with various factors, including the administration of high I-131 doses, age of more than 45 years, and time to event within the first 12 months. Considering these conditions may help enhance patient care and prevent adverse outcomes that may limit patients' quality of life.

Current Applications of PET/MR: Part I: Technical Basics and Preclinical/Clinical Applications.

Positron emission tomography/magnetic resonance (PET/MR) imaging has gone through major hardware improvements in recent years, making it a reliable state-of-the-art hybrid modality in clinical practice. At the same time, image reconstruction, attenuation correction, and motion correction algorithms have significantly evolved to provide high-quality images. Part I of the current review discusses technical basics, pre-clinical applications, and clinical applications of PET/MR in radiation oncology and head and neck imaging. PET/MR offers a broad range of advantages in preclinical and clinical imaging. In the preclinic, small and large animal-dedicated devices were developed, making PET/MR capable of delivering new insight into animal models in diseases and facilitating the development of methods that inform clinical PET/MR. Regarding PET/MR's clinical applications in radiation medicine, PET and MR already play crucial roles in the radiotherapy process. Their combination is particularly significant as it can provide molecular and morphological characteristics that are not achievable with other modalities. In addition, the integration of PET/MR information for therapy planning with linear accelerators is expected to provide potentially unique biomarkers for treatment guidance. Furthermore, in clinical applications in the head and neck region, it has been shown that PET/MR can be an accurate modality in head and neck malignancies for staging and resectability assessment. Also, it can play a crucial role in diagnosing residual or recurrent diseases, reliably distinguishing from oedema and fibrosis. PET/MR can furthermore help with tumour characterization and patient prognostication. Lastly, in head and neck carcinoma of unknown origin, PET/MR, with its diagnostic potential, may obviate multiple imaging sessions in the near future.

Current Applications of PET/MR: Part II: Clinical Applications II.

Due to the major improvements in the hardware and image reconstruction algorithms, positron emission tomography/magnetic resonance imaging (PET/MR) is now a reliable state-of-the-art hybrid modality in medical practice. Currently, it can provide a broad range of advantages in preclinical and clinical imaging compared to single-modality imaging. In the second part of this review, we discussed the further clinical applications of PET/MR. In the chest, PET/MR has particular potential in the oncology setting, especially when utilizing ultrashort/zero echo time MR sequences. Furthermore, cardiac PET/MR can provide reliable information in evaluating myocardial inflammation, cardiac amyloidosis, myocardial perfusion, myocardial viability, atherosclerotic plaque, and cardiac masses. In gastrointestinal and hepato-pancreato-biliary malignancies, PET/MR is able to precisely detect metastases to the liver, being superior over the other imaging modalities. In genitourinary and gynaecology applications, PET/MR is a comprehensive diagnostic method, especially in prostate, endometrial, and cervical cancers. Its simultaneous acquisition has been shown to outperform other imaging techniques for the detection of pelvic nodal metastases and is also a reliable modality in radiation planning. Lastly, in haematologic malignancies, PET/MR can significantly enhance lymphoma diagnosis, particularly in detecting extra-nodal involvement. It can also comprehensively assess treatment-induced changes. Furthermore, PET/MR may soon become a routine in multiple myeloma management, being a one-stop shop for evaluating bone, bone marrow, and soft tissues.

18F-FDG PET/MRI in Detection of Pulmonary Malignancies: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Background There have been conflicting results regarding fluorine 18-labeled fluorodeoxyglucose (18F-FDG) PET/MRI diagnostic performance in lung malignant neoplasms. Purpose To evaluate the diagnostic performance of 18F-FDG PET/MRI for the detection of pulmonary malignant neoplasms. Materials and Methods A systematic search was conducted within the Scopus, Web of Science, and PubMed databases until December 31, 2021. Published original articles that met the following criteria were considered eligible for meta-analysis: (a) detecting malignant lesions in the lung, (b) comparing 18F-FDG PET/MRI with a valid reference standard, and (c) providing data for the meta-analytic calculations. A hierarchical method was used to pool the performances. The bivariate model was used to find the summary points and 95% CIs. The hierarchical summary receiver operating characteristic model was used to draw the summary receiver operating characteristic curve and calculate the area under the curve. The Higgins I2 statistic and Cochran Q test were used for heterogeneity assessment. Results A total of 43 studies involving 1278 patients met the inclusion criteria and were included in the meta-analysis. 18F-FDG PET/MRI had a pooled sensitivity and specificity of 96% (95% CI: 84, 99) and 100% (95% CI: 98, 100), respectively. 18F-FDG PET/CT had a pooled sensitivity and specificity of 99% (95% CI: 61, 100) and 99% (95% CI: 94, 100), respectively, which were comparable with those of 18F-FDG PET/MRI. At meta-regression, studies in which contrast media (P = .03) and diffusion-weighted imaging (P = .04) were used as a part of a pulmonary 18F-FDG PET/MRI protocol showed significantly higher sensitivities. Conclusion Fluorine 18-labeled fluorodeoxyglucose (18F-FDG) PET/MRI was found to be accurate and comparable with 18F-FDG PET/CT in the detection of malignant pulmonary lesions, with significantly improved sensitivity when advanced acquisition protocols were used. © RSNA, 2023 Supplemental material is available for this article.

[18F]-FDG PET in anal canal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

PURPOSE: To provide comprehensive data on the diagnostic and prognostic value of [18F]-FDG PET (PET) in anal canal cancer patients. METHODS: This study was designed following the PRISMA-DTA guidelines. For the meta-analysis, published original articles (until December 2022) that met the following criteria were included: Evaluated PET for locoregional and/or distant disease detection in patients with histopathology-proven anal canal cancer; Compared PET with a valid reference standard; Provided crude data to calculate meta-analytic estimates. Diagnostic measurements from subgroups were calculated in evaluating primary tumour detection, T stage, lymph node and distant metastases. Articles providing prognostic information on PET were also reported as a systematic review. For pooled meta-analytic calculations, the hierarchical method was used. The bivariate model was conducted to find the summary estimates. Analyses were performed using STATA 16. RESULTS: After the screening, 28 studies were eligible to enter the meta-analytic calculations, and data from 15 were reported descriptively. For distinguishing T3/T4 from other T-stages, PET had pooled sensitivity and specificity of 91%(95%CI:72%-97%) and 96%(95%CI:88%-98%), respectively. The sensitivity and specificity for detecting metastatic (regional and/or distant) disease were 100% (95%CI:82%-100%) and 95% (95%CI:90%-98%), respectively. For therapy response assessment, the sensitivity and specificity of PET were 96%(95%CI:78%-99%) and 86%(95%CI:75%-93%), respectively. Higher pre-treatment total metabolic tumour volume was predictive of poorer survival. Conversely, for those achieving complete metabolic response, the 2-year PFS was 94%(95%CI:91%-97%) versus 51%(95%CI:42%-59%) for others (p-value < 0.001). CONCLUSION: PET may be a useful tool for anal canal cancer therapy planning and provides valuable prognostic information.

The role of [18F]-DCFPyL PET/MRI radiomics for pathological grade group prediction in prostate cancer.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of [18F]-DCFPyL PET/MRI radiomics for the prediction of pathological grade group in prostate cancer (PCa) in therapy-naïve patients. METHODS: Patients with confirmed or suspected PCa, who underwent [18F]-DCFPyL PET/MRI (n = 105), were included in this retrospective analysis of two prospective clinical trials. Radiomic features were extracted from the segmented volumes following the image biomarker standardization initiative (IBSI) guidelines. Histopathology obtained from systematic and targeted biopsies of the PET/MRI-detected lesions was the reference standard. Histopathology patterns were dichotomized as ISUP GG 1-2 vs. ISUP GG ≥ 3 categories. Different single-modality models were defined for feature extraction, including PET- and MRI-derived radiomic features. The clinical model included age, PSA, and lesions' PROMISE classification. Single models, as well as different combinations of them, were generated to calculate their performances. A cross-validation approach was used to evaluate the internal validity of the models. RESULTS: All radiomic models outperformed the clinical models. The best model for grade group prediction was the combination of PET + ADC + T2w radiomic features, showing sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, and AUC of 0.85, 0.83, 0.84, and 0.85, respectively. The MRI-derived (ADC + T2w) features showed sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, and AUC of 0.88, 0.78, 0.83, and 0.84, respectively. PET-derived features showed 0.83, 0.68, 0.76, and 0.79, respectively. The baseline clinical model showed 0.73, 0.44, 0.60, and 0.58, respectively. The addition of the clinical model to the best radiomic model did not improve the diagnostic performance. The performances of MRI and PET/MRI radiomic models as per the cross-validation scheme yielded an accuracy of 0.80 (AUC = 0.79), whereas clinical models presented an accuracy of 0.60 (AUC = 0.60). CONCLUSION: The combined [18F]-DCFPyL PET/MRI radiomic model was the best-performing model and outperformed the clinical model for pathological grade group prediction, indicating a complementary value of the hybrid PET/MRI model for non-invasive risk stratification of PCa. Further prospective studies are required to confirm the reproducibility and clinical utility of this approach.

68Ga-PSMA PET in prostate cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis of the observer agreement.

PURPOSE: The performance of 68 Ga-PSMA PET/CT-MR has been evaluated in prostate cancer (PCa), showing significant results. However, even a technically accurate imaging procedure requires a high interobserver agreement in its interpretation to implement in patients' management. This study aims to perform a systematic review and meta-analysis on the interobserver variability in 68 Ga-PSMA PET/CT-MR imaging in PCa patients. METHODS: We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis on the interobserver variability, including studies: (1) providing Kappa (K) as the inter-observer agreement test or the essential data to calculate it, (2) providing the K confidence interval or the essential crude data to calculate it, (3) measuring K statistic based on the appropriate use criteria for the inter-observer agreement. RESULTS: Twelve studies, providing 1585 68 Ga-PSMA PET/CT-MR studies reviewed by 62 independent readers, were included. In general, the pooled inter-observer agreement was interpreted as substantial for all analyzed groups, including tumoral lesions in the prostate bed, lymphadenopathies, bone metastasis, and soft-tissue metastasis (all between 0.6 and 0.8). The regional lymphadenopathy group (0.74) obtained the highest agreement, while the lowest was for soft tissue metastasis (0.65). CONCLUSION: This study showed a substantial interobserver agreement in the overall interpretation and detecting locoregional and distant involvement with 68 Ga-PSMA PET/CT-MR in PCa patients.

Diagnostic performance of [18F]-FDG PET/MR in evaluating colorectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

PURPOSE: To calculate the diagnostic performance of [18F]-FDG PET/MR in colorectal cancer (CRC). METHODS: This study was designed following the PRISMA-DTA guidelines. To be included, published original articles (until December 31, 2021) that met the following criteria were considered eligible: (1) evaluated [18F]-FDG PET/MR as the diagnostic method to detect CRC; (2) compared [18F]-FDG PET/MR with histopathology as the reference standard, or clinical/imaging composite follow-up when pathology was not available; (3) provided adequate crude data for meta-analysis. The diagnostic pooled measurements were calculated at patient and lesion levels. Regarding sub-group analysis, diagnostic measurements were calculated in "TNM staging," "T staging," "N staging," "M staging," and "liver metastasis" sub-groups. Additionally, we calculated the pooled performances in "rectal cancer: patient-level" and "rectal cancer: lesion-level" sub-groups. A hierarchical method was used to pool the performances. The bivariate model was conducted to find the summary points. Analyses were performed using STATA 16. RESULTS: A total of 1534 patients from 18 studies were entered. The pooled sensitivities in CRC lesion detection (tumor, lymph nodes, and metastases) were 0.94 (95%CI: 0.89-0.97) and 0.93 (95%CI: 0.82-0.98) at patient-level and lesion-level, respectively. The pooled specificities were 0.89 (95%CI: 0.84-0.93) and 0.95 (95%CI: 0.90-0.98) at patient-level and lesion-level, respectively. In sub-groups, the highest sensitivity (0.97, 95%CI: 0.86-0.99) and specificity (0.99, 95%CI: 0.84-1.00) were calculated for "M staging" and "rectal cancer: lesion-level," respectively. The lowest sensitivity (0.81, 95%CI: 0.65-0.91) and specificity (0.79, 95%CI: 0.52-0.93) were calculated for "N staging" and "T staging," respectively. CONCLUSION: This meta-analysis showed an overall high diagnostic performance for [18F]-FDG PET/MR in detecting CRC lesions/metastases. Thus, this modality can play a significant role in several clinical scenarios in CRC staging and restaging. Specifically, one of the main strengths of this modality is ruling out the existence of CRC lesions/metastases. Finally, the overall diagnostic performance was not found to be affected in the post-treatment setting.

Diagnostic performance of prone-only myocardial perfusion imaging versus coronary angiography in the detection of coronary artery disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

STUDY DESIGN: Although prone position is considered as a complementary protocol in myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI), there is no consensus on its capability to find coronary artery disease (CAD), independently. The primary aim of this review was to report pooled sensitivity and specificity for prone position MPI in detection of CAD. In addition, the results were compared to the supine position's performance. METHODS: Electronic bibliographic databases, The Cochrane Library, Web of Science (Science and Social Science Citation Index), Scopus, PubMed, and EMBASE until the end of June 2020 were searched. Studies were included based on the inclusion criteria of (1) evaluated the prone position MPI, (2) defined CAD with coronary angiography (CAG), using the threshold of ≥ 50% stenosis, (3) Adequate data were provided to extract the diagnostic performance. QUADAS-2 tool was utilized to assess the quality of included studies. Pooled sensitivity and specificity were calculated for prone and supine positions, separately. The hierarchical summary ROC curves were also drawn. RESULTS: Ten individual studies with the data of the 1490 patients for the prone position and 1138 patients for the supine position were included. Pooled sensitivity and specificity for the prone position were 83% and 79%, respectively. These results were calculated for the supine position as the sensitivity of 86% and specificity of 67%. The pooled sensitivity and specificity of the prone position in detecting the right coronary artery territory defects were 70% and 84%, in turn. CONCLUSION: In the suspicion for the CAD, prone position with comparable sensitivity and higher specificity can be an acceptable alternative to the supine position as the standard method. Also, in the cases of possible defects in the RCA territory, prone position showed to be a superior standard.

Diagnostic performance of deep learning models versus radiologists in COVID-19 pneumonia: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

PURPOSE: Although several studies have compared the performance of deep learning (DL) models and radiologists for the diagnosis of COVID-19 pneumonia on CT of the chest, these results have not been collectively evaluated. We performed a meta-analysis of original articles comparing the performance of DL models versus radiologists in detecting COVID-19 pneumonia. METHODS: A systematic search was conducted on the three main medical literature databases, Scopus, Web of Science, and PubMed, for articles published as of February 1st, 2023. We included original scientific articles that compared DL models trained to detect COVID-19 pneumonia on CT to radiologists. Meta-analysis was performed to determine DL versus radiologist performance in terms of model sensitivity and specificity, taking into account inter and intra-study heterogeneity. RESULTS: Twenty-two articles met the inclusion criteria. Based on the meta-analytic calculations, DL models had significantly higher pooled sensitivity (0.933 vs. 0.829, p < 0.001) compared to radiologists with similar pooled specificity (0.905 vs. 0.897, p = 0.746). In the differentiation of COVID-19 versus community-acquired pneumonia, the DL models had significantly higher sensitivity compared to radiologists (0.915 vs. 0.836, p = 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: DL models have high performance for screening of COVID-19 pneumonia on chest CT, offering the possibility of these models for augmenting radiologists in clinical practice.

A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis on the Diagnostic and Prognostic Values of 18F-FDG PET in Uveal Melanoma and Its Hepatic Metastasis.

In this systematic review and meta-analysis (PRISMA-compliant), we tried to investigate diagnostic and prognostic values of 18F-FDG PET in uveal melanoma. A systematic search was conducted on the main medical literature databases to include studies that evaluated 18F-FDG PET as the imaging modality to evaluate patients with uveal melanoma. Overall, 27 studies were included. Twelve had data about the detection rate of 18F-FDG PET in primary intra-ocular tumours. The pooled sensitivity was 45% (95%CI: 41-50%). Furthermore, studies showed that the larger the primary tumour, the higher its uptake. Among the included studies, 13 assessed 18F-FDG PET in detecting metastasis. The pooled sensitivity and specificity were 96% (95%CI: 81-99%) and 100% (95%CI: 94-100%), respectively. Regarding liver metastasis, they were 95% (95%CI: 79-99%) and 100% (95%CI: 91-100%), respectively. Noteworthy, the level of 18F-FDG uptake was a strong predictor of patient survival. Lastly, 18F-FDG PET could characterise lesions from the histopathology perspective, distinguishing high-risk from low-risk diseases. Overall, although not reliable in detecting primary intra-ocular tumours, 18F-FDG PET is highly accurate for diagnosing metastatic uveal melanomas. It can also be a highly valuable modality in terms of patient prognostication. Thus, 18F-FDG PET can be recommended in patients diagnosed with uveal melanoma to enhance decision-making and patient management.

Diagnostic Performance of [18F]F-FDG Positron Emission Tomography (PET) in Non-Ophthalmic Malignant Melanoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of More Than 10,000 Melanoma Patients.

We described the diagnostic performance of [18F]F-FDG-PET in malignant melanoma by conducting a comprehensive systematic review and meta-analysis of the existing literature. The study was designed following PRISMA-DTA. Original articles with adequate crude data for meta-analytic calculations that evaluated [18F]F-FDG-PET and compared it with a valid reference standard were considered eligible. The pooled measurements were calculated based on the data level (patient/lesion-based). Regarding sub-groups, diagnostic performances were calculated for local, regional and distant involvement. The bivariate model was employed to calculate sensitivity and specificity. The initial search resulted in 6678 studies. Finally, 100 entered the meta-analysis, containing 82 patient-based (10,403 patients) and 32 lesion-based (6188 lesions) datasets. At patient level, overall, [18F]F-FDG-PET had pooled sensitivity and specificity of 81% (95%CI: 73-87%) and 92% (95%CI: 90-94%), respectively. To detect regional lymph node metastasis, the pooled sensitivity and specificity were 56% (95%CI: 40-72%) and 97% (95%CI: 94-99%), respectively. To detect distant metastasis, they were 88% (95%CI: 81-93%) and 94% (95%CI: 91-96%), respectively. At lesion level, [18F]F-FDG-PET had a pooled sensitivity and specificity of 70% (95%CI: 57-80%) and 94% (95%CI: 88-97%), respectively. Thus, [18F]F-FDG-PET is a valuable diagnostic modality for melanoma assessment. It was accurate in various clinical scenarios. However, despite its high specificity, it showed low sensitivity in detecting regional lymph node metastasis and could not replace lymph node biopsy.

Application of Artificial Intelligence in Oncologic Molecular PET-Imaging: A Narrative Review on Beyond [18F]F-FDG Tracers - Part I. PSMA, Choline, and DOTA Radiotracers.

Artificial intelligence (AI) has evolved significantly in the past few decades. This thriving trend has also been seen in medicine in recent years, particularly in the field of imaging. Machine learning (ML), deep learning (DL), and their methods (eg, SVM, CNN), as well as radiomics, are the terminologies that have been introduced to this field and, to some extent, become familiar to the expert clinicians. PET is one of the modalities that has been enhanced via these state-of-the-art algorithms. This robust imaging technique further merged with anatomical modalities, such as computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), to provide reliable hybrid modalities, PET/CT and PET/MRI. Applying AI-based algorithms on the different components (PET, CT, and MRI) has resulted in promising results, maximizing the value of PET imaging. However, [18F]F-FDG, the most commonly utilized tracer in molecular imaging, has been mainly in the spotlight. Thus, we aimed to look into the less discussed tracers in this review, moving beyond [18F]F-FDG. The novel non-[18F]F-FDG agents also showed to be valuable in various clinical tasks, including lesion detection and tumor characterization, accurate delineation, and prognostic impact. Regarding prostate patients, PSMA-based models were highly accurate in determining tumoral lesions' location and delineating them, particularly within the prostate gland. However, they also could assess whole-body images to detect extra-prostatic lesions in a patient automatically. Considering the prognostic value of prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) PET using AI, it could predict response to treatment and patient survival, which are crucial in patient management. Choline imaging, another non-[18F]F-FDG tracer, similarly showed acceptable results that may be of benefit in the clinic, though the current evidence is significantly more limited than PSMA. Lastly, different subtypes of DOTA ligands were found to be valuable. They could diagnose tumoral lesions in challenging sites and even predict histopathology grade, being a highly advantageous noninvasive tool. In conclusion, the current limited investigations have shown promising results, leading us to a bright future for AI in molecular imaging beyond [18F]F-FDG.

Application of Artificial Intelligence in Oncologic Molecular PET-Imaging: A Narrative Review on Beyond [18F]F-FDG Tracers Part II. [18F]F-FLT, [18F]F-FET, [11C]C-MET and Other Less-Commonly Used Radiotracers.

Following the previous part of the narrative review on artificial intelligence (AI) applications in positron emission tomography (PET) using tracers rather than 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose ([18F]F-FDG), in this part we review the impact of PET-derived radiomics data on the diagnostic performance of other PET radiotracers, 18F-O-(2-fluoroethyl)-L-tyrosine ([18F]F-FET), 18F-Fluorothymidine ([18F]F-FLT) and 11C-Methionine ([11C]C-MET). [18F]F-FET-PET, using an artificial amino acid taken up into upregulated tumoral cells, showed potential in lesion detection and tumor characterization, especially with its ability to reflect glioma heterogeneity. [18F]F-FET-PET-derived textural features appeared to have the potential to reveal considerable information for accurate delineation for guiding biopsy and treatment, differentiate between low-grade and high-grade glioma and related wild-type genotypes, and distinguish pseudoprogression from true progression. In addition, models built using clinical parameters and [18F]F-FET-PET-derived radiomics features showed acceptable results for survival stratification of glioblastoma patients. [18F]F-FLT-PET-based characteristics also showed potential in evaluating glioma patients, correlating with Ki-67 and patient prognosis. AI-based PET-volumetry using this radiotracer as a proliferation marker also revealed promising preliminary results in terms of guide-targeting bone marrow-preserving adaptive radiation therapy. Similar to [18F]F-FET, the other amino acid tracer which reflects cellular proliferation, [11C]C-MET, has also shown acceptable performance in predicting tumor grade, distinguishing brain tumor recurrence from radiation necrosis, and treatment monitoring by PET-derived radiomics models. In addition, PET-derived radiomics features of various radiotracers such as [18F]F-DOPA, [18F]F-FACBC, [18F]F-NaF, [68Ga]Ga-CXCR-4 and [18F]F-FMISO may also provide useful information for tumor characterization and predict of disease outcome. In conclusion, AI using tracers beyond [18F]F-FDG could improve the diagnostic performance of PET-imaging for specific indications and help clinicians in their daily routine by providing features that are often not detectable by the naked eye.

SPECT/CT, PET/CT, and PET/MRI for Response Assessment of Bone Metastases.

Recent developments in hybrid SPECT/CT systems and the use of cadmium-zinc-telluride (CZT) detectors have improved the diagnostic accuracy of bone scintigraphy. These advancements have paved the way for novel quantitative approaches to accurate and reproducible treatment monitoring of bone metastases. PET/CT imaging using [18F]F-FDG and [18F]F-NaF have shown promising clinical utility in bone metastases assessment and monitoring response to therapy and prediction of treatment response in a broad range of malignancies. Additionally, specific tumor-targeting tracers like [99mTc]Tc-PSMA, [68Ga]Ga-PSMA, or [11C]C- or [18F]F-Choline revealed high diagnostic performance for early assessment and prognostication of bone metastases, particularly in prostate cancer. PET/MRI appears highly accurate imaging modality, but has associated limitations notably, limited availability, more complex logistics and high installation costs. Advances in artificial intelligence (Al) seem to improve the accuracy of imaging modalities and provide an assistant role in the evaluation of treatment response of bone metastases.

Pre-treatment 68 Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT Prognostic Value in Predicting Response to 177Lu-PSMA-I&T Therapy and Patient Survival.

PURPOSE: To assess the prognostic value of pre-treatment [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT and other baseline clinical characteristics in predicting prostate cancer (PCa) patients response to [177Lu]Lu-PSMA (PSMA-I&T), as well as patient survival. PROCEDURES: In this retrospective study, 81 patients who received [177Lu]Lu-PSMA-I&T between October 2018 and January 2023 were reviewed. Eligible patients had metastatic castration-resistant PCa, underwent pre-treatment [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT, and had serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels available. On PET/CT images, SUVmax, SULmax, SUVpeak, and SULpeak of the most-avid tumoral lesion, as well as SUVmean of the parotid gland (P-SUVmean) and liver (L-SUVmean), were measured. Also, whole-body PSMA tumour volume (PSMA-TV) and total lesion PSMA (TL-PSMA) were calculated. To interpret treatment response after [177Lu]Lu-PSMA-I&T, a composite of PSA values and [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT findings were considered. The outcomes were dichotomised into progressive versus controlled (stable disease or partial response) disease. Then, the association of baseline parameters with patient response was evaluated. Also, survival analyses were performed to assess baseline parameters in predicting overall survival. RESULTS: Sixty patients (age:73 ± 8, PSA:185 ± 371) were included. Patients received at least one cycle of [177Lu]Lu-PSMA therapy (median = 4). Overall, half of the patients showed disease progression. In the progressive versus controlled disease evaluation, the highest SULmax, as well as SUVmax and SULmax to both backgrounds (L-SUVmean and P-SUVmean), were significantly correlated with the outcome (p-values < 0.05). In the multivariate analysis, only SULmax to the L-SUVmean remained significant (p-value = 0.038). The best cut-off was 8 (AUC = 0.71). With a median follow-up of 360 days, 11 mortal events were documented. In the multivariate survival analysis, only SULmax to P-SUVmean (cut-off = 2.4; p-value = 0.043) retained significance (hazard ratio = 4.0). CONCLUSIONS: A greater level of PSMA uptake, specifically higher tumour-to-background uptake in the hottest lesion, may hold substantial prognostic significance, considering both [177Lu]Lu-PSMA-I&T response and patient survival. These ratios may have the potential to be used for PCa patient selection for radioligand therapy.

Value of Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced MRI for Grade Group Prediction in Prostate Cancer: A Radiomics Pilot Study.

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES: To determine the role of dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE) MRI-radiomics in predicting the International Society of Urological Pathology Grade Group (ISUP-GG) in therapy-naïve prostate cancer (PCa) patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this ethics review board-approved retrospective study on two prospective clinical trials between 2017 and 2020, 73 men with suspected/confirmed PCa were included. All participants underwent multiparametric MRI. On MRI, dominant lesions (per PI-RADS) were identified. DCE-MRI radiomic features were extracted from the segmented volumes following the image biomarker standardisation initiative (IBSI) guidelines through 14 time points. Histopathology evaluation on the cognitive-fusion targeted biopsies was set as the reference standard. Univariate regression was done to evaluate potential predictors across all calculated features. Random forest imputation was used for multivariate modelling. RESULTS: 73 index lesions were reviewed. Histopathology revealed 28, 16, 13 and 16 lesions with ISUP-GG-Negative/1/2, ISUP-GG-3, ISUP-GG-4 and ISUP-GG-5, respectively. From the extracted features, total lesion enhancement (TLE), minimum enhancement intensity and Grey-Level Run Length Matrix (GLRLM) were the most significantly different parameters among ISUP-GGs (Neg/1/2 vs 3/4 vs 5). 16 features with significant cross-sectional associations with ISUP-GGs entered the multivariate analysis. The final DCE partitioning model used only four features (lesion sphericity, TLE, GLRLM and Grey-Level Zone Length Matrix). For the binarized diagnosis (ISUP-GG≤2 vs ISUP-GG>2), the accuracy reached 81%. CONCLUSION: DCE-MRI radiomics might be used as a non-invasive tool for aiding pathological grade group prediction in therapy-naïve PCa patients, potentially adding complementary information to PI-RADS for supporting tailored diagnostic pathways and treatment planning.

Diagnostic value of [ 68 Ga]Ga-Pentixafor PET/CT in malignant melanoma: a pilot study.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the diagnostic value of [ 68 Ga] Ga-Pentixafor in malignant melanoma patients. METHODS: In this prospective study, patients with histology-proven melanoma were included and underwent [ 18 F]fluoro-D-glucose ([ 18 F]FDG) and [ 68 Ga] Ga-Pentixafor PET/computed tomography (CT) within a week. Suspicious lesions were interpreted as benign vs. malignant, and the corresponding semi-quantitative PET/CT parameters were recorded and compared. RESULTS: Twelve consecutive melanoma patients (mean age: 60 ±â€…6) were included. Two patients were referred for initial staging, two for detecting recurrence and eight for evaluating the extent of metastases. Overall, [ 18 F]FDG PET/CT showed 236 tumoral lesions, including two primary tumors, two recurrent lesions, 29 locoregional metastases and 203 distant metastases. In [ 68 Ga]Ga-Pentixafor PET/CT, 101 tumoral lesions were detected, including two primary tumors, one recurrence, 16 locoregional metastases and 82 distant metastases. Notably, a documented brain metastasis was only visualized on [ 68 Ga]Ga-Pentixafor PET/CT images. Compared with [ 18 F]FDG, [ 68 Ga]Ga-Pentixafor PET/CT provided a 42% detection rate. Regarding semi-quantitative measures, the intensity of uptake and tumor-to-background ratios were significantly lower on [ 68 Ga]Ga-Pentixafor PET/CT [average maximum standard uptake value (SUV max ) of 2.72 ±â€…1.33 vs. 11.41 ±â€…14.79; P value <0.001 and 1.17 ±â€…0.53 vs. 5.32 ±â€…7.34; P value <0.001, respectively]. CONCLUSION: When comparing [ 68 Ga]Ga-Pentixafor PET/CT with [ 18 F]FDG PET/CT, not only did [ 68 Ga]Ga-Pentixafor PET/CT detect fewer lesions, but the intensity of uptake and the TBRs were also lower on [ 68 Ga]Ga-Pentixafor PET/CT. Thus, our results may indicate a limited potential of this novel tracer in cutaneous melanoma patients compared to [ 18 F]FDG PET/CT. Given the lower TBRs, applying this radiotracer in radioligand therapies is also questionable.

Gastro-Esophageal Cancer: Can Radiomic Parameters from Baseline 18F-FDG-PET/CT Predict the Development of Distant Metastatic Disease?

We aimed to determine if clinical parameters and radiomics combined with sarcopenia status derived from baseline 18F-FDG-PET/CT could predict developing metastatic disease and overall survival (OS) in gastroesophageal cancer (GEC). Patients referred for primary staging who underwent 18F-FDG-PET/CT from 2008 to 2019 were evaluated retrospectively. Overall, 243 GEC patients (mean age = 64) were enrolled. Clinical, histopathology, and sarcopenia data were obtained, and primary tumor radiomics features were extracted. For classification (early-stage vs. advanced disease), the association of the studied parameters was evaluated. Various clinical and radiomics models were developed and assessed. Accuracy and area under the curve (AUC) were calculated. For OS prediction, univariable and multivariable Cox analyses were performed. The best model included PET/CT radiomics features, clinical data, and sarcopenia score (accuracy = 80%; AUC = 88%). For OS prediction, various clinical, CT, and PET features entered the multivariable analysis. Three clinical factors (advanced disease, age ≥ 70 and ECOG ≥ 2), along with one CT-derived and one PET-derived radiomics feature, retained their significance. Overall, 18F-FDG PET/CT radiomics seems to have a potential added value in identifying GEC patients with advanced disease and may enhance the performance of baseline clinical parameters. These features may also have a prognostic value for OS, improving the decision-making for GEC patients.