Bioequivalence and food effect assessment for vildagliptin/metformin fixed-dose combination tablets relative to free combination of vildagliptin and metformin in Japanese healthy subjects.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the bioequivalence of vildagliptin/metformin fixeddose combination (FDC) tablets (50/250 mg and 50/500 mg) to free combinations of vildagliptin and metformin and the effect of food on the pharmacokinetics (PK) of vildagliptin and metformin following administration of 50/500 mg FDC tablets. METHODS: Two openlabel, randomized, single-center, singledose, 2-period crossover studies were conducted in Japanese healthy male volunteers. Participants were administered vildagliptin/ metformin FDC tablets (study I: 50/250 mg, study II: 50/500 mg) or their free combinations under fasted condition. Food effect (standard Japanese breakfast: fat, 20 - 30% with ~ 600 kcal in total) was assessed during an additional period in study II (50/500 mg). PK parameters (AUC, C(max), t(max), t(1/2)) were calculated for vildagliptin and metformin. RESULTS: In both studies, vildagliptin/metformin FDC tablets were bioequivalent to their respective free combinations. Administration of FDC tablets after meals had no effect on vildagliptin PK parameters. The rate of absorption of metformin decreased when administered under fed condition, as reflected by a prolonged t(max) (3 hours in fasted state vs. 4 hours in fed state) and decrease in C(max) by 26%, however, the extent of absorption (AUC(last)) was similar to that in the fasted state. CONCLUSIONS: Vildagliptin/metformin FDC tablets were bioequivalent to their free combinations. Food decreased the C(max) of metformin by 26%, while AUC(last) was unchanged, consistent with previous reports. No food effect was observed on the C(max) or AUC(last) of vildagliptin. Thus, food had no clinically relevant effects on the PK of metformin or vildagliptin.

Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic interaction of vildagliptin and voglibose in Japanese patients with Type 2 diabetes.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the extent of pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic interaction between vildagliptin, a potent and selective inhibitor of dipeptidyl peptidase IV (DPP-4) enzyme, and voglibose, an α-glucosidase inhibitor widely prescribed in Japan, when coadministered in Japanese patients with Type 2 diabetes. METHODS: In this open-label, randomized, 3-treatment, 3-period and 6-way crossover study, 24 Japanese patients with Type 2 diabetes received 50 mg vildagliptin twice daily; 50 mg vildagliptin twice daily co-administered with 0.2 mg voglibose three times daily; or 0.2 mg voglibose three times daily for 3 days in each period. Plasma concentrations of vildagliptin, DPP-4, glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1), glucose, insulin, and glucagon were determined from blood samples collected at steady state. RESULTS: Exposure to vildagliptin 50 mg (area under the concentration-time curve from 0 to 12 hours (AUCτ,ss)) and maximum plasma concentration at steady state (Cmax,ss) was reduced by 23% and 34% respectively with co-administration of voglibose. The percentage of DPP-4 inhibition by vildagliptin remained unchanged when vildagliptin was given alone or co-administered with voglibose; maximum inhibition was 98.3 ± 1.4% (mean ± SD) for vildagliptin alone and 97.4 ± 1.1% with co-administration. Coadministration of vildagliptin and voglibose led to a greater increase in the active GLP-1 plasma concentration than did vildagliptin alone (geometric mean ratio 1.63 (90% CI, 1.30, 2.03), p = 0.0007). The combination of vildagliptin and voglibose also led to a significantly lower plasma glucose levels (p < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: Plasma vildagliptin levels were decreased when voglibose was co-administered, although DPP- 4 inhibition remained unchanged. Co-administration led to significantly better pharmacodynamic response compared with each treatment alone, including higher active GLP-1 and lower glucose levels. The results indicate that this coadministration may be beneficial in the clinical situation. Vildagliptin and voglibose treatments, alone or when co-administered, were well tolerated in Japanese patients with Type 2 diabetes.

Population Pharmacokinetic and Exposure-Safety Analyses of Ibrutinib for the Treatment of Chronic Graft-Versus-Host Disease.

The population pharmacokinetic (PK) and exposure-response (E-R) analyses for the safety of ibrutinib for the treatment of chronic graft-versus-host disease (cGVHD) is presented. This work aims to develop a population PK model for ibrutinib based on data from clinical studies in subjects with cGVHD, to evaluate the impact of intrinsic and extrinsic factors on PK parameters as well as systemic exposure levels, and to assess an E-R relationship for selected safety end points. Pooled data from 162 subjects with cGVHD enrolled in 4 clinical studies were included in the population PK analysis. In the studies, an ibrutinib dose of 420 mg once daily was administered orally. With the exception of 1 study, the study protocols instructed for a reduction of the ibrutinib dose to 140 or 280 mg once daily, depending on concomitant CYP3A inhibitor use. Concomitant CYP3A inhibitor use was found to be a primary covariate for relative bioavailability (F1): the F1 value increased 2.22-fold with concomitant moderate CYP3A inhibitors and 3.09-fold with concomitant strong CYP3A inhibitors, compared with the F1 value in the absence of CYP3A inhibitors. In addition, Japanese ethnicity led to an F1 value that was 1.70-fold higher than that in the non-Japanese population. Simulations using the final PK model suggest that ibrutinib exposure was appropriately controlled within the therapeutic range in the entire cGVHD population by applying dose reductions depending on the use of CYP3A inhibitors, and that additional dose modification for the Japanese population would not be required. The subsequent E-R analysis suggests no apparent association between the systemic exposure to ibrutinib and the selected safety end points.

Population pharmacokinetic modeling and noncompartmental analysis demonstrated bioequivalence between metformin component of metformin/vildagliptin fixed-dose combination products and metformin immediate-release tablet sourced from various countries.

Metformin is the first-line pharmacotherapy choice for treating type-2 diabetes mellitus, alone or in combination with other antidiabetic drugs. During the development of immediate-release (IR) metformin containing novel fixed-dose combination (FDC) products, several health-authorities require sponsors to demonstrate bioequivalence between FDC products and the country-sourced metformin for market approval. Eight bioequivalence studies that compared metformin/vildagliptin FDC product (test) to metformin IR tablet sourced from various countries (reference) were conducted. A population pharmacokinetic (PPK) analysis of pooled metformin concentration-time data was performed to evaluate whether country-sourced metformin is a significant covariate. The PPK analysis demonstrated that there was no clinically relevant effect of metformin source or race/ethnicity on metformin pharmacokinetics. Also, noncompartmental analysis conducted showed that 90%CI of geometric mean ratios of test to reference metformin formulations, calculated for maximum-concentration and exposure parameters, were within the 80%-125% criteria, indicating comparable metformin exposure regardless of the country-sourced metformin IR formulation. These results are consistent with the biopharmaceutics properties of metformin and provide scientific evidence that after assessing in vitro dissolution of novel FDC formulation, additional bioequivalence studies with multiple countries' reference products may not be required once bioequivalence is established with 1 country-sourced IR metformin formulation.

Effect of Renal Impairment on the Pharmacokinetics of Pradigastat, a Novel Diacylglycerol Acyltransferase1 (DGAT1) Inhibitor.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Pradigastat, a diacylglycerol acyltransferase1 inhibitor, is being developed for the treatment of familial chylomicronemia syndrome. The primary objective of this clinical study was to evaluate the effect of renal impairment on the pharmacokinetics of pradigastat. METHODS: In an open-label, parallel-group study, the single-dose (40 mg) pharmacokinetics of pradigastat were evaluated in patients with mild (n = 9), moderate (n = 10) and severe renal impairment (n = 9) compared with matched healthy subjects (n = 28). The protein binding and urinary excretion of pradigastat were also assessed in this study. RESULTS: In patients with mild and moderate renal impairment the geometric means of the maximum plasma concentration (C max) and the area under the plasma concentration-time curve from time zero to infinity (AUC inf) of pradigastat were similar as compared with healthy subjects. In patients with severe renal impairment, the geometric means of the C max and AUC inf increased by 40 % [geometric mean ratio 1.41; 90 % confidence interval (CI) 0.92-2.14] and 18 % (geometric mean ratio 1.18; 90 % CI 0.68-2.05), respectively. There was no significant correlation between renal function (measured by creatinine clearance) and C max or AUC inf. Protein binding values were >99 % and the urinary excretion of pradigastat was minimal in all subjects. There were no severe adverse events in the study and mild transient diarrhoea was the most common adverse event. The safety profile was similar between patients with renal impairment and healthy subjects. CONCLUSION: There was no change in the pharmacokinetics of pradigastat in patients with mild and moderate renal impairment. In patients with severe renal impairment, the mean exposure C max and AUC inf of pradigastat were increased by 40 and 18 %, respectively.

Inhibition of bile acid transport across Na+/taurocholate cotransporting polypeptide (SLC10A1) and bile salt export pump (ABCB 11)-coexpressing LLC-PK1 cells by cholestasis-inducing drugs.

Vectorial transport of bile acids across hepatocytes is a major driving force for bile flow, and bile acid retention in the liver causes hepatotoxicity. The basolateral and apical transporters for bile acids are thought to be targets of drugs that induce cholestasis. Previously, we constructed polarized LLC-PK1 cells that express both a major bile acid uptake transporter human Na+/taurocholate cotransporting polypeptide (SLC10A1) (NTCP) and the bile acid efflux transporter human bile salt export pump (ABCB 11) (BSEP) and showed that monolayers of such cells can be used to characterize vectorial transcellular transport of bile acids. In the present study, we investigated whether cholestasis-inducing drugs could inhibit bile acid transport in such cells. Because fluorescent substrates allow the development of a high-throughput screening method, we examined the transport by NTCP and BSEP of fluorescent bile acids as well as taurocholate. The aminofluorescein-tagged bile acids, chenodeoxycholylglycylamidofluorescein and cholylglycylamidofluorescein, were substrates of both NTCP and BSEP, and their basal-to-apical transport rates across coexpressing cell monolayers were 4.3 to 4.5 times those of the vector control, although smaller than for taurocholate. The well known cholestatic drugs, rifampicin, rifamycin SV, glibenclamide, and cyclosporin A, reduced the basal-to-apical transport and the apical efflux clearance of taurocholate across NTCP- and BSEP-coexpressing cell monolayers. Further analysis indicated that the drugs inhibited both NTCP and BSEP. Our study suggests that such coexpressing cells can provide a useful system for the identification of inhibitors of these two transport systems, including potential drug candidates.

Vectorial transport of unconjugated and conjugated bile salts by monolayers of LLC-PK1 cells doubly transfected with human NTCP and BSEP or with rat Ntcp and Bsep.

Na(+)-taurocholate-cotransporting peptide (NTCP)/SLC10A1 and bile salt export pump (BSEP)/ABCB11 synergistically play an important role in the transport of bile salts by the hepatocyte. In this study, we transfected human NTCP and BSEP or rat Ntcp and Bsep into LLC-PK1 cells, a cell line devoid of bile salts transporters. Transport by these cells was characterized with a focus on substrate specificity between rats and humans. The basal to apical flux of taurocholate across NTCP- and BSEP-expressing LLC-PK1 monolayers was 10 times higher than that in the opposite direction, whereas the flux across the monolayer of control and NTCP or BSEP single-expressing cells did not show any vectorial transport. The basal to apical flux of taurocholate was saturated with a K(m) value of 20 microM. Vectorial transcellular transport was also observed for cholate, chenodeoxycholate, ursodeoxycholate, their taurine and glycine conjugates, and taurodeoxycholate and glycodeoxycholate, whereas no transport of lithocholate was detected. To evaluate the respective functions of NTCP and BSEP and to compare them with those of rat Ntcp and Bsep, we calculated the clearance by each transporter in this system. A good correlation in the clearance of the examined bile salts (cholate, chenodeoxycholate, ursodeoxycholate, and their taurine or glycine conjugates) was observed between transport by human and that of rat transporters in terms of their rank order: for NTCP, taurine conjugates > glycine conjugates > unconjugated bile salts, and for BSEP, unconjugated bile salts and glycine conjugates > taurine conjugates. In conclusion, the substrate specificity of human and rat NTCP and BSEP appear to be very similar at least for monovalent bile salts under physiological conditions.

Vectorial transport of bile salts across MDCK cells expressing both rat Na+-taurocholate cotransporting polypeptide and rat bile salt export pump.

Bile salts are predominantly taken up by hepatocytes via the basolateral Na(+)-taurocholate cotransporting polypeptide (NTCP/SLC10A1) and secreted into the bile by the bile salt export pump (BSEP/ABCB11). In the present study, we transfected rat Ntcp and rat Bsep into polarized Madin-Darby canine kidney cells and characterized the transport properties of these cells for eight bile salts. Immunohistochemical staining demonstrated that Ntcp was expressed at the basolateral domains, whereas Bsep was expressed at the apical domains. Basal-to-apical transport of taurocholate across the monolayer expressing only Ntcp and that coexpressing Ntcp/Bsep was observed, whereas the flux across the monolayer of control and Bsep-expressing cells was symmetrical. Basal-to-apical transport of taurocholate across Ntcp/Bsep-coexpressing monolayers was significantly higher than that across monolayers expressing only Ntcp. Kinetic analysis of this vectorial transport of taurocholate gave an apparent K(m) value of 13.9 +/- 4.7 microM for cells expressing Ntcp alone, which is comparable with 22.2 +/- 4.5 microM for cells expressing both Ntcp and Bsep and V(max) values of 15.8 +/- 4.2 and 60.8 +/- 9.0 pmol.min(-1).mg protein(-1) for Ntcp alone and Ntcp and Bsep-coexpressing cells, respectively. Transcellular transport of cholate, glycocholate, taurochenodeoxycholate, chenodeoxycholate, glycochenodeoxycholate, tauroursodeoxycholate, ursodeoxycholate, and glycoursodeoxycholate, but not that of lithocholate was also observed across the double transfectant. This double-expressing system can be used as a model to clarify vectorial transport of bile salts across hepatocytes under physiological conditions.