Minimally invasive versus transcatheter closure of secundum atrial septal defects: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Limited data exists demonstrating the efficacy of minimally invasive surgery (MIS) compared to transcatheter (TC) closure of atrial septal defects (ASD). This systematic review and meta-analysis aims to compare post-operative outcomes of MIS versus TC repair in ASD closure. METHODS: PubMed, Medline and EMBASE were searched from inception until June 2018 for randomised and observational studies comparing post-operative outcomes for MIS and TC repair. The studies were reviewed for bias using the ROBINS-I Score and pooled in a meta-analysis using STATA (version 15). RESULTS: Six observational studies, involving 1524 patients assessing three primary and five secondary outcomes were included. Evidence suggests TC repair yielded shorter hospital stay (MD = 3.32, 95% CI 1.04-5.60) and lower rates of transient atrial fibrillation (AF) (RR = 0.48, 95% CI 0.20-1.15). TC repair patients also had fewer pericardial effusions (RR = 0.27, 95% CI 0.05-1.54, I2 = 0.0%) and pneumothoraxes (RR = 0.18, 95% CI 0.04-0.80, I2 = 0.0%). However, TC repair results in more minor residual shunts (RR = 6.04, 95% CI 1.69-21.63 in favour of MIS, I2 = 39.0%). No differences were found for incidences of strokes (RR = 1.58, 95% CI 0.23-10.91, I2 = 19.3%), unexpected bleeding (RR = 0.44, 95% CI 0.19-1.04, I2 = 0.0%) and blood transfusion (RR = 0.39, 95% CI 0.09-1.59, I2 = 0.0%). CONCLUSIONS: MIS closure for ASD has similar outcomes compared to TC repair. However, the lack of randomised literature related to MIS versus TC repair for ASD closure warrants further evidence in the form of RCTs to further support these findings.

Comparison of outcomes between minimally invasive and median sternotomy for double and triple valve surgery: A meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Limited data exists demonstrating the efficacy of minimally invasive surgery (MIS) compared to median sternotomy (MS) for multiple valvular disease (MVD). This systematic review and meta-analysis aims to compare operative and peri-operative outcomes of MIS vs MS in MVD. METHODS: PubMed, Ovid, and Embase were searched from inception until August 2019 for randomized and observational studies comparing MIS and MS in patients with MVD. Clinical outcomes of intra- and postoperative times, reoperation for bleeding and surgical site infection were evaluated. RESULTS: Five observational studies comparing 340 MIS vs 414 MS patients were eligible for qualitative and quantitative review. The quality of evidence assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa scale was good for all included studies. Meta-analysis demonstrated increased cardiopulmonary bypass time for MIS patients (weighted mean difference [WMD], 0.487; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.365-0.608; P < .0001). Similarly, aortic cross-clamp time was longer in patients undergoing MIS (WMD, 0.632; 95% CI, 0.509-0.755; P < .0001). No differences were found in operative mortality, reoperation for bleeding, surgical site infection, or hospital stay. CONCLUSIONS: MIS for MVD have similar short-term outcomes compared to MS. This adds value to the use of minimally invasive methods for multivalvular surgery, despite conferring longer operative times. However, the paucity in literature and learning curve associated with MIS warrants further evidence, ideally randomized control trials, to support these findings.

Transposition of Vessels for Microvascular Decompression of Posterior Fossa Cranial Nerves: Review of Literature and Intraoperative Decision-Making Scheme.

INTRODUCTION: Microvascular decompression with transposition of the involved vessels provides good surgical outcomes in cases of complex and recurrent neurovascular compression syndromes. We conducted a literature review to illustrate the variations in the surgical techniques used for transposition and to provide a practical decision-making scheme for transposition of the involved vessel. METHODS: A PubMed Medline database record search was conducted using the following algorithm ("Microvascular Decompression Surgery"[Mesh]) OR (((Microvascular) OR (Macrovascular)) AND decompression AND surgery) AND (transposition). Only articles that detailed the intraoperative techniques were included. RESULTS: A total of 48 articles were included. The adjacent anatomical walls to which the compressing vessel can be anchored were divided into 4 groups; A: roof (tentorium cerebelli), B: anterior wall (posterior surface of petrous bone and clivus), C: posterior wall (petrosal surface of the cerebellum), and D: "no wall" required. A new decision-making scheme based on the following 2 questions was designed: 1) is the conflicting vessel amenable to transposition to a nearby wall in the cerebello-brainstem space? 2) what is the closest wall to secure the transposed vessel? CONCLUSIONS: Transposition of the involved vessel is a valuable procedure for microvascular decompression of the posterior fossa cranial nerves. Anchoring the vessel to the adjacent anatomical wall ensures secure transposition. The proposed algorithm provides a systemic scheme to identify the optimal anatomical wall, and to determine the technique and material that can be used to anchor involved vessel. This scheme is an efficient method to inform the intraoperative decision-making process.