Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
1.
Inj Prev ; 22(5): 347-51, 2016 10.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27016462

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Four storage practices protect against unintentional and/or self-inflicted firearm injury among children and adolescents: keeping guns locked (1) and unloaded (2) and keeping ammunition locked up (3) and in a separate location from the guns (4). Our aim was to mimic common Google search strategies on firearm/ammunition storage and assess whether the resulting web pages provided recommendations consistent with those supported by the literature. METHODS: We identified 87 web pages by Google search of the 10 most commonly used search terms in the USA related to firearm/ammunition storage. Two non-blinded independent reviewers analysed web page technical quality according to a 17-item checklist derived from previous studies. A single reviewer analysed readability by US grade level assigned by Flesch-Kincaid Grade Level Index. Two separate, blinded, independent reviewers analysed deidentified web page content for accuracy and completeness describing the four accepted storage practices. Reviewers resolved disagreements by consensus. RESULTS: The web pages described, on average, less than one of four accepted storage practices (mean 0.2 (95% CL 0.1 to 0.4)). Only two web pages (2%) identified all four practices. Two web pages (2%) made assertions inconsistent with recommendations; both implied that loaded firearms could be stored safely. Flesch-Kincaid Grade Level Index averaged 8.0 (95% CL 7.3 to 8.7). The average technical quality score was 7.1 (95% CL 6.8 to 7.4) out of an available score of 17. There was a high degree of agreement between reviewers regarding completeness (weighted κ 0.78 (95% CL 0.61 to 0.97)). CONCLUSIONS: The internet currently provides incomplete information about safe firearm storage. Understanding existing deficiencies may inform future strategies for improvement.


Asunto(s)
Prevención de Accidentes , Información de Salud al Consumidor/normas , Seguridad de Productos para el Consumidor/normas , Armas de Fuego , Internet , Propiedad , Administración de la Seguridad/normas , Heridas por Arma de Fuego/prevención & control , Prevención de Accidentes/métodos , Guías como Asunto , Humanos , Padres , Estados Unidos
2.
Pediatrics ; 150(4)2022 10 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36180615

RESUMEN

Bruising or bleeding in a child can raise the concern for child abuse. Assessing whether the findings are the result of trauma and/or whether the child has a bleeding disorder is critical. Many bleeding disorders are rare, and not every child with bruising/bleeding that may raise a concern for abuse requires an evaluation for bleeding disorders. However, in some instances, bleeding disorders can present in a manner similar to child abuse. Bleeding disorders cannot be ruled out solely on the basis of patient and family history, no matter how extensive. The history and clinical evaluation can be used to determine the necessity of an evaluation for a possible bleeding disorder, and prevalence and known clinical presentations of individual bleeding disorders can be used to guide the extent of laboratory testing. This clinical report provides guidance to pediatricians and other clinicians regarding the evaluation for bleeding disorders when child abuse is suspected.


Asunto(s)
Trastornos de la Coagulación Sanguínea , Maltrato a los Niños , Contusiones , Niño , Maltrato a los Niños/diagnóstico , Contusiones/diagnóstico , Contusiones/etiología , Hemorragia/diagnóstico , Hemorragia/etiología , Humanos , Prevalencia
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA