Identifying preferred format and source of exercise information in persons with multiple sclerosis that can be delivered by health-care providers.

BACKGROUND: There is increasing recognition of the benefits of exercise in individuals with multiple sclerosis (MS), yet the MS population does not engage in sufficient amounts of exercise to accrue health benefits. There has been little qualitative inquiry to establish the preferred format and source for receiving exercise information from health-care providers among persons with MS. OBJECTIVE: We sought to identify the desired and preferred format and source of exercise information for persons with MS that can be delivered through health-care providers. SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: Participants were adults with MS who had mild or moderate disability and participated in a range of exercise levels. All participants lived in the Midwest of the United States. METHODS: Fifty semi-structured interviews were conducted and analysed using thematic analysis. RESULTS: Two themes emerged, (i) approach for receiving exercise promotion and (ii) ideal person for promoting exercise. Persons with MS want to receive exercise information through in-person consultations with health-care providers, print media and electronic media. Persons with MS want to receive exercise promotion from health-care providers with expertise in MS (ie neurologists) and with expertise in exercise (eg physical therapists). CONCLUSIONS: These data support the importance of understanding how to provide exercise information to persons with MS and identifying that health-care providers including neurologists and physical therapists should be involved in exercise promotion.

Investigating the needs and wants of healthcare providers for promoting exercise in persons with multiple sclerosis: a qualitative study.

PURPOSE: We undertook a qualitative study that explored the needs of healthcare providers for promoting exercise behaviour among persons with mild or moderate multiple sclerosis (MS). METHODS: We used interpretive description methodology, and conducted semi-structured interviews with Neurologists (n = 13), occupational therapists (n = 10), physical therapists (n = 11), and nurses (n = 10). The interviews were analysed using thematic analysis. RESULTS: We identified three themes with multiple subthemes regarding exercise promotion by healthcare providers. The first theme was "opportunities for exercise promotion" through the healthcare system, healthcare team, and clinical appointment. The second theme was "healthcare provider education" that included professional training, training among healthcare providers, and clear and defined exercise promotion protocols. The third theme was "patient tools/strategies" that should be delivered among persons with MS as part of the exercise prescription. CONCLUSIONS: Providers in MS healthcare consider the patient-provider interaction within the healthcare system, healthcare team, and clinical appointment as a novel opportunity for exercise promotion. Such an opportunity requires education of healthcare providers and provision of tools and strategies for exercise promotion among persons with MS. Implications for rehabilitation Healthcare providers are interested in and motivated for promoting exercise participation among persons with multiple sclerosis. Successful exercise promotion must consider opportunities at three different organisational levels, namely the healthcare system, the local healthcare team, and clinical appointment. Healthcare providers need further training for promoting exercise among persons with multiple sclerosis. The promotion of exercise among persons with multiple sclerosis will require resources and strategies that can be readily offered by providers.