Local recurrences following mastectomy: support for the concept of tumor dormancy.

BACKGROUND: Local or regional recurrence of breast cancer occurs in 5%-30% of patients treated by Halsted radical or modified radical mastectomy. Lag time between treatment and recurrence varies widely, and it is not known whether the recurring tumor grows at a constant growth rate or at a more rapid rate after a period of tumor dormancy. PURPOSE: This study was undertaken to discriminate between the above-mentioned hypotheses, i.e., determine whether a tumor that recurs after mastectomy grows at a constant rate or whether it grows rapidly following a period of tumor dormancy. METHODS: A series of 122 patients with local recurrence as a first event after mastectomy for resectable breast cancer was evaluated. We measured the diameter of the recurring tumor (Dr) in each patient and calculated the diameter that the recurring tumor could have reached at the immediately preceding physical examination (Dpe), when no local relapse had yet been detected, by assuming an exponential growth during the treatment-free interval. For patients who had a calculated diameter Dpe that was large enough to have been detected at the previous examination, we assumed that a tumor 5 mm in diameter had been mistakenly missed, and the expected corresponding tumor diameter at the time of detection (Drc) was calculated. Finally, the minimum growth rate (mGR) consistent with the sequence "no detection-->recurrence of diameter Dr" was obtained by assuming an exponential growth from the tumor volume corresponding to a diameter 1 mm less than the diameter detection threshold. RESULTS: A wide overlap between Dr and Dpe values was observed. Seventy-two (59%) of 122 Dpe values were larger than the minimum Dr; 18 (15%) were even larger than the median Dr value. The difference between expected and observed detection rates was highly significant (P < .0001). Furthermore, when treatment-free intervals were longer than 4 years, the difference between median Dr and median Dpe values failed to reach statistical significance. The Drc values were significantly lower than the related Dr values, while the mGR values were significantly higher than the corresponding growth rates (paired sample t test: P < .001). CONCLUSION: This study provides evidence that the hypothesis of uninterrupted constant growth of locally recurring breast tumors should be rejected, as it implies a statistically significant departure from observed data. Our results suggest that a period of tumor dormancy followed by more rapid growth could provide an alternative and more reasonable description of tumor recurrence.

Cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, and fluorouracil with and without doxorubicin in the adjuvant treatment of resectable breast cancer with one to three positive axillary nodes.

In the attempt to improve current adjuvant results in patients with one to three positive axillary lymph nodes, in November 1981 we activated a prospective randomized study to assess the effectiveness of intravenous (IV) cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, and fluorouracil (CMF) for 12 courses versus CMF for eight courses followed by Adriamycin (doxorubicin; Farmitalia Carlo Erba, Milan, Italy) for four courses. The 5-year results were evaluated in a total of 486 patients entered into the study up to December 1987. CMF chemotherapy was delivered IV for a total of 12 courses when given alone and for eight courses when followed by four courses of Adriamycin. All drugs were recycled every 3 weeks. Rather than temporarily reducing doses, drug administration was delayed for 1 to 2 weeks in the face of myelosuppression on the planned day of treatment. After a median follow-up of 61 months, no significant differences were evident between the treatment groups in terms of relapse-free (CMF 74% v CMF followed by Adriamycin 72%) and total survival (CMF 89% v CMF followed by Adriamycin 86%). Drug treatments were fairly well tolerated and devoid of life-threatening toxicity. Present results, which were not influenced by menopausal status, indicate that Adriamycin given after CMF failed to improve treatment outcome over CMF alone. However, the role of Adriamycin in an adjuvant setting remains to be further clarified. Considering the good 5-year results achieved in this study at the expense of minimal toxicity, full-dose CMF remains, at present, the adjuvant chemotherapy of choice for patients with one to three positive nodes.

Primary chemotherapy in operable breast cancer: eight-year experience at the Milan Cancer Institute.

PURPOSE: Primary chemotherapy was administered to patients with tumors that measured > or = 2.5 cm in largest diameter to decrease the size of the primary tumor and allow for effective local and distant control while avoiding mastectomy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Two prospective nonrandomized studies were performed that used different regimens of primary chemotherapy followed by breast-sparing surgery in the presence of objective tumor remission. Additional postoperative chemotherapy was given to women at high risk of disease relapse. The median follow-up duration was 65 months. RESULTS: A total of 536 assessable patients were enrolled, and the main characteristics were fairly comparable between the two trials. Following primary chemotherapy, 85% of patients could be subjected to breast-sparing surgery; in 14 patients (3%), surgical specimens failed to show any residual neoplastic cell. In the final multivariate analysis, the histologically assessed extent of axillary node involvement (P < .001), as well as degree of response to primary chemotherapy (P = .034), represented the significant variables able to influence 8-year relapse-free survival. In women subjected to a breast-conserving approach, the cumulative risk of local relapse as first event alone was 6.8% (95% confidence interval, 3.9% to 8.8%). CONCLUSION: Current findings indicate that primary chemotherapy can be safely administered in women with large tumors (>5.0 cm) and can allow breast-sparing surgery in a high fraction of patients (62%). However, to assess effectively the worthiness of this approach on long-term results, properlyconceived large randomized studies with newer and more effective drug regimens are warranted.

Long-term cardiac sequelae in operable breast cancer patients given adjuvant chemotherapy with or without doxorubicin and breast irradiation.

PURPOSE: To investigate long-term cardiac sequelae associated with anthracycline use in adjuvant chemotherapy of patients with early breast cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: All 1,000 patients from three prospective trials of adjuvant chemotherapy containing doxorubicin (n = 637, median total dose of 294 mg/m(2)) or not containing the anthracycline (cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, and fluorouracil [CMF] regimen alone, n = 363) were analyzed for the relative incidence of congestive heart failure (CHF) and myocardial infarction (MI) during 14 years of follow-up. The 462 women continuously free of disease as of February 1996 were recalled, and 355 consented to undergo evaluation including 12-lead ECG and cardiac ultrasound with determination of left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) to assess the relative incidence of abnormalities in long-term survivors. RESULTS: Among the 1,000 patients, there were six cases of CHF and three cases of MI. Cumulative cardiac mortality accounted for 0.4% (doxorubicin-treated = 0.6%; CMF-treated = 0). Eighteen (5%) of the 355 patients undergoing cardiac evaluation after median 11 years of follow-up presented systolic dysfunction as defined by pathologic (< 50%, n = 8) or borderline (50% to 55%, n = 10) LVEF. Systolic dysfunction was higher in doxorubicin-treated (15 of 192; 8%) than in CMF-treated patients (three of 150; 2%). Breast irradiation had a significant impact on the occurrence of early CHF (four of 116; 3%), but not on systolic dysfunctions. CONCLUSION: At longer than 10 years of follow-up, the use of doxorubicin at a total dose commonly applied in regimens of adjuvant chemotherapy does not lead to cardiac clinical sequelae that counter-balance the benefit of treatment in patients with operable breast cancer who may be cured of their disease.

Adjuvant and neoadjuvant treatment of breast cancer.

Treatment of early breast cancer has been revolutionized during the past 30 years and new data continue to refine our knowledge of systemic treatments for this stage of disease. The updated worldwide overview has confirmed that, in terms of recurrence and survival, the balance of the known long-term benefits and risk favors some months of adjuvant polychemotherapy and/or a few years of tamoxifen for a wide range of patients. Both the overview and individual trials have shown that anthracycline-containing regimens can achieve additional reduction of the risk of disease relapse and death over cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, and fluorouracil (CMF)-like regimens. Paclitaxel-containing regimens appear promising, but require additional confirmation with longer follow-up. By contrast, controversy still exists on the role of high-dose chemotherapy in high-risk patients. Primary (neoadjuvant) chemotherapy is a new modality to treat large operable breast cancers and offers the possibility of breast conservation with treatment results at least similar to those achieved with classical adjuvant regimens. In the near future, newer agents and information gained on the role of prognostic and predictive factors will probably increase the effectiveness of adjuvant and neoadjuvant treatments.

Pilot study of primary chemotherapy with doxorubicin plus paclitaxel in women with locally advanced or operable breast cancer.

A pilot study of primary chemotherapy with bolus doxorubicin plus paclitaxel (Taxol; Bristol-Myers Squibb Company, Princeton, NJ) infused over 3 hours was performed in 38 women with locally advanced and 41 with stage II/III breast cancer. Patients received four cycles of primary chemotherapy followed by surgery and treatment with cyclophosphamide/methotrexate/5-fluorouracil for six cycles. Preliminary data are available on 73 patients. Doxorubicin plus paclitaxel was well tolerated. Primary toxicity consisted of grade 1 or 2 reversible peripheral neuropathy and grade 3 alopecia. After a median follow-up of 13 months, none of the patients have developed cardiac toxicity or any significant alteration of the left ventricular ejection fraction, which was measured before treatment, at each cycle of doxorubicin plus paclitaxel, and every 3 months thereafter. Major clinical response of the breast tumor was observed in 88% of patients. At pathologic examination of the surgical specimen, 40% were pT1, 15% had no macroscopic tumor residue, and 7% had complete disappearance of invasive neoplastic cells. After a median follow-up of 17 months for patients with locally advanced breast cancer, freedom from progression was 67%, disease-free survival was 71%, and overall survival was 74%. The same end points were 100% for patients with stage II/III disease, with a shorter median follow-up of 10 months. In conclusion, doxorubicin plus paclitaxel is safe, feasible, and effective, and can be used as primary or adjuvant chemotherapy to assess its actual therapeutic role in women with early breast cancer.

Adjuvant chemotherapy after conservative surgery plus irradiation versus modified radical mastectomy. Analysis of drug dosing and toxicity.

In a cohort of 764 evaluable patients with primary breast cancer, we have compared the ability to deliver full doses of adjuvant chemotherapy in two patient groups: one undergoing conservative breast surgery plus irradiation and the other having modified radical mastectomy as primary treatment for the cancer. We have also analyzed the toxicities of the concurrent radiation and chemotherapy. The group having irradiation had significantly more moderate leucopenia, which caused a short delay (median, three weeks) in the overall time necessary to complete the planned chemotherapy. However, among those patients who completed the planned chemotherapy cycles, the fraction who received more than 85 percent average drug doses was 96 percent or higher in all but one small subgroup. Interaction between the irradiation and chemotherapy caused mild breast skin reactions in 42 percent of patients so analyzed and worse reactions in 12 percent. When follow-up tracings were performed, mild electrocardiogram abnormalities occurred in 19 percent of patients, apparently because of the irradiation. We conclude that intravenous adjuvant chemotherapy, as administered in this study, can be delivered as intensely with conservative primary treatment as after mastectomy and that toxicity is mild, rarely requiring intervention or treatment discontinuation.

Mitoxantrone as first-salvage chemotherapy in relapsed breast cancer.

Mitoxantrone was administered at the dose of 14 mg/m2 i.v. every 3 weeks to 25 consecutive women with measurable progressive disease who relapsed after adjuvant CMF and endocrine therapy. The treatment plan consisted in the delivery of 6 cycles, unless disease progression or severe toxicity occurred. All patients were evaluable for drug response and toxicity. One patient achieved complete remission and 6 partial remission, for a total response rate of 28%. Objective tumor response was observed in all major sites of disease. The median time to achieve remission was 3 months. The median duration of response was 7 months (range, 5-39+), and the median survival for the entire group was 10 months (range, 3-39+). Results were influenced only by the duration of disease-free status from the end of adjuvant CMF chemotherapy. In fact, all tumor responses were documented in woman with free intervals exceeding 1 year (7 of 17 or 41%). Treatment was generally well tolerated, with 10 patients developing leukopenia at some time during treatment. Only 2 patients received less than 75% of the projected dose because of granulocytopenia. Complete alopecia occurred in only 2 cases. Three patients developed a fall greater than 15% in left ventricular ejection fraction, but no episode of congestive heart failure was observed. We conclude that mitoxantrone is an effective and safe drug which can be utilized in women relapsing after adjuvant CMF.

Breast cancer recurrence dynamics following adjuvant CMF is consistent with tumor dormancy and mastectomy-driven acceleration of the metastatic process.

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to better understand human breast cancer biology by studying how the timing of metastasis following primary resection is affected by adjuvant CMF (cyclophoshamide, methotrexate, 5-fluorouracil) chemotherapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Discrete hazards of recurrence and recurrence risk reductions for treated patients relative to controls were analyzed for all patients enrolled in two separate randomized clinical trials [study 1 (386 women): no further treatment versus 12 cycles of CMF; study 2 (459 women): six versus 12 cycles of CMF] and a historical group (396 women: surgery alone) of axillary node-positive patients undergoing mastectomy. RESULTS: (i) Nearly all CMF benefit occurs during the first 4 years following resection/chemotherapy. (ii) The CMF recurrence rate reduction is largely restricted to two specific spans. These temporally separate recurrence clusters occur during the first and third year of follow-up, while the second-year recurrences are weakly affected. (iii) Prolonging adjuvant treatment from 6 to 12 months partially alters this recurrence timing, without appreciably affecting the overall recurrence rate. (iv) These effects upon the dynamics of post-resection occurrence are menopausal status-independent. CONCLUSIONS: At least two different therapeutically vulnerable proliferative events, resulting in clinical appearance of two metastasis temporally distinct clusters of post-resection cancer recurrence, apparently occur during the administration of adjuvant chemotherapy. Metastases that transpire outside of these temporal windows are refractory to adjuvant therapy. The dynamics of both post-treatment recurrence risk and CMF effectiveness are similar for both pre- and postmenopausal women, suggesting that post-resection mechanisms by which chemotherapy prevents metastases are similar, but of different magnitude in pre- and postmenopausal women. These findings are consistent with a metastasis model that includes tumor dormancy in specific micrometastatic phases (single cells and avascular foci) and with the acceleration of the metastatic process by the surgical resection of the primary breast cancer.

Second malignancies following CMF-based adjuvant chemotherapy in resectable breast cancer.

BACKGROUND: Only a few studies have evaluated the long-term effects of adjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer. Furthermore, neither the relation between the risk of second malignancies and type of adjuvant regimen utilized nor the interaction between chemotherapy and breast irradiation or age of the patients have been described in detail. METHODS: A total of 2,465 patients entered into prospective studies of CMF-based adjuvant chemotherapy carried out at the Milan Cancer Institute between June 1973 and July 1990 were evaluated. The median follow-up was 12.0 years and detailed information about therapy was available for all patients. RESULTS: At 15 years, the cumulative actuarial risk of second malignancies (excluding contralateral breast cancer and basal skin cancer) was 6.7% +/- 0.8% for the total series. The figures were 8.4% +/- 2.9% after local-regional treatment alone, 6.4% +/- 0.9% following CMF, and 5.1% +/- 1.0% following CMF plus Adriamycin (doxorubicin; Farmitalia-Carlo Erba, Milan, Italy). Compared to the general female population, the relative risk following CMF-based adjuvant chemotherapy was 1.29. Three patients, all of whom had received CMF-based chemotherapy, developed acute non-lymphocytic leukemia (cumulative risk 0.23% +/- 0.15%; relative risk 2.3). No differences were evident when breast irradiation was considered, but the cumulative risk of second tumors was slightly higher in women aged > or = 50 years at surgery (7.7% +/- 1.3%) than in younger patients (6.0% +/- 1.0%). CONCLUSIONS: At present, there is no evidence of a significantly increased risk of second malignancies following adjuvant CMF-based chemotherapy such as the one given in this case series. A low risk of acute leukemia was associated with the cumulative total dose of cyclophosphamide administered, and breast irradiation did not enhance this risk. IMPLICATIONS: Our findings suggest that there is no reason to omit alkylating agents from short-term effective adjuvant chemotherapy.

Cardiac effects following adjuvant chemotherapy and breast irradiation in operable breast cancer.

AIM: To assess the frequency and type of cardiac effects in women treated with adjuvant chemotherapy with or without breast irradiation for operable breast cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Retrospective analysis of a series of 825 women taking part in prospectively randomized trials on adjuvant chemotherapy with or without adriamycin (doxorubicin; Farmitalia-Carlo Erba, Milan, Italy) for operable breast cancer at high risk of new disease manifestations. A total of 360 patients (44%) also received breast irradiation because of conservative surgery. Median follow-up in first clinical complete remission from end of all adjuvant treatments was 80 months. According to the protocol requirements, electrocardiograms were obtained before breast cancer surgery, before starting therapy with adriamycin and at the end of all adjuvant treatments. During the follow-up observation, electrocardiograms were systematically obtained at least once a year. In the presence of suspicious findings as well as of clinical symptoms and signs of cardiovascular disease, additional cardiac investigations were undertaken. However, percutaneous endomyocardial biopsies were never performed. RESULTS: Congestive heart failure occurred in a total of 4 women (0.5% of all patients; 0.8% following adriamycin-containing chemotherapy; 2.6% after both adriamycin and irradiation to the left breast), in two of whom it was fatal. ST-segment and T-wave abnormalities in the absence of other symptoms and signs were detected in 3.4% of the case series. Other cardiac events were documented in 6.8% of all patients Overall, cardiac effects were more frequently detected in women who received irradiation to the left breast. In addition, age greater than 55 years at surgery and history of risk factors were important risk modifiers in the occurrence of cardiac events. CONCLUSIONS: The addition of full-dose adriamycin to alkylating-containing adjuvant chemotherapy, as given in our studies, failed per se to increase the frequency of cardiac effects. Thus anthracyclines, which have the potential to improve current treatment results, deserve a proper place in the design of future adjuvant studies.

Adjuvant cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, and fluorouracil in node-positive breast cancer: the results of 20 years of follow-up.

BACKGROUND: Adjuvant combination chemotherapy with cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, and fluorouracil was administered after radical mastectomy for primary breast cancer with histologically positive axillary lymph nodes to assess whether it would improve treatment outcome as compared with surgery alone. Here we report a 20-year follow-up of this investigation. METHODS: In 1973 we began a trial involving 386 women who were randomly assigned to receive either no further treatment after radical mastectomy (179 women) or 12 monthly cycles of adjuvant combination chemotherapy (207 women). All patients were admitted to the Istituto Nazionale Tumori in Milan, Italy. Adjuvant chemotherapy was delivered in the outpatient clinic of the Division of Medical Oncology. RESULTS: After a median follow-up of 19.4 years, the patients given adjuvant combination chemotherapy had significantly better rates of relapse-free survival (unadjusted relative risk of relapse, 0.71; 95 percent confidence interval, 0.56 to 0.90; P = 0.004; adjusted relative risk, 0.65, 95 percent confidence interval, 0.51 to 0.83; P < 0.001) and total survival (unadjusted relative risk of death, 0.78; 95 percent confidence interval, 0.62 to 0.99; P = 0.04; adjusted relative risk, 0.76; 95 percent confidence interval, 0.60 to 0.97; P = 0.03). With the exception of postmenopausal women, a benefit from adjuvant chemotherapy was evident in all subgroups of patients. CONCLUSIONS: The long-term results of this trial of adjuvant combination chemotherapy confirm our preliminary observations of the effectiveness of the treatment in women with node-positive breast cancer.

Vinorelbine: an active, non cross-resistant drug in advanced breast cancer. Results from a phase II study.

PURPOSE: To evaluate efficacy and toxicity of vinorelbine and to investigate its cross-resistance with other current drug treatments for metastatic breast cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: From July 1992 to December 1993, 57 histologically proven breast cancer patients entered this Phase II study. Patients were stratified according to their status of previous treatment, namely, no prior chemotherapy or relapse more than 12 months since the end of adjuvant chemotherapy (Group A) and other patients (Group B). RESULTS: Fifty three patients were evaluable for response, 27 in Group A and 26 in Group B. All patients were evaluable for toxicity. Vinorelbine was initially administered at the dose of 30 mg/sqm weekly by i.v. infusion in 100 ml of normal saline over 20 minutes. A frequency analysis of drug administration in the first 20 cases revealed two main treatment periodicities, corresponding to one week and to three weeks. Thereafter the drug was administered at 30 mg/sqm on day 1 and 8, every 3 weeks. With the new drug schedule, the mean dose intensity increased from 19.7 to 21.1 mg/sqm per week. Overall, an objective response rate of 47% (95% C.I. 33%-61%) was documented. Four patients achieved complete response (7%, CI: 2%-18%) and 21 partial response (40%, CI: 26%-54%). Fifty nine percent of patients in Group A and 35% in Group B showed objective tumor response. The analysis of response rate in previously treated patients failed to show evidence of cross-resistance with vinorelbine. Main side effects, i.e. neutropenia, local pain, and gastrointestinal and flu-like symptoms, were moderate and short lasting. CONCLUSION: Vinorelbine has clinically significant activity in metastatic breast cancer, and no cross-resistance with prior anthracyclines and CMF treatments. The drug schedule of 30 mg/sqm iv bolus on day 1 and 8 every 3 weeks was found effective and tolerable.

Comparative analysis of breast cancer recurrence risk for patients receiving or not receiving adjuvant cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, fluorouracil (CMF). Data supporting the occurrence of 'cures'.

PURPOSE: To comparatively analyse the risk of recurrence at given times after surgery for breast cancer patients receiving or not receiving adjuvant CMF. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 1452 node positive patients, who entered controlled clinical trials carried out at the Milan Cancer Institute and underwent radical or modified radical mastectomy for operable breast cancer, were examined. In 575 cases no further treatment was performed, whereas 877 pts were given 6 or 12 courses of adjuvant Cyclophosphamide, Methotrexate, Fluorouracil (CMF). The recurrence risk was estimated by the event-specific hazard rate for first failure and distant metastases, and, following Efron, hazard rates were fitted by logistic regression models. RESULTS: The hazard rate for first failure and distant metastases showed a double peaked pattern for both treated patients and controls, with a first major peak at about 18-24 months from surgery (early metastases), a second minor peak at the 5th-6th year, and a tapered plateau-like tail extending over 10 years from surgery (late metastases). As expected, the recurrence risk of CMF treated patients was lower than the corresponding risk of patients undergoing surgery only. However, the difference was highly evident for early recurrences, while it declined and disappeared afterwards. CONCLUSION: Our findings confirm previous reports on patients not receiving adjuvant chemotherapy, suggesting that the recurrence risk for operable breast cancer has a multipeak pattern. As far as CMF treated patients are concerned, the unchanged peak timing together with the early recurrence risk reduction in comparison to controls are much more consistent with the real nonappearance of some early recurrences (putatively 'cured' patients) than with the delay in their manifestation. As late relapsing patients seem to have at most marginal benefits from adjuvant CMF, ways to recognize patients doomed to have late recurrence and new ways for treating micrometastases resulting in late recurrences are required.

The probability distribution of structure factors with non-integral indices. II. The P1; case.

The probability distribution of the structure factors with non-integral indices is derived in P1;. For integral values of at least one of the indices, the intensity distribution coincides with that provided by Wilson's statistics, but may strongly differ when the indices are (or are close to) half-integers. The deviations are stronger when the integral part of the indices is small, and increase with the size of the structure. In favourable circumstances, moduli and phases of the reflections may be accurately estimated.