Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
1.
J Med Internet Res ; 25: e45550, 2023 06 29.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37384372

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Since the legalization of medical cannabis in Canada in 2013, prescription of cannabis for medical purposes has become commonplace and a multibillion dollar industry has formed. Much of the media coverage surrounding medical cannabis has been positive in nature, leading to Canadians potentially underestimating the adverse effects of medical cannabis use. In recent years, there has been a large increase in clinic websites advertising the use of medical cannabis for health indications. However, little is known about the quality of the evidence used by these clinic websites to describe the effectiveness of cannabis used for medical purposes. OBJECTIVE: We aimed to identify the indications for medical cannabis reported by cannabis clinics in Ontario, Canada, and the evidence these clinics cited to support cannabis prescription. METHODS: We conducted a cross-sectional web search to identify all cannabis clinic websites within Ontario, Canada, that had physician involvement and identified their primary purpose as cannabis prescription. Two reviewers independently searched these websites to identify all medical indications for which cannabis was promoted and reviewed and critically appraised all studies cited using the Oxford Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine Levels of Evidence rubric. RESULTS: A total of 29 clinics were identified, promoting cannabis for 20 different medical indications including migraines, insomnia, and fibromyalgia. There were 235 unique studies cited on these websites to support the effectiveness of cannabis for these indications. A high proportion (36/235, 15.3%) of the studies were identified to be at the lowest level of evidence (level 5). Only 4 clinic websites included any mention of harms associated with cannabis. CONCLUSIONS: Cannabis clinic websites generally promote cannabis use as medically effective but cite low-quality evidence to support these claims and rarely discuss harms. The recommendation of cannabis as a general therapeutic for many indications unsupported by high-quality evidence is potentially misleading for medical practitioners and patients. This disparity should be carefully evaluated in context of the specific medical indication and an individualized patient risk assessment. Our work illustrates the need to increase the quality of research performed on the medical effects of cannabis.


Asunto(s)
Cannabis , Marihuana Medicinal , Humanos , Marihuana Medicinal/efectos adversos , Estudios Transversales , Ontario , Publicidad
2.
BMC Geriatr ; 22(1): 916, 2022 11 29.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36447157

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Among older adults with delirium and positive urinalysis, antibiotic treatment for urinary tract infection is common practice, but unsupported by literature or guidelines. We sought to: i) determine the rate of antibiotic treatment and the proportion of asymptomatic patients (other than delirium) in this patient population, and ii) examine the effect of antibiotic treatment on delirium resolution and adverse outcomes. METHODS: A health record review was conducted at a tertiary academic centre from January to December 2020. Inclusion criteria were age ≥ 65, positive delirium screening assessment, positive urinalysis, and admission to general medical units. Outcomes included rates of antibiotic treatment, delirium on day 7 of admission, and 30-day adverse outcomes. We compared delirium and adverse outcome rates in antibiotic-treated vs. non-treated groups. We conducted subgroup analyses among asymptomatic patients. RESULTS: We included 150 patients (57% female, mean age 85.4 years). Antibiotics were given to 86%. The asymptomatic subgroup (delirium without urinary symptoms or fever) comprised 38% and antibiotic treatment rate in this subgroup was 68%. There was no significant difference in delirium rate on day 7 between antibiotic-treated vs. non-treated groups, (entire cohort RR 0.94 [0.41-2.16] and asymptomatic subgroup RR 0.69 [0.22-2.15]) or in 30-day adverse outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: Older adults with delirium and positive urinalysis in general medical inpatient units were frequently treated with antibiotics - often despite the absence of urinary or other infectious symptoms. We failed to find evidence that antibiotic treatment in this population is associated with delirium resolution on day 7 of admission.


Asunto(s)
Delirio , Pacientes Internos , Humanos , Femenino , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Masculino , Urinálisis , Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Hospitalización , Delirio/diagnóstico , Delirio/tratamiento farmacológico , Delirio/epidemiología
3.
Can J Ophthalmol ; 59(2): e142-e148, 2024 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36731536

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: In this study we aim to determine seasonal patterns underlying optic neuritis (ON) onset that may provide valuable epidemiologic information and help delineate causative or protective factors. DESIGN: Single-centre retrospective chart review. METHODS: A database search of centralized electronic health records was completed using diagnostic codes employed at the Ottawa Eye Institute for data collection. Charts were reviewed for documentation supporting a diagnosis of ON falling into the following categories: multiple sclerosis ON and clinically isolated syndrome ON, myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein ON, neuromyelitis optica ON, and idiopathic ON. Date of onset, biological sex, and age were extracted from each chart. Data were analyzed for calculation of frequency by season and overall pooled seasonal trends of all cases of ON. RESULTS: From the 218 included patients with ON, there was no statistically significant seasonal correlation. The overall trend of ON was lowest in winter and spring (22% and 23%, respectively) and highest in summer and fall (28% and 27% respective). Divided further, multiple sclerosis ON or clinically isolated syndrome ON rates (n = 144) were lowest in the spring (21%) and highest in fall (29%); myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein ON rates (n = 25) were lowest in winter (16%) and highest in summer and fall (both at 32%); neuromyelitis optica ON rates (n = 16) were lowest in fall (12.5%) and highest in winter and summer (both at 31.25%); and idiopathic ON rates (n = 33) were lowest in fall (18%) and highest in spring (33%). CONCLUSIONS: The overall ON seasonal trend appears to have a predilection for the summer and fall months, which may be explained by warmer weather and viral infections as risk factors for multiple sclerosis relapse during those seasons.


Asunto(s)
Esclerosis Múltiple , Neuromielitis Óptica , Neuritis Óptica , Humanos , Neuromielitis Óptica/diagnóstico , Neuromielitis Óptica/epidemiología , Estaciones del Año , Glicoproteína Mielina-Oligodendrócito , Estudios Retrospectivos , Neuritis Óptica/diagnóstico , Neuritis Óptica/epidemiología , Esclerosis Múltiple/epidemiología , Autoanticuerpos
4.
Thromb Haemost ; 122(7): 1169-1176, 2022 Jul.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35263789

RESUMEN

Growth differentiation factor-15 (GDF-15), high-sensitivity cardiac troponin T (hs-TnT), and N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) are associated with increased risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE) in noncancer patients. However, the performance of these biomarkers in cancer patients is unknown. Our objective was to assess performance of these biomarkers in predicting VTE in cancer patients at intermediate to high risk for VTE (Khorana Score ≥ 2). We used 1-month plasma samples from AVERT trial patients to determine if GDF-15, NT-proBNP, and hs-TnT levels are associated with VTE incidence between 1 and 7 months from the start of chemotherapy. The minimal Euclidean distance of the receiver operating characteristic curve was used to derive optimal cut-offs for GDF-15 and NT-proBNP given there was no evidence of a commonly used cut-off. Logistic and Fine and Gray competing risk regression analyses were used to calculate odds ratios (ORs) and subdistribution hazard ratios, respectively, while adjusting for age, sex, anticoagulation, and antiplatelet therapy. We tested in two groups: all patients (n = 476, Model 1) and all patients with nonprimary brain cancers (n = 454, Model 2). In models 1 and 2, GDF-15 ≥2,290.9 pg/mL had adjusted ORs for VTE of 1.65 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.89-3.08), and 2.28 (95% CI: 1.28-4.09), respectively. hs-TnT ≥14.0 pg/mL was associated with higher odds of VTE in models 1 and 2 (adjusted ORs: 2.26 [95% CI: 1.40-3.65] and 2.03 [95% CI: 1.07-3.84], respectively). For NT-proBNP, levels ≥183.5 pg/mL were not associated with VTE. Similar results were observed in the Fine and Gray analysis. Our results indicate that increased GDF-15 and hs-TnT levels predicted increased VTE risk.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias , Tromboembolia Venosa , Biomarcadores , Ensayos Clínicos como Asunto , Factor 15 de Diferenciación de Crecimiento , Humanos , Péptido Natriurético Encefálico , Neoplasias/tratamiento farmacológico , Fragmentos de Péptidos , Troponina T , Tromboembolia Venosa/epidemiología
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA