RESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study is to verify the study hypothesis of the EXCEL trial by comparing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) in an EXCEL-like population of patients. BACKGROUND: The upcoming EXCEL trial will test the hypothesis that left main patients with SYNTAX score ≤ 32 experience similar rates of 3-year death, myocardial infarction (MI), or cerebrovascular accidents (CVA) following revascularization by PCI or CABG. METHODS: We compared the 3-year rates of death/MI/CVA and death/MI/CVA/target vessel revascularization (MACCE) in 556 patients with left main disease and SYNTAX score ≤ 32 undergoing PCI (n = 285) or CABG (n = 271). To account for confounders, outcome parameters underwent extensive statistical adjustment. RESULTS: The unadjusted incidence of death/MI/CVA was similar between PCI and CABG (12.7% vs. 8.4%, P = 0.892), while MACCE were higher in the PCI group compared to the CABG group (27.0% vs. 11.8%, P < 0.001). After propensity score matching, PCI was not associated with a significant increase in the rate of death/MI/CVA (11.8% vs. 10.7%, P = 0.948), while MACCE were more frequently noted among patients treated with PCI (28.8% vs. 14.1%, P = 0.002). Adjustment by means of SYNTAX score and EUROSCORE, covariates with and without propensity score, and propensity score alone did not change significantly these findings. CONCLUSIONS: In an EXCEL-like cohort of patients with left main disease, there seems to be a clinical equipoise between PCI and CABG in terms of death/MI/CVA. However, even in patients with SYNTAX score ≤ 32, CABG is superior to PCI when target vessel revascularization is included in the combined endpoint.
Asunto(s)
Angioplastia Coronaria con Balón , Puente de Arteria Coronaria , Enfermedad de la Arteria Coronaria/terapia , Puntaje de Propensión , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto/métodos , Proyectos de Investigación , Anciano , Angioplastia Coronaria con Balón/efectos adversos , Angioplastia Coronaria con Balón/instrumentación , Angioplastia Coronaria con Balón/mortalidad , Puente de Arteria Coronaria/efectos adversos , Puente de Arteria Coronaria/mortalidad , Enfermedad de la Arteria Coronaria/mortalidad , Enfermedad de la Arteria Coronaria/cirugía , Stents Liberadores de Fármacos , Femenino , Humanos , Italia , Estimación de Kaplan-Meier , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Infarto del Miocardio/etiología , Modelos de Riesgos Proporcionales , Estudios Prospectivos , Sistema de Registros , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , Medición de Riesgo , Factores de Riesgo , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Accidente Cerebrovascular/etiología , Equipoise Terapéutico , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Although drug-eluting stents (DES) have reduced restenosis in a broad range of lesions, there is limited data, from relatively small studies, on the safety and efficacy of DES for isolated ostial left anterior descending (LAD) stenoses. In addition, in the setting of these high-risk lesions, there is the issue of the potential involvement of the left main (LM) bifurcation, requiring subsequent revascularization for a lesion involving this critical location. METHODS: Patients with a de novo isolated unprotected ostial LAD stenoses treated with DES were included. Evaluated end points were cardiac death, nonfatal myocardial infarction, overall target lesion revascularization (TLR), and the reintervention for a restenotic lesion located at the LM segment adjacent to the stent (TLR-LM). RESULTS: A total of 162 patients were included: 95 underwent focal ostial LAD stenting and 67 stenting from the distal LM into the LAD ostium. The 2-year Kaplan-Meier estimates of cardiac death, nonfatal myocardial infarction, overall TLR, and TLR-LM were 2.6%, 2.1%, 8.3%, and 4.7%, respectively. Overall TLR and TLR-LM rates were higher in the focal ostial LAD stenting group. There was a trend toward an independent increased risk of TLR associated with focal ostial stenting. In addition, final minimal luminal diameter trended to be independently associated with TLR. CONCLUSION: The present study showed that DES for isolated ostial LAD lesions is a feasible, safe, and effective treatment strategy. In addition, this study suggested the hypothesis that a default distal LM-LAD stenting, rather than focal ostial stenting, might provide more favorable outcomes. Nevertheless, larger specifically designed studies are needed.
Asunto(s)
Estenosis Coronaria/cirugía , Stents Liberadores de Fármacos , Infarto del Miocardio/epidemiología , Causas de Muerte , Angiografía Coronaria , Reestenosis Coronaria/epidemiología , Reestenosis Coronaria/etiología , Reestenosis Coronaria/prevención & control , Estenosis Coronaria/complicaciones , Estenosis Coronaria/diagnóstico por imagen , Electrocardiografía , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Incidencia , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Infarto del Miocardio/etiología , Infarto del Miocardio/prevención & control , Pronóstico , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de TiempoAsunto(s)
Ecocardiografía Tridimensional/métodos , Anuloplastia de la Válvula Mitral/efectos adversos , Insuficiencia de la Válvula Mitral/diagnóstico por imagen , Válvula Mitral/diagnóstico por imagen , Anciano , Enfermedades Genéticas Ligadas al Cromosoma X/cirugía , Humanos , Masculino , Válvula Mitral/fisiopatología , Válvula Mitral/cirugía , Anuloplastia de la Válvula Mitral/instrumentación , Insuficiencia de la Válvula Mitral/etiología , Insuficiencia de la Válvula Mitral/fisiopatología , Prolapso de la Válvula Mitral/cirugía , Complicaciones Posoperatorias , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , Insuficiencia del TratamientoRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Uncoverage and malapposition of stent struts at optical coherence tomography (OCT) have been associated with stent thrombosis. Stent uncoverage by OCT is being used as a surrogate to address the propensity of a stent to develop thrombosis. We aimed to appraise early vessel healing in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) treated with the novel Avantgarde stent. METHODS: Patients with STEMI and multivessel disease were enrolled. The stent deployed on the infarct-related artery was imaged by frequency domain-OCT during deferred intervention (4-7 days apart). The primary end-point was the percentage of uncovered struts. Secondary end-points were the percentage of malapposed struts and struts covered with thrombus. RESULTS: Twenty patients (20 lesions) were enrolled, with 18 (18 stents) achieving a complete OCT pull-back and thus entering the final analysis (1497 cross-sections, 11 446 struts). Uncovered struts were 3.9%, whilst 8.0% of struts were malapposed and 2.6% were covered by thrombus. At per-stent analysis, all stents but two had a homogeneous distribution of strut coverage (i.e. % of uncovered struts ≥10). CONCLUSIONS: This study, originally exploiting OCT data early after stenting in STEMI patients, shows that the Avantgarde stent is associated with favourable vessel healing features.
Asunto(s)
Angioplastia Coronaria con Balón/instrumentación , Infarto del Miocardio/terapia , Stents , Anciano , Angioplastia Coronaria con Balón/efectos adversos , Cromo , Cobalto , Trombosis Coronaria/diagnóstico , Trombosis Coronaria/etiología , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Infarto del Miocardio/diagnóstico , Estudios Prospectivos , Diseño de Prótesis , Stents/efectos adversos , Factores de Tiempo , Tomografía de Coherencia Óptica/métodos , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
To investigate the prevalence of significant renal artery stenosis (RAS ≥50%), and to identify clinical predictors for significant RAS in patients with an elevated cardiovascular risk, such as those affected by ischemic heart disease. In patients with an elevated cardio-vascular risk, both atherosclerotic renovascular disease and coronary artery disease (CAD) are likely to occur. Prospectively from April 2007 to March 2008, all consecutive patients with ischemic heart disease undergoing non-emergent cardiac catheterization were also evaluated for atherosclerotic RAS by renal arteriography. A RAS ≥50% was considered as significant. A total of 1,298 patients underwent cardiac and renal angiography. Significant RAS was found in 70 out of 1,298 patients (5.4%). The presence of peripheral vascular disease, eGFR <67 ml/min/1.73 m(2), age >66 years, dyslipidemia, CAD severity and pulse pressure >52 mmHg were independent clinical predictors of significant RAS, and jointly produced a ROC AUC of 0.79 (95% CI 0.73-0.85, P < 0.001). Based on these data, a prediction rule for significant RAS was developed, and it showed an adequate predictive performance with 64% sensitivity and 82% specificity. In a large cohort of patients undergoing coronary angiography, significant RAS is a relatively rare comorbidity (5.4%). A model based on simple clinical variables may be useful for the clinical identification of high CV risk patients who may be suitable for renal arteriography at the time of cardiac catheterization.
Asunto(s)
Cateterismo Cardíaco , Isquemia Miocárdica/complicaciones , Obstrucción de la Arteria Renal/complicaciones , Obstrucción de la Arteria Renal/epidemiología , Anciano , Angiografía , Medios de Contraste , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Isquemia Miocárdica/terapia , Valor Predictivo de las Pruebas , Prevalencia , Estudios Prospectivos , Obstrucción de la Arteria Renal/diagnóstico por imagen , Factores de Riesgo , Sensibilidad y EspecificidadRESUMEN
There is a lack of knowledge on the interaction between age and left main coronary artery revascularization. The aim of this study was to investigate the comparative effectiveness of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with drug-eluting stents and coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) in patients with left main coronary artery disease aged <75 versus ≥75 years. Of a total of 894 patients included, 692 (77.4%) were aged <75 years and 202 (23.6%) ≥75 years. PCI was found to be significantly different from CABG with respect to the composite of major adverse cardiac events at 1-year follow-up in patients aged <75 years (15.5% vs 8.5%, p = 0.01) but not in those aged ≥75 years (16.4% vs 13.9%, p = 0.65). This finding was consistent after statistical adjustment for baseline confounders in the 2 groups (adjusted hazard ratio [AHR] 2.2, 95% confidence interval 1.2 to 4.1, p = 0.016 in younger patients; AHR 0.9, 95% confidence interval 0.3 to 3.0, p = 0.88 in older patients). In the 2 groups, PCI and CABG showed similar adjusted risks for all-cause death, cardiac death, and myocardial infarction. Target lesion revascularization occurred more frequently in patients aged <75 years treated with PCI compared to CABG (AHR 5.1, 95% confidence interval 1.9 to 13.6, p = 0.001) but not in those aged ≥75 years. A significant interaction between age and treatment with regard to major adverse cardiac events was identified (adjusted p for interaction = 0.034). In conclusion, compared to younger patients, elderly patients with left main disease are likely to derive the maximal gain from a less invasive procedure such as PCI.
Asunto(s)
Puente de Arteria Coronaria/métodos , Enfermedad de la Arteria Coronaria/cirugía , Stents Liberadores de Fármacos , Intervención Coronaria Percutánea/métodos , Sistema de Registros , Anciano , Causas de Muerte/tendencias , Enfermedad de la Arteria Coronaria/mortalidad , Femenino , Humanos , Italia/epidemiología , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Tasa de Supervivencia/tendencias , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: Strut coverage represents the most powerful morphometric predictor of stent thrombosis and the best surrogate indicator of endothelization. The aim of this study was to get new insights on temporal patterns of vessel healing after stenting with different types of stent. METHODS: Optical coherence tomography (OCT) was used to investigate the early strut coverage of lesions treated with CATANIA (CAT) stent, drug-eluting stent (DES) or cobalt-chromium bare metal stent (BMS). Two cohorts of 10 and 24 patients underwent OCT follow-up at 7-10 and 28-32 days after stenting, respectively. In each cohort, patients were randomly assigned to receive a CAT stent in one lesion and a BMS or a DES in a separate lesion. RESULTS: A total of 7975 and 8406 struts were analyzed for the comparisons of CAT stent vs. DES and CAT stent vs. BMS at 7-10 days, respectively. A total of 21 123 and 25 069 struts were analyzed for the comparisons of CAT stent vs. DES and CAT stent vs. BMS at 28-32 days, respectively. At 7-10 days, the CAT stent showed higher coverage rates compared with DES (90.0 vs. 85.9%, P < 0.0001) and BMS (90.2 vs. 83.6%, P < 0.0001). Similarly, at 28-32 days, the coverage rate was higher with CAT stent compared with DES (97.7 vs. 90.5%, P < 0.0001) and BMS (97.2 vs. 96.5%, P < 0.0001). CONCLUSION: The CAT stent yields quicker and more complete strut coverage than DES and BMS in the early phases of vessel healing following stent implantation.
Asunto(s)
Angioplastia Coronaria con Balón/instrumentación , Enfermedad de la Arteria Coronaria/terapia , Stents , Tomografía de Coherencia Óptica , Cicatrización de Heridas , Anciano , Angioplastia Coronaria con Balón/efectos adversos , Distribución de Chi-Cuadrado , Aleaciones de Cromo , Angiografía Coronaria , Enfermedad de la Arteria Coronaria/diagnóstico por imagen , Stents Liberadores de Fármacos , Femenino , Humanos , Italia , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Prospectivos , Diseño de Prótesis , Trombosis/etiología , Trombosis/patología , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
Uncertainty surrounds the optimal revascularization strategy for patients with left main coronary artery disease presenting with acute coronary syndromes (ACSs), and adequately sized specific comparisons of percutaneous and surgical revascularization in this scenario are lacking. The aim of this study was to evaluate the incidence of 1-year major adverse cardiac events (MACEs) in patients with left main coronary artery disease and ACS treated with percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and drug-eluting stent implantation or coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). A total of 583 patients were included. At 1 year, MACEs were significantly higher in patients treated with PCI (n = 222) compared to those treated with CABG (n = 361, 14.4% vs 5.3%, p <0.001), driven by a higher rate of target lesion revascularization (8.1% vs 1.7%, p = 0.001). This finding was consistent after statistical adjustment for MACEs (adjusted hazard ratio [HR] 2.7, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.2 to 5.9, p = 0.01) and target lesion revascularization (adjusted HR 8.0, 95% CI 2.2 to 28.7, p = 0.001). No statistically significant differences between PCI and CABG were noted for death (adjusted HR 1.1, 95% CI 0.4 to 3.0, p = 0.81) and myocardial infarction (adjusted HR 4.8, 95% CI 0.3 to 68.6, p = 0.25). No interaction between clinical presentation (ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction or unstable angina/non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction) and treatment (PCI or CABG) was observed (p for interaction = 0.68). In conclusion, in patients with left main coronary artery disease and ACS, PCI is associated with similar safety compared to CABG but higher risk of MACEs driven by increased risk of repeat revascularization.
Asunto(s)
Síndrome Coronario Agudo/cirugía , Angioplastia Coronaria con Balón , Puente de Arteria Coronaria , Enfermedad de la Arteria Coronaria/cirugía , Stents Liberadores de Fármacos , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/mortalidad , Sistema de Registros , Síndrome Coronario Agudo/mortalidad , Anciano , Enfermedad de la Arteria Coronaria/mortalidad , Supervivencia sin Enfermedad , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Infarto del Miocardio/mortalidadRESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to investigate the association between plaque distribution at left main (LM) bifurcation and target lesion revascularization (TLR) after stenting. BACKGROUND: Despite favorable reported mid- and long-term results, stent implantation on LM bifurcation remains challenging. The role of atherosclerotic plaque distribution in affecting LM bifurcation stenting outcomes has not been explored. METHODS: A total of 329 patients undergoing LM bifurcation stenting in 2 centers were included. A method based on different plaque locations within the bifurcation area was applied. The overall population was divided in 2 groups according to the presence of a specific pattern characterized by plaque occupying (n = 145) or not occupying (n = 184) the whole bifurcation (WB) area. RESULTS: Baseline clinical, angiographic, and procedural characteristics were well-balanced between the 2 groups. The WB group showed a significantly higher risk of 3-year TLR compared with the non-WB group (24.9% vs. 8.3%; unadjusted hazard ratio: 3.12; 95% confidence interval: 1.59 to 6.11; p = 0.001; adjusted hazard ratio: 2.84; 95% confidence interval: 1.43 to 5.64; p = 0.003). The 3-year TLR rate was not significantly different between patients treated with 1-or 2-stent techniques either in the WB or non-WB groups. In the WB group, TLR was similar between patients with lesions classified as 1,1,1 and non-1,1,1 by the Medina classification (20.7% vs. 26.8%, p = 0.57, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: The WB pattern is associated with enhanced TLR risk, regardless of stent technique and plaque severity. This could impact the treatment strategy of high-risk lesions involving the whole bifurcation area.
Asunto(s)
Angioplastia Coronaria con Balón/instrumentación , Angiografía Coronaria , Estenosis Coronaria/diagnóstico por imagen , Estenosis Coronaria/terapia , Stents , Anciano , Angioplastia Coronaria con Balón/efectos adversos , Distribución de Chi-Cuadrado , Stents Liberadores de Fármacos , Femenino , Humanos , Italia , Estimación de Kaplan-Meier , Masculino , Metales , Persona de Mediana Edad , Valor Predictivo de las Pruebas , Modelos de Riesgos Proporcionales , Diseño de Prótesis , Estudios Retrospectivos , Medición de Riesgo , Factores de Riesgo , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: We sought to evaluate the impact on long-term clinical outcomes of different types of drug-eluting stents (DES) in elderly patients. BACKGROUND: Elderly patients constitute a fast-growing portion of cardiovascular patients, however, they are not adequately represented in clinical trials. Moreover, few data comparing different type of DES in elderly patients are available. METHODS: From a total of 2,330 consecutive patients treated at our institution with DES, we selected 207 elderly patients (> or = 75 years of age) who underwent, from May 2002 to December 2006, sirolimus-eluting stent (SES group, 116 patients [pts], 56%) or paclitaxel-eluting stent (PES group, 91 pts, 43.9%) implantation. We evaluated the 24-month incidence of major adverse cardiac events (MACE). RESULTS: Higher rates of hypertension (78.4% vs. 90.1%; p = 0.01), diabetes (37.9 vs. 45.1; p = 0.01) and previous coronary artery bypass grafts (10.3% vs. 19.4%; p = 0.04) in the PES group were observed, whereas in the SES group, there were more smokers (26.6% vs. 12.1%; p = 0.007) and a higher incidence of previous myocardial infarction (MI) (50% vs. 35.2%; p = 0.02). Procedural success and in-hospital MACE were similar in both groups. At follow up, there was a higher incidence of MACE (22.4% vs. 10.9%; p = 0.04) and target lesion revascularization (7.1% vs. 3.0%; p = 0.02) in the SES group compared to the PES group. The incidence of cardiac death and MI were comparable between the two groups, as well as the rate of stent thrombosis. After adjustment for clinical and angiographic characteristics, no significant differences in outcomes were observed between SES and PES. CONCLUSIONS: In this real-word experience, no significant differences were found in the safety and efficacy profiles between SES and PES use in elderly patients.