Psychosocial interventions to improve sexual functioning in women with cancer: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials.

INTRODUCTION: Many women with cancer struggle with sexual side effects during and after treatment. Although preliminary evidence indicates that psychosocial interventions may be efficacious in improving sexual functioning for women with cancer, no systematic review has summarized the state of the science in this area. OBJECTIVES: The primary goal of this review was to narratively synthesize the results of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) testing the efficacy of psychosocial interventions to address sexual dysfunction in women with cancer. A secondary goal was to describe the diversity of the included samples (ie, racial/ethnic and sexual minority). METHODS: Following the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines, a systematic review was conducted examining RCTs of psychosocial interventions to improve sexual functioning for women with cancer. Articles were identified using MEDLINE, Embase, PsycINFO, and Cochrane CENTRAL. Two reviewers independently assessed each article for inclusion, with a third to resolve discrepancies. RESULTS: Seventeen studies were included in the review, 12 of which provided sufficient information to calculate effect sizes. Ten of the 12 studies primarily aimed to improve sexual functioning, all of which demonstrated positive effects on at least 1 outcome of sexual functioning. In the 2 RCTs of psychosocial interventions in which sexual function was a secondary aim, effects were negligible (ds = -0.04 and -0.15). Commonalities among the studies with large effect sizes were that they included education, mindfulness/acceptance, and communication/relationship skills as intervention components. Of note, there was an overall lack of sample diversity across studies, and most studies failed to report the race/ethnicity or sexual orientation of the participants. CONCLUSION: Results support interventions targeting sexual functioning outcomes for women with cancer and suggest that multimodal interventions including education, mindfulness/acceptance, and communication/relationship skills may be most effective. Future research should also focus on examining the efficacy and potential adaptations of extant sexual functioning interventions for underrepresented groups.

The psychological impacts of post-mastectomy breast reconstruction: a systematic review.

Background: While it is often presumed that undergoing breast reconstruction (BR) after mastectomy has positive psychosocial effects, a comprehensive review of current knowledge on the topic is to date absent. The aim of this systematic review is to summarize the available literature on the effects of BR on postoperative psychological distress. Methods: A systematic review of the literature was performed using PubMed, Google Scholar, EMBASE, PSYCinfo, and Web of Science. Inclusion criteria included clinical studies of patients who underwent BR post-mastectomy with psychological distress assessments as primary outcomes. Articles were independently reviewed and assessed for bias and evidence quality. Analyses were performed among patients receiving mastectomy alone (MA) versus mastectomy with breast reconstruction (MBR), immediate versus delayed mastectomy, and implant-based versus autologous reconstruction. Results: Ninety-nine studies published from 1980-2021 met inclusion criteria and were reviewed. Twenty-six (26.3%) studies compared patients who underwent MBR to those who underwent MA. Of these, 18 (69.2%) found that MBR had superior effects on psychologic outcomes, 6 (23.1%) found no differences, and 2 (7.7%) found negative psychologic effects relative to MA. Fourteen (14.1%) studies compared immediate versus delayed BR, of which 4 (28.6%) found that immediate BR had superior psychologic outcomes while 10 (71.4%) found no significant differences. Sixteen (16.2%) studies compared autologous versus implant-based reconstruction. Eight (50.0%) of these reported patients with autologous BR were more satisfied with breast appearance. Conclusions: While findings are not uniform, the majority of studies found that BR following mastectomy improves psychologic outcomes, with a possible benefit of immediate over delayed BR. Future studies should determine if BR type has an effect on psychological distress.

Cancer Drug Safety Training: Comparing Distance and In-Person Simulations for Interprofessional Education.

The Multi-Professional Oncology Safety and Simulation Training (MOSST) program, supported by the National Cancer Institute was launched in Fall 2018. The original workshop was conducted in person. As the COVID pandemic hit the program was transitioned to an online/distance simulation program using best practices in healthcare simulation design and implementation. The full day workshop was moved to an online platform using Zoom and the in-person simulations were re-developed as video branching case simulations. Learner outcomes that were identical in each modality were evaluated using the evaluation metrics from the original workshop. The use of a distance simulation modality to deliver the MOSST workshop resulted in a high-quality educational experience for the learners and the educational outcomes were comparable to the in-person version. Distance simulation using virtual unfolding case studies and didactic content showed comparable subjective and objective outcomes from participating learners. This work adds to the developing body of research on distance simulation.

Eficacia y aplicación de la hipnosis clínica / No disponible

La hipnosis es una técnica potente para la mejora de la calidad de vida de una gran variedad de pacientes. Sin embargo, es frecuente que tanto pacientes como terapeutas tengan creencias erróneas que dificultan que la hipnosis clínica se utilice más. El presente trabajo disipa estas creencias erróneas, destaca la eficacia clínica de la hipnosis y la investigación de vanguardia, y argumenta en favor de un uso más extendido de esta técnica terapéutica adjunta (AU)

Hypnosis is a powerful technique for improving quality of life for a wide variety of patients. Unfortunately, misconceptions about hypnosis are too often held by patients and therapists alike, possibly preventing greater use of clinical hypnosis. The present paper dispels these misconceptions, highlights clinical effectiveness of hypnosis and cutting edge research, and argues for more widespread use of this adjunctive therapeutic technique (AU)