Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Más filtros

Bases de datos
Asunto principal
Tipo del documento
Asunto de la revista
País de afiliación
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
BMC Public Health ; 22(1): 1547, 2022 08 13.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35964026

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: Vaccination will be instrumental in controlling the COVID-19 pandemic, and vaccination of children will be necessary to achieve herd immunity. Given that children with chronic health conditions may be at increased risk of COVID-19, it is crucial to understand factors influencing parental decisions about whether to have their child vaccinated. The study objectives were to measure parental intent to have their child with asthma vaccinated against COVID-19 and identify the determinants of their vaccination decision. STUDY DESIGN: This study is based on a cross-sectional exploratory observational online survey assessing parents' risk perception in the context of COVID-19. METHODS: In this study conducted in August 2020, the primary outcome was parent's answer to the question on their intention to get their child vaccinated if a vaccine against COVID-19 was available. Participants were also asked about their intention to get vaccinated themselves. Independent variables studied included sociodemographic, clinical data (e.g. presence of other chronic diseases), psychological, cognitive and risk perception related to COVID-19. Simultaneous equations models (3SLS) and seemingly unrelated regressions model (SUR) were carried out to identify factors associated with intention to have the child vaccinated and participants' intention to get vaccinated themselves against COVID-19. RESULTS: A total of 305 participants completed the survey. Overall, 19.1% of participants reported being unlikely or very unlikely to vaccinate their child against COVID-19 if a vaccine was available. Similarly, 21.0% were unlikely or very unlikely to get vaccinated themselves. The following factors were significantly associated with parents' decision to have their child vaccinated: parental level of education (p = 0.003), employment status (p < 0.001), sex of the child (p = 0.019), presence of other chronic diseases (p = 0.028), whether or not the child had been vaccinated against influenza in the past (p < 0.001), parental anxiety (p = 0.046), and consultation with a health professional since the beginning of the pandemic (p = 0.009). There was a strong relationship between likelihood of not intending to have one's child vaccinated and personal intent not to get vaccinated. CONCLUSION: These findings are essential in planning for the communication and dissemination of COVID-19 vaccination information to parents, especially for children with asthma or other chronic medical conditions.


Asunto(s)
Asma , COVID-19 , Asma/epidemiología , COVID-19/prevención & control , Vacunas contra la COVID-19/uso terapéutico , Niño , Enfermedad Crónica , Estudios Transversales , Conocimientos, Actitudes y Práctica en Salud , Humanos , Intención , Pandemias , Padres/psicología , Vacunación
2.
Health Econ Rev ; 10(1): 41, 2020 Dec 18.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33337515

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Physicians' financial interests might conflict with the best service to patients. It is essential to gain a thorough understanding of the effect of remuneration systems on physician behaviour. METHODS: We conducted a controlled laboratory experiment using a within-subject design to investigate physician behaviour underpayment heterogeneity. Each physician provided medical care to patients whose treatments were paid for under fee-for-service (FFS) or capitation (CAP). RESULTS: We observed that physicians customized their care in response to the payment system. FFS patients received considerably more medical care than did CAP patients with the same illness and treatment preference. Physicians over-served FFS patients and under-served CAP patients. After a CAP payment reduction, we observed neither a quantity reduction under CAP nor a spillover in FFS patients' treatment. CONCLUSIONS: The results suggest that, in our experimental model, fee regulation can be used to some extent to control physician spending since we did not identify a behavioural response to the CAP payment cut. Physicians did not recoup lost income by altering treatment behaviour toward CAP and/or FFS patients. Experimental economics is an excellent tool for ensuring the welfare of all those involved in the health system. Further research should investigate payment incentives as a means of developing health care teams that are more efficient.

SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA