Histology-based Classification Predicts Pattern of Recurrence and Improves Risk Stratification in Primary Retroperitoneal Sarcoma.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the prognostic significance of histologic type/subtype in a large series of patients with primary resected retroperitoneal sarcoma. BACKGROUND: The histologic diversity and rarity of retroperitoneal sarcoma has hampered the ability to predict patient outcome. METHODS: From a single-institution, prospective database, 675 patients treated surgically for primary, nonmetastatic retroperitoneal sarcoma during 1982 to 2010 were identified and histologic type/subtype was reviewed. Clinicopathologic variables were analyzed for association with disease-specific death (DSD), local recurrence (LR), and distant recurrence (DR). RESULTS: Median follow-up for survivors was 7.5 years. The predominant histologies were well-differentiated liposarcoma, dedifferentiated liposarcoma, and leiomyosarcoma. Five-year cumulative incidence of DSD was 31%, and factors independently associated with DSD were R2 resection, resection of 3 or more contiguous organs, and histologic type. Five-year cumulative incidence for LR was 39% and for DR was 24%. R1 resection, age, tumor size, and histologic type were independently associated with LR; size, resection of 3 or more organs, and histologic type were independently associated with DR. Liposarcoma and leiomyosarcoma were associated with late recurrence and DSD (as long as 15 years from diagnosis). For solitary fibrous tumor, LR was uncommon (<10%), but early distant recurrence was common (36% at 5 years). Nomograms were developed to predict DSD, LR, and DR. CONCLUSIONS: Histologic type/subtype is the most important independent predictor of DSD, LR, and DR in primary retroperitoneal sarcoma. Histology predicts the pattern and incidence of LR and DR and will aid in more accurate patient counseling and selection of patients for adjuvant therapy trials.

Soft tissue sarcoma of the head & neck: nomogram validation and analysis of staging systems.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Soft tissue sarcomas of the head and neck (STSHN) comprise a rare group of malignancies. Our objective is to determine the utility of soft tissue sarcoma staging systems within the head and neck, and to validate an individualized soft tissue sarcoma nomogram within head and neck primary sites. METHODS: Previously-untreated patients with STSHN diagnosed and treated between 1982 and 2012 were eligible (n = 319, median follow-up 46 months). Clinical variables were extracted from a prospectively-maintained database. The performance of AJCC/UICC and MSK staging systems and a soft tissue sarcoma-specific nomogram were assessed. RESULTS: Four-year overall survival (OS), disease specific survival (DSS), and recurrence-free survival (RFS) were 72%, 76%, and 71%, respectively. AJCC/UICC and MSK staging systems accurately stratified outcomes (OS, DSS, and RFS; P < 0.001 for all comparisons). The nomogram stratified outcomes by quartile (P < 0.001), and predicted risk of death at 4, 8 and 12 years (P < 0.001). Concordance indices for overall survival for the AJCC/UICC system, MSK system, and the nomogram were 0.71, 0.70, and 0.78, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Oncologic outcomes among groups of patients with STSHN can be accurately predicted using both the AJCC/UICC and MSK staging systems. A soft tissue sarcoma-specific nomogram provides reliable, individualized prognostic information for patients with STSHN.

Lessons learned from the study of 10,000 patients with soft tissue sarcoma.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: The management of rare tumors is difficult because of limited information on natural history. Our objective was to describe a long-term comprehensive prospective database with the assumption that with careful attention to patient, predisposing tumor and treatment variables, valuable knowledge could be obtained that could guide management. METHODS: In July of 1982, we began a prospective database of all adult patients admitted to our institution for a surgical procedure for soft tissue sarcoma. Patients were included if they had primary, locally recurrent or metastatic disease undergoing a surgical procedure. RESULTS: Over 3 decades, we entered 10,000 patients into our prospective soft tissue sarcoma database. Data were entered on a weekly or biweekly schedule with full participation of a multidisciplinary team and a dedicated sarcoma pathologist. Extensive information is available from this database. In this article, we describe distribution by site, histopathology, sex, size, and grade. We utilize this information along with outcome data for local recurrence, distant recurrence, disease specific, and overall survival. The value of molecular diagnosis is illustrated. CONCLUSIONS: Continuous prospective long-term databases are important to obtain knowledge particularly for rare tumors. Such data can be a rich resource for the development of prognostic indicators including nomograms and can be analyzed by Bayesian Belief Networks. These long-term data linked to collection of tumor and germ-line tissue at the time of an initial procedure will remain a resource for future decades.

Predictors of survival and recurrence in primary leiomyosarcoma.

BACKGROUND: Leiomyosarcoma is a soft tissue sarcoma whose outcome has historically been confounded by the inclusion of gastrointestinal stromal tumors. Thus, we sought to determine the factors that predict survival and recurrence in patients with primary leiomyosarcoma alone. METHODS: During 1982-2006, a total of 353 patients with primary resectable leiomyosarcoma were identified from a prospective database. Multivariate analysis was used to assess clinicopathologic factors for association with disease-specific survival (DSS). Competing risk survival analysis was used to determine factors predictive for local and distant recurrence. RESULTS: Of 353 patients, 170 (48 %) presented with extremity, 144 (41 %) with abdominal/retroperitoneal, and 39 (11 %) with truncal tumors. Median age was 57 (range, 18-88) years, and median follow-up was 50 (range, 1-270) months. Most tumors were high grade (75 %), deep (73 %), and completely resected (97 %); median size was 6.0 (range, 0.3-45) cm. Abdominal/retroperitoneal location was associated with worse long-term DSS compared to extremity or trunk (P = 0.005). However, by multivariate analysis, only high grade and size were significant independent predictors of DSS. Overall, 139 patients (39 %) had recurrence: 51 % of those with abdominal/retroperitoneal, 33 % of extremity, and 26 % of truncal disease. Significant independent predictors for local recurrence were size and margin, whereas predictors for distant recurrence were size and grade. Site was not an independent predictor of recurrence; however, late recurrence (>5 years) occurred in 9 % of abdominal/retroperitoneal and 4 % of extremity lesions. CONCLUSIONS: Grade and size are significant independent predictors of DSS and distant recurrence. Long-term follow-up in leiomyosarcoma is important, as late recurrence continues in 6-9 % patients.

Oncologic outcomes of sporadic, neurofibromatosis-associated, and radiation-induced malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumors.

BACKGROUND: Malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumors (MPNSTs) occur sporadically, after prior radiation therapy (RT), or in association with neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1). It is controversial whether patients with NF1-associated MPNST have worse outcomes. We investigated the prognostic significance of sporadic, NF1-associated, and RT-induced MPNST. METHODS: Patients with primary high-grade MPNST from 1982 to 2011 were identified from a prospectively maintained database. Patients with sporadic MPNST were included only if the MPNST was not associated with NF1 or a neurofibroma or if it was immunohistochemically S100-positive. RESULTS: We studied 105 patients; 42 had NF1-associated tumors, 49 sporadic, and 14 RT-induced. Median age at diagnosis was 38 years. Median follow-up for surviving patients was 4 years. Mean tumor diameter was 5.5 cm for RT-induced tumors and 9.7 cm for NF1-associated and sporadic tumors (P=0.004). In multivariate analysis, factors associated with worse disease-specific survival (DSS) were larger size (HR 1.08; 95% CI 1.04-1.13; P<0.001) and positive margin (HR 3.30; 95% CI 1.74-6.28; P<0.001). Age, gender, site of disease, and S100 staining were not associated with DSS. The 3-year and median DSS were similar for NF1 and sporadic cases; combined 3-year DSS was 64% and median DSS was 8.0 years. For RT-induced tumors, 3-year DSS was 49% and median DSS was 2.4 years. The relationship between RT association and DSS approached statistical significance (HR 2.29; 95% CI 0.93-5.67; P=0.072). CONCLUSIONS: Margin status and size remain the most important predictors of DSS in patients with MPNST. NF1-associated and sporadic MPNSTs may be associated with improved DSS compared with RT-induced tumors.

Toward better soft tissue sarcoma staging: building on american joint committee on cancer staging systems versions 6 and 7.

BACKGROUND: Based on review of patient data in case conferences over time, we hypothesized that clinically relevant data are omitted in routine soft tissue sarcoma staging. METHODS: We examined subsets of a prospectively collected single institution soft tissue sarcoma database with respect to criteria of the AJCC versions 6 (2002) and 7 (2010) staging systems and examined their clinical outcomes. RESULTS: Relapse-free survival decreases with increasing primary tumor size in four categories, versus two categories used in AJCC 6 and 7 staging. Disease-specific survival decreases over three categories. Conversely, omission of tumor depth as a prognostic factor in version 7 appears supported, since tumor depth is not an independent risk factor for disease-specific survival by multivariate analysis. Patients with nodal disease and no other metastases fare better than patients with other metastases, but have inferior outcomes compared with patients with large high-grade tumors without nodal metastasis. Multivariate analysis identified size, site, grade, age, nodal metastatic disease, and other metastatic disease as independent risk factors for disease-specific survival. Versions 6 and 7 criteria are tacit regarding anatomic site and histology for tumors with identical FNCLCC grade. CONCLUSIONS: Improved patient risk assessment may be achieved by staging using a larger number of size categories. Staging system refinements come at the cost of a larger number of staging categories. Histology or site-specific staging systems, nomograms or Bayesian belief networks may provide more accurate means to assess clinical outcomes.

Finding New Meaning in the Practice of Medicine: A Quality Improvement Project Evaluating the Remote Communication Liaison Program During the Initial COVID Pandemic Surge.

Background: In spring 2020, the COVID-19 pandemic overwhelmed intensive care teams with severely ill patients. Even at the end of life, families were barred from hospitals, relying solely on remote communication. A Remote Communication Liaison Program (RCLP) was established to ensure daily communication for families, while supporting overstretched intensivists. Objectives: To evaluate the effectiveness and impact of the RCLP on participating liaisons and intensivists. Design: Two quality improvement surveys were developed and administered electronically. Setting/Subjects: Based in the United States, all liaisons and intensivists who participated in this program were invited to take the surveys. Measurements: Descriptive statistics were used to analyze the quantitative Likert-scale data, and qualitative analysis was used to assess themes. Results: Among respondents, all (100%) liaisons and more than 90% of intensivists agreed or strongly agreed that the RCLP provided a valuable service to families. More than 70% of intensivists agreed or strongly agreed that the program lessened their workload. More than 90% of liaisons agreed or strongly agreed that participation in the program improved their confidence and skills in end-of-life decision making, difficult conversations, and comprehension of critical care charts. Themes elicited from the liaisons revealed that participation fostered a renewed sense of purpose as physicians, meaningful connection, and opportunities for growth. Conclusions: RCLP successfully trained and deployed liaisons to rapidly develop skills in communication with beleaguered families during COVID-19 surge. Participation in the program had a profound effect on liaisons, who experienced a renewed sense of meaning and connection to the practice of medicine.

Assessment of a Crisis Standards of Care Scoring System for Resource Prioritization and Estimated Excess Mortality by Race, Ethnicity, and Socially Vulnerable Area During a Regional Surge in COVID-19.

Importance: Crisis standards of care (CSOC) scores designed to allocate scarce resources during the COVID-19 pandemic could exacerbate racial disparities in health care. Objective: To analyze the association of a CSOC scoring system with resource prioritization and estimated excess mortality by race, ethnicity, and residence in a socially vulnerable area. Design, Setting, and Participants: This retrospective cohort analysis included adult patients in the intensive care unit during a regional COVID-19 surge from April 13 to May 22, 2020, at 6 hospitals in a health care network in greater Boston, Massachusetts. Participants were scored by acute severity of illness using the Sequential Organ Failure Assessment score and chronic severity of illness using comorbidity and life expectancy scores, and only participants with complete scores were included. The score was ordinal, with cutoff points suggested by the Massachusetts guidelines. Exposures: Race, ethnicity, Social Vulnerability Index. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was proportion of patients in the lowest priority score category stratified by self-reported race. Secondary outcomes were discrimination and calibration of the score overall and by race, ethnicity, and neighborhood Social Vulnerability Index. Projected excess deaths were modeled by race, using the priority scoring system and a random lottery. Results: Of 608 patients in the intensive care unit during the study period, 498 had complete data and were included in the analysis; this population had a median (IQR) age of 67 (56-75) years, 191 (38.4%) female participants, 79 (15.9%) Black participants, and 225 patients (45.7%) with COVID-19. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve for the priority score was 0.79 and was similar across racial groups. Black patients were more likely than others to be in the lowest priority group (12 [15.2%] vs 34 [8.1%]; P = .046). In an exploratory simulation model using the score for ventilator allocation, with only those in the highest priority group receiving ventilators, there were 43.9% excess deaths among Black patients (18 of 41 patients) and 28.6% (58 of 203 patients among all others (P = .05); when the highest and intermediate priority groups received ventilators, there were 4.9% (2 of 41 patients) excess deaths among Black patients and 3.0% (6 of 203) among all others (P = .53). A random lottery resulted in more excess deaths than the score. Conclusions and Relevance: In this study, a CSOC priority score resulted in lower prioritization of Black patients to receive scarce resources. A model using a random lottery resulted in more estimated excess deaths overall without improving equity by race. CSOC policies must be evaluated for their potential association with racial disparities in health care.

Soft tissue sarcoma diagnosed subsequent to lymphoma is associated with prior radiotherapy and decreased survival.

BACKGROUND: Cancer survivors are at increased risk for second malignancies, and vigilance is thus required. The authors sought to determine whether there was an association among lymphoma, sarcoma, and the associated treatments for these diseases. METHODS: From the authors' prospective soft tissue sarcoma (STS) database of 8240 patients, they identified 112 patients with STS and lymphoma treated from 1982 to 2009 who had complete follow-up data. They examined the importance of the initial diagnosis in patients with both STS and lymphoma, in addition to determining the role of radiation therapy, a known inducer of sarcoma. RESULTS: Review of their sarcoma, gastric, urology, breast, and gynecology databases revealed that lymphoma (95%) or leukemia (5%) occurred in 1.6% of STS patients in comparison to 0.5% of patients in the other databases (P < .01; odds ratio, 3.1; 95% confidence interval, 2.6-3.8). Patients diagnosed with STS only were more likely to die of disease at 10 years compared with those with STS and lymphoma (P = .006), but this difference was not significant when patients presenting with recurrence or metastases were excluded. Among patients with lymphoma and STS, lymphoma was the first diagnosis in 71% of patients. Median survival after STS diagnosis was shorter when lymphoma was the initial diagnosis (67 vs 170 months, P = .002), and these patients were more likely to have radiation-associated STS (44% vs 3%, P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: There was a 3-fold higher incidence of lymphoma in STS patients compared with other solid tumors. The poor prognosis of those diagnosed with both STS and lymphoma was most likely a consequence of prior irradiation.

Dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans (DFSP): predictors of recurrence and the use of systemic therapy.

BACKGROUND: Dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans (DFSP) is an uncommon soft tissue malignancy that typically presents with local invasion but rarely metastasizes. We examine clinicopathologic factors associated with disease-free survival (DFS) in patients with primary and recurrent DFSP and evaluate responses to multimodality therapy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients treated for DFSP were identified in a prospectively maintained database. Clinicopathologic factors associated with DFS were analyzed using univariate and multivariate analysis. RESULTS: A total of 244 patients with DFSP were identified. Median follow-up was 50 months. A total of 14 patients had local recurrence (LR), and 2 patients had distant recurrence (DR), with a median time to recurrence of 35 months. At time of last follow-up, 70% and 47% of patients showed no evidence of disease (NED) in the primary (n = 197) and recurrent groups (n = 47), respectively. On univariate analysis, tumor location and depth were associated with DFS in the primary group, while margin status (R1 vs. R0) was associated with DFS in the LR group. On multivariate analysis, only depth (primary group) and margin status (LR group), remained significant. Also, 22 patients had therapy other than surgical resection: 14 radiotherapy, 4 tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) only, 2 conventional chemotherapy only, and 2 chemotherapy plus TKI. Responses to other therapies were variable. CONCLUSIONS: DFS after treatment for DFSP is strongly predicted by tumor depth in the primary setting and margin status in recurrent tumors. The treatment for DFSP in the primary or recurrent setting is excision with negative margins, resulting in low recurrence rates and infrequent metastatic spread. Multimodality treatment, especially TKI use, can be effective, but is not curative.

Recurrence patterns after resection of soft tissue sarcomas of the chest wall.

BACKGROUND: Soft tissue sarcoma (STS) of the chest wall is uncommon, and our knowledge is limited to small, single institutional case series. Although some series have examined prognostic factors for survival with this rare set of neoplasms, our knowledge of the patterns of relapse is limited. METHODS: We performed a retrospective review of a prospectively maintained database of consecutive patients treated for STS of the chest wall. Predictors of survival and recurrence were analyzed using Cox and competing-risk regression analyses. RESULTS: From 1989 to 2011, 192 patients underwent resection for STS of the chest wall. The most common histopathologic type was desmoid (33 [17%]), followed by undifferentiated pleomorphic sarcoma (32 [16%]), liposarcoma (22 [11%]), and myxofibrosarcoma (22 [11%]). The median follow-up was 50.9 months. The 5- and 10-year survival rates were 73% and 61%, respectively. Recurrences occurred in 45 patients (23%): 17 developed local recurrences, and 28 developed distant recurrences. Among the patients who developed recurrences, the median time to event was 11.6 months for local recurrences and 13.5 months for distant recurrences. The most common histologic type among recurrences was undifferentiated pleomorphic sarcoma (n = 12), and the most common site of distant recurrences was lung (n = 18). The primary treatment modality for both local and distant recurrences was surgical resection; median survival after recurrence was 19.4 months. CONCLUSIONS: Recurrences of STS are common after surgical resection. Although local or distant recurrences can occur soon after surgery, both can often be treated with resection, producing reasonable outcomes.

Expression profiling of liposarcoma yields a multigene predictor of patient outcome and identifies genes that contribute to liposarcomagenesis.

Liposarcomas are the most common type of soft tissue sarcoma but their genetics are poorly defined. To identify genes that contribute to liposarcomagenesis and serve as prognostic candidates, we undertook expression profiling of 140 primary liposarcoma samples, which were randomly split into training set (n = 95) and test set (n = 45). A multigene predictor for distant recurrence-free survival (DRFS) was developed by the supervised principal component method. Expression levels of the 588 genes in the predictor were used to calculate a risk score for each patient. In validation of the predictor in the test set, patients with low risk score had a 3-year DRFS of 83% versus 45% for high risk score patients (P = 0.001). The HR for high versus low score, adjusted for histologic subtype, was 4.42 (95% CI, 1.26-15.55; P = 0.021). The concordance probability for risk score was 0.732. In contrast, the concordance probability for histologic subtype, which had been considered the best predictor of outcome in liposarcoma, was 0.669. Genes related to adipogenesis, DNA replication, mitosis, and spindle assembly checkpoint control were all highly represented in the multigene predictor. Three genes from the predictor, TOP2A, PTK7, and CHEK1, were found to be overexpressed in liposarcoma samples of all five subtypes and in liposarcoma cell lines. RNAi-mediated knockdown of these genes in liposarcoma cell lines reduced proliferation and invasiveness and increased apoptosis. Taken together, our findings identify genes that seem to be involved in liposarcomagenesis and have promise as therapeutic targets, and support the use of this multigene predictor to improve risk stratification for individual patients with liposarcoma.

Do radiation-associated soft tissue sarcomas have the same prognosis as sporadic soft tissue sarcomas?

PURPOSE To determine the prognostic significance of histologic type in radiation-associated soft tissue sarcomas (RASs) and determine whether RASs are associated with an inferior prognosis compared with sporadic soft tissue sarcomas (STSs). PATIENTS AND METHODS One hundred thirty primary RASs were identified from 7,649 STS patients from 1982 to 2007. Multivariate analysis of clinicopathologic factors for disease-specific survival (DSS) was performed for RASs, and a multivariate analysis of radiation exposure was also performed for RASs and sporadic sarcomas. A matched-cohort analysis was performed for radiation-associated and sporadic malignant fibrous histiocytoma (MFH). Results Most RASs were high grade (83%), deep (87%), and truncal (61.5%). The median interval between radiation therapy and RAS development was 10 years (range, 1.3 to 74 years), which varied significantly by histologic type (P = .003). The 5-year DSS was 58%, and independent predictors were size > 5 cm, margin positivity, and histologic type. Multivariate analysis of histologic types of primary, high-grade radiation-associated and sporadic STSs showed that RAS was associated with a worse DSS (hazard ratio, 1.7; range, 1.1 to 2.4; P = .007). For pleomorphic MFH-the most common RAS type-the 5-year DSS was 44% versus 66% in a matched cohort of sporadic MFH patients (P = .07). DSS was significantly worse in primary RAS malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumors (MPNSTs) compared with unmatched sporadic MPNSTs (P = .001). CONCLUSION Histologic type, margin status, and tumor size are the most important independent predictors of DSS in patients with RASs. DSS in patients with primary RAS is significantly worse compared with sporadic STS independent of sarcoma histologic type.