The new normal: a review of the impact of COVID-19 on gastroenterology fellowship training.

The COVID-19 pandemic had a significant impact on medical education and gastroenterology fellowship training. As a result of the pandemic, a trainee's physical safety, mental health and wellness, clinical and procedural training, and educational opportunities were all potentially altered. Changes necessitated at the start of the pandemic were different than those needed further along in the pandemic course. Fellowship programs were required to modify policies and adapt to changes rapidly to advocate for their trainees and ensure quality education. Much of COVID-19's initial impact on education - decreased endoscopic procedures and the loss of educational conferences - has largely returned to pre-pandemic form. However, other changes made during the pandemic have persisted and likely will continue in the future. This includes a virtual interview format for fellowship matches, a virtual option for many national conferences, and an expansion of simulation training. This article reviews the impact that COVID-19 had on medical education with a specific focus on gastroenterology fellowship. The paper highlights the initial impact of COVID-19, the lingering effects, and discusses the areas needed for further research to best understand the total impact COVID-19 had on our trainees' education.

Safety and Efficacy of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors in Cancer Patients and Preexisting Autoimmune Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis in Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer.

BACKGROUND: Cancer patients with preexisting autoimmune diseases (AID) have been traditionally excluded from clinical trials of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) due to concerns for toxicity. As indications for ICI expand, more data are needed on the safety and efficacy of ICI treatment in cancer patients with AID. METHODS: We systematically searched for studies consisting of NSCLC, AID, ICI, treatment response, and adverse events. Outcomes of interest include incidence of autoimmune flare, irAE, response rate, and ICI discontinuation. Study data were pooled using random-effects meta-analysis. RESULTS: Data were extracted from 24 cohort studies, consisting of 11,567 cancer patients (3774 NSCLC patients and 1157 with AID). Pooled analysis revealed an AID flare incidence of 36% (95% CI, 27%-46%) in all cancers and 23% (95% CI, 9%-40%) in NSCLC. Preexisting AID was associated with an increased risk of de novo irAE in all cancer patients (RR 1.38, 95% CI, 1.16-1.65) and NSCLC patients (RR 1.51, 95% CI, 1.12-2.03). There was no difference in de novo grade 3 to 4 irAE and tumor response between cancer patients with and without AID. However, in NSCLC patients, preexisting AID was associated with a 2-fold increased risk of de novo grade 3 to 4 irAE (RR 1.95, 95% CI, 1.01-3.75) but also better tumor response in achieving a complete or partial response (RR 1.56, 95% CI, 1.19-2.04). CONCLUSIONS: NSCLC patients with AID are at a higher risk of grade 3 to 4 irAE but are more likely to achieve treatment response. Prospective studies focused on optimizing immunotherapeutic strategies are needed to improve outcomes for NSCLC patients with AID.

Learning to SuRRF: Sustained Engagement and Increased Academic Productivity Over Two Years of a Resident-Led Virtual Laboratory.

OBJECTIVE: To determine if implementation of a resident-led virtual laboratory can sustain increased engagement and academic productivity in residents and faculty. DESIGN: We developed and introduced a multimodal virtual Surgery Resident Research Forum (SuRRF) in July 2019. SuRRF utilizes monthly virtual lab meetings, weekly newsletters, a centralized database of projects, project tracking tools, and a shared calendar of deadlines to facilitate research among surgical residents. Data on number of participating residents, faculty, and projects across SuRRF meetings at 1-year (7/2020) and 2-years post-implementation (9/2021) were collected to evaluate engagement. Institutional ACGME Resident Scholarly Activity and Faculty Scholarly Activity reports were evaluated for the pre-SuRRF implementation (2018-2019) and post-implementation (2020-2021) academic years to assess productivity pre- and post-implementation. SETTING: Three tertiary academic hospitals of a single health system in New York. PARTICIPANTS: All residents in our general surgery program during the study period, including research residents, were eligible to participate in our study. RESULTS: At 1-year, there were 2 attendings, 13 residents, and 23 projects, compared to 12 attendings, 25 residents, and 42 projects at 2-years post-implementation. Post-SuRRF implementation, residents had significantly more publications (0.56 ± 0.15 vs. 1.10 ± 0.15, p = 0.005), textbook chapters (0.00 vs. 0.010 ± 0.044, p = 0.014), research participation (p < 0.01), and scholarly activity (p = 0.02). Post-SuRRF, faculty had significantly more publications (0.74 ± 0.15 vs. 2.20 ± 0.33, p < 0.001) and scholarly activity (p = 0.006). CONCLUSIONS: SuRRF promotes exposure to projects and resources and increases collaboration and peer-to-peer mentorship. Our experience with SuRRF suggests that resident-led virtual laboratories may increase peer-reviewed publications and improve resident and faculty engagement in scholarly activity, thus supporting academic growth.