Febrile neutropenia after kidney transplantation.

Neutropenia is common after kidney transplant. There are few data on febrile neutropenia episodes (FNE) after kidney transplant. We studied FNE in a single-center retrospective cohort of 1682 kidney transplant recipients. Neutropenia (absolute neutrophil count [ANC] <1000) occurred in 32% and FNE in 3%. There were 56 FNE. Median time to FNE was 143 days, and median time from onset of neutropenia to onset of FNE was 5.5 days. The most common sources of infection were urine, blood, and lungs, and in 20% of FNE no source was identified. No infectious organism was identified in 46% of FNE, and opportunistic infections were uncommon. Patient survival was similar among those with and without FNE, but FNE was associated with increased death-censored graft failure (DCGF). Following FNE, acute rejection occurred in 31% and DCGF in 15%, often in the setting of persistent reduced immunosuppression. In conclusion, FNE are common after kidney transplant and are associated with inferior long-term outcomes.

C3 Glomerulopathy Recurs Early after Kidney Transplantation in Serial Biopsies Performed within the First 2 Years after Transplantation.

Background: C3 glomerulopathy (C3G), which encompasses C3GN and dense deposit disease (DDD), results from dysregulation of the alternative complement pathway. Data on disease recurrence after kidney transplantation are limited, and details on histologic features of recurrent C3G are scarce. We aimed to evaluate C3G recurrence in the allograft, with a focus on histologic presentation and progression. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 18 patients with native kidney failure attributed to C3G (12 C3GN and six DDD), who received a kidney transplant from January 2016 to January 2023. Demographic, genetic, clinical, and histologic data were studied. The NanoString 770 genes PanCancer Immune Profiling Panel was used for transcriptomic analysis. Disease recurrence was the primary outcome. Results: During a median (interquartile range) follow-up period of 37 (18­56) months, C3G recurrence occurred in 16 (89%) patients (11 with C3GN and five with DDD) at a median (interquartile range) of 33 (13­141) days after transplantation. Over a third (38%) of recurrent cases were detected in protocol biopsies, and only 31% of patients presented with >300 mg/g of proteinuria. Recurrence in index biopsies was mainly established through a combination of immunofluorescence and electron microscopy findings, while it showed only subtle histologic alterations and no characteristic transcriptomic signals. Over time, histologic chronicity indices increased, but all the allografts were functioning at the end of follow-up. Patients with recurrence of C3GN and DDD showed overlapping immunofluorescence and electron microscopy findings and had similar recurrence rate and time to recurrence. Conclusions: Most of the patients with native kidney failure attributed to C3G developed disease recurrence very early after kidney transplantation, usually with minimal proteinuria, mild histologic alterations, and favorable short-term allograft survival. Immunofluorescence and electron microscopy played a crucial role in detecting early, subclinical recurrence of C3GN and DDD, which showed significant overlapping features.

Impact of the ALMS and MAINTAIN trials on the management of lupus nephritis.

Current treatment of lupus nephritis consists of both induction and maintenance therapy, with the latter being designed to consolidate remissions and prevent relapses. Long-term maintenance treatment with intravenous cyclophosphamide was effective but associated with considerable toxicity. A small but well-designed controlled trial found that for post-induction maintenance therapy, both oral mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) and oral azathioprine were superior in efficacy and had reduced toxicity than a regimen of continued every third month intravenous cyclophosphamide. Although these oral agents were rapidly accepted and utilized as maintenance medications, their usage was based on scant evidence and there were no comparisons between the two. Recently, two relatively large, randomized, well-controlled, multicenter trials dealing with maintenance therapy for severe lupus nephritis have been completed. The Aspreva Lupus Management Study (ALMS) maintenance and MAINTAIN nephritis trials provide important information regarding the comparative efficacy and safety of MMF and azathioprine as maintenance therapies, as well as information on the effect of dosage and duration of treatment with these agents.

Pilot Study of Return of Genetic Results to Patients in Adult Nephrology.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Actionable genetic findings have implications for care of patients with kidney disease, and genetic testing is an emerging tool in nephrology practice. However, there are scarce data regarding best practices for return of results and clinical application of actionable genetic findings for kidney patients. DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS, & MEASUREMENTS: We developed a return of results workflow in collaborations with clinicians for the retrospective recontact of adult nephrology patients who had been recruited into a biobank research study for exome sequencing and were identified to have medically actionable genetic findings. RESULTS: Using this workflow, we attempted to recontact a diverse pilot cohort of 104 nephrology research participants with actionable genetic findings, encompassing 34 different monogenic etiologies of nephropathy and five single-gene disorders recommended by the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics for return as medically actionable secondary findings. We successfully recontacted 64 (62%) participants and returned results to 41 (39%) individuals. In each case, the genetic diagnosis had meaningful implications for the patients' nephrology care. Through implementation efforts and qualitative interviews with providers, we identified over 20 key challenges associated with returning results to study participants, and found that physician knowledge gaps in genomics was a recurrent theme. We iteratively addressed these challenges to yield an optimized workflow, which included standardized consultation notes with tailored management recommendations, monthly educational conferences on core topics in genomics, and a curated list of expert clinicians for patients requiring extranephrologic referrals. CONCLUSIONS: Developing the infrastructure to support return of genetic results in nephrology was resource-intensive, but presented potential opportunities for improving patient care. PODCAST: This article contains a podcast at https://www.asn-online.org/media/podcast/CJASN/2020_04_16_12481019.mp3.

IL-2 is required for the activation of memory CD8+ T cells via antigen cross-presentation.

Dendritic cells (DCs) are capable of capturing exogenous Ag for the generation of MHC class I/peptide complexes. For efficient activation of memory CD8(+) T cells to occur via a cross-presentation pathway, DCs must receive helper signals from CD4(+) T cells. Using an in vitro system that reflects physiologic recall memory responses, we have evaluated signals that influence helper-dependent cross-priming, while focusing on the source and cellular target of such effector molecules. Concerning the interaction between CD4(+) T cells and DCs, we tested the hypothesis that CD40 engagement on DCs is critical for IL-12p70 (IL-12) production and subsequent stimulation of IFN-gamma release by CD8(+) T cells. Although CD40 engagement on DCs, or addition of exogenous IL-12 are both sufficient to overcome the lack of help, neither is essential. We next evaluated cytokines and chemokines produced during CD4(+) T cell/DC cross talk and observed high levels of IL-2 produced within the first 18-24 h of Ag-specific T cell engagement. Functional studies using blocking Abs to CD25 completely abrogated IFN-gamma production by the CD8(+) T cells. Although required, addition of exogenous IL-2 did not itself confer signals sufficient to overcome the lack of CD4(+) T cell help. Thus, these data support a combined role for Ag-specific, cognate interactions at the CD4(+) T cell/DC as well as the DC/CD8(+) T cell interface, with the helper effect mediated by soluble noncognate signals.