Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Más filtros

Bases de datos
Tipo del documento
País de afiliación
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Crit Care Med ; 47(1): 3-14, 2019 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30339549

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: Decades-old, common ICU practices including deep sedation, immobilization, and limited family access are being challenged. We endeavoured to evaluate the relationship between ABCDEF bundle performance and patient-centered outcomes in critical care. DESIGN: Prospective, multicenter, cohort study from a national quality improvement collaborative. SETTING: 68 academic, community, and federal ICUs collected data during a 20-month period. PATIENTS: 15,226 adults with at least one ICU day. INTERVENTIONS: We defined ABCDEF bundle performance (our main exposure) in two ways: 1) complete performance (patient received every eligible bundle element on any given day) and 2) proportional performance (percentage of eligible bundle elements performed on any given day). We explored the association between complete and proportional ABCDEF bundle performance and three sets of outcomes: patient-related (mortality, ICU and hospital discharge), symptom-related (mechanical ventilation, coma, delirium, pain, restraint use), and system-related (ICU readmission, discharge destination). All models were adjusted for a minimum of 18 a priori determined potential confounders. MEASUREMENTS AND RESULTS: Complete ABCDEF bundle performance was associated with lower likelihood of seven outcomes: hospital death within 7 days (adjusted hazard ratio, 0.32; CI, 0.17-0.62), next-day mechanical ventilation (adjusted odds ratio [AOR], 0.28; CI, 0.22-0.36), coma (AOR, 0.35; CI, 0.22-0.56), delirium (AOR, 0.60; CI, 0.49-0.72), physical restraint use (AOR, 0.37; CI, 0.30-0.46), ICU readmission (AOR, 0.54; CI, 0.37-0.79), and discharge to a facility other than home (AOR, 0.64; CI, 0.51-0.80). There was a consistent dose-response relationship between higher proportional bundle performance and improvements in each of the above-mentioned clinical outcomes (all p < 0.002). Significant pain was more frequently reported as bundle performance proportionally increased (p = 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: ABCDEF bundle performance showed significant and clinically meaningful improvements in outcomes including survival, mechanical ventilation use, coma, delirium, restraint-free care, ICU readmissions, and post-ICU discharge disposition.


Asunto(s)
Enfermedad Crítica/epidemiología , Unidades de Cuidados Intensivos , Paquetes de Atención al Paciente , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Estudios de Cohortes , Coma/epidemiología , Delirio/epidemiología , Femenino , Mortalidad Hospitalaria , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Dolor/epidemiología , Alta del Paciente , Readmisión del Paciente/estadística & datos numéricos , Mejoramiento de la Calidad , Respiración Artificial , Restricción Física/estadística & datos numéricos , Adulto Joven
2.
Crit Care Nurse ; 39(1): 36-45, 2019 Feb.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30710035

RESUMEN

The ABCDEF bundle (A, assess, prevent, and manage pain; B, both spontaneous awakening and spontaneous breathing trials; C, choice of analgesic and sedation; D, delirium: assess, prevent, and manage; E, early mobility and exercise; and F, family engagement and empowerment) improves intensive care unit patient-centered outcomes and promotes interprofessional teamwork and collaboration. The Society of Critical Care Medicine recently completed the ICU Liberation ABCDEF Bundle Improvement Collaborative, a 20-month, multicenter, national quality improvement initiative that formalized dissemination and implementation strategies to promote effective adoption of the ABCDEF bundle. The purpose of this article is to describe 8 of the most frequently asked questions during the Collaborative and to provide practical advice from leading experts to other institutions implementing the ABCDEF bundle.


Asunto(s)
Cuidados Críticos/normas , Enfermedad Crítica/terapia , Unidades de Cuidados Intensivos/normas , Paquetes de Atención al Paciente/normas , Mejoramiento de la Calidad , Conducta Cooperativa , Práctica Clínica Basada en la Evidencia/normas , Humanos
3.
Crit Care Nurse ; 39(1): 46-60, 2019 Feb.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30710036

RESUMEN

Although growing evidence supports the safety and effectiveness of the ABCDEF bundle (A, assess, prevent, and manage pain; B, both spontaneous awakening and spontaneous breathing trials; C, choice of analgesic and sedation; D, delirium: assess, prevent, and manage; E, early mobility and exercise; and F, family engagement and empowerment), intensive care unit providers often struggle with how to reliably and consistently incorporate this interprofessional, evidence-based intervention into everyday clinical practice. Recently, the Society of Critical Care Medicine completed the ICU Liberation ABCDEF Bundle Improvement Collaborative, a 20-month, nationwide, multicenter quality improvement initiative that formalized dissemination and implementation strategies and tracked key performance metrics to overcome barriers to ABCDEF bundle adoption. The purpose of this article is to discuss some of the most challenging implementation issues that Collaborative teams experienced, and to provide some practical advice from leading experts on ways to overcome these barriers.


Asunto(s)
Cuidados Críticos/normas , Enfermedad Crítica/terapia , Unidades de Cuidados Intensivos/normas , Paquetes de Atención al Paciente/normas , Mejoramiento de la Calidad , Conducta Cooperativa , Práctica Clínica Basada en la Evidencia/normas , Humanos
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA