Safety and acute efficacy of cryoballoon ablation for atrial fibrillation at community hospitals.

AIMS: Pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) using cryoballoon ablation (CBA) is an established procedure for treating symptomatic paroxysmal and persistent atrial fibrillation (AF). The safety and efficacy of PVI performed at community hospitals are unknown. We aimed to determine the safety and acute efficacy of PVI using CBA performed at community hospitals with limited annual case numbers. METHODS AND RESULTS: This registry study included 1004 consecutive patients who had PVI performed for symptomatic paroxysmal (n = 563) or persistent AF (n = 441) from January 2019 to September 2020 at 20 hospitals. Each hospital performed fewer than 100 CBA-PVI procedures/year according to local standards. Procedural data, efficacy, and complication rates were determined. The mean number of CBA procedures performed/year at each centre was 59 ± 25. The average procedure time was 90.1 ± 31.6 min and the average fluoroscopy time was 19.2 ± 11.4 min. Isolation of all pulmonary veins was documented in 97.9% of patients. The most frequent reason for not achieving complete isolation was development of phrenic nerve palsy. No hospital deaths were observed. Two patients (0.2%) suffered a clinical stroke. Pericardial effusion occurred in six patients (0.6%), two of whom (0.2%) required pericardial drainage. Vascular complications occurred in 24 patients (2.4%), two of whom (0.2%) required vascular surgery. Phrenic nerve palsy occurred in 48 patients (4.8%) and persisted up to hospital discharge in six patients (0.6%). CONCLUSION: Pulmonary vein isolation procedures for paroxysmal or persistent AF using CBA can be performed at community hospitals with high acute efficacy and low complication rates.

Twelve-month efficacy of second-generation cryoballoon ablation for atrial fibrillation performed at community hospitals: results of the German register on cryoballoon ablation in local hospitals (regional).

BACKGROUND: The 12-month follow-up (F/U) efficacy of CBA PVI performed at community hospitals for treatment of symptomatic paroxysmal and persistent atrial fibrillation (AF) is unknown. This study determined the 12-month efficacy of pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) using cryoballoon ablation (CBA) performed at community hospitals with limited annual case numbers. METHODS: This registry study included 983 consecutive patients (pts) from 19 hospitals, each with an annual procedural volume of < 100 PVI procedures/year. Pts underwent CBA PVI for paroxysmal AF (n = 520), persistent AF (n = 423), or redo PVI (n = 40). The primary endpoint was frequency of documented recurrent AF, the occurrence of atrial flutter or tachycardia following a 90-day period after the index ablation and up to 12 months. The frequency of repeat ablation was determined. RESULTS: Isolation of all PVs was documented in 98% of pts at the end of the procedure. Twelve-month F/U data could be obtained in 916 pts. A 24-h ECG registration was performed in 641 pts (70.0%); in 107 pts (16.7%) of them, recurrent AF was documented. The primary endpoint was met in 193 F/U pts (21.1%). It occurred in 80/486 F/U pts with paroxysmal AF (16.4%), and in 107/390 F/U pts with persistent AF (27.4%). Redo PVI was performed in 71 pts (7.8%), and atrial flutter ablation was performed in 12 pts (1.4%). CONCLUSIONS: CBA PVI for paroxysmal or persistent AF can be performed at community hospitals with adequate rates of 12-month symptom freedom and arrhythmia recurrence. The study was registered at the German register of clinical studies (DRKS00016504).