Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Más filtros

Bases de datos
Tipo del documento
País de afiliación
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Gastrointest Endosc ; 73(1): 22-8, 2011 Jan.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21067740

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Remote control of capsule endoscopes might allow reliable inspection of the human stomach. OBJECTIVE: To assess the safety and efficacy of manipulation of a modified capsule endoscope with magnetic material (magnetic maneuverable capsule [MMC]) in the human stomach by using a handheld external magnet. DESIGN: Open clinical trial. SETTING: Academic hospital. PATIENTS: Ten healthy volunteers. INTERVENTIONS: Subjects swallowed the MMC and sherbet powder for gastric distention. An external magnetic paddle (EMP-2) was used to manipulate the MMC within the stomach. MMC responsiveness was evaluated on a screen showing the MMC film in real time. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: Safety and tolerability (questionnaire), gastric residence time of the MMC, its responsiveness to the EMP-2, area of gastric mucosa visualized. RESULTS: There were no adverse events. The MMC was always clearly attracted by the EMP-2 and responded to its movements. It remained in the stomach for 39 ± 24 minutes. In 7 subjects, both the cardia and the pylorus were inspected and 75% or more of the gastric mucosa was visualized (≥50% in all of the remaining subjects). A learning curve was clearly recognizable (identification of MMC localization, intended movements). LIMITATIONS: Small amounts of fluid blocked the view of apical parts of the fundus; gastric distention was not sufficient to flatten all gastric folds. CONCLUSIONS: Remote control of the MMC in the stomach of healthy volunteers using a handheld magnet is safe and feasible. Responsiveness of the MMC was excellent, and visualization of the gastric mucosa was good, although not yet complete, in the majority of subjects. The system appeared to be clinically valuable and should be developed further. ( CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: DE/CA05/2009031008.).


Asunto(s)
Endoscopía Capsular/instrumentación , Gastroscopía/instrumentación , Adulto , Endoscopios en Cápsulas , Endoscopía Capsular/métodos , Diseño de Equipo , Femenino , Tránsito Gastrointestinal , Gastroscopía/métodos , Humanos , Magnetismo , Masculino , Satisfacción del Paciente , Valores de Referencia , Estómago/anatomía & histología , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Adulto Joven
2.
Gastrointest Endosc ; 72(5): 941-6, 2010 Nov.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20855064

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Remote control of esophageal capsule endoscopes could enhance diagnostic accuracy. OBJECTIVE: To assess the safety and efficacy of remote magnetic manipulation of a modified capsule endoscope (magnetic maneuverable capsule [MMC]; Given Imaging Ltd, Yoqneam, Israel) in the esophagus of healthy humans. DESIGN: Randomized, controlled trial. SETTING: Academic hospital. PATIENTS: This study involved 10 healthy volunteers. INTERVENTION: All participants swallowed a conventional capsule (ESO2; Given Imaging) and a capsule endoscope with magnetic material, the MMC, which is activated by a thermal switch, in random order (1 week apart). An external magnetic paddle (EMP; Given Imaging) was used to manipulate the MMC within the esophageal lumen. MMC responsiveness was evaluated on a screen showing the MMC film in real time. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: Safety and tolerability of the procedure (questionnaire), responsiveness of the MMC to the EMP, esophageal transit time, and visualization of the Z-line. RESULTS: No adverse events occurred apart from mild retrosternal pressure (n = 5). The ability to rotate the MMC around its longitudinal axis and to tilt it by defined movements of the EMP was clearly demonstrated in 9 volunteers. Esophageal transit time was highly variable for both capsules (MMC, 111-1514 seconds; ESO2, 47-1474 seconds), but the MMC stayed longer in the esophagus in 8 participants (P < .01). Visualization of the Z-line was more efficient with the ESO2 (inspection of 73% ± 18% of the circumference vs 33% ± 27%, P = .01). LIMITATIONS: Magnetic forces were not strong enough to hold the MMC against peristalsis when the capsule approached the gastroesophageal junction. CONCLUSION: Remote control of the MMC in the esophagus of healthy volunteers is safe and feasible, but higher magnetic forces may be needed.


Asunto(s)
Endoscopios en Cápsulas , Endoscopía Capsular/instrumentación , Esófago , Magnetismo , Adulto , Diseño de Equipo , Seguridad de Equipos , Esófago/anatomía & histología , Esófago/fisiología , Estudios de Factibilidad , Femenino , Tránsito Gastrointestinal/fisiología , Humanos , Masculino , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , Adulto Joven
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA