A Greek Multicentre Study Assessing the Outcome of Late Rupture After Endovascular Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Repair.

OBJECTIVE: Late rupture after endovascular aortic aneurysm repair (EVAR) for an abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) is an increasing complication associated with a high mortality rate. This study aimed to analyse the causes and outcomes in patients with AAA rupture after EVAR. METHODS: A multi-institutional Greek study of late ruptures after EVAR between 2008 - 2022 was performed. Primary outcomes were intra-operative and in hospital death. RESULTS: A total of 70 patients presented with late rupture after EVAR (proportion of ruptured EVARs among all EVARs, 0.6%; 69 males; mean age 77.2 ± 6.7 years). The mean time interval between EVAR and late rupture was 72.3 months (range 6 - 180 months). In all cases the cause of rupture was the presence of an endoleak (type I, 73%) with sac enlargement. Moreover, 34% of subjects with rupture after EVAR had been lost to follow up and 32% underwent a secondary intervention. Additionally, 57 patients (81%) were treated by conversion to open surgical repair (COSR) and the remainder by endovascular correction of endoleak (ECE). Eleven intra-operative deaths (16%) were recorded. The overall in hospital mortality rate was 41% (23% ECE vs. 46% COSR; p = .21). Of the patients who presented as initially haemodynamically stable, 23% died during hospitalisation, while the respective mortality rate for patients who presented as unstable was 78% (odds ratio [OR] 11.8, 95% confidence interval [CI] 3.6 - 39.1; p < .001). Multivariable logistic regression analysis revealed that severity of haemodynamic shock was the most significant risk factor for intra-operative (OR 7.15, 95% CI 1.58 - 32.40; p = .010) and in hospital death (OR 9.53, 95% CI 2.79 - 32.58; p < .001). CONCLUSION: These data underline the devastating prognosis of late rupture after EVAR. Haemodynamic status at presentation was an important predictive factor for death both in the ECE and COSR groups. Rigorous follow up and prompt evaluation of an unstable patient in case of rupture after EVAR is recommended.

Individual Patient Data Meta-Analysis of 10-Year Follow-Up after Endovascular and Open Repair for Ruptured Abdominal AorticAneurysms.

BACKGROUND: Endovascular aortic repair (EVAR) has conferred an early survival advantage compared to an open surgical repair (OSR) in patients with ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms (rAAA). However, the long-term survival benefit after EVAR was not displayed among randomized controlled trials (RCTs), whereas many non-RCTs have provided conflicting results. We conducted a time-to-event individual patient data (IPD) meta-analysis on long-term rAAA data. METHODS: All studies comparing mortality after EVAR versus OSR for rAAA were included. We used restricted mean survival times (RMSTs) as a measure of life expectancy for EVAR and OSR. RESULTS: A total of 21 studies, including 12,187 patients (4952 EVAR and 7235 OSR) were finally deemed eligible. A secondary IPD analysis included 725 (372 EVAR and 353 OSR) patients only from the 3 RCTs (Immediate Management of the Patient With Rupture : Open Versus Endovascular Repair, Endovasculaire ou Chirurgie dans les Anévrysmes aorto-iliaques Rompus and Amsterdam Acute Aneurysm Trial trials). Among all studies, the median survival was 4.20 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 3.70-4.58) years for EVAR and 1.91 (95% CI: 1.57-2.39) years for OSR. Although EVAR presented with increased hazard risk from 4 to 7 years, which peaked at 6 years after the operation, the RMST difference was 0.54 (95% CI: 0.35-0.73; P < 0.001) years gained with EVAR at the end of the 10-year follow-up. IPD meta-analysis of RCTs did not demonstrate significant differences. CONCLUSIONS: At 10-years follow-up, EVAR was associated with a 6.5 month increase in life expectancy when compared to OSR after analyzing all eligible studies. Evidence from our study suggests that a strict follow-up program would be desirable, especially for patients with long-life expectancy.

Antegrade Endograft Deployment with Supra-Aortic Debranching to Treat Arch and Descending Thoracic Aortic Lesions. A Single-Center Experience.

BACKGROUND: Thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) is a widely used procedure that has drastically changed the management of thoracic aortic diseases. We assess the effectiveness of supra-aortic debranching during antegrade TEVAR procedures with a retrospective analysis of our clinical experience. METHODS: Between December 2005 and April 2017, 55 patients underwent 64 TEVAR procedures. Among them, there were 8 male patients, mean age 72, who underwent hybrid antegrade stent-graft deployment. Particularly, for degenerative aneurysms of the aortic arch, 3 patients for aneurysm of descending thoracic aorta 3, for post-traumatic pseudoaneurysm 1, and for penetrating aortic ulcer 1 which had resulted in an aortoesophageal fistula. Proximal landing zones were Z0:1, Z1:3 and Z2:4. Type I hybrid aortic arch repair was performed in 1 case, carotid-carotid bypass in 2, carotid-subclavian in 5 and aorto-carotid in 1. RESULTS: The 30-day postoperative mortality was 12.5%. One patient suffered a temporary right hemiplegia which resolved after left aorto-carotid bypass. No endoleaks were observed postoperatively and in follow-up period. In the long term and a mean follow-up of 4.9 years, there were no deaths related to the stent-graft implantation or to revascularization procedures. Regarding the aortic arch rerouting procedure, there were no pseudoaneurysm or other anastomotic events. CONCLUSIONS: Antegrade delivery of the endograft, combined with hybrid and revascularization procedures of the supra-aortic vessels is a safe treatment modality, in complex hostile anatomies. However, further improvements are recommended due to the presence of neurologic complications and reinterventions.

Snare Entrapment During EVAR Limb Cannulation Resulting in Open Conversion. A Rare Complication.

We present an unreported complication that occurred during an accidental loss of the ipsilateral limb's wire during EVAR. During an endovascular repair of an abdominal aortic aneurysm (EVAR), unintentional loss of the ipsilateral limb's wire during deployment and withdrawal of the endogaft's main body occurred. The snare's loops were entrapped while attempting to catch the wire through the limb. Multiple maneuvers were performed to detach the snare, but all were unsuccessful. We then performed a conversion to open repair. In conclusion, commercially available endografts should include standard radiopaque markers in the ipsilateral limb to facilitate retrograde cannulation. Retrieval via the snare should not be performed proximal to the gate of the limb.

The use of iliac branch devices for preservation of flow in internal iliac artery during endovascular aortic aneurysm repair.

OBJECTIVE: Common iliac artery aneurysms are present in more than a third of patients with abdominal aortic aneurysm and may pose a challenge during open and endovascular repair. Although embolization of the internal iliac artery is an established method, it may be complicated with buttock claudication, erectile dysfunction, colon ischemia, and pelvic necrosis. Iliac branch devices (IBDs), which permit preservation of the hypogastric artery, have been used to prevent these complications. We conducted a meta-analysis to assess the safety and outcomes of IBDs and to explore potential differences between the commercially available types of IBDs. METHODS: The meta-analysis was conducted using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. After review of the literature, 36 eligible studies with a total of 1502 patients were included in our study. A meta-analysis was performed with investigation of the following outcomes: technical success rate, 30-day mortality, 30-day patency, follow-up patency, endoleak, buttock claudication, and IBD-associated reintervention. Furthermore, we conducted a subgroup meta-analysis by commercial type of endograft among the outcomes of interest. RESULTS: Among all eligible studies, technical success of the method was 97.35% (95% confidence interval [CI], 96.27-98.29). The endoleak rate postoperatively and during the follow-up period was 12.68% (95% CI, 8.80-17.07). The 30-day patency of IBDs was estimated at 97.59% (95% CI, 96.49-98.54), whereas follow-up patency was 94.32% (95% CI, 91.70-96.54). Furthermore, reintervention rate associated with IBDs was 6.96% (95% CI, 5.10-9.03), and buttock claudication during the follow-up period was 2.15% (95% CI, 1.25-3.22). CONCLUSIONS: IBD seems to be a safe, feasible, and effective technique for the treatment of aortoiliac aneurysms in select patients with suitable anatomy. Further results are awaited to explore the long-term efficacy and durability of these devices.

A Technical Tip of Aortic Stump Reinforcement with Plication of the Falciform Ligament of the Liver.

BACKGROUND: The residual stump after excision of an infected aortic graft may be subject to acute disruption-blowout-because of recurrence of infection or fatigue due to the mechanical stress. We present an innovative technique in which we used the falciform ligament of the liver to reinforce the aortic stump. METHODS: We excised the falciform ligament by giving attention to avoid any bleeding from the liver. The aortic stump was reinforced with synthetic, monofilament, nonabsorbable polypropylene sutures and the falciform ligament of the liver was plicated inside the stump and further sutured with polypropylene sutures. RESULTS: After 5 months, he is in excellent condition. His laboratory examination is normal, he has stopped taking antibiotics, gained his initial weight, and recovered full activity. CONCLUSIONS: We presented an innovative technique in which we used the falciform ligament of the liver to reinforce the aortic stump after excision of an infected aortobiiliac synthetic graft. This technique can be an alternative option in patients with weak arterial wall or extended bacterial local infection in the retroperitoneal area which renders the aortic wall tissue extremely stiff to be folded and sutured. This technique may enhance the mechanical integrity of the stump.

Aortic Banding to Treat Simultaneously a Type Ia Endoleak and Aortic Neck Rupture during Endovascular Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Repair.

BACKGROUND: Type Ia endoleak due to inadequate seal at the proximal end of the endograft is not infrequent during the initial operation. However, repeated attempts at balloon inflation or over-dilatation of the balloon can produce high axial pressures and can lead to aortic neck rupture with hemodynamic instability. METHODS: The purpose of the paper is to present a useful technique for simultaneously treating a type Ia endoleak and aortic neck rupture during endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair. RESULTS: The technique for treating a type Ia endoleak has been described, but it was used for the first time to treat simultaneously a type Ia endoleak and rupture of the aortic neck with active bleeding during endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair. After laparotomy, the left renal vein was ligated and a proximal control was achieved with placement of a vascular clamp above the renal arteries. Effective external banding of the infrarenal neck was performed with two 10-mm polyester Dacron limbs tied in the same fashion, close to one another, and parallel just below the renal arteries. We describe the steps of the surgical technique in detail and we analyze crucial issues associated with the technique. CONCLUSIONS: In this paper, we presented a useful technique for simultaneously treating a type Ia endoleak and aortic neck rupture during endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair. Effective external banding of the infrarenal neck led to control of the hemorrhage and exclusion of the blood flow in the aneurysm sac.

Extracranial Internal Carotid Artery Aneurysm in a Patient with Marfan Syndrome.

Extracranial internal carotid artery (ICA) aneurysms are rare and most of them are considered of atherosclerotic etiology. Marfan syndrome (MS) is a systemic connective tissue disorder caused by mutation in the extracellular matrix protein fibrillin 1. Clinical manifestations of the MS include aortic aneurysms, dislocation of the ocular lens, and long bone overgrowth. The presence of extracranial ICA aneurysm in patients with MS is very rare. We report a 62-year-old female patient with MS presented with an extracranial ICA aneurysm. She was treated with aneurysmectomy and end-to-end anastomosis, with good outcomes. Only 10 cases of patients with MS and extracranial ICA aneurysm have been described in the literature. Clinical presentation, treatment, and outcome of these patients are reviewed and discussed.

Open repair of thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms in experienced centers.

OBJECTIVE: We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis aiming to assess the mortality and morbidity of all published case series on thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms (TAAAs) in experienced centers treated with open repair. METHODS: A systematic search of the literature published until April 2017 was performed according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. Separate meta-analyses were conducted for overall in-hospital mortality for TAAA, mortality according to the type of TAAA, spinal cord ischemia, paraplegia and paraparesis, cardiac events, stroke, acute kidney failure, and bowel ischemia. A metaregression analysis was performed with volume of the center, percentage of ruptured cases among the series, length of in-hospital stay, and publication year as covariates. RESULTS: A total of 30 articles were included in the meta-analysis, corresponding to a total of 9963 patients who underwent open repair for TAAAs (543 ruptured). The pooled mortality rate among all studies was 11.26% (95% confidence interval [CI], 9.56-13.09). Mortality was 6.97% (95% CI, 3.75-10.90), 10.32% (95% CI, 7.39-13.63), 8.02% (95% CI, 6.37-9.81), and 7.20% (95% CI, 4.19-10.84) for Crawford types I, II, III, and IV, respectively. Pooled spinal cord ischemia rate was estimated at 8.26% (95% CI, 6.95-9.67), whereas paraparesis and paraplegia rates were 3.61% (95% CI, 2.25-5.25) and 5% (95% CI, 4.36-5.68), respectively. We estimated a pooled cardiac event rate of 4.41% (95% CI, 1.84-7.95) and a stroke rate of 3.11% (95% CI, 2.36-3.94), whereas the need for permanent dialysis rate was 7.92% (95% CI, 5.34-10.92). Respiratory complications after surgery were as high as 23.01% (95% CI, 14.73-32.49). Metaregression analysis evidenced a statistically significant inverse association between mortality and the volume of cases performed in the vascular center (t = -2.00; P = .005). Interestingly, a more recent year of study publication tended to be associated with decreased in-hospital mortality (t = -1.35; P = .19). CONCLUSIONS: Our study showed that despite the advances in open surgical techniques, the morbidity and mortality of the technique continue to remain considerable. Despite the focus on mortality and spinal cord ischemia, respiratory complications, permanent postoperative renal dialysis, stroke rate, and cardiac events also affect the outcome. The estimated trend of lower mortality in high-volume centers suggests that perhaps this type of service should be provided in a few reference centers that have an established record and experience in the management of these patients.

Emergent Carotid Stent Removal after Carotid Stent Thrombosis.

BACKGROUND: Acute carotid stent thrombosis in patients undergoing CAS is a relatively rare and potentially devastating complication influencing significantly the quality of life. With the increasing use of stenting in clinical practice, it is expected to represent a more often encountered complication for physicians performing CAS. Emergent removal of the thrombosed stent and endarterectomy is indicated when the intrastent thrombosis is not associated with intracranial carotid branch thrombosis. METHODS: The technique and its peculiarities and tip and tricks of this carotid operation have not been described meticulously. We describe the steps of the surgical technique in detail, and we analyze crucial issues associated with the technique. RESULTS: We have performed this emergency operation in 2 patients with acute early stroke after CAS. Both patients presented recovery of their previous neurologic deficits and had uneventful postoperative course. CONCLUSIONS: We illustrate the technique of emergent removal of the thrombosed stent after CAS. If carotid stent thrombosis with no distal extension is documented post procedurally, emergency stent removal and endarterectomy is the preferred strategy. Special care should be taken to avoid risk of clot dislocation and consequent cerebral embolization during the surgical exposure of the carotid bifurcation and placement of the vascular clamps.

Bilateral Endograft Limb Occlusion after Endovascular Aortic Repair: Predictive Factors of Occurrence.

BACKGROUND: Bilateral limb occlusion after endovascular aortic repair (EVAR) is relatively uncommon. The aim of this study was to investigate the incidence of bilateral endograft limb occlusion after EVAR and identify potential anatomical predictive factors of occurrence. METHODS: A total of 579 patients underwent elective EVAR for abdominal aortic aneurysm between January 2010 and December 2015. All patients presenting with unilateral and bilateral occlusions were prospectively analyzed. A group of patients who underwent EVAR but did not present with endograft limb occlusion were matched for sex, age, and commercial type of endograft and were used as controls. RESULTS: Overall, 21 (3.6%) patients were complicated with unilateral endograft limb occlusion, whereas 8 (1.4%) of them presented with sequential (in different time) bilateral limb occlusion. We found that iliac artery angulation ≥60°, iliac perimeter calcification ≥50%, and endograft oversizing in the common iliac artery of more than 15% had the same impact and could equally result in limb occlusion. We coded the variables angle, calcification, and endograft limb oversizing of the common iliac artery with a score from 0 to 2 as follows: (1) 0: angle <60° in both limbs, 1: angle ≥60° in one limb, 2: angle ≥60° in both limbs; (2) 0: calcification <50%: in both limbs, 1: calcification ≥ 50%: in one limb, 2: calcification ≥ 50%: in both limbs; and (3) 0: endograft limb oversizing <15%, 1: endograft limb oversizing ≥15% in one limb, 2: endograft limb oversizing ≥15% in both limbs. A composite variable, consisting of the sum of scoring in variables was analyzed, with a score from 0 to 6. Our study showed that it was the most probable to be in the control group when score in the composite variable was 0-3, it was the most probable to have unilateral limb occlusion when score was 4-5, and finally, it was the most probable to have bilateral limb occlusion when score in the composite variable was equal to 6. CONCLUSIONS: Our study evidenced that the highest probability for bilateral limb occlusion occurred when implantation of a more than 15% oversized endograft in iliac arteries with iliac artery angulation ≥60° and iliac perimeter calcification ≥50% was present in both iliac arteries. It is therefore clear that limb occlusion requires the synergistic effect and interaction of bilateral multiple thrombogenic components in the iliac artery before it is manifested.

Spinal Cord Ischemia following Elective Endovascular Repair of Infrarenal Aortic Aneurysms: A Systematic Review.

BACKGROUND: Spinal cord ischemia (SCI) after abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair (EVAR) is a rare but devastating complication. The mechanism underlying the occurrence of SCI after EVAR seems to be multifactorial and is underreported and not fully elucidated. The aim of the study was to investigate the clinical outcomes in patients with this serious complication. METHODS: A systematic review of the current literature, as per Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses statement guidelines, was performed to evaluate the incidence of SCI after elective EVAR. PubMed and Scopus databases were systematically searched. Studies reporting on thoracic endovascular aneurysm repair, open repair of AAAs, and symptomatic or ruptured AAAs were excluded. RESULTS: In total, 18 articles reporting 25 cases were included. The mean age was 74.6 ± 7.6 (range: 60-90) years. The mean diameter of AAAs was 5.96 ± 1.0 cm (range: 4.7-8.3). Six cases also had aneurysms in the common iliac arteries. Seventy-one percent of AAAs had characteristics that made EVAR difficult and technically demanding. The mean operative time was prolonged, 254 ± 104.6 min, and associated with extensive intravascular handling. In 41.6% of cases, additional procedures were performed because of the difficult anatomy. Thirty-two percent of the cases had 1 internal iliac artery (IIA) embolized with coils or covered with the stent graft, and 14% had both IIAs compromised. In most of the cases, SCI symptoms presented immediately after the operation, and in 14.8% of patients, the symptoms had late presentation. Almost all cases had motor loss in the form of paraparesis or paraplegia, 54% of the cases also had diminished sensation, and 29.1% of the cases had urinary and/or fecal incontinence. Heterogeneity was observed regarding the management of the disease; in 6 of the cases, cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) drainage was performed, steroids were administered in 5, and in the other cases, an expectant strategy was selected. In 50% of the cases, only small improvement was seen at follow-up. In 25% of the cases, no improvement was seen, and 25% had almost complete recovery. CONCLUSIONS: Our study identified a common pattern among patients who present SCI after EVAR: difficult anatomy, prolonged operative time, additional procedures, and extensive intravascular handling that may have led to embolization. Patency of pelvic circulation preoperatively is also of importance. Regarding outcomes, only 25% of patients recovered, and in certain cases, CSF drainage may have significantly improved chances for recovery.

A network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials comparing treatment modalities for de novo superficial femoral artery occlusive lesions.

BACKGROUND: Treatment of superficial femoral artery (SFA) lesions remains challenging. We conducted a network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials aiming to explore the efficacy of treatment modalities for SFA "de novo" lesions. METHODS: Eleven treatments for SFA occlusive disease were recognized. We used primary patency and binary restenosis at 12-month follow-up as proxies of efficacy for the treatment of SFA lesions. RESULTS: A total of 33 studies (66 study arms; 4659 patients) were deemed eligible. In terms of primary patency, odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were statistically significantly higher in drug-eluting stent (DES; OR, 10.05; 95% CI, 3.22-31.39), femoropopliteal bypass surgery (BPS; OR, 7.15; 95% CI, 2.27-22.51), covered stent (CS; OR, 3.56; 95% CI, 1.33-9.53), and nitinol stent (NS; OR, 2.83; 95% CI, 1.42-5.51) compared with balloon angioplasty (BA). The rank order from higher to lower primary patency in the multidimensional scaling was DES, BPS, NS, CS, drug-coated balloon, percutaneous transluminal angioplasty with brachytherapy, stainless steel stent, cryoplasty (CR), and BA. Combination therapy of NS with CR and drug-coated balloon were the two most effective treatments, followed by NS, CS, percutaneous transluminal angioplasty with brachytherapy, cutting balloon, stainless steel stent, BA, and CR in terms of multidimensional scaling values for binary restenosis. CONCLUSIONS: DES has shown encouraging results in terms of primary patency for SFA lesions, whereas BPS still maintains its role as a principal intervention. On the contrary, BA and CR appear to be less effective treatment options.

Intraoperative Type IIIb Endoleak after Endograft Deployment during EVAR.

Type IIIb endoleak usually occurs years after the initial endograft implantation, and the cause is the chronic fatigue of the endograft. This rare case describes a type IIIb endoleak, appearing immediately after deployment of a new generation low-profile stentgraft and highlights the diagnostic and treatment challenges associated with the type IIIb endoleak. A 74-year-old man underwent elective EVAR for an infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysm. A type IIIb endoleak near to the flow divider due to a fabric defect was diagnosed. The endoleak was successfully treated by endovascular positioning of a converter stent graft followed by the occlusion of the left limb with an iliac occluder and a femoro-femoral crossover bypass surgery. The ultrasound scan after 4 weeks showed no sign of endoleak. Occurrence of a type IIIb endoleak immediately after deployment is extremely rare. Based on the convenience of the intraoperative procedure and the anatomic characteristics of the aneurysm, we assume that the fabric defect might have occurred during loading of the endograft and subsequent confinement in the delivery catheter. We cannot definitely rule out the possibility of fabric damage induced by low-pressure balloon instrumentation. In case of a suspicion of a type IIIb endoleak, bilateral balloon occlusion of both limbs followed by antergrade aortography will help to identify the leak. In case the defect is near to the flow divider, aortouniliac grafting followed by femoro-femoral crossover bypass surgery represents an alternative option to conversion to open surgical repair.

Changes in Arterial Stiffness and N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide Levels after Endovascular Repair of Descending Thoracic Aorta.

BACKGROUND: Limited data exist concerning the biomechanical and central hemodynamic changes induced by endograft implantation in the descending thoracic aorta. The aim of this prospective ongoing study was to evaluate changes in arterial stiffness, assessed by pulse wave velocity (PWV; m/sec), and N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP; pg/mL) levels in patients undergoing endovascular repair of descending thoracic aorta (thoracic endovascular aortic repair [TEVAR]). METHODS: Twenty-seven patients with thoracic aorta pathology who underwent elective TEVAR were included in the study. Blood samples were obtained preoperatively, 24 hr, 48 hr, and 6 months postoperatively, and serum levels of NT-proBNP were measured. PWV was determined before and 6 months after TEVAR. One-way analysis of variance by ranks was used to test the alterations in PWV (from baseline to 6 months) and NT-proBNP (along the 4 phases of evaluation). Post hoc analyses were appropriately performed. RESULTS: We recorded an increase in values of NT-proBNP from baseline (median = 96.1, interquartile range [IQR] = 82.7-117.9) to 24 hr postoperative (median = 201.6, IQR = 82.8-425.9), 48 hr postoperative (median = 317.0, IQR = 102.5-1,479.5), and 6 months postoperative (median = 144, IQR = 82.8-276.4). The Kruskal-Wallis H test showed a statistically significant increase (x2(3) = 11.17, P = 0.01) in NT-proBNP from baseline (rank mean = 22.19) toward the postoperative time points of evaluation (24 hr postoperative: 35.17 [change: +12.9, P = 0.02]; 48 hr postoperative: 42.64 [change: +20.5, P < 0.001]; 6 month postoperative: 34.91 [change: +12.7, P = 0.03]). An increase in PWV values was recorded from baseline (median = 11.9, IQR = 10.0-13.5) to 6 months postoperatively (median = 13.9, IQR = 11.9-16.4). That change achieved statistically significant level [x2(1) = 4.86, P = 0.03], with an increase in mean rank PWV (+7.5). CONCLUSIONS: Implementation of thoracic stent grafts may be associated with considerable increase of both arterial stiffness and NT-proBNP serum levels along time. Those results may indicate an adverse cardiac impact of TEVAR. However, the early and long-term effects of TEVAR on cardiovascular outcomes require further investigation.

Treatment of Type II Endoleak and Aneurysm Expansion after EVAR.

BACKGROUND: The management of type II endoleak causing sac enlargement continues to be a topic of debate. The purpose of this study was to examine and compare the outcomes between open surgical technique with sacotomy and suturing of the feeding vessels to interventional embolization in patients with aneurysm sac expansion after endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR). METHODS: Inclusion criteria for intervention in patients with prior EVAR and type II endoleak were asymptomatic expanding aneurysm sac > 5 mm between 2 consecutive follow-up computed tomography angiography scans and symptomatic aneurysm sac expansion. Age, sex, comorbidities, clinical presentation, commercial type of endograft of prior EVAR, aneurysm sac increase, type of treatment, morbidity, mortality, and follow-up were also recorded. RESULTS: A total of 694 consecutive patients were operated with EVAR during the study period. Among them, 29 patients (4.2%) were presented with a type II endoleak that required reintervention. Ten patients (34.5%) were treated with embolization. We recorded a 50% technical success in the group of primary translumbar embolization and 67% in the group of intra-arterial embolization. Twenty-two patients were treated with laparotomy and open ligation of the culprit arteries causing the type II endoleak. Among them, 3 patients (13.6%) had been initially treated with unsuccessful embolization. Periprocedural intervention complications for the embolization group (10%, 1/10) included 1 psoas hematoma. On the contrary, complications after primary open ligation were 13.6% (3/22) and included 1 proximal dislocation treated with endograft explantation, 1 distal dislocation, and 1 limb ligation with femoral-femoral bypass which resulted in colonic ischemia and death (4.5%). CONCLUSIONS: Open surgical repair with sacotomy and suturing of the feeding vessels appeared to have better outcome regarding the exclusion of the aneurysm but was associated with a higher incidence of severe complications and one related death. If these results are confirmed in larger series, endovascular approach should be the preferred treatment option.

Acute Early Carotid Stent Thrombosis: A Case Series.

BACKGROUND: Acute early carotid stent thrombosis (AcuteCST) is a rare complication after carotid artery stenting (CAS). The purpose of this retrospective study was to investigate the incidence, causes, and optimal management of AcuteCST. METHODS: Medical records of all patients undergoing CAS between 2008 and 2016 were retrospectively reviewed. The time of thrombosis, grade of stenosis, lesion side, preprocedural and postprocedural anticoagulants, causes, symptoms, treatment, recanalization, and outcome were reviewed. RESULTS: Overall, 674 patients were treated with CAS. Four cases of AcuteCST were identified (0.59%). In the first patient, the stent thrombosis was attributed to dissection caused by filter deployment within a distal internal carotid artery with 360° coiling. Notably, in 3 of the 4 cases of thrombosis a second overlapping stent had been deployed. In total, 41 patients of the cohort under investigation underwent overlapping stent deployment. The use of a second overlapping stent as a bail-out procedure due to dissection or malposition or due to long lesions was correlated with increased rate of thrombosis (3/41 [7.3%] vs. 1/633 [0.002%]). In 2 patients, carotid stents were thrombosed within 2 hr of the procedure. Endovascular thrombus aspiration and subsequent eversion carotid endarterectomy with stent explantation in the first patient and intrathrombus urokinase administration with thromboaspiration and additional stent placement in the second patient were followed. In the other 2 patients having their carotid stents thrombosed 3 and 4 days after the procedure, treatment with low weight molecular heparin and antiplatelet regimens was followed. CONCLUSIONS: The use of overlapping stents in the carotid artery is a predisposing factor for AcuteCST. Prognostic factors of this potentially devastating complication are the initial clinical presentation expressing the grade of ischemic brain damage, the accurate and timely recognition of the thrombosis, and the prompt restoration of oxygenated blood flow into the viable tissue at risk of infarction.

Endovascular management of infected iliofemoral pseudoaneurysms - a systematic review.

We conducted a systematic review regarding the efficacy and outcome of endovascular treatment of infected iliofemoral arterial pseudoaneurysms with covered stents. 35 cases were identified, including 5 own. 22 pseudoaneurysms were located in the femoral area and 13 in the iliac vessels. The most commonly reported complaints were pulsatile groin mass (40 %), sepsis (37.1 %), active bleeding (31.4 %), and groin infection with purulent discharge (17.1 %). S. aureus (65.7 %) and Streptococcus species (22.9 %) were the most common microbes isolated. Factors for the development of infected pseudoaneurysms were intravenous drug use (20 %), infection of anastomosis in bypass surgery (22.9 %), cancer (14.3 %), history of multiple hip operations (14.3 %), renal transplantation (2.9 %), and obesity (5.7 %). The most commonly used covered stents were Viabahn (22.9 %),Jostent (17.1 %), Fluency (14.3 %), and Wallgraft (14.3 %). In 15 cases, surgical debridement and/or drainage was also performed.The mean follow-up was 15.8 months. There were only 2 cases of stent graft thrombosis (5.7 %). 2 patients required an open vascular bypass procedure at a later stage. One death was attributed to procedure-related complications (2.9 %). The infection rate of the deployed stent graft in follow-up was 3.4 %. Endovascular exclusion of an infected pseudoaneurysm with primary stent grafting and drainage may be an option in high-risk patients.
.