Assessment of Thrombectomy versus Combined Thrombolysis and Thrombectomy in Patients with Acute Ischemic Stroke and Medium Vessel Occlusion.

Background The combination of intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) with mechanical thrombectomy (MT) may have clinical benefits for patients with medium vessel occlusion. Purpose To examine whether MT combined with IVT is associated with different outcomes than MT alone in patients with acute ischemic stroke (AIS) and medium vessel occlusion. Materials and Methods This retrospective study included consecutive adult patients with AIS and medium vessel occlusion treated with MT or MT with IVT at 37 academic centers in North America, Asia, and Europe. Data were collected from September 2017 to July 2021. Propensity score matching was performed to reduce confounding. Univariable and multivariable logistic regression analyses were performed to test the association between the addition of IVT treatment and different functional and safety outcomes. Results After propensity score matching, 670 patients (median age, 75 years [IQR, 64-82 years]; 356 female) were included in the analysis; 335 underwent MT alone and 335 underwent MT with IVT. Median onset to puncture (350 vs 210 minutes, P < .001) and onset to recanalization (397 vs 273 minutes, P < .001) times were higher in the MT group than the MT with IVT group, respectively. In the univariable regression analysis, the addition of IVT was associated with higher odds of a modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score 0-2 (odds ratio [OR], 1.44; 95% CI: 1.06, 1.96; P = .019); however, this association was not observed in the multivariable analysis (OR, 1.37; 95% CI: 0.99, 1.89; P = .054). In the multivariable analysis, the addition of IVT also showed no evidence of an association with the odds of first-pass effect (OR, 1.27; 95% CI: 0.9, 1.79; P = .17), Thrombolysis in Cerebral Infarction grades 2b-3 (OR, 1.64; 95% CI: 0.99, 2.73; P = .055), mRS scores 0-1 (OR, 1.27; 95% CI: 0.91, 1.76; P = .16), mortality (OR, 0.78; 95% CI: 0.49, 1.24; P = .29), or intracranial hemorrhage (OR, 1.25; 95% CI: 0.88, 1.76; P = .21). Conclusion Adjunctive IVT may not provide benefit to MT in patients with AIS caused by distal and medium vessel occlusion. © RSNA, 2024 Supplemental material is available for this article. See also the editorial by Wojak in this issue.

Use of the pRESET LITE thrombectomy device in combined approach for medium vessel occlusions: A multicenter evaluation.

PURPOSE: Our purpose was to assess the efficacy and safety of the pRESET LITE stent retriever (Phenox, Bochum, Germany), designed for medium vessel occlusion (MeVO) in acute ischemic stroke (AIS) patients with a primary MeVO. METHODS: We performed a retrospective analysis of the MAD MT Consortium, an integration of prospectively maintained databases at 37 academic institutions in Europe, North America, and Asia, of AIS patients who underwent mechanical thrombectomy with the pRESET LITE stent retriever for a primary MeVO. We subcategorized occlusions into proximal MeVOs (segments A1, M2, and P1) vs. distal MeVOs/DMVO (segments A2, M3-M4, and P2). We reviewed patient and procedural characteristics, as well as angiographic and clinical outcomes. RESULTS: Between September 2016 and December 2021, 227 patients were included (50% female, median age 78 [65-84] years), of whom 161 (71%) suffered proximal MeVO and 66 (29%) distal MeVO. Using a combined approach in 96% of cases, successful reperfusion of the target vessel (mTICI 2b/2c/3) was attained in 85% of proximal MeVO and 97% of DMVO, with a median of 2 passes (IQR: 1-3) overall. Periprocedural complications rate was 7%. Control CT at day 1 post-MT revealed a hemorrhagic transformation in 63 (39%) patients with proximal MeVO and 24 (36%) patients with DMVO, with ECASS-PH type hemorrhagic transformations occurring in 3 (1%) patients. After 3 months, 58% of all MeVO and 63% of DMVO patients demonstrated a favorable outcome (mRS 0-2). CONCLUSION: Mechanical thrombectomy using the pRESET LITE in a combined approach with an aspiration catheter appears effective for primary medium vessel occlusions across several centers and physicians.

Long-term outcome of endovascular treatment for indirect carotid-cavernous fistulas.

OBJECTIVE: Endovascular treatment (EVT) is the primary approach used to treat indirect carotid-cavernous fistulas (CCFs). In this study, the authors evaluated the immediate and long-term efficacy and safety of different endovascular techniques for indirect CCFs. METHODS: The databases of two endovascular centers were retrospectively reviewed to collect the patients with indirect CCFs treated using endovascular techniques between 2013 and 2023. Demographics, clinical presentation, CCF features, EVT characteristics, and clinical and radiological outcomes were evaluated and analyzed. The analysis was performed to compare the clinical and radiological data between different endovascular approaches and different embolic materials. RESULTS: Ninety-eight patients were included in the study. EVT was successful in 95 patients (96.9%). Immediate complete obliteration of the CCF was achieved in 93.9% of patients, with 98% undergoing embolization with liquid embolic agents (LEAs) and 95.6% undergoing coiling alone. Complete CCF obliteration was higher in the transvenous than in the transarterial approach (94.3% vs 75%, p = 0.010). At ≥ 6 months follow-up, complete CCF obliteration was achieved in all patients (100%). The rate of procedure-related complications was higher following LEAs than with coiling alone (32.0% vs 15.6%). New cranial nerve (CN) palsy was diagnosed in 26.0% and 2.2% after embolization with LEAs and coiling alone, respectively (p = 0.001), with complete CN palsy recovery in 78.6%. Procedure-related intracranial hemorrhage occurred in 3 patients (3.1%). Two patients experienced an ischemic stroke following Onyx migration into the internal carotid artery. Ocular symptoms improved in 93% (83/89) of the patients who were followed. CONCLUSIONS: In this study, complete obliteration of an indirect CCF was achieved in more than 90% of patients. Despite the occurrence of some new postprocedural ocular CN palsy, ocular symptoms improved in most patients in long-term follow-up. The transvenous approach was the most effective method for treating the indirect CCF. Coiling was safer than LEAs for the embolization of the indirect CCF.

Middle Meningeal Artery Embolization with Liquid Embolic Agents for Chronic Subdural Hematoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

PURPOSE: To assess the efficacy and safety of middle meningeal artery (MMA) embolization with liquid embolic agents and the outcomes of patients following this procedure. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A review of the literature was conducted to identify studies investigating the efficacy and safety of MMA embolization with liquid embolic agents in patients with chronic subdural hematoma (cSDH) in PubMed, Scopus, Embase, and Web of Science. The keywords "liquid embolic agent," "middle meningeal artery," "cSDH," and "embolization" as well as their synonyms were used to build up the search strategy. The R statistical software and random-effects model were used for analysis. Heterogeneity was reported as I2, and publication bias was calculated using the Egger test. RESULTS: Of 628 articles retrieved, 14 studies were eligible to be included in this study. Data of 276 patients were analyzed. n-Butyl cyanoacrylate and ethylene vinyl alcohol copolymer were the most commonly used embolic agents. This study revealed a pooled mortality rate of 0% (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.00%-100%), recurrence and failure rate of 3% (95% CI, 1%-10%), reoperation/reintervention rate of 4% (95% CI, 2%-12%), rate of size decrease of 94% (95% CI, 79%-98%), technical success rate of 100% (95% CI, 76%-100%), and adverse event rate of 1% (95% CI, 0.00%-4%). CONCLUSIONS: With low mortality, recurrence, reoperation, and adverse event rates and a remarkable decrease in the size of hematomas, MMA embolization with liquid embolic agents may be considered a safe and effective treatment option in patients in whom surgical intervention has previously failed and as an alternative to conventional treatments.

Safety of dual antiplatelet therapy in the acute phase of aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage: a propensity score-matched study.

OBJECTIVE: With the evolution of neuroendovascular treatments, there is a great trend to treat acutely ruptured wide-necked aneurysms with stent-assisted coiling (SAC) and flow diverters (FDs), which inevitably requires dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT). This therapy can increase the rate of hemorrhagic complications following other neurosurgical maneuvers, such as external ventricular drain (EVD) placement or removal. In this study, the authors aimed to evaluate the safety of DAPT in patients with aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH) treated with SAC or FDs and the therapy's potential benefit in reducing cerebral ischemia and cerebral vasospasm. METHODS: In this retrospective study, the authors reviewed the records of patients who had been admitted to their hospital with acute aneurysmal SAH and treated with SAC, FDs, and/or coiling between 2012 and 2022. Patients were classified into two groups: a DAPT group, including patients who had received DAPT for SAC or FDs, and a non-DAPT group, including patients who had not received any antiplatelet regimen and had been treated with coiling. Perioperative hemorrhagic and ischemic complications and clinical outcomes were compared between the two groups. RESULTS: From among 938 cases of acute ruptured aneurysms treated during 10 years of study, 192 patients were included in this analysis, with 96 patients in each treatment group, after propensity score matching. All basic clinical and imaging characteristics were equivalent between the two groups except for the neck size of aneurysms (p < 0.001). EVD-related hemorrhage was significantly higher in the DAPT group than in the non-DAPT group (p = 0.035). In most patients, however, the EVD-related hemorrhage was insignificant. Parent artery or stent-induced thrombosis was higher in the DAPT group than in the non-DAPT group (p = 0.003). The rate of cerebral ischemia was slightly lower in the DAPT group than in the non-DAPT group (11.5% vs 15.6%, p = 0.399). In the multivariate analysis, cerebral ischemia, rebleeding before securing the aneurysm, extracranial hemorrhage, and cerebral vasospasm were the predictive factors of a poor clinical outcome (p < 0.001, p < 0.001, p = 0.038, and p = 0.038, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: The DAPT regimen may be safe in the setting of acute aneurysmal SAH. Although EVD-related hemorrhage is more common in the DAPT group than the non-DAPT group, it is usually insignificant without any neurological deficit.

Endovascular therapy for acute stroke with a large infarct core: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVE: In this meta-analysis, we aimed to investigate the efficacy and safety of endovascular treatment (EVT) for acute ischemic stroke (AIS) patients with large core infarct. METHODS: Three online databases of Web of Science, PubMed and Scopus were systematically searched. Original studies which evaluated AIS participants with large core infarction who underwent EVT were included. R statistical software was used for statistical analyses. Effect sizes were presented with odds ratios (ORs) with their 95% confidence intervals (CIs). The effect sizes were pooled using random effects modeling. RESULTS: Including 47 studies and 15,173 patients, this meta-analysis showed that compared with medical management (MM), EVT was significantly associated with decreased odds of mortality (0.67, 95% CI: 0.51-0.87) and increased odds of favorable outcomes, including a modified Rankin Scale of 0-3 (2.36, 95% CI: 1.69-3.291) and of 0-2 (3.54, 95% CI: 1.96-6.4) in 90 days and remarkable improvement in National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale within 48 h after the procedure (3.6, 95% CI:1.32-9.79). Besides, there was a higher chance of intracranial hemorrhage (ICH) development (1.88, 95% CI: 1.32-2.68) but not symptomatic ICH (1.34, 95% CI: 0.78-2.31) in those who underwent EVT. CONCLUSION: Our study suggests that EVT might be an effective and relatively safe treatment option for the treatment of AIS patients with large vessel occlusion who have large core infarcts, although more large-scale trials are needed to consolidate the results and to make inclusion criteria and the patient selection process clearer.

Basilar artery bifurcation anatomy as a determinant of recanalization and stroke outcome: Basilar artery bifurcation anatomy and stroke outcome.

OBJECTIVES: Thrombectomy improves outcomes in patients with basilar artery (BA) occlusion. We hypothesized that the anatomic configuration of the BA bifurcation, classified as T- or Y-shaped, may impact the outcome as a T-shaped BA would involve more deep penetrating arteries of the midbrain and thalamus. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this 2-center retrospective cohort study, we included patients with stroke due to distal BA occlusion and performed blinded classification of their BA distal bifurcation as either T- or Y-shaped. The primary outcomes were favorable outcome at 90-days (modified Rankin Scale 0 - 2) and successful recanalization (TICI scores 2B or 3). RESULTS: 70 patients (mean age 66 years, 36% women) were included. 38 had T- and 32 had Y-shaped bifurcations. Baseline characteristics were similar for both groups, including demographics, onset to arterial puncture time, baseline NIHSS, THRIVE score, posterior circulation collateral score, and presence of tandem occlusion. Comparing the T- to the Y- shape, there was no difference in the likelihood of successful recanalization (RR: 1.02, CI: [0.86-1.21], p=1.00) nor 90-day favorable mRS (0-2) score (RR: 0.58, CI: [0.25-1.32]; p=0.18). Similarly, mortality at 30 and 90-days were not significantly affected by the type of bifurcation. CONCLUSIONS: The configuration of the basilar artery does not significantly impact on recanalization success or stroke outcome in our study. Further studies are needed to confirm our observations.

International controlled study of revascularization and outcomes following COVID-positive mechanical thrombectomy.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Previous studies suggest that mechanisms and outcomes in patients with COVID-19-associated stroke differ from those in patients with non-COVID-19-associated strokes, but there is limited comparative evidence focusing on these populations. The aim of this study, therefore, was to determine if a significant association exists between COVID-19 status with revascularization and functional outcomes following thrombectomy for large vessel occlusion (LVO), after adjustment for potential confounding factors. METHODS: A cross-sectional, international multicenter retrospective study was conducted in consecutively admitted COVID-19 patients with concomitant acute LVO, compared to a control group without COVID-19. Data collected included age, gender, comorbidities, clinical characteristics, details of the involved vessels, procedural technique, and various outcomes. A multivariable-adjusted analysis was conducted. RESULTS: In this cohort of 697 patients with acute LVO, 302 had COVID-19 while 395 patients did not. There was a significant difference (p < 0.001) in the mean age (in years) and gender of patients, with younger patients and more males in the COVID-19 group. In terms of favorable revascularization (modified Thrombolysis in Cerebral Infarction [mTICI] grade 3), COVID-19 was associated with lower odds of complete revascularization (odds ratio 0.33, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.23-0.48; p < 0.001), which persisted on multivariable modeling with adjustment for other predictors (adjusted odds ratio 0.30, 95% CI 0.12-0.77; p = 0.012). Moreover, endovascular complications, in-hospital mortality, and length of hospital stay were significantly higher among COVID-19 patients (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: COVID-19 was an independent predictor of incomplete revascularization and poor functional outcome in patients with stroke due to LVO. Furthermore, COVID-19 patients with LVO were more often younger and had higher morbidity/mortality rates.

SARS-CoV-2 and Stroke Characteristics: A Report From the Multinational COVID-19 Stroke Study Group.

[Figure: see text].

Does Body Mass Index Impact the Outcome of Stroke Patients Who Received Intravenous Thrombolysis?

BACKGROUND: We sought to investigate the effect of obesity and BMI on functional outcome and rate of symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH) in a large sample of patients with acute ischemic stroke (AIS) treated with intravenous thrombolysis (IVT). METHODS: In a single-center retrospective, but prospectively collected data, study of patients with AIS treated with IVT in a 10-year period, patients were placed into groups based on their BMI defined as underweight (<18.5 kg/m2), normal weight (18.5-24.9 kg/m2), overweight (25-29.9 kg/m2), or obese (<30 kg/m2). The rate of sICH and discharge modified Rankin Scale (mRS) were compared between the groups using logistic regression analysis. RESULTS: In a total of 834 patients who received IVT for AIS during a 10-year period, 224 (27.0%) were obese. Obese patients did not have a higher rate of sICH after IVT for AIS on the unadjusted or adjusted analysis (adjusted OR 0.95, 95% CI 0.48-1.88). We did not find an association between obesity and poor functional outcome at discharge (adjusted OR 0.76, 95% CI 0.53-1.09). CONCLUSIONS: After adjusting for confounding factors such as age, baseline National Institute of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS), and comorbidities, obesity was not associated with an unfavorable functional outcome at discharge nor with a higher risk of sICH in patients with AIS treated with IVT.

Thrombolysis for stroke in elderly in the late window period.

OBJECTIVES: Safety of intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) within 3-4.5 hours of stroke onset in patients ≥80 years is still disputable. We evaluated the association of symptom onset-to-treatment time (SOTT) with the symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH), poor outcome, and mortality in patients≥80 years. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In a retrospective study, patients treated with IVT following stroke were registered. Outcomes were poor outcome (mRS>2), sICH/ECASS-2, and in-hospital mortality. We compared the patients≥80 years who received IVT within 3 hours with those receiving IVT within 3-4.5 hours. We further compared the patients who were <80 years with those ≥80 years and SOTT of 3-4.5 hours. RESULTS: Of 834 patients, 265 aged over 80. In those above 80 and in multivariable analysis, the associations of SOTT with poor outcome (aOR: 1.401, CI: 0.503-3.903, p=0.519), sICH (aOR=2.50, CI=0.76-8.26, p= 0.132) and mortality (aOR=1.12, CI=0.39-3.25, p= 0.833) were not significant. 106 patients received IVT within 3-4.5 hours. In multivariable analysis, the associations of age (≥80 versus <80) with poor outcome (aOR=1.87, CI=0.65-5.37, p=0.246), sICH (aOR=0.65, CI=0.14-3.11, p=0.590), and mortality (aOR=0.87, 95% CI=0.16-4.57, p=0.867) were not significant in patients with SOTT of 3-4.5 hours. CONCLUSION: IVT within 3-4.5 hours in patients ≥80 years is not associated with increased sICH, poor outcome, and mortality compared to the early time window, and also compared to the younger patients in 3-4.5 hours window period. The decision of IVT administration in this age group should not be made solely on the basis of stroke onset timing.

Safety of Intravenous Thrombolysis for Acute Ischemic Stroke in Patients Taking Warfarin with Subtherapeutic INR.

INTRODUCTION: Current guidelines allow the administration of intravenous recombinant tissue plasminogen activator (IV r-tPA) to warfarin-treated patients with acute ischemic stroke (AIS) who have an international normalized ratio (INR) of ≤1.7. However, concerns remain about the safety of using IV r-tPA in this situation due to a conceivable risk of symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH), lack of dedicated randomized controlled trials and the conflicts in the available data. We aimed to determine the risk of sICH in warfarin-treated patients with subtherapeutic INR who received IV r-tPA for AIS in our large volume comprehensive center. METHODS: Patients who had received IV r-tPA for AIS in a 9.6-year period were retrospectively investigated (n = 834). Patients taking warfarin prior to presentation were identified (n = 55). One patient was excluded due to elevated INR beyond the acceptable range for IV r-tPA treatment. Because of the significant difference in the sample size (54 vs 779), warfarin group was matched with 54 non-warfarin patients adjusted for independent risk factors for sICH (age, admission NIHSS, history of diabetes). Good outcome was defined as mRS of 0-2 on discharge and sICH was defined as an ICH causing increase in NIHSS ≥4 or death. Warfarin-treated group was further dichotomized based on INR (1-1.3 vs 1.3-1.7) and safety and outcome measures were compared between resultant groups. RESULTS: No significant difference was found between warfarin-treated and the non-warfarin groups in terms of chance of good outcome on discharge (27.8% in warfarin group vs 26.4% in non-warfarin group; p-value >0.05), or the rate of occurrence of sICH (3.7% in warfarin group vs 11.1% in non-warfarin group; p-value >0.05). Furthermore, rate of sICH (5.1% in patients with INR <1.3 versus 0.0% in patients with INR 1.3-1.7; p-value >0.05) or chance of good outcome on discharge (28.2% of patients with INR <1.3 versus 26.7% in patients with INR 1.3-1.7; p-value >0.05) were not found to be different after the warfarin-treated group was dichotomized. CONCLUSION: Administration of IV r-tPA for AIS in warfarin-treated patients with subtherapeutic INR <1.7 does not increase the risk of sICH.

Safety of Intravenous Thrombolysis Among Patients Taking Direct Oral Anticoagulants: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Background and Purpose- There are scarce data regarding the safety of intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) in acute ischemic stroke among patients on direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs). Methods- We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of the current literature. Data regarding all adult patients pretreated with DOAC who received IVT for acute ischemic stroke were recorded. Meta-analysis was performed by comparing the rate of symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage in these patients with (1) stroke patients without prior anticoagulation therapy and (2) patients on warfarin with international normalized ratio <1.7. Meta-analyses were further conducted in subgroups as follows: (1) administration of DOAC within 48 hours versus an unknown interval before IVT, (2) consideration of symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage outcome according to the National Institute of Neurological Disorders (NINDS) versus the European Cooperative Acute Stroke Study II (ECASS-II) criteria. Results- After reviewing 13 392 reports and communicating with certain authors of 12 published studies, a total of 52 823 acute ischemic stroke patients from 6 studies were enrolled in the present meta-analysis: DOACs: 366, warfarin: 2133, and 503 241 patients without prior anticoagulation. We detected no additional risk of symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage following IVT among patients taking DOACs within 48 hours-DOACs-warfarin: NINDS (odds ratio [OR], 0.55 [95% CI, 0.19-1.59]), ECASS-II (OR, 0.77 [95% CI, 0.28-2.16]); DOACs-no-anticoagulation: NINDS (OR, 1.23 [95% CI, 0.46-3.31]), ECASS-II (OR, 0.87 [95% CI, 0.32-2.41]). Similarly, no additional risk was detected with no time limit between last DOAC intake-DOACs warfarin: NINDS (OR, 0.85 [95% CI, 0.49-1.45]), ECASS-II (OR, 1.11 [95% CI, 0.67-1.85]); DOACs-no-anticoagulation: NINDS (OR, 1.17 [95% CI, 0.43-3.15]), ECASS-II (OR, 0.87 [95% CI, 0.33-2.41]). There was no evidence of heterogeneity across included studies (I2=0%). We also provided the details of 123 individual cases with or without reversal agents before IVT. There was no significant increase in the risk of hemorrhagic transformation (OR, 1.48 [95% CI, 0.50-4.38]), symptomatic hemorrhagic transformation (OR, 0.47 [95% CI, 0.09-2.55]), or early mortality (OR, 0.60 [95% CI, 0.11-3.43]) between cohorts who did or did not receive prethrombolysis idarucizumab. Conclusions- The results of our study indicated that prior intake of DOAC appears not to increase the risk of symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage in selected AIS patients treated with IVT.

Statins Use and Outcome of Acute Ischemic Stroke Patients after Systemic Thrombolysis.

AIM: The aim of this was to study the effects of statins and their intensity on symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH) and outcome after IV thrombolysis (IVT) for acute ischemic stroke (AIS). METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the medical records and cerebrovascular images of all the patients treated with IVT for AIS in our center in a 10-year period. Patients were further characterized as any statin users versus non-users on admission to the emergency department. Statins were categorized in high intensity or low intensity statin based on its propensity to reduce lower low-density cholesterol by ≥45% or <45%, respectively. Safety and discharge modified Rankin Score were compared between statin users versus non-users and also between high-intensity versus low-intensity groups. RESULTS: A total of 834 patients received IVT for AIS in our center during a 10-year period. Multivariate models were adjusted for age, NIH Stroke Scale at admission, INR, and history of DM and atrial fibrillation. There was no association between odds of sICH and any statin use (OR = 0.52 [0.26-1.03], p = 0.06). In multivariate model, any statin use was not associated with odds of poor outcome (Table 4: OR = 1.01 [0.79-1.55], p = 0.57). There was no significant association between odds of sICH among patients on high-intensity statin compared to low intensity statin (multivariate model OR = 0.39 [0.11-1.40], p = 0.15). There was 47% reduced odds of poor outcome among patients on high-intensity statin as compared to low-intensity statin (OR = 0.53[0.32-0.88] p = 0.01). However, this significant association was lost in the multivariate model (OR = 0.60 [0.35-1.05], p = 0.07). CONCLUSION: Our study does not show any significant association between risk of sICH and poor outcome after IVT for patients on prior statin therapy. We also did not find significant association between the risk of sICH and poor outcome after IVT and the intensity of the stain used.

Unusual Pattern of Arterial Macrothrombosis Causing Stroke in a Young Adult Recovered from COVID-19.

Coronavirus disease-19 (COVID-19) pandemic continues to grow all over the world. Neurological manifestations related to COVID-19, including acute ischemic Stroke (AIS), have been reported in recent studies. In most of these, the patients are older, have multiple co-morbidities as risk factors for AIS and have developed a severe respiratory illness. Herein, we report a 36-year-old man with no significant past medical history who recently recovered from a mild COVID-19 infection and presented with unusual pattern of arterial macrothrombosis causing AIS. When the AIS happened, he had no COVID-19 related symptoms, had two negative screening tests for the infection and his chest CT was unremarkable.

Early, delayed, and expanded intracranial hemorrhage in cerebral venous thrombosis.

OBJECTIVES: One of the most important prognostic factors of cerebral venous sinus thrombosis (CVST) is intracranial hemorrhage (ICH). We studied the risk factors, clinical, and radiologic characteristics of early, delayed, and expanded ICH in Iranian patients with CVST. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In a retrospective study, from August 2012 to September 2016, all adult patients with a confirmed diagnosis of CVST were recruited. Demographic, clinical, and radiologic characteristics of the patients were recorded. The predictors of early, delayed, and expanded ICH were assessed through logistic regression analysis. RESULTS: Among 174 eligible patients, 35.1% of the patients had early ICH. Delayed and expanded hemorrhage occurred in 5% and 7.4% of the patients, respectively. Higher age was a risk factor (odds ratio [OR] = 1.038, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.008-1.069), and involvement of multiple sinuses/veins was associated with lower risk of early ICH (OR = 0.432, CI = 0.226-0.827). The risk of delayed ICH was higher in the patients with early hemorrhage (OR = 4.44, CI: 0.990-19.94), men (OR = 4.18, CI: 0.919-19.05), and those with a focal neurologic deficit on admission (OR = 16.05, CI: 1.82-141.39). Acute onset was the predictor of the expansion of early ICH (OR = 8.92, CI: 1.81-43.77), whereas female gender-related conditions were associated with a lower risk of hemorrhage expansion (OR = 0.138, CI: 0.025-0.770). Administration of anticoagulants was associated with neither delayed (P value = .140) nor expanded hemorrhage (P-value = .623). CONCLUSIONS: Male gender, early hemorrhages, acute onset, and presence of focal neurologic deficit are the risk factors for delayed and/or expanded hemorrhages in the patients with CVST.

Intravenous Thrombolysis for Acute Ischemic Stroke in Patients with Thrombocytopenia.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the safety of intravenous (IV) recombinant tissue plasminogen activator (rtPA) in patients with acute ischemic stroke (AIS) who had a platelet count <100,000 /mm3. METHODS: We reviewed the charts of all patients who received IV rtPA for AIS during a 9.6-year period at our stroke center. Those with platelets <100,000/mm3 were identified. Head computed tomography scans performed in 24-36 hours postthrombolysis were reviewed to evaluate the rate of symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH). RESULTS: A total of 835 patients received IV rtPA for AIS during this period. A total of 5 patients were identified to have a platelet count <100,000/mm3. One of them (20%) developed sICH post-IV tPA administration .The mean platelet count of those 5 patients was 63,000 ± 19,000/mm3. To the best of our knowledge, only 21 thrombocytopenic patients have been reported to receive IV rtPA for AIS in the medical literature. Combining our 5 cases with 21 patients previously reported, we have 26 AIS patients who had a platelet count <100,000/mm3 and received IV rtPA, with 2 of them developing sICH (7.7 %). Comparing the rate of sICH among this group with the patients with normal platelet count in our cohort, there was no statistically significant difference (7.7% versus 6.04%, P value = .73). CONCLUSION: IV rtPA for AIS might be safe in patients with platelet count <100,000/mm3 and it is reasonable not to delay IV rtPA administration while waiting for the platelet count result, unless there is strong suspicion for abnormal platelet count.

Prior Asymptomatic Parenchymal Hemorrhage Does Not Increase the Risk for Intracranial Hemorrhage after Intravenous Thrombolysis.

BACKGROUND: The NINDS trial demonstrated the efficacy of intravenous (IV) recombinant tissue plasminogen activator (rtPA) in improving the neurologic outcome in patients presenting with acute ischemic strokes. Patients who had a prior history of intracranial hemorrhage (ICH) were excluded from this trial, possibly due to a hypothetical increase in the subsequent bleeding risk. Thus, there is little data available, whether against or in favor of, the use of IV rtPA in patients with prior ICH. We aim to aid in determining the safety of IV rtPA in such patients through a retrospective hospital-based single center study. METHODS: We reviewed the brain imaging of all patients who received IV rtPA at our comprehensive stroke center from January 2006 to April 2014 for evidence of prior ICH at the time of IV rtPA administration. Their outcomes were determined in terms of subsequent development of symptomatic ICH as defined by the NINDS trial. RESULTS: Brain imaging for 640 patients was reviewed. A total of 27 patients showed evidence of prior ICH at the time of IV thrombolysis, all intra-parenchymal. Only 1 patient (3.7%) developed subsequent symptomatic ICH after the administration of IV rtPA. Of the remaining 613 patients who received IV rtPA, 25 patients (4.1%) developed symptomatic ICH. CONCLUSION: This retrospective study provides Level C evidence that patients with imaging evidence of prior asymptomatic intra-parenchymal hemorrhage presenting with an acute ischemic stroke do not show an increased risk of developing symptomatic ICH after IV thrombolysis.