Sudden cardiac death in long-term follow-up in patients treated with primary percutaneous coronary intervention.

Objective. Most studies analyzing predictors of sudden cardiac death (SCD) after acute myocardial infarction included only high-risk patients or index reperfusion had not been performed in all patients. The aim of our study was to analyze the incidence of SCD and determine the predictors of SCD occurrence during 6-year follow-up of unselected patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI), treated with primary percutaneous coronary intervention (pPCI). Method. we analysed 3114 STEMI patients included included in the University Clinical Center of Serbia STEMI Register. Patients presenting with cardiogenic schock were excluded. Echocardiographic examination was performed before hospital discharge. Results. During 6-year follow-up, lethal outcome was registered in 297 (9.5%) patients, of whom 95 (31.9%) had SCD. The highest incidence of SCD was recorded in the first year of follow-up, when SCD was registered in 25 patients, which is 26.3% of the total number of patients who had had SCD, i.e. 0.8% of the patients analyzed. The independent predictors for the occurrence of SCD during 6-year follow-up were EF < 45% (HR 3.07, 95% 1.87-5.02), post-procedural TIMI flow <3 (HR 2.59, 95%CI 1.37-5.14), reduced baseline kidney function (HR 1.87, 95%CI 1.12-2.93) and Killip class >1 at admission (HR 1.69, 95%CI 1.23-2.97). Conclusion. There is a low incidence of SCD in unselected STEMI patients treated with primary PCI. Predictors of SCD occurence during long-term follow-up in analyzed patients are clinical variables that are easily recorded during index hospitalization and include: EF ≤45%, post-procedural flow TIMI < 3, Killip class >1, and reduced baseline kidney function.

The Impact of Kidney Function on the Slow-Flow/No-Reflow Phenomenon in Patients Treated with Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: Registry Analysis.

Objective: The objective of this study is to analyze the impact of declining kidney function on the occurrence of the slow-flow/no-reflow phenomenon in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) treated with primary PCI (pPCI), as well as the analysis of the prognostic impact of the slow-flow/no-reflow phenomenon on short- and long-term mortality in these patients. Methods: We analyzed 3,115 consecutive patients. A value of the glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) at the time of admission of eGFR <90 ml/min/m2 was considered a low baseline eGFR. The follow-up period was 8 years. Results: The slow-flow/no-reflow phenomenon through the IRA was registered in 146 (4.7%) patients. Estimated GFR of <90 ml/min/m2 was an independent predictor for the occurrence of the slow-flow/no-reflow phenomenon (OR 2.91, 95% CI 1.25-3.95, p < 0.001), and the risk for the occurrence of the slow-flow/no-reflow phenomenon increased with the decline of the kidney function: eGFR 60-89 ml/min/m2: OR 1.94 (95% CI 1.22-3.07, p = 0.005), eGFR 45-59 ml/min/m2: OR 2.55 (95% CI 1.55-4.94, p < 0.001), eGFR 30-44 ml/min/m2: OR 2.77 (95% CI 1.43-5.25, p < 0.001), eGFR 15-29 ml/min/m2: OR 5.84 (95% CI 2.84-8.01, p < 0.001). The slow-flow/no-reflow phenomenon was a strong independent predictor of short- and long-term all-cause mortality: 30-day mortality (HR 2.62, 95% CI 1.78-3.57, p < 0.001) and 8-year mortality (HR 2.09, 95% CI 1.49-2.09, p < 0.001). Conclusion: Reduced baseline kidney function was an independent predictor for the occurrence of the slow-flow/no-reflow phenomenon, and its prognostic impact started with the mildest decrease in eGFR (below 90 ml/min/m2) and increased with its further decline. The slow-flow/no-reflow phenomenon was a strong independent predictor of mortality in the short- and long-term follow-up of the analyzed patients.

Use of Anticoagulant Therapy in Patients with Acute Myocardial Infarction and Atrial Fibrillation.

The incidence of atrial fibrillation (AF) in acute coronary syndrome (ACS) ranges from 2.3-23%. This difference in the incidence of AF is explained by the different ages of the patients in different studies and the different times of application of both reperfusion and drug therapies in acute myocardial infarction (AMI). About 6-8% of patients who underwent percutaneous intervention within AMI have an indication for oral anticoagulant therapy with vitamin K antagonists or new oral anticoagulants (NOAC).The use of oral anticoagulant therapy should be consistent with individual risk of bleeding as well as ischemic risk. Both HAS-BLED and CHA2DS2VASc scores are most commonly used for risk assessment. Except in patients with mechanical valves and antiphospholipid syndrome, NOACs have an advantage over vitamin K antagonists (VKAs). One of the advantages of NOACs is the use of fixed doses, where there is no need for successive INR controls, which increases the patient's compliance in taking these drugs. The use of triple therapy in ACS is indicated in the case of patients with AF, mechanical valves as well as venous thromboembolism. The results of the studies showed that when choosing a P2Y12 receptor blocker, less potent P2Y12 blockers such as Clopidogrel should be chosen, due to the lower risk of bleeding. It has been proven that the presence of AF within AMI is associated with a higher degree of reinfarction, more frequent stroke, high incidence of heart failure, and there is a correlation with an increased risk of sudden cardiac death. With the appearance of AF in ACS, its rapid conversion into sinus rhythm is necessary, and in the last resort, good control of heart rate in order to avoid the occurrence of adverse clinical events.

Using the RISK-PCI Score in the Long-Term Prediction of Major Adverse Cardiovascular Events and Mortality after Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.

BACKGROUND/AIM: The RISK-PCI is a simple score for the prediction of 30-day major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) and mortality in patients treated with primary PCI (pPCI). The aim of the present study is to evaluate the prognostic performance of the RISK-PCI score in predicting MACE and mortality in the long-term follow-up of STEMI patients treated with pPCI. METHOD: The present study enrolled 2,096 STEMI patients treated with pPCI included in the RISK-PCI trial. Patients presenting with cardiogenic shock were excluded. The composite end-point MACE comprising cardiovascular mortality, nonfatal reinfarction and stroke. Patients were followed up at 6 years after enrollment. RESULTS: One-year and 6-year MACE occurred in 229 (10.9%) and 285 (13.6%) patients, respectively; and 1-year and 6-year mortality occurred in 128 (6.2%) and 151 (7.2%) patients, respectively. The RISK-PCI score was an independent predictor for 1-year MACE (HR 1.24, 95% CI 1, 18-1.31, p < 0.001), 6-year MACE (HR 1.22, 95% CI 1.16-1.28, p < 0.001), 1-year mortality (HR 1.21, 95% CI 1.13-1.29, p < 0.001), and 6-year mortality (HR 1.23, 95% CI 1.15-1.31, p < 0.001). The discrimination of the RISK-PCI score to predict 1-year and 6-year MACE and mortality was good: for 1-year MACE c-statistic 0.78, for 6-year MACE c-statistic 0.75, for 1-year mortality c-statistic 0.87, and for 6-year mortality c-statistic 0.83. The nonsignificant Hosmer-Lemeshow goodness-of-fit estimates for 1-year MACE (p=0.619), 6-year MACE (p=0.319), 1-year mortality (p=0.258), and 6-year mortality (p=0.540) indicated a good calibration of the model. CONCLUSION: The RISK-PCI score demonstrates good characteristics in the assessment of the risk for the occurrence of MACE and mortality during long-term follow-up after pPCI.

Comparison of RISK-PCI, GRACE, TIMI risk scores for prediction of major adverse cardiac events in patients with acute coronary syndrome.

AIM: To compare the prognostic performance of three major risk scoring systems including global registry for acute coronary events (GRACE), thrombolysis in myocardial infarction (TIMI), and prediction of 30-day major adverse cardiovascular events after primary percutaneous coronary intervention (RISK-PCI). METHODS: This single-center retrospective study involved 200 patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) who underwent invasive diagnostic approach, ie, coronary angiography and myocardial revascularization if appropriate, in the period from January 2014 to July 2014. The GRACE, TIMI, and RISK-PCI risk scores were compared for their predictive ability. The primary endpoint was a composite 30-day major adverse cardiovascular event (MACE), which included death, urgent target-vessel revascularization (TVR), stroke, and non-fatal recurrent myocardial infarction (REMI). RESULTS: The c-statistics of the tested scores for 30-day MACE or area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) with confidence intervals (CI) were as follows: RISK-PCI (AUC=0.94; 95% CI 1.790-4.353), the GRACE score on admission (AUC=0.73; 95% CI 1.013-1.045), the GRACE score on discharge (AUC=0.65; 95% CI 0.999-1.033). The RISK-PCI score was the only score that could predict TVR (AUC=0.91; 95% CI 1.392-2.882). The RISK-PCI scoring system showed an excellent discriminative potential for 30-day death (AUC=0.96; 95% CI 1.339-3.548) in comparison with the GRACE scores on admission (AUC=0.88; 95% CI 1.018-1.072) and on discharge (AUC=0.78; 95% CI 1.000-1.058). CONCLUSIONS: In comparison with the GRACE and TIMI scores, RISK-PCI score showed a non-inferior ability to predict 30-day MACE and death in ACS patients. Moreover, RISK-PCI was the only scoring system that could predict recurrent ischemia requiring TVR.

Clinical Significance of Laboratory-determined Aspirin Poor Responsiveness After Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.

AIMS: The objective of the present substudy was to examine whether aspirin poor/high responsiveness (APR/AHR) is associated with increased rates of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) and serious bleeding after primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PPCI). METHODS: We analyzed 961 consecutive ST-elevation acute myocardial infarction patients who underwent PPCI between February 2008 and June 2011. Multiplate analyser (Dynabite, Munich, Germany) was used for the assessment of platelet reactivity. APR/AHR were defined as the upper/lower quintiles of ASPI values, determined 24 h after aspirin loading. APR patients were tailored using 300 mg maintenance dose for 30 days. The co-primary end points at 30 days were: MACE (death, non-fatal infarction, ischemia-driven target vessel revascularization and ischemic stroke) and serious bleeding according to the BARC classification. RESULTS: One hundred and 90 patients were classified as APR, and 193 patients as AHR. At admission, compared with aspirin sensitive patients (ASP), patients with APR had more frequently diabetes, anterior infarction and heart failure, while AHR patients had reduced values of creatine kinase, leukocytes, heart rate and systolic blood pressure. Compared with ASP, the rates of 30-day primary end points did not differ neither in APR group including tailored patients (MACE, adjusted OR 1.02, 95%CI 0.47-2.17; serious bleeding, adjusted OR 1.92, 95%CI 0.79-4.63), nor in patients with AHR (MACE, adjusted OR 1.58, 95%CI 0.71-5.51; serious bleeding, adjusted OR 0.69, 95%CI 0.22-2.12). CONCLUSIONS: The majority of APR patients were suitable for tailoring. Neither APR including tailored patients nor AHR were associated with adverse 30-day efficacy or safety clinical outcomes.

B-type Natriuretic Peptide and RISK-PCI Score in the Risk Assessment in Patients with STEMI Treated by Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.

BACKGROUND: RISK-PCI score is a novel score for risk stratification of patients with ST elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) treated by primary percutaneous coronary intervention (pPCI). The aim of this study was to evaluate the role of B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP) and the RISK-PCI score for early risk assessment in patients with STEMI treated by pPCI. METHODS: In 120 patients with STEMI treated by pPCI, BNP was measured on admission before pPCI. The primary end point was 30-day mortality. RESULTS: The ROC curve analysis revealed that the most powerful predictive factors of 30-day mortality were the plasma level of BNP ≥ 206.6 pg/mL with the sensitivity of 75% and specificity of 87.5% and the RISK-PCI score ≥ 5.25 with the sensitivity of 75% and specificity of 85.7%. Thirty-day mortality was 6.7%. After multivariate adjustment, admission BNP (≥ 206.6 pg/mL) (OR 2.952, 95% CI 1.072 - 8.133, p = 0.036) and the RISK-PCI score (≥ 5.25) (OR 2.284, 95% CI 1.140-4.578, p = 0.020) were independent predictors of 30-day mortality. The area under the ROC curve using the RISK-PCI score and BNP to detect mortality was 0.828 (p = 0.002) and 0.903 (p < 0.001), respectively. Addition of BNP to RISK-PCI score increased the area under the ROC to 0.949 (p < 0.001), but this increase measured by the c-statistic was not significant (p = 0.107). Furthermore, the significant improvement in risk reclassification (p < 0.001) and the integrated discrimination index (p = 0.042) were observed with the addition of BNP to RISK-PCI score for 30-day mortality. CONCLUSIONS: BNP on admission and the RISK-PCI score were the independent predictors of 30-day mortality in patients with the STEMI treated by pPCI. BNP in combination with the RISK-PCI score showed the way to more accurate risk assessment in patients with STEMI treated by pPCI.

Low On-Treatment Platelet Reactivity Predicts Long-Term Risk of Bleeding After Elective PCI.

BACKGROUND: Bleeding after percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI) is an important complication with impact on prognosis. AIM: To evaluate the predictive value of enhanced platelet responsiveness to dual antiplatelet therapy with aspirin and clopidogrel, for bleeding, after elective PCI. METHODS AND RESULTS: We performed multiple electrode aggregometry (MAE) platelet functional tests induced by arachidonic acid (ASPI) and adenosine-diphosphate (ADP) before PCI, and 24 hours after PCI, in 481 elective PCI patients who were followed-up for an average of 15.34 ± 7.19 months. Primary end point was the occurrence of any bleeding, while ischemic major adverse cardiovascular event (MACE) was a secondary endpoint. The incidence of total, BARC ≤ 2, and BARC ≥ 3 bleeding, according to BARC classification, was 19, 18, and 1%, respectively. Groups with any, and BARC ≤ 2 bleeding, had a lower average value of MAE ADP test after 24 hours, compared to the group without bleeding: 45.30 ± 18.63 U versus 50.99 ± 19.01 U; P = 0.005; and 45.75 ± 18.96 U versus 50.99 ± 18.99 U; P = 0.01; respectively. Female gender (HR 2.11; CI 1.37-3.25; P = 0.001), previous myocardial infarction (HR 0.56; CI 0.37-0.85; P = 0.006), lower body mass (HR 0.78; CI 0.62-0.98; P = 0.03), and MAE ADP test after 24 hours (HR 0.75; CI 0.61-0.93; P = 0.009) were the independent predictors for any bleeding by Cox univariate analysis. After adjustment, MAE ADP test after 24 hours, was the only independent predictor for any (HR 0.7; CI 0.56-0.87; P = 0.002), and BARC ≤ 2 (HR 0.71; CI 0.56-0.89; P = 0.003) bleeding, by Cox multivariate analysis. CONCLUSION: MAE ADP test before and after PCI, was associated with any, and BARC ≤ 2 bleeding after elective PCI.

Impact of platelet phenotype on myocardial infarction.

In acute myocardial infarction patients the injured vascular wall triggers thrombus formation in the damage site. Fibrin fibers and blood cellular elements are the major components of thrombus formed in acute occlusion of coronary arteries. It has been established that the initial thrombus is primarily composed of activated platelets rapidly stabilized by fibrin fibers. This review highlights the role of platelet membrane phenotype in pathophysiology of myocardial infarction. Here, we regard platelet phenotype as quantitative and qualitative parameters of the plasma membrane outer surface, which are crucial for platelet participation in blood coagulation, development of local inflammation and tissue repair.

Prognostic significance of dipping in older hypertensive patients.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Arterial hypertension doubles the risk of coronary heart disease, heart and kidney failure, and peripheral arterial disease. Less variation in diurnal ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM) patterns may affect mortality outcome. Therefore, as hypertension occurs in over 95% of older subjects, the prognostic value of dipping status in older hypertensive patients will be assessed. METHOD: The retrospective study group consisted of 170 hypertensive patients, aged 75-84 years, enrolled in the years 2005 to 2007. Baseline measures included 24-h ABPM. Diurnal index and dipping status was calculated and stratified the group into dippers (40 patients, 23.5%), non-dippers (65 patients, 38.2%) and reverse-dippers (65 patients, 38.2%). RESULTS: During a 5-year observation, after baseline we have observed 69 deaths (40.9%) from the whole group of 170 patients with 23 (35.4%) being non-dippers and 36 (55.4%) reverse-dippers. There were significant differences between the groups divided according to diurnal dipping status in survival time, number of recorded deaths and night mean blood pressure. We have identified and confirmed risk factors for the all-cause mortality: age, mean systolic and diastolic blood pressure, diurnal index and dipping status (dipping, non-dipping or reverse-dipping). CONCLUSION: Reverse-dippers and non-dippers revealed worse prognosis compared with dippers.

Long-Term Prognostic Impact of Stress Hyperglycemia in Non-Diabetic Patients Treated with Successful Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.

BACKGROUND: stress hyperglicemia (SH) is common in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infraction (STEMI). The aims of this study were to analyze the impact of SH on the incidence of all-cause mortality and major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE-cardiovascular death, nonfatal reinfarction, target vessel revascularization, and stroke) in STEMI patients without diabetes mellitus (DM) who have been treated successfully with primary PCI (pPCI). METHOD: we analyzed 2362 STEMI patients treated with successful pPCI (post-procedural flow TIMI = 3) and without DM and cardiogenic shock at admission. Stress hyperglycemia was defined as plasma glucose level above 7.8 mmol/L at admission. The follow-up period was 8 years. RESULTS: incidence of SH was 26.9%. Eight-year all-cause mortality and MACE rates were significantly higher in patients with SH, as compared to patients without SH (9.7% vs. 4.2%, p < 0.001, and 15.7% vs. 9.4%, p < 0.001). SH was an independent predictor of short- and long-term all-cause mortality (HR 2.19, 95%CI 1.16-4.18, and HR 1.99, 95%CI 1.03-3.85) and MACE (HR 1.49, 95%CI 1.03-2.03, and HR 1.35, 95%CI 1.03-1.89). CONCLUSION: despite successful revascularization, SH at admission was an independent predictor of short-term and long-term (up to eight years) all-cause mortality and MACE, but its negative prognostic impact was stronger in short-term follow-up.

Long-Term Prognosis after ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction in Patients with Premature Coronary Artery Disease.

BACKGROUND: A significant percentage of younger patients with myocardial infarction have premature coronary artery disease (CAD). The aims of this study were to analyze all-cause mortality and major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs cardiovascular death, non-fatal reinfarction, stroke, target vessel revascularization) during eight-year follow-up in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) and premature CAD. METHOD: We analyzed 2560 STEMI patients without previous CAD and without cardiogenic shock at admission who were treated with primary PCI. CAD was classified as premature in men aged <50 years and women <55 years. RESULTS: Premature CAD was found in 630 (24.6%) patients. Patients with premature CAD have fewer comorbidities and better initial angiographic findings compared to patients without premature CAD. The incidence of non-fatal adverse ischemic events was similar to the incidence in older patients. Premature CAD was an independent predictor for lower mortality (HR 0.50 95%CI 0.28-0.91) and MACEs (HR 0.27 95%CI 0.15-0.47). In patients with premature CAD, EF < 40% was the only independent predictor of mortality (HR 5.59 95%CI 2.18-8.52) and MACEs (HR 4.18, 95%CI 1.98-8.13). CONCLUSIONS: Premature CAD was an independent predictor for lower mortality and MACEs. In patients with premature CAD, EF < 40% was an independent predictor of eight-year mortality and MACEs.

Rationale and design of the on-treatment PLAtelet Reactivity-Guided Therapy Modification FOR ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction (PLATFORM) randomized trial.

OBJECTIVES: The present trial aims at examining whether antiplatelet regimen modification, guided by assessment of the on-treatment platelet reactivity, might result with clinical benefit in moderate to high-risk patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PPCI). BACKGROUND: High platelet reactivity has been associated with an increased rate of ischemic events after PCI. Recent large trials did not show a clinical benefit of platelet reactivity-guided therapy modification in acute coronary syndrome patients treated by PCI. METHODS: PLATFORM is an investigator-initiated, prospective, randomized, parallel-group, controlled clinical trial. Approximately 632 STEMI patients with intermediate to high-risk (RISK-PCI score >3) clinical features undergoing PPCI will be randomly allocated to treatment modification or standard therapy. Low responders to aspirin will receive 200 mg aspirin for 30 days. Low responders to clopidogrel will receive 180 mg ticagrelor for 1 year. The primary end-point is the time to the first composite major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) including death, nonfatal infarction, stroke, or immediate target vessel revascularization. Key safety end-point is the rate of TIMI major bleeding unrelated to coronary artery bypass graft surgery. Our secondary end-points are individual components of MACE, definite stent thrombosis, total bleeding, and the need for blood transfusions. Patients will be followed-up at 30 days and at 1 year after PPCI. CONCLUSION: PLATFORM will determine whether the platelet reactivity-guided use of ticagrelor in combination with 200 mg aspirin, compared with standard antiplatelet regimen, improves clinical outcome in moderate to high-risk STEMI patients undergoing PPCI. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: U.S. National Institutes of Health (NIH) at www.clinicaltrials.gov. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01739556, and Current Controlled Trials at www.controlledtrials.com. International Standard Randomized Controlled Trial Number ISRCTN83081599.

Simple risk algorithm to predict serious bleeding in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention: RISK-PCI bleeding score.

BACKGROUND: Bleeding is a potentially catastrophic complication after primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PPCI). It occurs most frequently within the first 30 days following the intervention. The aim of this study was to generate a simple and accurate risk model for the prediction of bleeding after PPCI. METHODS AND RESULTS: The training set included 2,096 patients enrolled in the RISK-PCI trial. The model was validated using a database of 961 patients enrolled in the ART-PCI trial. Bleeding was defined as type ≥3a bleeding according to the Bleeding Academic Research Consortium definition. Multivariate logistic regression was used to evaluate the predictors of outcome. A sum of weighted points for specific predictors was calculated to determine the final score. The model included 5 independent predictors of 30-day bleeding: gender (female); history of peptic ulcer; creatinine clearance at admission (<60 ml/min); hemoglobin at presentation (<125 g/dl); and Killip class >1 heart failure at admission. The model showed good discrimination and calibration for the prediction of bleeding in the derivation set (C-statistic, 0.79; goodness of fit, P=0.12) and in the validation set (C-statistic, 0.76; goodness of fit, P=0.37). Patients were classified into 3 risk classes and the observed incidence of 30-day bleeding of 1.0%, 3.5% and 10.7% corresponded to the low-, intermediate- and high-risk classes, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: A simple risk model was developed that has a reasonably good capacity for the prediction of 30-day bleeding after PPCI.

Usefulness of the RISK-PCI score to predict stent thrombosis in patients treated with primary percutaneous coronary intervention for ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: a substudy of the RISK-PCI trial.

Stent thrombosis (ST) is an important cause of death after primary percutaneous coronary intervention (pPCI). This substudy aimed at evaluating the usefulness of the RISK-PCI score, originally developed for the prediction of 30-day major adverse cardiovascular events, to predict the occurrence of ST after pPCI. We analyzed 1972 consecutive patients who underwent pPCI with stent implantation between February 2007 and December 2009. Early ST (EST), late ST (LST), and cumulative 1-year ST (CST) were the predefined end points. Definite, probable, and possible ST were included. Models discrimination and calibration to predict ST was tested using receiver-operating characteristics curves and the goodness-of-fit (GoF) test. Sensitivity analyses and 1000-resample bootstrapping were used to evaluate the model's performance. The rates of EST, LST, and CST were 4.6, 1.4, and 6.0 %, respectively. Compared with controls, the cumulative ST group was associated with much higher rates of adverse clinical outcomes at 30-day follow-up (adjusted odds ratio (OR) for death 6.45, adjusted OR for major bleeding 4.41) and at 12-month follow-up (adjusted OR for death 7.35, adjusted OR for major bleeding 4.56). Internal validation confirmed a reasonably good discrimination and calibration of the RISK-PCI score for the prediction of EST (area under the curve (AUC) 0.71, GoF 0.42), LST (AUC 0.69, GoF 0.36), and CST (AUC 0.70, GoF 0.22) after pPCI. ST after pPCI is associated with adverse 30-day and 1-year clinical outcomes. We conclude that the risk of ST could be accurately assessed using the RISK-PCI score, which might help in deciding upon measures aimed at preventing adverse prognosis.

Prognostic Impact of Non-Cardiac Comorbidities on Long-Term Prognosis in Patients with Reduced and Preserved Ejection Fraction following Acute Myocardial Infarction.

BACKGROUND: We aimed to analyze the prevalence and long-term prognostic impact of non-cardiac comorbidities in patients with reduced and preserved left-ventricular ejection fraction (EF) following ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). METHOD: A total of 3033 STEMI patients undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention (pPCI) were divided in two groups: reduced EF < 50% and preserved EF ≥ 50%. The follow-up period was 8 years. RESULTS: Preserved EF was present in 1726 (55.4%) patients and reduced EF was present in 1389 (44.5%) patients. Non-cardiac comorbidities were more frequent in patients with reduced EF compared with patients with preserved EF (38.9% vs. 27.4%, respectively, p < 0.001). Lethal outcome was registered in 240 (17.2%) patients with reduced EF and in 40 (2.3%) patients with preserved EF, p < 0.001. Diabetes and chronic kidney disease (CKD) were independent predictors for 8-year mortality in patients with preserved EF. In patients with reduced EF, CKD was independently associated with 8-year mortality. CONCLUSION: In patients who had reduced EF, the prevalence of non-cardiac comorbidities was higher than in patients who had preserved EF after STEMI. Only diabetes mellitus and CKD were independently associated with 8-year mortality in analyzed patients.

Impact of the combined left ventricular systolic and renal dysfunction on one-year outcomes after primary percutaneous coronary intervention.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to assess the impact of combined left ventricular systolic dysfunction (LVSD) and renal dysfunction (RD) on 1-year overall mortality and major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs) (comprising cardiovascular death, nonfatal renfarction, target vessel revascularization, and nonfatal stroke) in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention (pPCI). METHODS: One thousand three hundred ninety eight patients with first myocardial infarction, undergoing pPCI were divided into four groups according to the presence of LVSD (ejection fraction [EF] <40%) and/or baseline RD (estimated glomerular filtration rate <60 mL/min per m(2)): Group I (no LVSD and no RD); Group II (LVSD, no RD); Group III (RD, no LVSD); Group IV (LVSD + RD). RESULTS: One-year mortality rates in Groups I, II, III, and IV were 2.6%, 15.2%, 10.6%, and 34.2% and 1-year MACE rates were 5.7%, 19.5%, 17.1% and 35.7%, respectively. Patients in Groups II, III, and IV had an increased probability of 1-year overall mortality and MACE as compared to Group I. Overall mortality: Group II HR 2.1 (95% CI 1.1-4.2); Group III HR 2.1 (95% CI 1.1-4.1); Group IV HR 4.8 (95% CI 2.4-9.4); MACE: Group II HR 2.2 (95% CI 1.1-4.2); Group III HR 2.2 (95% CI 1.1-4.3); Group IV HR 5.1 (95% CI 2.6-10.1). The LVSD-RD combination was the strongest independent predictor for 1-year outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: The LVSD-RD combination is associated with an approximately five-fold increase in 1-year overall mortality and MACE after pPCI. The evaluation of the renal function in patients with LVSD represents a simple method which enables a more precise stratification of the risks related to the occurrence of adverse events in long-term patient follow-up.

Utility of lipoprotein-associated phospholipase A2 for prediction of 30-day major adverse coronary event in patients with the first anterior ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction treated by primary percutaneous coronary intervention.

BACKGROUND: Lipoprotein-associated phospholipase A2 (Lp-PLA2) has been suggested as an inflammatory marker of cardiovascular risk. The predictive value of Lp-PLA2 in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) treated by primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) has not been established. The aim of this study was to determine whether plasma Lp-PLA2 is a predictor of a major adverse cardiac event (MACE) in patients with the first anterior STEMI treated by primary PCI. METHODS: This study consisted of 100 consecutive patients with first anterior STEMI who underwent primary PCI within 6 hours of the symptom onset. Plasma Lp-PLA2 level was measured on admission using a turbidimetric immunoassay (diaDexus, Inc., USA). The Receiver Operating Characteristic analysis was performed to identify the most useful Lp-PLA2 cut-off level for the prediction of MACE. The patients were divided into two groups according to the cut-off Lp-PLA2 level: high Lp-PLA2 group (> or = 463 ng/mL, n = 33) and low Lp-PLA2 group (< 463 ng/mL, n = 67). MACE was defined as cardiac death, non-fatal reinfarction, and target vessel revascularization. RESULTS: Patients in the high Lp-PLA2 group had significantly higher total-, LDL-cholesterol, apolipoprotein B levels, and significantly lower estimated glomerular filtration rates compared with the low Lp-PLA2 group. The incidence of 30-day mortality was 18.2% (6/33) in high Lp-PLA2 group, while in the low Lp-PLA2 group no patient died (p < 0.001). The 30-day MACE occurred in 24.2% of the high Lp-PLA2 group and 3% of the low Lp-PLA2 group (p = 0.001). Multiple logistic regression analysis identified the plasma Lp-PLA2 level as an independent predictor of MACE (OR 1.011, 95%CI 1.001 - 1.013, p = 0.037). CONCLUSIONS: In patients with first anterior STEMI treated by primary PCI, the plasma Lp-PLA2 level is an independent predictor of 30-day MACE.

The usefulness of myeloperoxidase in prediction of in-hospital mortality in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction treated by primary percutaneous coronary intervention.

BACKGROUND: The predictive value of myeloperoxidase (MPO) in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) treated by primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) has not been established. The aim of the present study was to investigate MPO as a predictor of in-hospital mortality in STEMI patients treated by primary PCI. METHODS: Study population consisted of 189 STEMI patients having undergone primary PCI. Plasma MPO level was measured 24 hours after symptom onset using chemiluminescent microparticle immunoassay (Abbott Diagnostics, Germany). The Receiver Operating Characteristic analysis was performed to identify the most useful MPO cut-off level for the prediction of in-hospital mortality. The patients were divided into two groups according to the cut-off MPO level: high MPO group (> or = 840 pmol/L, n = 65) and low MPO group (< 840 pmol/L, n = 124). RESULTS: The high MPO group had significantly more frequent anterior wall infarctions (p < 0.001) and Killip class > 1 on admission (p = 0.013) as well as lower left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) (p = 0.011) and higher B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP) (p = 0.029) than the low MPO group. The incidence of in-hospital mortality was 5.8% and was significantly higher in the high MPO group (13.8%) than in the low MPO group (1.6%) (p = 0.001). Multiple logistic regression analysis identified the plasma MPO level as an independent predictor of in-hospital mortality (OR 3.88, 95% CI 1.13 - 13.34, p = 0.031). CONCLUSIONS: Plasma MPO level independently predicts in-hospital mortality in STEMI patients treated by primary PCI.

Acute Coronary Syndrome in the COVID-19 Era-Differences and Dilemmas Compared to the Pre-COVID-19 Era.

The COVID-19 pandemic has led to numerous negative implications for all aspects of society. Although COVID-19 is a predominant lung disease, in 10-30% of cases, it is associated with cardiovascular disease (CVD). The presence of myocardial injury in COVID-19 patients occurs with a frequency between 7-36%. There is growing evidence of the incidence of acute coronary syndrome (ACS) in COVID-19, both due to coronary artery thrombosis and insufficient oxygen supply to the myocardium in conditions of an increased need. The diagnosis and treatment of patients with COVID-19 and acute myocardial infarction (AMI) is a major challenge for physicians. Often the presence of mixed symptoms, due to the combined presence of COVID-19 and ACS, as well as possible other diseases, nonspecific changes in the electrocardiogram (ECG), and often elevated serum troponin (cTn), create dilemmas in diagnosing ACS in COVID-19. Given the often-high ischemic risk, as well as the risk of bleeding, in these patients and analyzing the benefit/risk ratio, the treatment of patients with AMI and COVID-19 is often associated with dilemmas and difficult decisions. Due to delays in the application of the therapeutic regimen, complications of AMI are more common, and the mortality rate is higher.