Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
1.
Disaster Med Public Health Prep ; 17: e151, 2022 05 02.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35492009

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: Despite widespread use of noninvasive ventilation (NIV) in some coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) hypoxemic patients, its clinical application is still subject of debate. METHODS: This is a retrospective, observational study with data collected from 91 consecutive patients treated in COVID intensive care unit (ICU) in our institution between October 2020 and February 2021. Outcomes were represented as ventilation hours, ICU and hospital length of stay, and ICU and hospital mortality. RESULTS: Patients' mean age was 66 ± 11 y and severe COVID-19 pneumonia with mean paO2/FiO2 137 ± 57 was observed in 90% of the patients. High positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) NIV by means of total face mask was initially applied in 58 (64%) patients, high flow oxygen therapy (HFOT) in 25 (27%) patients, whilst invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV) started at the moment of admission in 8 (9%) patients. NIV and high flow oxygen therapy (HFOT) have been kept on throughout ICU stay in 50 (55%) patients, while 41 (45%) patients were put on IMV. Overall ICU mortality was 41%, while ICU mortality of patients on NIV was 14%. CONCLUSIONS: High PEEP NIV was convenient and safe as initial respiratory support and in some COVID-19 ARDS patients remained an optimal respiratory support throughout their disease.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Ventilación no Invasiva , Síndrome de Dificultad Respiratoria , Insuficiencia Respiratoria , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Anciano , Respiración Artificial , Ventilación no Invasiva/efectos adversos , COVID-19/epidemiología , COVID-19/terapia , COVID-19/etiología , Hospitales Generales , Unidades de Cuidados Intensivos , Síndrome de Dificultad Respiratoria/terapia , Síndrome de Dificultad Respiratoria/etiología , Oxígeno , Insuficiencia Respiratoria/etiología , Insuficiencia Respiratoria/terapia
2.
Croat Med J ; 48(1): 51-8, 2007 Feb.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17309139

RESUMEN

AIM: To compare T-tube and pressure support ventilation (PSV) as two methods of mechanical ventilation weaning of patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) after failed extubation. METHODS: A prospective randomized trial carried out at the multidisciplinary intensive care unit (ICU) over 2 years included 136 patients with COPD who required mechanical ventilation longer than 24 hours. The patients who could be weaned from mechanical ventilation were randomized to either a T-tube or PSV 2-hour spontaneous breathing trial. The patients in whom 2-hour trial was successful were extubated and excluded from further research. Patients in whom 2-hour trial failed had mechanical ventilation reinstated and underwent the same weaning procedure after 24 hours in case they fulfilled the weaning criteria. The weaning outcome was assessed according to the following parameters: extubation success, mechanical ventilation duration, time spent in ICU, reintubation rate, and mortality rate. RESULTS: Two-hour trial failed in 31 patients in T-tube and 32 patients in PSV group, of whom 17 and 23, respectively, were successfully extubated (P<0.001, chi(2)test). Mechanical ventilation lasted significantly longer in T-tube than in PSV group (187 hours vs 163 hours, respectively, P<0.001, Mann-Whitney test). Also, patients in T-tube group spent significantly more time in ICU than patients in PVS group (241 hours [interquartile range 211-268] vs 210 hours [211-268], respectively, P<0.001, Mann-Whitney test). Reintubation was required in 8 and 6 patients in T-tube and PVS group, respectively, and death occurred in 4 and 2 patients, respectively, during ICU stay. CONCLUSION: Patients with COPD who failed the 2-hour spontaneous breathing trial had more favorable outcome when PVS rather than T-tube method was used for weaning from mechanical ventilation.


Asunto(s)
Intubación Intratraqueal/instrumentación , Respiración con Presión Positiva/métodos , Enfermedad Pulmonar Obstructiva Crónica/diagnóstico , Enfermedad Pulmonar Obstructiva Crónica/terapia , Desconexión del Ventilador/métodos , Adulto , Anciano , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Unidades de Cuidados Intensivos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Respiración con Presión Positiva/instrumentación , Probabilidad , Estudios Prospectivos , Respiración , Respiración Artificial/efectos adversos , Respiración Artificial/métodos , Pruebas de Función Respiratoria , Factores de Riesgo , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Estadísticas no Paramétricas , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del Tratamiento
3.
Wien Klin Wochenschr ; 125(17-18): 524-8, 2013 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23934185

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Tonsillectomy is a very painful procedure. Pain may be severe, and patients are often unable to perform in school or eat regular food for a number of days after the surgery. The aim of this study was to compare the quality of life after undergoing two different surgical techniques of tonsillectomy, harmonic scalpel and classic tonsillectomy with bipolar cauterization. DESIGN AND SETTING: Prospective randomized double-blind, clinical trial study conducted in the ENT Department, Dr. Josip Bencevic General Hospital, Slavonski Brod, Croatia. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Data were collected, according to the type of operation, on pain persistence and intensity and returning to normal eating with tonsillectomy patients during the first seven postoperative days. Group A consisted of 50 children submitted to classic tonsillectomy with bipolar cauterization, while group B included 50 children operated on using the harmonic scalpel. Data on pain intensity were obtained using pain measuring scales adjusted to children's age (Faces scales, visual analog scale). The first day of normal oral food intake was recorded. RESULTS: The analysis of variance revealed that the grade of pain significantly differs by a surgical technique employed, and that it significantly varied over the first seven postoperative days. The pain was more severe after undergoing the harmonic scalpel technique and children started to eat later compared with the classic tonsillectomy. CONCLUSION: The classic tonsillectomy method with bipolar cauterization is the method of choice due to lower postoperative pain levels and sooner normal eating. The quality of life is better after undergoing the classic tonsillectomy method.


Asunto(s)
Trastornos de Alimentación y de la Ingestión de Alimentos/epidemiología , Dolor Postoperatorio/epidemiología , Calidad de Vida , Tonsilectomía/métodos , Tonsilitis/epidemiología , Tonsilitis/cirugía , Adolescente , Causalidad , Niño , Comorbilidad , Croacia/epidemiología , Método Doble Ciego , Trastornos de Alimentación y de la Ingestión de Alimentos/prevención & control , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Dimensión del Dolor/estadística & datos numéricos , Dolor Postoperatorio/diagnóstico , Dolor Postoperatorio/prevención & control , Satisfacción del Paciente , Prevalencia , Estudios Prospectivos , Factores de Riesgo , Resultado del Tratamiento
4.
Med Glas (Zenica) ; 9(2): 438-41, 2012 Aug.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22926398

RESUMEN

The success of a frontal sinus endoscopic or external operation depends on the postoperative stenosis of the frontal sinus ostium. Formation of a stenosis can be prevented by placing a stent in the frontal sinus ostium. The period optimal for leaving the stent in the sinus ostium is yet to be established, but experts recommend a maximum six months period. This case report presents a female patient who underwent an endoscopic bilateral frontal sinus operation in 2005. Postoperatively, she developed a stenosis of the right frontal sinus recess which resulted in a series of reoperations. At the end of 2009, a Medtronix Xomed Incl Parell T-Frontal Stent was inserted by external approach. At the 21-month followup, the patient was still free from discomfort with the stent normally placed. Proper hygiene, regular monitoring and endoscopic cleansing of the patient's stent resulted in the sinus orderly functioning with the stent placed within its ostium, without incrustation or breathing difficulties and headaches as a consequence.


Asunto(s)
Seno Frontal , Sinusitis Frontal/cirugía , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/terapia , Stents , Adulto , Constricción Patológica/etiología , Constricción Patológica/terapia , Femenino , Seno Frontal/cirugía , Humanos
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA