RESUMEN
Introduction Both non-contrast Computed Tomography (CT) and ultrasound (US) are used for the diagnosis of renal colic in the emergency department (ED). Although US reduces radiation exposure, its diagnostic accuracy is inferior to that of CT. In this context, data regarding the cost and organizational impact of these strategies represent essential elements in the choice of imaging; however, they remain poorly documented. Aim of the study The aim of this study was to compare the costs and effectiveness of diagnostic workup by US and CT for patients consulting with renal colic in the ED. Methods We conducted a monocentric real-life retrospective study of patients consulting for a renal colic in an ED between 1 July 2018 and 31 December 2018. We estimated length of stay (LOS), total hospital costs at 60 days including ED, and initial and repeat admissions. Patients with initial US in the ED were compared to patients with initial CT using inverse probability weighting of the propensity score calculated from demographic variables, vital parameters, and clinical presentation. We calculated the incremental cost effectiveness ratio as the difference in costs by the difference in LOS. The variability of the results was assessed using non-parametric bootstrapping. Results In this study, of the 273 patients included, 67 were patients assessed with US and 206 with CT. The average costs were 1159 (SD 1987) and 956 (SD 1462) for US and CT, respectively, and the ED LOS was 8.9 [CI 95% 8.1; 9.4] and 8.7 [CI 95% 7.9; 9.9] hours for US and CT, respectively. CT was associated with a decreased LOS by 0.139 [CI 95% -1.1; 1.5] hours and was cost-saving, with a 199 [CI 95% -745; 285] reduction per patient. Conclusion When imaging is required in the ED for suspected renal colic as recommended, there is real-life evidence that CT is a cost-effective strategy compared to US, reducing costs and LOS in the ED.
Asunto(s)
Cólico Renal , Humanos , Cólico Renal/diagnóstico por imagen , Análisis Costo-Beneficio , Estudios Retrospectivos , Hospitalización , Servicio de Urgencia en HospitalRESUMEN
Background and Objectives: Chest radiography remains the most frequently used examination in emergency departments (ED) for the diagnosis of community-acquired pneumonia (CAP), despite its poor diagnostic accuracy compared with ultra-low-dose (ULD) chest computed tomography (CT). However, although ULD CT appears to be an attractive alternative to radiography, its organizational impact in ED remains unknown. Our objective was to compare the relevant timepoints in ED management of CT and chest radiography. Materials and Methods: We conducted a retrospective study in two ED of a University Hospital including consecutive patients consulting for a CAP between 1 March 2019 and 29 February 2020 to assess the organizational benefits of ULD chest CT and chest radiography (length of stay (LOS) in the ED, time of clinical decision after imaging). Overlap weights (OW) were used to reduce covariate imbalance between groups. Results: Chest radiography was performed for 1476 patients (mean age: 76 years [63; 86]; 55% men) and ULD chest CT for 133 patients (mean age: 71 [57; 83]; 53% men). In the weighted population with OW, ULD chest CT did not significantly alter the ED LOS compared with chest radiography (11.7 to 12.2; MR 0.96 [0.85; 1.09]), although it did significantly reduce clinical decision time (6.9 and 9.5 h; MR 0.73 [0.59; 0.89]). Conclusion: There is real-life evidence that a strategy with ULD chest CT can be considered to be a relevant approach to replace chest radiography as part of the diagnostic workup for CAP in the ED without increasing ED LOS.
Asunto(s)
Neumonía , Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos X , Masculino , Humanos , Anciano , Femenino , Estudios Retrospectivos , Radiografía , Neumonía/diagnóstico por imagen , Servicio de Urgencia en HospitalRESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to compare the costs and organizational benefits of diagnostic workup without and with MRI dedicated to the ED. METHODS: We conducted a prospective observational uncontrolled before-after study in one ED of a university hospital in France from July 1, 2018, and January 3, 2020. We included all consecutive patients presenting with dizziness or diplopia. The main outcomes were the clinical decision time of ED physicians and the total costs for each strategy. Outcomes were compared using propensity score with inverse probability weighting in the 2 arms and an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) was calculated. RESULTS: Among the 199 patients during the "before" period (average age: 60.4 years ± 17.6): 112 men (57%), and 181 during the "after" period (average age, 54.8 years ± 18.5): 107 men (59%), the average costs were 2701 (95% CI 1918; 3704) and 2389 (95% CI: 1627; 3280) per patient, respectively. The average time to clinical decision was 9.8 h (95% CI: 8.9 10.7) in the group "before" and 7.7 h (95% CI: 7.1; 8.4) in the group "after" (ICER: 151 saved for a reduction of 1 h in clinical decision time). The probabilistic sensitivity analysis estimated a 71% chance that the MRI dedicated to ED was dominant (less costly and more effective). CONCLUSION: Easy access to MRI in the ED for posterior circulation stroke-like symptoms must be considered a relevant approach to help physicians for an appropriate and rapid diagnostic with reduction of costs. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT03660852 KEY POINTS: ⢠A dedicated MRI in the ED for diplopia or dizziness may be considered an efficient strategy improving diagnostic performance, reducing physicians' decision time, and decreasing hospital costs. ⢠This strategy supports clinical decision-making with early treatment and management of patients with posterior circulation-like symptoms in the ED. ⢠There is 71% chance that the MRI dedicated to ED was dominant (less costly and more effective) compared with a strategy without dedicated MRI.
Asunto(s)
Diplopía , Mareo , Masculino , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Mareo/diagnóstico por imagen , Análisis Costo-Beneficio , Diplopía/diagnóstico por imagen , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital , Imagen por Resonancia MagnéticaRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Even though France was severely hit by the COVID-19 pandemic, few studies have addressed the dynamics of the first wave on an exhaustive, nationwide basis. We aimed to describe the geographic and temporal distribution of COVID-19 hospitalisations and in-hospital mortality in France during the first epidemic wave, from January to June 2020. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study used the French national database for all acute care hospital admissions (PMSI). Contiguous stays were assembled into "care sequences" for analysis so as to limit bias when estimating incidence and mortality. The incidence rate and its evolution, mortality and hospitalized case fatality rates (HCFR) were compared between geographic areas. Correlations between incidence, mortality, and HCFR were analyzed. RESULTS: During the first epidemic wave, 98,366 COVID-19 patients were hospitalized (incidence rate of 146.7/100,000 inhabitants), of whom 18.8% died. The median age was 71 years, the male/female ratio was 1.16, and 26.2% of patients required critical care. The Paris area and the North-East region were the first and most severely hit areas. A rapid increase of incidence and mortality within 4 weeks was followed by a slow decrease over 10 weeks. HCFRs decreased during the study period, and correlated positively with incidence and mortality rates. DISCUSSION: By detailing the geographical and temporal evolution of the COVID-19 epidemic in France, this study revealed major interregional differences, which were otherwise undetectable in global analyses. The precision afforded should help to understand the dynamics of future epidemic waves.
Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Humanos , Femenino , Masculino , Anciano , COVID-19/epidemiología , COVID-19/terapia , Pandemias , Estudios Retrospectivos , Francia/epidemiología , HospitalizaciónRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: Frequency of normal chest CT in symptomatic COVID-19 patients as well as the outcome of these patients remains unknown. The objectives of this work were to assess the incidence of initially normal chest CT in a cohort of consecutive confirmed COVID-19 patients with respiratory symptoms and to compare their clinical characteristics and their outcome to matched patients with typical COVID-19 lesions at initial CT. METHODS: From March 6th to April 22nd, all consecutive adult patients referred to the COVID-19 clinic of our Emergency Department were retrospectively analyzed. Each patient with a positive SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR and a normal initial chest CT after second reading was 1:1 matched based on sex, age and date of CT acquisition to a patient with positive RT-PCR and initial chest CT with typical COVID-19 lesions. Clinical data, laboratory results and outcomes (major being mechanical ventilation and/or death) were compared between both groups, using Wilcoxon signed-rank test, McNemar's chi-squared test and/or exact McNemar's test where appropriate. RESULTS: Fifty-seven chest CT out of 1091 (5.2%, 95% CI 4.0-6.7) in symptomatic patients with positive RT-PCR were normal, with a median onset of symptoms of 4.5 days (IQR [1.25-10.25]). After a median follow-up of 43 days, death and/or mechanical ventilation occurred in 3 patients (5.3%) in the study group, versus 11 (19.3%) in the control group (p = 0.011). CONCLUSIONS: Normal initial chest CT occurred in 5.2% of symptomatic confirmed COVID-19 cases in our cohort. While better than those with abnormal chest CT, outcome was not entirely benign with 5.3% death and/or mechanical ventilation. KEY POINTS: ⢠In a cohort of 1091 symptomatic COVID-19 patients, initial chest CT was normal in 5.2% of cases. ⢠Normal chest CT in confirmed COVID-19 is frequent even when onset of symptoms is greater than 3 days. ⢠The outcome of COVID-19 patients with initial normal chest CT, while better than those with abnormal CT, was not entirely benign with 5.3% death and/or mechanical ventilation.
Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Adulto , COVID-19/diagnóstico por imagen , Humanos , Radiografía Torácica , Estudios Retrospectivos , Tórax/diagnóstico por imagen , Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos XRESUMEN
The prevalence of Clostridioides difficile PCR-ribotype (RT) 018 is low in Europe but variations are observed across countries. We report here the first RT 018-related outbreak in France that took place in 4 geriatric units (GU) in Strasbourg, France. From January to December 2017, 38 patients were diagnosed with C. difficile infection (CDI). Strains were first characterized by PCR ribotyping: 19 out of 38 (50%) strains belonged to RT 018. These strains as well as 12 RT 018 isolated in other French healthcare facilities and 2 strains of RT 018 isolated in the GU in 2015 were characterized by multi locus variable-number tandem repeat (VNTR) analysis (MLVA), whole genome multi locus sequence typing (wgMLST) and core genome single nucleotide polymorphism typing (cgSNP). The MLVA indicated that 15 out of 19 epidemic strains of RT 018 were included in 2 Clonal Complexes (CC). Four RT 018 strains from the outbreak did not belong to the CC. The wgMLST and cgSNP typing analysis revealed a single CC that included 19 strains from the geriatric unit (17 from GU in 2017 and 2 from GU in 2015) and 4 strains (33%) from other healthcare facilities (HCF). Our results suggest that a specific RT 018 clone has spread in the geriatric unit and has evolved slowly over time. MLVA, wgMLST and cgSNP typing results provided fairly consistent information but wgMLST and cgSNP typing better separated epidemic strains from non-epidemic strains. Compared to wgMLST, the cgSNP typing did not provide additional information.
Asunto(s)
Clostridioides difficile/clasificación , Clostridioides difficile/genética , Infecciones por Clostridium/epidemiología , Infecciones por Clostridium/microbiología , ADN Bacteriano , Brotes de Enfermedades , Genoma Bacteriano , Repeticiones de Minisatélite , Antibacterianos/farmacología , Toxinas Bacterianas/genética , Clostridioides difficile/efectos de los fármacos , Genómica/métodos , Humanos , Pruebas de Sensibilidad Microbiana , Tipificación de Secuencias Multilocus , Filogenia , Reacción en Cadena de la Polimerasa , Polimorfismo de Nucleótido Simple , RibotipificaciónRESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: To determine whether the risk of second primary cancer (SPC) among patients with bladder cancer (BCa) has changed over past years. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Data from 10 French population-based cancer registries were used to establish a cohort of 10 047 patients diagnosed with a first invasive (≥T1) BCa between 1989 and 2004 and followed up until 2007. An SPC was defined as the first subsequent primary cancer occurring at least 2 months after a BCa diagnosis. Standardized incidence ratios (SIRs) of metachronous SPC were calculated. Multivariate Poisson regression models were used to assess the direct effect of the year of BCa diagnosis on the risk of SPC. RESULTS: The risk of new malignancy among BCa survivors was 60% higher than in the general population (SIR 1.60, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.51-1.68). Male patients presented a high risk of SPC of the lung (SIR 3.12), head and neck (SIR 2.19) and prostate (SIR 1.54). In multivariate analyses adjusted for gender, age at diagnosis and follow-up, a significant increase in the risk of SPC of the lung was observed over the calendar year of BCa diagnosis (P for linear trend 0.010), with an SIR increasing by 3.7% for each year (95% CI 0.9-6.6%); however, no particular trend was observed regarding the risk of SPC of the head and neck (P = 0.596) or the prostate (P = 0.518). CONCLUSIONS: As the risk of SPC of the lung increased between 1989 and 2004, this study contributes more evidence to support the promotion of tobacco smoking cessation interventions among patients with BCa.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Primarias Secundarias/epidemiología , Neoplasias de la Vejiga Urinaria/terapia , Anciano , Estudios de Cohortes , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Medición de Riesgo/tendencias , Sobrevivientes , Factores de TiempoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Cramps are involuntary painful muscle contractions that mainly affect older people. Cramps may cause severe pain and sleep disturbance. Little information exists on the prevalence and the main features of cramps in primary care settings. The objective of this study was to estimate the prevalence and the main features of cramps among primary care patients aged 60 years and older. METHODS: We prospectively enrolled 516 patients aged 60 years and older in a cross-sectional study at 25 general practices in Alsace - France between October 2011 and March 2012. Questionnaires were used to obtain information about demographics, cramp presence and main features, medical history, and treatment. RESULTS: The adjusted prevalence was 46 % (95 % CI: 38-53 %). Thirty-one per cent of the study sample reported being woken up by cramps, 15 % had cramps more than 3 times a month. Logistic regression revealed a slightly higher prevalence in the age group 65-69 years compared to 60-64 years. No significant association was observed between other age groups and prevalence, or between gender and prevalence. The main localization of cramps was in the calves (80 %). The duration since onset was 5 years or more for 58 %. CONCLUSIONS: Cramps are common in primary care, and although only a minority of patients report suffering from cramps more than once a week, many patients report cramp-related sleep disturbance. Further studies are needed to assess risk factors and therapeutic options for patients suffering from cramps in primary care.
Asunto(s)
Francia/epidemiología , Calambre Muscular/epidemiología , Atención Primaria de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Enfermedad Crónica , Estudios Transversales , Disomnias/epidemiología , Disomnias/etiología , Femenino , Humanos , Pierna , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Calambre Muscular/complicaciones , Prevalencia , Estudios Prospectivos , Encuestas y CuestionariosAsunto(s)
Antivirales/uso terapéutico , Betacoronavirus/efectos de los fármacos , Infecciones por Coronavirus/tratamiento farmacológico , Neumonía Viral/tratamiento farmacológico , Comunicación Académica , Azitromicina/uso terapéutico , COVID-19 , Decepción , Combinación de Medicamentos , Francia , Humanos , Hidroxicloroquina/uso terapéutico , Lopinavir/uso terapéutico , Pandemias , Ritonavir/uso terapéutico , SARS-CoV-2 , Tratamiento Farmacológico de COVID-19RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Acute ischemic stroke (AIS) is an immediate emergency whose management is becoming more and more personalized while facing a limited number of neurologists with high expertise. Clinical decision support systems (CDSS) are digital tools leveraging information and artificial intelligence technologies. Here, we present the Strokecopilot project, a CDSS for the management of the acute phase of AIS. It has been designed to support the evidence-based medicine reasoning of neurologists regarding the indications of intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) and endovascular treatments (ET). METHODS: Reference populations were manually extracted from the field's main guidelines and randomized clinical trials (RCT). Their characteristics were harmonized in a computerized reference database. We developed a web application whose algorithm identifies the reference populations matching the patient's characteristics. It returns the latter's outcomes in a graphical user interface (GUI), whose design has been driven by real-world practices. RESULTS: Strokecopilot has been released at www.digitalneurology.net . The reference database includes 25 reference populations from 2 guidelines and 15 RCTs. After a request, the reference populations matching the patient characteristics are displayed with a summary and a meta-analysis of their results. The status regarding IVT and ET indications are presented as "in guidelines", "in literature", or "outside literature references". The GUI is updated to provide several levels of explanation. Strokecopilot may be updated as the literature evolves by loading a new version of the reference populations' database. CONCLUSION: Strokecopilot is a literature-based CDSS, developed to support neurologists in the management of the acute phase of AIS.
Asunto(s)
Isquemia Encefálica , Sistemas de Apoyo a Decisiones Clínicas , Accidente Cerebrovascular Isquémico , Accidente Cerebrovascular , Humanos , Accidente Cerebrovascular/tratamiento farmacológico , Isquemia Encefálica/tratamiento farmacológico , Fibrinolíticos/uso terapéutico , Terapia Trombolítica/métodos , Accidente Cerebrovascular Isquémico/tratamiento farmacológico , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
Background: COVID-19 infection is less severe among children than among adults; however, some patients require hospitalization and even critical care. Using data from the French national medico-administrative database, we estimated the risk factors for critical care unit (CCU) admissions among pediatric COVID-19 hospitalizations, the number and characteristics of the cases during the successive waves from January 2020 to August 2021 and described death cases. Methods: We included all children (age < 18) hospitalized with COVID-19 between January 1st, 2020, and August 31st, 2021. Follow-up was until September 30th, 2021 (discharge or death). Contiguous hospital stays were gathered in "care sequences." Four epidemic waves were considered (cut off dates: August 11th 2020, January 1st 2021, and July 4th 2021). We excluded asymptomatic COVID-19 cases, post-COVID-19 diseases, and 1-day-long sequences (except death cases). Risk factors for CCU admission were assessed with a univariable and a multivariable logistic regression model in the entire sample and stratified by age, whether younger than 2. Results: We included 7,485 patients, of whom 1988 (26.6%) were admitted to the CCU. Risk factors for admission to the CCU were being younger than 7 days [OR: 3.71 95% CI (2.56-5.39)], being between 2 and 9 years old [1.19 (1.00-1.41)], pediatric multisystem inflammatory syndrome (PIMS) [7.17 (5.97-8.6)] and respiratory forms [1.26 (1.12-1.41)], and having at least one underlying condition [2.66 (2.36-3.01)]. Among hospitalized children younger than 2 years old, prematurity was a risk factor for CCU admission [1.89 (1.47-2.43)]. The CCU admission rate gradually decreased over the waves (from 31.0 to 17.8%). There were 32 (0.4%) deaths, of which the median age was 6 years (IQR: 177 days-15.5 years). Conclusion: Some children need to be more particularly protected from a severe evolution: newborns younger than 7 days old, children aged from 2 to 13 years who are more at risk of PIMS forms and patients with at least one underlying medical condition.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is a serious public health issue that became rapidly pandemic. Liver injury and comorbidities, including metabolic syndrome, are associated with severe forms of the disease. This study sought to investigate liver injury, clinical features, and risk factors in patients with mild, moderate, and severe COVID-19. METHODS: We retrospectively included all consecutive patients hospitalized with laboratory-confirmed COVID-19 between February, 22 and May 15, 2020 at the emergency rooms of a French tertiary hospital. Medical history, symptoms, biological and imaging data were collected. RESULTS: Among the 1381 hospitalizations for COVID-19, 719 patients underwent liver tests on admission and 496 (68.9%) patients displayed abnormal liver tests. Aspartate aminotransferase was most commonly abnormal in 57% of cases, followed by gamma-glutamyl transferase, alanine aminotransferase, albumin, alkaline phosphatase, and total bilirubin in 56.5%, 35.9%, 18.4%, 11.4%, and 5.8%. The presence of hepatocellular type more than 2xULN was associated with a higher risk of hospitalization and a worse course of severe disease (odd ratio [OR] 5.599; 95%CI: 1.27-23.86; p = 0.021; OR 3.404; 95% CI: 2.12-5.47; p < 0.001, respectively). A higher NAFLD fibrosis score was associated with a higher risk of hospitalization (OR 1.754; 95%CI: 1.27-2.43, p < 0.001). In multivariate analyses, patients with high fibrosis-4 index had a 3-fold greater risk of severe disease (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Abnormal liver tests are common in patients with COVID-19 and could predict the outcome. Patients with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease and liver fibrosis are at higher risk of progressing to severe COVID-19.
Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Enfermedad del Hígado Graso no Alcohólico , COVID-19/complicaciones , Progresión de la Enfermedad , Humanos , Hígado , Cirrosis Hepática , Enfermedad del Hígado Graso no Alcohólico/complicaciones , Enfermedad del Hígado Graso no Alcohólico/diagnóstico , Estudios Retrospectivos , SARS-CoV-2RESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: Emergency departments (EDs) were on the front line for the diagnostic workup of patients with COVID-19-like symptoms during the first wave. Chest imaging was the key to rapidly identifying COVID-19 before administering RT-PCR, which was time-consuming. The objective of our study was to compare the costs and organizational benefits of triage strategies in ED during the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective study in five EDs in France, involving 3712 consecutive patients consulting with COVID-like symptoms between 9 March 2020 and 8 April 2020, to assess the cost effectiveness of imaging strategies (chest radiography, chest computed tomography (CT) scan in the presence of respiratory symptoms, systematic ultra-low-dose (ULD) chest CT, and no systematic imaging) on ED length of stay (LOS) in the ED and on hospital costs. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio was calculated as the difference in costs divided by the difference in LOS. RESULTS: Compared with chest radiography, workup with systematic ULD chest CT was the more cost-effective strategy (average LOS of 6.89 hours; average cost of 3646), allowing for an almost 4-hour decrease in LOS in the ED at a cost increase of 98 per patient. Chest radiography (extendedly dominated) and RT-PCR with no systematic imaging were the least effective strategies, with an average LOS of 10.8 hours. The strategy of chest CT in the presence of respiratory symptoms was more effective than the systematic ULD chest CT strategy, with the former providing a gain of 37 minutes at an extra cost of 718. DISCUSSION: Systematic ULD chest CT for patients with COVID-like symptoms in the ED is a cost-effective strategy and should be considered to improve the management of patients in the ED during the pandemic, given the need to triage patients.
Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Pandemias , Humanos , COVID-19/diagnóstico , Análisis Costo-Beneficio , Estudios Retrospectivos , Servicio de Urgencia en HospitalRESUMEN
RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this work was to analyze temporal variations in the diagnostic performance of chest CT for Covid-19 throughout the first wave, depending on disease prevalence variations between the ascending, peak and descending phases of the epidemic in North-Eastern France. MATERIALS AND METHODS: From March 6th to April 22nd 2020, all consecutive adult patients referred to the "Covid-19 clinic" of our Emergency Department with the availability of chest CT and of at least one RT-PCR result were retrospectively included in the present study. Chest CT was considered positive when typical Covid-19 lesions were observed (bilateral and predominantly peripheral and sub-pleural ground glass opacities and/or alveolar consolidations). RT-PCR results were considered as the reference standard. Ascending, peak and descending phases were determined based on the number of CT scans performed daily. CT diagnostic performance were calculated and variations between phases were tested for equivalence or difference using Bayesian methods. RESULTS: 2194 consecutive chest CT were analyzed. Overall CT diagnostic performance was Se = 84.2 [82.0 ; 86.3], Sp = 86.6 [84.5 ; 88.5], PPV = 86.1 [84.0 ; 88.1], NPV = 84.7 [82.6 ; 86.7] and accuracy = 85.4 [83.9 ; 86.8], with no significant differences between chest and non-chest radiologists. Variations between the ascending (11 days, 281 chest CT, disease prevalence 37.0 %), the peak (18 days, 1167 chest CT, disease prevalence 64 %) and the descending phases (19 days, 746 chest CT, disease prevalence 32.2 %) were highest for PPV and NPV with a probability of difference >99.9 %, and smallest for accuracy and specificity with a probability of equivalence >98.8 %. CONCLUSION: In a homogenous cohort of 2194 consecutive chest CT performed over a 7-week epidemic wave, we observed significant variations of CT predictive values whereas CT specificity appeared marginally affected.
Asunto(s)
COVID-19/diagnóstico , COVID-19/epidemiología , Pulmón/diagnóstico por imagen , Radiografía Torácica/métodos , Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos X/métodos , Adulto , Teorema de Bayes , Estudios de Cohortes , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital , Femenino , Francia/epidemiología , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Prevalencia , Probabilidad , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , Estudios Retrospectivos , SARS-CoV-2 , Sensibilidad y Especificidad , TiempoRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To explore mortality risk factors for patients hospitalised with COVID-19 in a critical care unit (CCU) or a hospital care unit (HCU). DESIGN: Retrospective cohort analysis using the French national (Programme de médicalisation des systèmes d'information) database. SETTING: Any public or private hospital in France. PARTICIPANTS: 98 366 patients admitted with COVID-19 for more than 1 day during the first semester of 2020 were included. The underlying conditions were retrieved for all contiguous stays. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: In-hospital mortality and associated risk factors were assessed using frailty Cox models. RESULTS: Among the 98 366 patients included, 25 765 (26%) were admitted to a CCU. The median age was 66 (IQR: 55-76) years in CCUs and 74 (IQR: 57-85) years in HCUs. Age was the main risk factor of death in both CCUs and HCUs, with adjusted HRs (aHRs) in CCUs increasing from 1.60 (95% CI 1.35 to 1.88) for 46 to 65 years to 8.17 (95% CI 6.86 to 9.72) for ≥85 years. In HCUs, the aHR associated with age was more than two times higher. The gender was not significantly associated with death, aHR 1.03 (95% CI 0.98 to 1.09, p=0.2693) in CCUs. Most of the underlying chronic conditions were risk factors for death, including malignant neoplasm (CCU: 1.34 (95% CI 1.25 to 1.43); HCU: 1.41 (95% CI 1.35 to 1.47)), cirrhosis without transplant (1.41 (95% CI 1.22 to 1.64); 1.27 (95% CI 1.12 to 1.45)) and dementia (1.30 (95% CI 1.16 to 1.46); 1.07 (95% CI 1.03 to 1.12)). CONCLUSION: This analysis confirms the role of age as the major risk factor of death in patients with COVID-19 irrespective to admission to critical care and therefore supports the current vaccination policies targeting older individuals.
Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Anciano , Cuidados Críticos , Hospitales , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Riesgo , SARS-CoV-2RESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: Correct and timely identification of SARS-CoV-2-positive patients is critical in the emergency department (ED) prior to admission to medical wards. Antigen-detecting rapid diagnostic tests (Ag-RDTs) are a rapid alternative to Reverse-transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) for the diagnosis of COVID-19 but have lower sensitivity. METHODS: We evaluated the performance in real-life conditions of a strategy combining Ag-RDT and chest computed tomography (CT) to rule out COVID-19 infection in 1015 patients presenting in the ED between 16 November 2020 and 18 January 2021 in order to allow non-COVID-19 patients to be hospitalized in dedicated units directly. The combined strategy performed in the ED for patients with COVID-19 symptoms was assessed and compared with RT-PCR. RESULTS: Compared with RT-PCR, the negative predictive value was 96.7% for Ag-RDT alone, 98.5% for Ag-RDT/CT combined, and increased to 100% for patients with low viral load. CONCLUSION: A strategy combining Ag-RDT and chest CT is effective in ruling out COVID-19 in ED patients with high precision.
RESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: This study reported a hospital outbreak due to an extensively drug-resistant (XDR) OXA-72-producing strain of Acinetobacter baumannii (A. baumannii). METHODS AND RESULTS: The isolates were found to be genotypically indistinguishable by whole-genome multiple locus sequence typing, and to belong to the international clonal complex CC2. One of these isolates sequentially developed a high resistance to colistin and rifampicin under treatment, as a result of mutations in genes pmrB and rpoB, respectively. The blaOXA-72 gene was localised on a 10-kb transferable plasmid, named pAB-STR-1, whose sequence is nearly identical to that of another plasmid previously found in Lithuanian strains, pAB120. CONCLUSION: This report highlighted the need to carefully monitor the emergence of colistin and rifampicin resistance in patients treated for infections with multidrug-resistant A. baumannii.
Asunto(s)
Infecciones por Acinetobacter/microbiología , Acinetobacter baumannii/efectos de los fármacos , Antibacterianos/farmacología , Proteínas Bacterianas/metabolismo , Colistina/farmacología , Farmacorresistencia Bacteriana , Rifampin/farmacología , beta-Lactamasas/metabolismo , Infecciones por Acinetobacter/epidemiología , Acinetobacter baumannii/clasificación , Acinetobacter baumannii/genética , Acinetobacter baumannii/aislamiento & purificación , Proteínas Bacterianas/genética , Conjugación Genética , Infección Hospitalaria/epidemiología , Infección Hospitalaria/microbiología , ARN Polimerasas Dirigidas por ADN/genética , Brotes de Enfermedades , Femenino , Transferencia de Gen Horizontal , Genotipo , Humanos , Masculino , Tipificación Molecular , Mutación , Plásmidos/análisis , Análisis de Secuencia de ADN , Factores de Transcripción/genéticaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The significant risk of adverse events following medical procedures supports a clinical epidemiological approach based on the analyses of collections of electronic medical records. Data analytical tools might help clinical epidemiologists develop more appropriate case-crossover designs for monitoring patient safety. OBJECTIVE: To develop and assess the methodological quality of an interactive tool for use by clinical epidemiologists to systematically design case-crossover analyses of large electronic medical records databases. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We developed IT-CARES, an analytical tool implementing case-crossover design, to explore the association between exposures and outcomes. The exposures and outcomes are defined by clinical epidemiologists via lists of codes entered via a user interface screen. We tested IT-CARES on data from the French national inpatient stay database, which documents diagnoses and medical procedures for 170 million inpatient stays between 2007 and 2013. We compared the results of our analysis with reference data from the literature on thromboembolic risk after delivery and bleeding risk after total hip replacement. RESULTS: IT-CARES provides a user interface with 3 columns: (i) the outcome criteria in the left-hand column, (ii) the exposure criteria in the right-hand column, and (iii) the estimated risk (odds ratios, presented in both graphical and tabular formats) in the middle column. The estimated odds ratios were consistent with the reference literature data. DISCUSSION: IT-CARES may enhance patient safety by facilitating clinical epidemiological studies of adverse events following medical procedures. The tool's usability must be evaluated and improved in further research.