Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 6 de 6
Filtrar
1.
Stem Cell Res ; 50: 102127, 2020 12 15.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33360098

RESUMEN

Niemann-Pick disease Type C (NPC) is a rare progressive neurodegenerative disorder with an incidence of 1:120,000 caused by mutations in the NPC1 or NPC2 gene leading to a massive cholesterol accumulation. Here, we describe the generation of induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs) of an affected female adult individual carrying the NPC1 mutation p.Val1023Serfs*15/p.Gly992Arg and an iPSC line from an unrelated healthy female adult control individual. Human iPSCs were derived from fibroblasts using retroviruses carrying the four reprogramming factors OCT4, SOX2, KLF4 and C-MYC. These lines provide a valuable resource for studying the pathophysiology of NPC and for pharmacological intervention.

2.
Clin Pharmacol Ther ; 105(4): 926-931, 2019 04.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30428144

RESUMEN

Eight years ago, this journal published "The Value and Benefits of the International Conference on Harmonization to Drug Regulatory Authorities: Advancing Harmonization for Better Public Health" to mark the 20th anniversary of the International Council on Harmonization (ICH). Much has happened since following the reform of ICH, which culminated in 2015 with the establishment of ICH as an international nonprofit association. This entailed a transformation of the collaboration between a limited number of parties in an informal setting into a formal international organization with its own legal entity. The reform was a time-consuming exercise preceded by in-depth and complex discussions, where different options had to be considered and different interests balanced while ICH continued its normal harmonization work within the existing framework. However, the mission of ICH remained unchanged: advancing harmonization for better health. This article describes what triggered the reform and the work that paved the way for reaching the end result.


Asunto(s)
Industria Farmacéutica/legislación & jurisprudencia , Cooperación Internacional/legislación & jurisprudencia , Salud Pública/legislación & jurisprudencia , Humanos
3.
Ther Innov Regul Sci ; 53(5): 601-608, 2019 09.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30663334

RESUMEN

Patient engagement in health care has been an emerging priority in the global effort and move toward the consideration of patients as experts of their own conditions. However, the input of pediatric patients and their families have not been consistently requested nor regarded as valuable when deriving protocols for, as well as assessing the outcomes of, pediatric clinical trials. Extending this mutual collaboration further upstream is important, especially in the area of pediatric drug development where the lack of formalized trials for children and adolescents result in the increased use of off-label prescribing and risk of adverse effects. While recent changes to European and North American legislation contributed to the inclusion of children and youth in pediatric drug development, the lack of systematic guidelines and methodologies in literature serve as barriers for practical application. When combined with the work of external pediatric advocacy and patient advisory groups, the hope is that pediatric patient voices can be brought forward for the future. This article brings together international experts to review current best practices, progress from regulatory agencies, as well as global advocacy efforts to involve patients and families in the pursuit of drug development processes that value the voice of children and youth.


Asunto(s)
Desarrollo de Medicamentos/legislación & jurisprudencia , Participación del Paciente/legislación & jurisprudencia , Adolescente , Niño , Ensayos Clínicos como Asunto/legislación & jurisprudencia , Humanos , Padres , Pediatría/legislación & jurisprudencia , Guías de Práctica Clínica como Asunto
4.
Res Involv Engagem ; 4: 10, 2018.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29619246

RESUMEN

PLAIN ENGLISH SUMMARY: People living with a condition are uniquely positioned to inform the understanding of the therapeutic context for drug development and evaluation. In 2012, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) established the Patient-Focused Drug Development (PFDD) initiative to more systematically obtain the patient perspective on specific diseases and their currently available treatments. PFDD meetings are unique among FDA public meetings, with a format designed to engage patients and elicit their perspectives on two topic areas: (1) the most significant symptoms of their condition and the impact of the condition on daily life; and, (2) their current approaches to treatment. FDA has conducted 24 disease-specific PFDD meetings to date. The lessons learned from PFDD meetings range from experiences common across rare diseases to more disease specific experiences that matter most to patients. FDA recognizes that FDA-led PFDD meetings alone cannot address the gaps in information on the patient perspective. Patient-focused drug development is an ongoing effort and FDA looks forward to the next steps in advancing the science and the utilization of patient input throughout drug development and evaluation. ABSTRACT: The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has multiple mechanisms for its regulators and staff to interact with patients -- but none quite like its novel Patient-Focused Drug Development (PFDD) initiative. FDA established the PFDD initiative to more systematically obtain the patient perspective on specific diseases and their currently available treatments. Since the initiative's inception in 2012, FDA has held 24 PFDD meetings, covering a range of disease areas and hearing directly from thousands of patients and caregivers. FDA's PFDD meetings have also provided key stakeholders, including patient advocates, researchers, drug developers, healthcare providers, and other government officials, an opportunity to hear the patient's voice. The lessons learned include but are not limited to specific experiences that matter most to patients, patient perspectives on meaningful treatment benefits and how patients want to be engaged in the drug development process. FDA recognizes that FDA-led PFDD meetings alone cannot address the gaps in information on the patient perspective. Further enhancing the incorporation of the patient's voice in drug development and evaluation continues to be a priority for FDA.

5.
AAPS J ; 17(4): 1011-8, 2015 Jul.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25840884

RESUMEN

On September 16 and 17, 2014, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and Product Quality Research Institute (PQRI) inaugurated their Conference on Evolving Product Quality. The Conference is conceived as an annual forum in which scientists from regulatory agencies, industry, and academia may exchange viewpoints and work together to advance pharmaceutical quality. This Conference Summary Report highlights key topics of this conference, including (1) risk-based approaches to pharmaceutical development, manufacturing, regulatory assessment, and post-approval changes; (2) FDA-proposed quality metrics for products, facilities, and quality management systems; (3) performance-based quality assessment and clinically relevant specifications; (4) recent developments and implementation of continuous manufacturing processes, question-based review, and European Medicines Agency (EMA)-FDA pilot for Quality-by-Design (QbD) applications; and (5) breakthrough therapies, biosimilars, and international harmonization, focusing on ICH M7 and Q3D guidelines. The second FDA/PQRI conference on advancing product quality is planned for October 5-7, 2015.


Asunto(s)
Diseño de Fármacos , Preparaciones Farmacéuticas/normas , Aprobación de Drogas , Humanos , Control de Calidad , Estados Unidos , United States Food and Drug Administration
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA