Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 1 de 1
Filtrar
Más filtros

Bases de datos
País/Región como asunto
Tipo del documento
Asunto de la revista
País de afiliación
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
BMC Med Ethics ; 13: 29, 2012 Nov 08.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23136958

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The intervention reported in this paper was a follow up to an empirical study conducted in Malawi with the aim of assessing trial participants' understanding of randomisation, double-blinding and placebo use. In the empirical study, the majority of respondents (61.1%; n=124) obtained low scores (lower than 75%) on understanding of all three concepts under study. Based on these findings, an intervention based on a narrative which included all three concepts and their personal implications was designed. The narrative used daily examples from the field of Agriculture because Malawi has an agro-based economy. METHODS: The intervention was tested using a sample of 36 women who had been identified as low scorers during the empirical study. The 36 low scorers were randomly assigned to control (n=18) and intervention arms (n=18). The control arm went through a session in which they were provided with standard informed consent information for the microbicide trial. The intervention arm went through a session in which they were provided with a narrative in ChiChewa, the local language, with the assistance of a power point presentation which included pictures as well as discussions on justification and personal implications of the concepts under study. RESULTS: The findings on the efficacy of the intervention suggest that the 3 scientific concepts and their personal implications can be understood by low literacy populations using simple language and everyday local examples. The findings also suggest that the intervention positively impacted on understanding of trial procedures under study, as 13 of the 18 women in the intervention arm, obtained high scores (above 75%) during the post intervention assessment and none of the 18 in the control arm obtained a high score. Using Fischer's exact test, it was confirmed that the effect of the intervention on understanding of the three procedures was statistically significant (p=0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: Potential trial participants can be assisted to understand key clinical trial procedures, their justification and personal implications by using innovative tailored local narratives.


Asunto(s)
Comprensión , Formación de Concepto , Alfabetización Informacional , Consentimiento Informado , Lenguaje , Narración , Proyectos de Investigación , Sujetos de Investigación , Enseñanza/métodos , Adulto , Agricultura , Antiinfecciosos/administración & dosificación , Comprensión/ética , Características Culturales , Método Doble Ciego , Escolaridad , Ética en Investigación , Femenino , Humanos , Consentimiento Informado/ética , Consentimiento Informado/psicología , Malaui , Análisis por Apareamiento , Persona de Mediana Edad , Placebos/administración & dosificación , Distribución Aleatoria , Investigadores , Sujetos de Investigación/psicología , Poblaciones Vulnerables/psicología , Mujeres/educación , Mujeres/psicología
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA