Diagnostic performance of MRI and endoscopy for assessing complete response in rectal cancer after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy: a systematic review of the literature.

BACKGROUND: The diagnostic performance of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) modalities and/or endoscopy for assessing complete response in rectal cancer after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT) is unclear. PURPOSE: To summarize existing evidence on the diagnostic performance of diffusion-weighted MRI, perfusion-weighted MRI, T2-weighted MR tumor regression grade, and/or endoscopy for assessing complete tumor response after nCRT. MATERIAL AND METHODS: MEDLINE and Embase databases were searched. The PRISMA guidelines were followed. Sensitivity, specificity, negative predictive, and positive predictive values were retrieved from included studies. RESULTS: In total, 81 studies were eligible for inclusion. Evidence suggests that combined use of MRI and endoscopy tends to improve the diagnostic performance compared to single imaging modality. The positive predictive value of a complete response varies substantially between studies. There is considerable heterogeneity between studies. CONCLUSION: Combined re-staging tends to improve diagnostic performance compared to single imaging modality, but the vast majority of studies fail to offer true clinical value due to the study heterogeneity.

Systematic Review of Oral Combination Therapy for Erectile Dysfunction When Phosphodiesterase Type 5 Inhibitor Monotherapy Fails.

INTRODUCTION: On-demand phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitor (PDE5i) monotherapy is a first-line treatment for erectile dysfunction (ED), but 30%-40% of patients exhibit little or no response. The success rate of alprostadil therapy is high in these patients, but this treatment requires painful intracavernosal injection. AIM: To systematically review the efficacy and safety of second-line oral pharmacologic combination therapies of ED when PDE5i monotherapy fails. METHODS: PubMed and Embase were searched to identify reports providing quantitative data on the treatment of ED in patients failing PDE5i monotherapy. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The measures of erectile function were the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF) and the Erectile Function Domain (EFD). RESULTS: Chronic treatment with the PDE5i tadalafil alone or in combination with sildenafil on demand showed similar IIEF-5 score improvements. None of the 3 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in patients who had failed PDE5i monotherapy found a superior effect on IIEF scores from the combination of androgen plus PDE5i compared with PDE5i monotherapy. Combination therapy with androgen supplementation and PDE5i appears safe. In 1 RCT, combination therapy with PDE5i and an α1-adrenoceptor antagonist was not superior to PDE5i monotherapy. Six other studies, each with a different combination of PDE5i and another drug (eg, metformin, folic acid, 5-alpha-reductase inhibitors), were identified, but further research is required to investigate their efficacy in treating ED. CONCLUSION: For ED, chronic treatment with low-dose PDE5i can be attempted when standard on-demand regimens fail. Combination therapy with androgen supplementation and a PDE5i appears to be safe. The combination of an α1-adrenoceptor antagonist and PDE5i shows no advantageous effect on ED compared with PDE5i monotherapy. The efficacy of combining PDE5i with metformin, folic acid, or 5-alpha-reductase inhibitors is uncertain and requires further research. There is an unmet need for oral treatment of ED in nonresponders to PDE5i treatment. Munk NE, Knudsen JS, Comerma-Steffensen S, et al. Systematic Review of Oral Combination Therapy for Erectile Dysfunction When Phosphodiesterase Type 5 Inhibitor Monotherapy Fails. Sex Med Rev 2019;7:430-441.