Sacrospinous ligament fixation: medium and long-term anatomical results, functional and quality of life results.

BACKGROUND: To evaluate the medium and long-term anatomical results of sacrospinous ligament fixation (SLF) and its impact on quality of life (QoL). METHODS: We conducted a retrospective and observational single centre study. Fifty-nine patients were interviewed using the Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory and Pelvic Floor Impact Questionnaire and underwent physical examination using POP-Q several years after SLF. Primary outcome was the comparison of anatomic results of SLF at medium-term (group 1: 1-5 years after surgery) and long-term (group 2: more than 5 years after surgery). The secondary outcome was QoL evaluation. RESULTS: The overall recurrence and complication rates were respectively 22% and 10%, with no significant differences between groups 1 and 2. The recurrence rate was similar in both groups [twelve (35%) in group 1 and nine (20%) in group 2, p = 0.09]. Two patients (12%) in the recurrence and none in the no recurrence group had clinical symptoms (p = 0.08). Two patients (12%) in the recurrence and one patient (2%) in the no-recurrence group had a significant impact on their quality of life (p = 0.12). CONCLUSION: This study showed sustainable anatomic and functional results of SLF in medium and long-term analysis with overall low morbidity.

Revisiting the management of term breech presentation: a proposal for overcoming some of the controversies.

BACKGROUND: The debate surrounding the management of term breech presentation has excessively focused on the mode of delivery. Indeed, a steady decline in the rate of vaginal breech delivery has been observed over the last three decades, and the soundness of the vaginal route was seriously challenged at the beginning of the 2000s. However, associations between adverse perinatal outcomes and antenatal risk factors have been observed in foetuses that remain in the breech presentation in late gestation, confirming older data and raising the question of the role of these antenatal risk factors in adverse perinatal outcomes. Thus, aspects beyond the mode of delivery must be considered regarding the awareness and adequate management of such situations in term breech pregnancies. MAIN BODY: In the context of the most recent meta-analysis and with the publication of large-scale epidemiologic studies from medical birth registries in countries that have not abruptly altered their criteria for individual decision-making regarding the breech delivery mode, the currently available data provide essential clues to understanding the underlying maternal-foetal conditions beyond the delivery mode that play a role in perinatal outcomes, such as foetal growth restriction and gestational diabetes mellitus. In view of such data, an accurate evaluation of these underlying conditions is necessary in cases of persistent term breech presentation. Timely breech detection, estimated foetal weight/growth curves and foetal/maternal well-being should be considered along with these possible antenatal risk factors; a thorough analysis of foetal presentation and an evaluation of the possible benefit of external cephalic version and pelvic adequacy in each specific situation of persistent breech presentation should be performed. CONCLUSION: The adequate management of term breech pregnancies requires screening and the efficient identification of breech presentation at 36 weeks of gestation, followed by thorough evaluations of foetal weight, growth and mobility, while obstetric history, antenatal gestational disorders and pelvis size/conformation are considered. The management plan, including external cephalic version and follow-up based on the maternal/foetal condition and potentially associated disorders, should be organized on a case-by-case basis by a skilled team after the woman is informed and helped to make a reasoned decision regarding delivery route.

Segmental and Discoid Resection are Preferential to Bowel Shaving for Medium-Term Symptomatic Relief in Patients With Bowel Endometriosis.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate and compare medium-term clinical outcomes and recurrence rates in the laparoscopic surgical management of bowel endometriosis comparing 3 different surgical techniques (shaving, discoid, and segmental resection). DESIGN: Retrospective study (Canadian Task Force classification II-2). SETTING: Endometriosis tertiary referral center. PATIENTS: A retrospective cohort of 106 patients with histological confirmation of bowel endometriosis undergoing laparoscopic surgical treatment between January 1, 2010, and September 1, 2012. INTERVENTION: Assessment of laparoscopic bowel shaving, discoid or segmental resection for the treatment of painful symptoms related to deep endometriosis (DE) involving the bowel with 24 months of follow-up. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: A total of 92 patients were included in the study and were divided into 3 groups according to the surgical procedure performed (shaving, n = 47; discoid resection, n = 15; segmental resection, n = 30). All symptoms improved significantly in the immediate postoperative follow-up, with significant reduction in all visual analog scale scores for pain. Compared with the discoid resection and segmental resection groups, the shaving group had a significantly higher rate of medium-term recurrence of dysmenorrhea and dyspareunia. Furthermore, the shaving group had a higher rate of reintervention for recurrent DE lesions compared with the segmental resection group (27.6% vs 6.6%; relative risk [RR], 4.14; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.0-17.1). Postoperative complication rates were similar across all 3 groups with a rate of major complications of 4.2% in the shaving group, 6.6% in the discoid resection group, and 6.6% in the segmental resection group. According to our data, the patients with a nodule >3 cm had an RR of 2.5 (95% CI, 1.66-3.99) of requiring bowel resection. CONCLUSION: All 3 treatment modalities are effective in terms of immediate symptom relief with acceptable complication rates. However, significantly higher rates of symptom recurrence and reintervention were noted in the shaving group, whereas segmental resection is more likely to be indicated in cases of large nodules.

Impact of Laparoscopic Surgical Management of Deep Endometriosis on Pregnancy Rate.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the impact of laparoscopic excision of lesions on deep endometriosis-related infertility. DESIGN: Retrospective study. SETTING: Endometriosis tertiary referral center (Canadian Task Force II-2). PATIENTS: A group of 115 patients who had undergone laparoscopic surgery for infertility with histologic confirmation of deep endometriosis. INTERVENTIONS: Patient medical records and operative reports were reviewed. Telephone interviews were conducted for long-term follow-up of fertility outcomes. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Evaluation of fertility outcome after laparoscopic treatment of deep endometriosis by spontaneous conception and by assisted reproductive technology (ART) correlated with lesion number, size, and location (anterior, posterolateral, pouch of Douglas, and multiple locations). After a mean follow-up of 22 months the overall pregnancy rate was 54.78% (n = 63) with a live-birth rate of 42.6% (n = 49). Among those patients given the chance to conceive spontaneously (n = 70), the overall pregnancy rate was 60% (n = 42): 38.5% (n = 27) spontaneously and 21.4% (n = 15) by ART. The removal of multiple lesions was associated with a higher pregnancy rate after surgery. When comparing isolated lesion size and disease location, there was no difference in pregnancy rate. Furthermore, those patients who underwent surgical eradication of the disease for the first time had a higher pregnancy rate (odds ratio, 4.18). CONCLUSION: This study demonstrates that laparoscopic excision of deep endometriosis enhances pregnancy rate, by both spontaneous conception and ART. First surgical treatment of multiple lesions was associated with higher pregnancy rates, whereas isolated lesions influenced the pregnancy rate irrespective of their location and size.

Step-by-step Type C Laparoscopic Radical Hysterectomy With Nerve-sparing Approach.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To show the laparoscopic technique to perform type C radical hysterectomy with a nerve-sparing approach and pelvic lymphadenectomy. DESIGN: Educational video with step-by-step explanation of the technique using videos and pictures to highlight the anatomic landmark that guides the procedure. SETTING: The goal of this procedure is to enlarge the resection of the paracervix at the junction with internal iliac vascular system, leaving the neural part of the structure under the deep uterine vein untouched. Type C consists in the resection of the uterosacral ligament at the rectum level and the vesicouterine ligament at the bladder level. The ureter is mobilized completely, and 15 to 20 mm of the vagina from the tumor or cervix is resected. Performing such an enlarged hysterectomy, the preservation of the nerve supply to the bladder is crucial, leading to the creation of the subclasses. Type C1 conserves a nerve-sparing approach remaining above the deep uterine vein, whereas in type C2 a resection beyond this landmark including the neural part of the paracervix is performed. INTERVENTIONS: Total laparoscopic type C1 radical hysterectomy with pelvic lymphadenectomy. CONCLUSION: This video shows the feasibility of type C radical hysterectomy through a minimally invasive approach. The possibility to perform this type of procedure laparoscopically matches with the more conservative approach to cervical cancer, bringing all the advantages of this technique into this field of gynecologic surgery.

Collateral damage of COVID-19 pandemic: The impact on a gynecologic surgery department.

OBJECTIVE: This study focuses on changes in gynecologic surgical activity at Hospital Foch, Paris, France during the first French COVID lockdown in 2020. Additional goals include the evaluation the extent of the postponement suffered for each type of surgery and estimate the possible negative impact for patients. STUDY DESIGN: Single-center, retrospective, chart-review cohort study in the gynecology department of Hospital Foch. Comparison of all patients scheduled, postponed and operated during the first COVID lockdown (March 14, to May 11, 2020) versus the same period in 2019. Postponed surgeries were classified into 4 scheduling interval categories according to the Society of Gynecology Oncology (SGO) recommendations: urgent (without delay), semi-urgent (1-4 weeks), non-urgent (>4-12 weeks) and elective (>3 months) and evaluated to determine whether COVID-19-related delays of surgeries fell within guidelines. The potential "loss of chance" or medical risk associated with postponed surgeries was estimated according to a composite criterion including death, aggravation of expected tumor stages/grades in cancers, increase in surgical complexity compared to that initially planned, need for preoperative transfusions, start of morphine consumption during preoperative treatment for opiate-naive patients, additional hospitalization or consultations in emergency room and delay in treatment when surgery was urgent. RESULTS: During the 2020 French COVID lockdown, 61 patients had a surgical procedure and 114 were postponed; in the comparator 2019 group, 232 patients underwent surgical procedures, indicating an overall decrease of 65% of activity. Analysis of differences between the two years revealed a reduction of 64% in emergency procedures, 90% of functional pathologies, and 13% of cancers. According to SGO guidelines, the only type of surgical procedures that had excessive delay was the semi-urgent group, where time to surgery was 6.7 weeks [range 5.4-10 weeks] instead of the recommended interval of 1-4 weeks. Among postponed surgeries there were 10 patients (8.7%) with a potential "loss of chance" according to the composite criteria, all included in the semi-urgent group. CONCLUSION: The COVID 19 pandemic was responsible for a significant decrease of activity in the surgical department of Hospital Foch. Difficulty of rescheduling surgeries was responsible for an increased delay in semi-urgent operations. In almost 9% of postponed surgeries, there was a potential "loss of chance", which likely represents only the tip of iceberg of collateral damages due to COVID 19 pandemic in this surgical unit. These data show the importance of continuing to treat pathologies requiring urgent or semi-urgent surgery during pandemics.

Managing a Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology in Times of COVID-19 Outbreak: The Foch Hospital Experience.

Departments of Gynecology and Obstetrics, as other departments, were faced with a major challenge at the outbreak of the COVID-19 pandemic. Fast restructuring was necessary in order to provide the means for COVID-related care. In this article we share our 1-year experience in reshaping our activities, managing healthcare workers and securing a pathway for pregnant patients, including potential, and confirmed COVID-19 cases. Priorities were set on ensuring patients' and healthcare workers' safety. Key containment measures included facemasks, systematic screening, dedicated spaces for COVID-19 cases with reinforced measures and vaccination campaign.

Risks factors FOR wound complications after cesarean section.

OBJECTIVE: The primary outcome was to determine risks factors for wound complications after cesarean section. Secondary outcome was the management of these complications. STUDY DESIGN: We performed a retrospective cohort study of consecutive cesarean deliveries performed at a secondary care facility between June 2017 and June 2019. Composite wound complications included infection, disruption and fluid collection occurring 30 days post-operatively. Medical records were reviewed and data including patient demographics, comorbidities, intra-partum characteristics were evaluated as potential risk factors for wound complications using multivariate logistic regression. Secondarily, post-operative management of wound complications was described. RESULTS: Among 1520 patients undergoing cesarean section during the period of study, 67 developed wound complications (4.4 %). Mean Duration of local wound care was 41.35 days (2-95). Mean number of wound care related visits in our hospital was 4.85(1-11). Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed 2 significant independant risk factors: preeclampsia with OR 5.60, 95 % CI 2.83, 11.11 (p:<0.001), and premature rupture of the membranes with OR 9.76, 95 % CI 2.13, 44.77 (p: 0.003). CONCLUSION: Preeclampsia and premature rupture of the membrane were independent risk factors for wound complications after cesarean section. Information regarding higher rates of wound complications and preventive measures should be provided to high-risk women prior to surgery.

Serous Borderline Ovarian Tumor Diagnosis, Management and Fertility Preservation in Young Women.

Borderline ovarian tumors (BOT) represent about 10 to 20 percent of all epithelial tumors of the ovary. They constitute intermediate lesions between benign ovarian cysts and invasive carcinomas. They often occur in young women of reproductive age, and, albeit with a favorable prognosis, it may recur on the ipsilateral or contralateral ovary. Controversies surround the diagnostic criteria used for their assessment, and the optimal management to minimize their risk of recurrence and/or transformation into malignant carcinoma. Fertility preservation (FP) is considered a priority in the management of these patients, and studies aim at finding the safest and most effective way to help women with BOT history conceive with minimal risk. We present the experience of a single institution in managing three cases of serous BOT in young nulliparous women, followed by a thorough review of the existing literature, highlighting controversies and exploring the possible FP techniques for these women.

Employing laparoscopic surgery for endometriosis.

Endometriosis is a chronic, multifactorial disease, which can impact significantly on a women's quality of life. It is associated with pelvic pain, dyspareunia and intestinal disorders, and can lead to infertility. The use of laparoscopic surgery in the management of endometriosis is well documented; however, the optimal management of women with deep infiltrating disease remains controversial. This review describes the different surgical strategies for the treatment of endometriosis.