Trends in neonatal mortality and morbidity in very-low-birth-weight (VLBW) infants over a decade: Singapore national cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Very preterm infants are at risk for neurodevelopmental impairment because of postnatal morbidities. This study aims to (1) compare the outcomes of very-low-birth-weight (VLBW) infants in Singapore during two time periods over a decade; 2) compare performances among Singaporean neonatal intensive care units (NICUs); and 3) compare a Singapore national cohort with one from the Australian and New Zealand Neonatal Network (ANZNN). METHODS: Singapore national data on VLBW infants born during two periods, 2007-2008 (SG2007, n = 286) and 2015-2017 (SG2017, n = 905) were extracted from patient medical records. The care practices and clinical outcomes among three Singapore NICUs were compared using SG2017 data. Third, using data from the ANZNN2017 annual report, infants with gestational age (GA) ≤29 weeks in SG2017 were compared with their Oceania counterparts. RESULTS: SG2017 had 9.9% higher usage of antenatal steroids (p < 0.001), 8% better survival for infants ≤26 weeks (p = 0.174), and used 12.7% lesser nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs for patent ductus arteriosus closure (p < 0.001) than those of SG2007 cohort. Rate of late-onset sepsis (LOS) was almost halved (7.4% vs. 14.0%, p < 0.001), and exclusive human milk feeding after discharge increased threefold (p < 0.001). SG2017, in contrast, had a higher rate of chronic lung disease (CLD) (20.0% vs. 15.1%, p = 0.098). Within SG2017, the rates of LOS, CLD, and human milk feeding varied significantly between the three NICUs. When compared with ANZNN2017, SG2017 had significantly lower rates of LOS for infants ≤25 weeks (p = 0.001), less necrotizing enterocolitis for infants ≤27 weeks (p = 0.002), and less CLD across all GA groups. CONCLUSION: Postnatal morbidities and survival rates for VLBW infants in Singapore have improved over a decade. Outcomes for VLBW infants varied among three Singapore NICUs, which provide a rationale for collaboration to improve clinical quality. The outcomes of Singaporean VLBW infants were comparable to those of their ANZNN counterparts.

Preventing early-onset group B streptococcal sepsis: clinical risk factor-based screening or culture-based screening?

INTRODUCTION: Two strategies are available for prevention of early-onset group B streptococcal (GBS) sepsis - clinical risk factor-based screening and routine culture-based screening of pregnant women for GBS colonisation. In our hospital, we switched from the former to the latter approach in 2014. METHODS: We compared the incidence of early-onset GBS sepsis during 2001-2015 between infants born to pregnant women who were screened for GBS colonisation and those born to women who were not screened. RESULTS: Among 41,143 live births, there were nine cases of early-onset GBS sepsis. All infants with GBS sepsis were born to pregnant women who were not screened for GBS colonisation. The incidence of early-onset GBS sepsis among infants of women who were not screened was 0.41 per 1,000 live births (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.19-0.77) when compared to infants of women who were screened, for whom the sepsis incidence was zero per 1,000 live births (95% CI 0-0.19; p = 0.005). CONCLUSION: Our data suggests that routine culture-based screening of pregnant women for GBS colonisation is a better preventive strategy for early-onset GBS sepsis in neonates when compared to clinical risk factor-based screening.