Combination of high anti-SKI and low anti-TMED5 antibody levels is preferable prognostic factor in esophageal carcinoma.

Given that esophageal cancer is highly malignant, the discovery of novel prognostic markers is eagerly awaited. We performed serological identification of antigens by recombinant cDNA expression cloning (SEREX) and identified SKI proto-oncogene protein and transmembrane p24 trafficking protein 5 (TMED5) as antigens recognized by serum IgG antibodies in patients with esophageal carcinoma. SKI and TMED5 proteins were expressed in Escherichia coli, purified by affinity chromatography, and used as antigens. The serum anti-SKI antibody (s-SKI-Ab) and anti-TMED5 antibody (s-TMED5-Ab) levels were significantly higher in 192 patients with esophageal carcinoma than in 96 healthy donors. The presence of s-SKI-Abs and s-TMED5-Abs in the patients' sera was confirmed by western blotting. Immunohistochemical staining showed that the TMED5 protein was highly expressed in the cytoplasm and nuclear compartments of the esophageal squamous cell carcinoma tissues, whereas the SKI protein was localized predominantly in the nuclei. Regarding the overall survival in 91 patients who underwent radical surgery, the s-SKI-Ab-positive and s-TMED5-Ab-negative statuses were significantly associated with a favorable prognosis. Additionally, the combination of s-SKI-Ab-positive and s-TMED5-Ab-negative cases showed an even clearer difference in overall survival as compared with that of s-SKI-Ab-negative and s-TMED5-Ab-positive cases. The s-SKI-Ab and s-TMED5-Ab biomarkers are useful for diagnosing esophageal carcinoma and distinguishing between favorable and poor prognoses.

Clinical practice guidelines for molecular tumor markers, 2nd edition review part 1.

With advances in gene and protein analysis technologies, many target molecules that may be useful in cancer diagnosis have been reported. Therefore, the "Tumor Marker Study Group" was established in 1981 with the aim of "discovering clinically" useful molecules. Later, the name was changed to "Japanese Society for Molecular Tumor Marker Research" in 2000 in response to the remarkable progress in gene-related research. Currently, the world of cancer treatment is shifting from the era of representative tumor markers of each cancer type used for tumor diagnosis and treatment evaluation to the study of companion markers for molecular-targeted therapeutics that target cancer cells. Therefore, the first edition of the Molecular Tumor Marker Guidelines, which summarizes tumor markers and companion markers in each cancer type, was published in 2016. After publication of the first edition, the gene panel testing using next-generation sequencing became available in Japan in June 2019 for insured patients. In addition, immune checkpoint inhibitors have been indicated for a wide range of cancer types. Therefore, the 2nd edition of the Molecular Tumor Marker Guidelines was published in September 2021 to address the need to revise the guidelines. Here, we present an English version of the review (Part 1) of the Molecular Tumor Marker Guidelines, Second Edition.

Presence of serum RalA and serum p53 autoantibodies in 1833 patients with various types of cancers.

BACKGROUND: RalA is a member of the Ras superfamily of small GTPases. The Anti-RalA autoantibodies (s-RalA-Abs) act as tumor markers in various types of cancer and are negatively associated with the p53 autoantibodies (s-p53-Abs). This study aimed to evaluate the relationship between s-RalA-Abs and s-p53-Abs in various types of cancer. METHODS: A total of 1833 cancer patients (esophageal cancer, 172; hepatocellular carcinoma, 91; lung cancer, 269; gastric cancer, 317; colon cancer, 262; breast cancer, 364; and prostate cancer, 358) and 73 healthy subjects were enrolled in the study. The levels of s-RalA-Abs and s-p53-Abs were analyzed using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay, and the positivity rates and relations between the two autoantibodies were evaluated. The cutoff values for s-RalA abs and s-p53 abs were set as mean + 2 standard deviation and the values higher than the cutoff values were defined as positive. RESULTS: The titers in all cancer types were significantly higher than those in the controls (P < 0.01). The positivity rates for s-RalA-Abs ranged between 11.7 and 21.5%, and those for s-p53-Abs ranged between 12 and 28.5%. A combined assay of the two antibodies revealed positivity rates of 20.9 and 44.2%. In Stage 0/I/II tumors, the positivity rates of the combination of the two antibodies ranged between 21.5 and 42.3%. The two autoantibodies were complementary to each other in the prostate and breast cancers, but independent in other carcinomas. CONCLUSION: The combined use of s-RalA-Abs and s-p53-Abs tended to increase the positivity rate in all cancers, including Stage 0/I/II cancers.

Prognostic significance of preoperative low serum creatine kinase levels in gastric cancer.

PURPOSE: We evaluated the clinicopathological and prognostic significance of preoperative serum creatine kinase (CK) levels in gastric cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The subjects of this retrospective study were 942 patients who underwent surgery without preoperative chemotherapy for gastric cancer (643 men and 299 women), excluding Stage IV gastric cancer, between January, 2001 and December, 2020. We set the cutoff values for CK according to gender, as 64 U/L for men and 57 U/L for women, and evaluated the clinicopathological, prognostic, and gender significance of low CK levels by multivariate analysis. RESULTS: Tumor depth was significantly associated with low serum CK levels (p < 0.001). The low CK group showed significantly worse overall survival than the high CK group (p = 0.01). The prognostic impact of low CK levels was evident only in men (p = 0.009). In women, low CK levels were not an independent risk factor for poor prognosis (p = 0.33). These prognostic impacts of low CK levels on overall survival and recurrence-free survival were similar. CONCLUSION: Low preoperative CK levels in men with gastric cancer were predictive of poor survival. These prognostic impacts of low CK levels were not evident in women.

Preoperative low serum creatine kinase is associated with poor overall survival in the male patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.

BACKGROUND: Serum creatine kinase level has been reported to be a prognostic indicator in breast or lung cancers but no reports have been in esophageal cancer. We analyzed the prognostic significance of preoperative serum creatine kinase level in patients with esophageal carcinoma. METHODS: We evaluated the preoperative serum creatine kinase levels of 148 patients (118 male and 30 female) with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. According to their median serum creatine kinase levels, we divided the patients into high and low serum creatine kinase groups. Univariate and multivariate analyses were used to evaluate the impact of serum creatine kinase level on the prognosis of the patients. RESULTS: The tumor depth (P < 0.01) and stage (P < 0.01) were significantly associated with serum creatine kinase levels. The prognosis was worse in the low serum creatine kinase group than in the high serum creatine kinase group (P = 0.02). In the subgroup analysis, although no survival difference was observed in the female patients between the groups (P = 0.171), the survival of low serum creatine kinase group was significantly worse than that of high creatine kinase group in the male patients (P = 0.001). Cox proportional hazard regression analysis revealed that nodal status (P = 0.019) and serum creatine kinase level (P = 0.047) were independent risk factors associated with overall survival in the male patients. CONCLUSIONS: Preoperative low serum creatine kinase level was useful in predicting overall survival in the male patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.

Low anti-CFL1 antibody with high anti-ACTB antibody is a poor prognostic factor in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.

BACKGROUND: Cofilin (CFL1, actin-binding protein) and ß-actin (ACTB) are key molecules in the polymerization and depolymerization of actin microfilaments. The levels of these antibodies were analyzed, and the clinicopathological significance in patients with esophageal carcinoma were evaluated. METHODS: The levels of anti-CFL1 and anti-ACTB antibodies were analyzed in serum samples of patients with esophageal carcinoma and of healthy donors. Eighty-seven cases underwent radical surgery and the clinicopathological characteristics and prognosis was examined. RESULTS: Serum anti-CFL1 antibody (s-CFL1-Ab) levels and anti-ACTB antibody (s-ACTB-Ab) levels were significantly higher in patients with esophageal carcinoma than in healthy donors. Following the receiver operating characteristic curve analysis between healthy donors and esophageal carcinoma, the sensitivity and specificity for serum anti-CFL1 antibody (s-CFL1-Ab) were 53.3% and 68.8%. The sensitivity and specificity for serum anti-ACTB antibody (s-ACTB-Ab) were 54.9% and 67.7%, respectively. Univariate and multivariate analysis showed that s-CFL1-Ab and s-ACTB-Ab levels were not associated with sex, age, tumor depth, lymph node metastasis, or anti-p53-antibody levels. s-ACTB-Ab levels but not s-CFL1-Ab levels significantly correlated with squamous cell carcinoma antigen. Neither s-CFL1-Ab nor s-ACTB-Ab levels alone were obviously related to overall survival. However, patients with low s-CFL1-Ab levels and high s-ACTB-Ab levels exhibited significantly more unfavorable prognoses than those with high s-CFL1-Ab and low s-ACTB-Ab levels. CONCLUSIONS: Serum levels of anti-CFL1 and anti-ACTB antibodies were significantly higher in patients with esophageal carcinoma than in healthy donors. A combination of low anti-CFL1 and high anti-ACTB antibodies is a poor prognostic factor in esophageal carcinoma.

Prognostic impact of CEA/CA19-9 at the time of recurrence in patients with gastric cancer.

PURPOSE: We evaluated the clinical impact of the carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) and carbohydrate antigen 19-9 (CA19-9) values at the time of recurrence in gastric cancer patients. METHODS: Among 790 patients with R0 resected gastric cancer without neoadjuvant therapy between 2004 and 2017, 89 recurrence cases were retrospectively evaluated. The clinical impact of CEA and CA19-9 values on recurrence sites and post-recurrent prognosis were evaluated using univariate and multivariate analyses. RESULTS: The positive rates of CEA and CA19-9 at recurrence were significantly higher than the preoperative positive rates (CEA, 56% vs 24%; CA19-9, 37% vs 15%). Although CA19-9-positive patients at recurrence exhibited a poor survival, the difference was not significant. The positive rates of CEA at liver or lymph node recurrence were significantly higher than the preoperative positive rates. The positive rate of CA19-9 at peritoneal recurrence was significantly higher than the preoperative positive rate. CA19-9-positive patients at recurrence exhibited worse prognosis than CA19-9-negative patients, although the difference was not significant. At lymph node recurrence, CA19-9-positive patients exhibited a significantly worse survival than CA19-9-negative patients. CONCLUSION: In recurrent gastric cancer, the positive status of CA19-9 at recurrence might have a negative prognostic impact after recurrence; particularly, in patients with lymph node recurrence.

Serum p53 antibody: useful for detecting gastric cancer but not for predicting prognosis after surgery.

PURPOSE: To establish the clinicopathological importance of serum p53 autoantibody (s-p53-Ab) titrations in patients with gastric cancer. METHODS: Preoperative s-p53-Ab titers were analyzed in 448 gastric cancer patients between 2010 and 2017. Seropositive patients were divided into three groups based on their antibody titers: 1.31-10.0 U/mL (low group); 10.1-100 U/mL (medium group); and > 100 U/mL (high group). We evaluated the associations between the s-p53-Abs and clinicopathological factors, carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) levels, and cancer antigen 19-9 (CA19-9) levels. Overall survival was analyzed by multivariate analyses. RESULTS: A total of 72 patients (16%) were positive for s-p53-Abs. The rate of positivity for s-p53-Abs + CEA + CA19-9 was significantly higher than that for CEA + CA19-9, even in stage I gastric cancers. Gender, tumor depth, lymphatic node metastases, and distant metastases were all significantly associated with the presence of s-p53-Abs; however, overall survival was not associated with the antibodies. The patients in the high titer group (> 100 U/mL) had a relatively worse survival than those in the other groups. CONCLUSIONS: Based on our findings, s-p53-Abs improve the overall rate of positivity for detecting gastric cancer, but the prognostic value of a high s-p53-Ab titer for predicting overall survival is limited.

The effectiveness of serum midkine in detecting esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.

BACKGROUND: Studies investigating serum midkine (s-MK) concentrations have employed a polyclonal antibody enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay system (ELISA), because the targeted polyclonal antibody has low specificity. We used a newly developed monoclonal antibody ELISA to investigate the prognostic and diagnostic capabilities of s-MK in patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. METHODS: Serum samples from 102 patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma were analyzed using a newly developed monoclonal antibody ELISA specifically developed to detect s-MK. s-MK cutoff value was set at 421 pg/mL (mean + 2 SD) based on data from healthy controls. Clinicopathological characteristics, including tumor stage and positivity rates for two conventional tumor markers, serum p53 (s-p53-Abs) antibodies and SCC-antigen, were evaluated to assess a possible correlation with s-MK. The prognostic capability of a high s-MK level was evaluated using univariate and multivariate methods. RESULTS: Overall positive rate for s-MK concentrations: 21%. Large tumors (> 50 mm) showed significantly higher concentrations than smaller specimens, but other clinicopathological factors were not associated with s-MK. A combination assay using SCC-antigen together with s-p53-Abs and s-MK clearly increased our capability to detect esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. Although the difference was not statistically significant (P = 0.310), the high s-MK group experienced worse overall survival than our low s-MK group. CONCLUSIONS: s-MK and conventional tumor marker combination increased our capability to detect esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. Although s-MK might be associated with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma progression, it was not an independent risk factor reducing patient survival. This study was registered as UMIN000014530.

Prognostic significance of high serum p53 antibody titers in patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.

BACKGROUND: The p53 protein overexpression that usually results from genetic alterations reportedly induces serum antibodies against p53. However, little information is available about the prognostic significance of perioperative serum p53 antibody (s-p53-Abs) titers in patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. METHODS: In this study, we retrospectively evaluated the clinical significance of perioperative s-p53-Abs in 135 patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. Of these, 58 patients received neoadjuvant chemotherapy comprising 5-FU and CDDP. While the cutoff level at 1.3 U/ml indicated seropositive patients, level of 13.4 U/ml was used to identify high-titer patients. We monitored serum titers seropositive patients after surgery and evaluated the prognostic significance by the univariate and multivariate analyses. RESULTS: In this study, 29 patients (21.5%) were positive for s-p53-Abs before treatment. The frequency of both seropositive patients and high-titer patients (> 13.4 U/ml) was not significantly associated with tumor progression. While seropositive patients did not demonstrate significant poor overall survival, high-titer patients demonstrated significant poor overall survival based on the multivariate analysis (P < 0.001). Moreover, the s-p53-Abs titer did not correlate with the response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Among seropositive patients, the negative conversion of s-p53-Abs more likely led to be long-term survival. CONCLUSIONS: This study determined that the high-titer of s-p53-Abs was an independent risk factor to reduce the overall survival of patients with esophageal cancer patients. The negative conversion of s-p53-Abs could be a good indicator of favorable prognosis.

Prognostic significance of hyperfibrinogenemia in patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.

BACKGROUND: Preoperative hyperfibrinogenemia is associated with inflammatory mediators and a poor prognosis in several types of cancer. However, there is no published information on the monitoring of patients with preoperative hyperfibrinogenemia after surgery. The aim of the study reported here was to assess the clinicopathological and prognostic significance of plasma fibrinogen levels in patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma before and after surgical treatment. METHODS: Plasma fibrinogen levels were analyzed before surgical treatment (endoscopic submucosal dissection and surgery) in 82 patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. The clinicopathological significance of plasma fibrinogen levels and the relationship of plasma fibrinogen levels with several biomarkers were evaluated. The cutoff value for hyperfibrinogenemia was 321 mg/dl. Univariate and multivariate analysis using the Cox proportional hazards model were performed to evaluate the prognostic significance of plasma fibrinogen levels. The changing patterns of plasma fibrinogen were monitored after surgical treatment to evaluate prognostic impact. RESULTS: Hyperfibrinogenemia was significantly associated with advanced pathological stage of cancer and high C-reactive protein levels. Plasma fibrinogen levels significantly decreased after surgical treatment in recurrence-free patients but did not decrease in patients with recurrence. The multivariate analysis indicated that preoperative hyperfibrinogenemia was an independent prognostic factor for poor survival (hazard ratio 1.005, 95% confidence interval 1.000-1.010; P = 0.039). CONCLUSION: Preoperative hyperfibrinogenemia was associated with inflammatory mediators, tumor progression, and poor survival in patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. The absence of a decrease in plasma fibrinogen levels after surgical treatment may indicate the possibility of tumor recurrence.

Relationship between ABO blood group and clinicopathological factors and their effect on the survival of Japanese patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.

PURPOSE: Several studies have evaluated the association between ABO blood group and the prognosis of various types of cancer; however, little is known about the relationship between ABO blood group and esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (SCC). We investigated how ABO blood group and clinicopathological characteristics are related to the survival of Japanese patients with esophageal SCC. METHODS: We reviewed the medical records of 181 patients who underwent surgery for esophageal SCC between June, 2004 and December, 2015 and analyzed the association between ABO blood group and clinicopathological factors. Clinicopathological factors were also evaluated by univariate and multivariate analyses for possible association with survival. RESULTS: The prevalence of each blood group was as follows: A, 35.5%; B, 22.4%; O, 32.8%; and AB, 8.2%. The 5-year overall survival of all patients was 37.1%. Patients with non-type B blood had significantly worse 5-year overall survival than those with type B blood (30.2 vs. 58.8%, P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: ABO blood groups were associated with the survival of Japanese patients with esophageal SCC. Patients with non-B blood groups had significantly worse overall survival than those with the B blood group.

Hyperfibrinogenemia is associated with inflammatory mediators and poor prognosis in patients with gastric cancer.

PURPOSE: Hyperfibrinogenemia is associated with poor prognosis in various cancers; however, its clinical relevance in gastric cancer has not been well analyzed. We conducted this study to assess the clinicopathological significance and prognostic value of hyperfibrinogenemia in patients with gastric cancer. METHODS: Plasma fibrinogen levels were measured preoperatively in 315 patients undergoing surgery for gastric cancer. We then evaluated the clinicopathological significance of hyperfibrinogenemia and its relationship with several biomarkers, including white blood cell (WBC), C-reactive protein (CRP), platelet count, prothrombin time (PT) and activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT). Postoperative plasma levels were compared with preoperative levels. The multivariate prognostic value of hyperfibrinogenemia was calculated using the Cox proportional hazards model. RESULTS: Tumor progression was significantly associated with hyperfibrinogenemia, as were the CRP level and platelet counts. Plasma fibrinogen levels decreased significantly after radical surgery. Adjusting for TNM factors, multivariate analysis indicated that hyperfibrinogenemia was an independent prognostic factor for poor survival (hazard ratio = 2.607, 95 % confidence interval = 1.180-5.761, P = 0.018). CONCLUSION: Preoperative hyperfibrinogenemia was associated with tumor progression, inflammatory mediators, and poor overall survival in patients with gastric cancer.

[Liquid Biopsy in Multimodal Treatment of Esophageal Carcinoma].

Predicting and monitoring the treatment response of patients with esophageal carcinoma are important. Molecular analyses of biopsy specimens are useful; however, the characteristics of the biopsy specimen are not similar to those of whole tumors, including metastatic tumors. Therefore, liquid biopsy using blood samples has been applied for the prediction of the tumor stage, sensitivity to radiotherapy, sensitivity to chemotherapy, and recurrent disease. Liquid biopsy is advantageous for monitoring the treatment response and as an objective diagnostic tool; it is cost effective.

Is High Score of Preoperative Lactate Dehydrogenase to Albumin Ratio Predicting Poor Survivals in Esophageal Carcinoma Patients?

PURPOSE: The lactate dehydrogenase-to-albumin ratio (LAR) has been reported as a potential prognostic biomarker in various cancers; however, only a few pieces of information have been reported on esophageal cancer. Therefore, this study aimed to evaluate the prognostic significance of preoperative LAR in patients with esophageal cancer. METHODS: This study included 236 patients (193 men and 43 women; mean age of 66 years [range, 41-83 years]) with esophageal cancer who underwent curative surgery between September 2008 and March 2020. A total of 107 patients underwent upfront surgery, and 129 patients received neoadjuvant treatment. Patients were assigned into two groups, high and low LAR, based on preoperative LAR using a cutoff value of 6.2. The clinicopathological and prognostic significance of preoperative LAR was evaluated in univariate and multivariate analyses. RESULTS: Patients with deep tumors and neoadjuvant treatment were significantly associated with high LAR (p <0.05). The high LAR group showed a significantly poorer prognosis than the low LAR group (p <0.01). The multivariate analysis for the overall survival showed that deep tumors, lymph node metastasis, and high LAR were independent poor prognostic factors (p <0.05). CONCLUSION: High LAR was a useful poor prognostic biomarker in patients with esophageal cancer.

The combination of positive anti­WDR1 antibodies with negative anti­CFL1 antibodies in serum is a poor prognostic factor for patients with esophageal carcinoma.

WD repeat-containing protein 1 (WDR1) regulates the cofilin 1 (CFL1) activity, promotes cytoskeleton remodeling, and thus, facilitates cell migration and invasion. A previous study reported that autoantibodies against CFL1 and ß-actin were useful biomarkers for diagnosing and predicting the prognosis of patients with esophageal carcinoma. Therefore, the present study aimed to evaluate the serum levels of anti-WDR1 antibodies (s-WDR1-Abs) combined with serum levels of anti-CFL1 antibodies (s-CFL1-Abs) in patients with esophageal carcinoma. Serum samples obtained from 192 patients with esophageal carcinoma and other solid cancers. And s-WDR1-Ab and s-CFL1-Ab titers were analyzed using the amplified luminescent proximity homogeneous assay-linked immunosorbent assay. Compared with those of healthy donors, the s-WDR1-Ab levels were significantly higher in the 192 patients with esophageal, whereas these were not significantly higher in the samples from patients with gastric, colorectal, lung, or breast cancer. In 91 patients treated with surgery, sex, tumor depth, lymph node metastasis, stage and C-reactive protein levels were significantly associated with overall survival, as determined using the log-rank test, whereas the squamous cell carcinoma antigen, p53 antibody and s-WDR1-Ab levels tended to be associated with a worse prognosis. Although no significant difference was observed in the survival between the positive and negative groups of s-WDR1-Abs or s-CFL1-Abs alone in the Kaplan-Meier test, the patients in the s-WDR1-Ab-positive and s-CFL1-Ab-negative groups exhibited a significantly poorer prognosis in the overall survival analysis. On the whole, the present study demonstrates that the combination of positive anti-WDR1 antibodies with negative anti-CFL1 antibodies in serum may be a poor prognostic factor for patients with esophageal carcinoma.

Preoperative Low Serum Calcium Levels Predict Poor Prognosis for Patients with Esophageal Cancer.

PURPOSE: Hypercalcemia has been reported as a poor prognostic factor in malignant tumors. However, no report has shown the clinical impact of serum calcium levels on patients with esophageal cancer. We evaluated the prognostic impact of preoperative serum calcium levels on patients with esophageal cancer. METHODS: We evaluated 240 patients (197 men, 43 women; mean age, 66 years; age range, 34-85 years) with esophageal cancer who underwent radical surgery between September 2008 and December 2017. After assigning the patients to two groups (high calcium group, 8.8 mg/dL or more and low calcium group, 8.7 mg/dL or less), we compared the groups' overall survival and the clinicopathological features. The clinicopathological and prognostic significance of preoperative serum calcium levels were evaluated in a univariate and multivariate analysis. RESULTS: The patients with deep tumors showed low serum calcium levels significantly more frequently (P <0.05). The low calcium group showed a significantly worse prognosis than the high calcium group (P <0.05). However, low serum calcium level was not an independent poor prognostic factor. CONCLUSIONS: Preoperative low serum calcium levels were associated with advanced tumors. Low serum calcium might be associated with esophageal cancer progression.

Serum WT1-271 IgM antibody as a novel diagnostic marker for Gastric Cancer.

The Wilms tumor 1 gene, WT1, is overexpressed in various types of cancer, including gastric cancer. The product of WT1 is highly immunogenic and is a promising target molecule for cancer immunotherapy. The current study aimed to examine the production of WT1-specific IgG and IgM autoantibodies to identify biomarkers of diagnostic value in patients with gastric cancer. IgG antibodies that bind to WT1-derived peptides were obtained, the serum levels of which correlate with those of IgG antibodies against the WT1 protein in patients with intestinal malignancies. The serum levels of IgG and IgM antibodies against the WT1-271 peptide (271-288 amino acids) were examined in 39 healthy individuals and 97 patients with gastric cancer. The positivity cutoff value was determined according to the receiver operating characteristic curve. The association between WT1-271 IgM and the clinicopathological factors and prognosis of patients was additionally analyzed. The results revealed that serum WT1-271 IgM antibody levels in patients with gastric cancer were significantly higher than those in healthy individuals. The sensitivity and specificity of this antibody for gastric cancer were 67.0 and 71.8%, respectively; this sensitivity was improved when compared with conventional tumor markers (P<0.001). There was no statistical difference in WT1-271 IgG antibody levels between patients with gastric cancer and healthy individuals. Serum WT1-271 IgM antibody levels were not significantly associated with clinicopathological factors but were associated with unfavorable prognosis. Serum WT1-271 IgM antibody levels could serve as a diagnostic biomarker in patients with gastric cancer.

Comparison between a new assay system, Elecsys® Anti-p53, and conventional MESACUP™ for the detection of serum anti-p53 antibodies: A multi-institutional study.

The sensitivity and specificity of a new automated electrochemiluminescence immunoassay system, Elecsys® Anti-p53 (Elecsys), were compared with that of the conventional serum anti-p53 antibody (s-p53-Ab) enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay kit [MESACUP anti-p53 test (MESACUP)]. Elecsys and MESACUP were used to analyze the levels of s-p53-Abs in patients with esophageal, colorectal and breast cancer. A total of 532 controls and 288, 235 and 329 patients with esophageal, colorectal and breast cancer, respectively, were enrolled. Additionally, the sera of patients with benign diseases of the esophagus, colorectal system and breast, patients with autoimmune diseases and healthy volunteers were analyzed as controls. Sensitivity and specificity were compared between the two assay systems. Positive agreement rates were 58.7% in all samples, 71.2% in esophageal samples, 73.6% in colorectal samples and 35.1% in breast samples. Negative agreement rates for the different cancer types were ≥97.1% and the overall agreement rates were ≥92.3%. When the specificities of the two assays were aligned for all samples, Elecsys demonstrated higher sensitivities for all types of analyzed cancer together, as well as for esophageal, colorectal and breast cancer, respectively. Although positive concordance between the two assay systems was low in terms of specificity, Elecsys had a higher sensitivity than the MESACUP.

Randomized Phase II Study to Comparing Docetaxel/Nedaplatin versus Docetaxel for 5-Fluorouracil/Cisplatin Resistant Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma.

PURPOSE: To compare efficacy and safety of dual docetaxel/nedaplatin treatment versus docetaxel alone as second-line chemotherapy for advanced esophageal cancer. METHODS: In all, 36 patients with metastatic and/or recurrent esophagus squamous cell carcinoma resistant to first-line chemotherapy (fluorouracil/cisplatin) were recruited from 2011 to 2018 and randomized into two groups. Treatment response and survival were compared between the docetaxel/nedaplatin (60/80 mg/m2/day) group and docetaxel (70 mg/m2/day) group. Treatment was repeated every 3 weeks until tumor progression. Patients were followed up until March 2019 or death. RESULTS: The frequency of Grade 3 or higher adverse events in the docetaxel/nedaplatin group (58.8%) was higher compared with the docetaxel group (26.3%) (P = 0.090). We found a treatment response rate of 52.9% and 36.8% and a median survival of 8.9 and 7.0 months in the docetaxel/nedaplatin-treated and docetaxel-treated group, respectively (P = 0.544). CONCLUSION: No significant survival advantage was found for docetaxel/nedaplatin-treated patients, although there was an increased frequency of high-grade adverse events compared to docetaxel-treated patients. Because of the limited cohort size, a Phase III study based on our findings is not warranted to assess the clinical impact of docetaxel/nedaplatin treatment. This trial is registered with the University Hospital Medical Information Network (UMIN 000005877).