RESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) is an advanced treatment for acute severe respiratory failure. Patients on ECMO are frequently maintained sedated and immobilized until weaning from ECMO, first, and then from mechanical ventilation. Avoidance of sedation and invasive ventilation during ECMO may have potential advantages. We performed a systematic literature review to assess efficacy and safety of awake ECMO without invasive ventilation in patients with respiratory failure. DATA SOURCES: PubMed, Web of Science, and Scopus were searched for studies reporting outcome of awake ECMO for adult patients with respiratory failure. STUDY SELECTION: We included all studies reporting outcome of awake ECMO in patients with respiratory failure. Studies on ECMO for cardiovascular failure, cardiac arrest, or perioperative support and studies on pediatric patients were excluded. Two investigators independently screened and selected studies for inclusion. DATA EXTRACTION: Two investigators abstracted data on study characteristics, rate of awake ECMO failure, and mortality. Primary outcome was rate of awake ECMO failure (need for intubation). Pooled estimates with corresponding 95% CIs were calculated. Subgroup analyses by setting were performed. DATA SYNTHESIS: A total of 57 studies (28 case reports) included data from 467 awake ECMO patients. The subgroup of patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome showed a pooled estimate for awake ECMO failure of 39.3% (95% CI, 24.0-54.7%), while in patients bridged to lung transplantation, pooled estimate was 23.4% (95% CI, 13.3-33.5%). Longest follow-up mortality was 121 of 439 (pooled estimate, 28%; 95% CI, 22.3-33.6%). Mortality in patients who failed awake ECMO strategy was 43 of 74 (pooled estimate, 57.2%; 95% CI, 40.2-74.3%). Two cases of cannula self-removal were reported. CONCLUSIONS: Awake ECMO is feasible in selected patients, although the effect on outcome remains to be demonstrated. Mortality is almost 60% in patients who failed awake ECMO strategy.
Asunto(s)
Oxigenación por Membrana Extracorpórea , Ventilación no Invasiva , Síndrome de Dificultad Respiratoria , Insuficiencia Respiratoria , Humanos , Adulto , Niño , Resultado del Tratamiento , Pulmón , Insuficiencia Respiratoria/terapia , Síndrome de Dificultad Respiratoria/terapiaRESUMEN
Blood flow obstruction at the level of the outflow graft is a rare but severe complication of LVAD support. We present a series of five patients supported with HeartMate3 LVAD (Abbott Labs, Chicago, IL) that developed an outflow graft obstruction after 607-1250 days of support, during prolonged antithrombotic therapy. Three patients presented with severe symptoms of heart failure, were treated with endovascular stenting and experienced full recovery. Preoperative computed tomography angiography and intraoperative angiography together with intravascular ultrasound provided diagnosis and guided treatment. In two patients, outflow obstruction was an occasional finding at imaging without heart failure symptoms and a "watchful waiting" approach was adopted: delayed treatment in one of them was futile. This late adverse event is peculiar for its pathophysiology and not yet discussed among the mechanical circulatory support community.
Asunto(s)
Cardiopatías , Insuficiencia Cardíaca , Corazón Auxiliar , Humanos , Corazón Auxiliar/efectos adversos , Insuficiencia Cardíaca/cirugía , Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos X , ChicagoRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Critically ill patients with inflammatory dysregulation and organ disfunction may benefit from blood purification, although the use of this technique has not been described in large case series. We evaluated clinical outcomes and survival in high-risk intensive care unit (ICU) patients who underwent extracorporeal blood purification. METHODS: 359 consecutive ICU patients treated with CytoSorb were included. RESULTS: Main admission diagnoses were 120 (34%) refractory cardiac arrest under mechanical chest compression; 101 (28%) profound cardiogenic shock; 81 (23%) post-cardiotomy cardiogenic shock; and 37 (10%) respiratory failure. Fifteen patients (4%) were positive for SARS-CoV-2 infection. We observed 49% 30-day mortality, 57% ICU mortality, and 62% hospital mortality, all lower than the 71% mortality predicted by SAPS II and 68% predicted by SOFA score. Parameters of shock and organ failure, above all vasoactive inotropic score, reduced during CytoSorb treatment. Multivariable analysis identified SAPS II, lactate dehydrogenase, ICU stay duration, vasoactive inotropic score, lactates, intra-aortic counterpulsation on top of VA-ECMO, and total bilirubin as predictors of mortality. No CytoSorb-related complications occurred. CONCLUSION: CytoSorb treatment was effective in reducing laboratory parameters of shock and vasoactive inotropic score with possible survival implications in a large population of critically ill patients.
Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Choque Cardiogénico , Humanos , Choque Cardiogénico/terapia , Enfermedad Crítica/terapia , Mortalidad Hospitalaria , Cuidados Críticos , Estudios RetrospectivosRESUMEN
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic changed the way we had to approach hospital- and intensive care unit (ICU)-related resource management, especially for demanding techniques required for advanced support, including extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO). RECENT FINDINGS: Availability of ICU beds and ECMO machines widely varies around the world. In critical conditions, such a global pandemic, the establishment of contingency capacity tiers might help in defining to which conditions and subjects ECMO can be offered. A frequent reassessment of the resource saturation, possibly integrated within a regional healthcare coordination system, may be of help to triage the patients who most likely will benefit from advanced techniques, especially when capacities are limited. SUMMARY: Indications to ECMO during the pandemic should be fluid and may be adjusted over time. Candidacy of patients should follow the same prepandemic rules, taking into account the acute disease, the burden of any eventual comorbidity and the chances of a good quality of life after recovery; but the current capacity of healthcare system should also be considered, and frequently reassessed, possibly within a wide hub-and-spoke healthcare system. VIDEO ABSTRACT: http://links.lww.com/COCC/A43.
Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Oxigenación por Membrana Extracorpórea , Humanos , COVID-19/terapia , Oxigenación por Membrana Extracorpórea/métodos , Triaje , SARS-CoV-2 , Selección de Paciente , Calidad de VidaRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To analyze the survival rates of patients with COVID-19 supported with extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) and compare the survival rates of patients with COVID-19 supported with ECMO to patients with influenza supported with ECMO. DESIGN: A systematic review and meta-analysis to assess the impact of ECMO as supportive therapy of COVID-19. SETTING: The authors performed a search through the Cochrane, EMBASE, and MEDLINE/PubMed databases from inception to February 19, 2021, for studies reporting hospitalized patients with COVID-19 managed with ECMO. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 134 studies were selected, including 6 eligible for the comparative meta-analysis of COVID-19 versus influenza. INTERVENTIONS: The authors pooled the risk ratio and random effects model. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: The primary endpoint was the overall mortality of patients with COVID-19 receiving ECMO. Of the total number of 58,472 patients with COVID-19 reported, ECMO was used in 4,044 patients. The analysis suggested an overall in-hospital mortality of 39% (95% CI 0.34-0.43). In the comparative analysis, patients with COVID-19 on ECMO had a higher risk ratio (RR) for mortality when compared to influenza patients on ECMO: 72/164 (44%) v 71/186 (38%) RR 1.34; 95% CI 1.05-1.71; pâ¯=â¯0.03. CONCLUSIONS: ECMO could be beneficial in patients with COVID-19, according to the authors' meta-analysis. The reported mortality rate was 39%. This systematic analysis can provide clinical advice in the current era and ongoing pandemic.
Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Oxigenación por Membrana Extracorpórea , Gripe Humana , COVID-19/terapia , Mortalidad Hospitalaria , Humanos , Gripe Humana/epidemiología , Gripe Humana/terapia , PandemiasRESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: Patients with COVID-19 frequently develop acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) requiring intensive care unit (ICU) admission. Data on long-term survival of these patients are lacking. The authors investigated 1-year survival, quality of life, and functional recovery of patients with COVID-19 ARDS requiring invasive mechanical ventilation. DESIGN: Prospective observational study. SETTING: Tertiary-care university hospital. PARTICIPANTS: All patients with COVID-19 ARDS receiving invasive mechanical ventilation and discharged alive from hospital. INTERVENTIONS: Patients were contacted by phone after 1 year. Functional, cognitive, and psychological outcomes were explored through a questionnaire and assessed using validated scales. Patients were offered the possibility to undergo a follow-up chest computed tomography (CT) scan. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: The study included all adult (age ≥18 years) patients with COVID-19-related ARDS admitted to an ICU of the authors' institution between February 25, 2020, and April 27, 2020, who received at least 1 day of invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV). Of 116 patients who received IMV, 61 (52.6%) survived to hospital discharge. These survivors were assessed 1 year after discharge and 56 completed a battery of tests of cognition, activities of daily living, and interaction with family members. They had overall good functional recovery, with >80% reporting good recovery and no difficulties in usual activities. A total of 52 (93%) of patients had no dyspnea at rest. Severe anxiety/depression was reported by 5 (8.9%) patients. Comparing 2-month and 1-year data, the authors observed the most significant improvements in the areas of working status and exertional dyspnea. One-year chest CT scans were available for 36 patients; fibrotic-like changes were present in 4 patients. CONCLUSIONS: All patients who survived the acute phase of COVID-19 and were discharged from the hospital were alive at the 1-year follow up, and the vast majority of them had good overall recovery and quality of life.
Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Respiración Artificial , Actividades Cotidianas , Adolescente , Adulto , COVID-19/terapia , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Unidades de Cuidados Intensivos , Calidad de Vida , SARS-CoV-2RESUMEN
CytoSorb is a promising tool to treat severe inflammatory status with multiple mechanisms in the acute care setting. Its effect on drugs is, however, poorly documented in vivo, although removal of small molecules might translate into decreased blood levels of life-saving medications. The aim of this study was to assess the impact of CytoSorb on vancomycin and bivalirudin clearance in a large population of critically ill patients. We performed a single-center analysis of CytoSorb treatments performed between January 2018 and March 2019 in critically ill patients admitted to our intensive care unit. A total of 109 CytoSorb treatments were performed in 89 patients. A decrease in lactate dehydrogenase (P = .007), troponin T (P = .022), and creatine phosphokinase (P = .013) was reported during treatment. Vancomycin dose required significant adjustments during treatment (P < .001), but no significant change was necessary after the first 3 days. Similarly, the requirements of bivalirudin significantly changed over days (P < .001), but no dose adjustment was needed after the first 3 days of treatment. No differences in terms of vancomycin and bivalirudin dose need was observed between patients on extracorporeal membrane oxygenation and those who were not (P = .6 and P = .6, respectively), between patients with and without continuous veno-venous hemofiltration (P = .9 and P = .9, respectively), and between CytoSorb responders or not (P = .4 and P = .7, respectively). CytoSorb is effective in mitigating the systemic inflammatory response and safe with respect to vancomycin and bivalirudin administration. These preliminary data further support the use of CytoSorb as adjunct therapy in critically ill patients.
Asunto(s)
Antibacterianos/farmacocinética , Antitrombinas/farmacocinética , Enfermedad Crítica , Hemabsorción , Hirudinas/farmacocinética , Fragmentos de Péptidos/farmacocinética , Vancomicina/farmacocinética , Antibacterianos/administración & dosificación , Antitrombinas/administración & dosificación , Biomarcadores/sangre , Oxigenación por Membrana Extracorpórea , Femenino , Hirudinas/administración & dosificación , Humanos , Infusiones Intravenosas , Unidades de Cuidados Intensivos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Fragmentos de Péptidos/administración & dosificación , Proteínas Recombinantes/administración & dosificación , Proteínas Recombinantes/farmacocinética , Estudios Retrospectivos , Vancomicina/administración & dosificaciónRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: There is no information on acute kidney injury (AKI) and continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) among invasively ventilated coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) patients in Western healthcare systems. OBJECTIVE: To study the prevalence, characteristics, risk factors and outcome of AKI and CRRT among invasively ventilated COVID-19 patients. METHODS: Observational study in a tertiary care hospital in Milan, Italy. RESULTS: Among 99 patients, 72 (75.0%) developed AKI and 17 (17.7%) received CRRT. Most of the patients developed stage 1 AKI (33 [45.8%]), while 15 (20.8%) developed stage 2 AKI and 24 (33.4%) a stage 3 AKI. Patients who developed AKI or needed CRRT at latest follow-up were older, and among CRRT treated patients a greater proportion had preexisting CKD. Hospital mortality was 38.9% for AKI and 52.9% for CRRT patients. CONCLUSIONS: Among invasively ventilated COVID-19 patients, AKI is very common and CRRT use is common. Both carry a high risk of in-hospital mortality.
Asunto(s)
Lesión Renal Aguda/etiología , Lesión Renal Aguda/terapia , COVID-19/complicaciones , COVID-19/terapia , Terapia de Reemplazo Renal Continuo , Respiración Artificial , Lesión Renal Aguda/mortalidad , Anciano , COVID-19/mortalidad , Estudios de Cohortes , Femenino , Mortalidad Hospitalaria , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Prevalencia , Factores de Riesgo , SARS-CoV-2/aislamiento & purificación , Resultado del Tratamiento , Ventiladores MecánicosRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To assess whether the administration of the ultra-short-acting ß-blocker esmolol in cardiac surgery could have a cardioprotective effect that translates into improved postoperative outcomes. DESIGN: Single-center, double-blinded, parallel-group randomized controlled trial. SETTING: A tertiary care referral center. PARTICIPANTS: Patients undergoing elective cardiac surgery with preoperative evidence of left ventricular end-diastolic diameter >60 mm and/or left ventricular ejection fraction <50%. INTERVENTIONS: Patients were assigned randomly to receive either esmolol (1 mg/kg as a bolus before aortic cross-clamping and 2 mg/kg mixed in the cardioplegia solution) or placebo in a 1:1 allocation ratio. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: The primary composite endpoint of prolonged intensive care unit stay and/or in-hospital mortality occurred in 36/98 patients (36%) in the placebo group versus 27/102 patients (27%) in the esmolol group (pâ¯=â¯0.13). In the esmolol group, a reduction in the maximum inotropic score during the first 24 postoperative hours was observed (10 [interquartile range 5-15] v 7 [interquartile range 5-10.5]; pâ¯=â¯0.04), as well as a trend toward a reduction in postoperative low-cardiac-output syndrome (13/98 v 6/102; pâ¯=â¯0.08) and the rate of hospital admission at one year (26/95 v 16/96; pâ¯=â¯0.08). A trend toward an increase in the number of patients with ejection fraction ≥60% at hospital discharge also was observed (4/95 v 11/92; pâ¯=â¯0.06). CONCLUSIONS: In the present trial, esmolol as a cardioplegia adjuvant enhanced postoperative cardiac performance but did not reduce a composite endpoint of prolonged intensive care unit stay and/or mortality.
Asunto(s)
Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Cardíacos , Propanolaminas , Humanos , Volumen Sistólico , Función Ventricular IzquierdaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Bleeding and transfusions affect mortality in aortic surgery. Although tranexamic acid significantly reduced bleeding in multiple settings, its role in major vascular surgery was never studied. The aim of this study was to determine if tranexamic acid reduces blood loss in open abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) surgery. METHODS: A total of 100 patients undergoing elective open AAA repair were randomised to receive tranexamic acid (a loading dose of 500 mg and a continuous infusion of 250 mg h-1) or placebo. The primary outcome was intraoperative blood loss, and the secondary outcomes were the number of patients receiving red blood cells, occurrence of thromboembolic events, and mortality. Data were analysed using the intention-to-treat principle. RESULTS: Fifty patients were randomised into each group. Median (inter-quartile range) intraoperative blood loss was 400 (300-1050) ml in the tranexamic acid group vs 500 (360-1000) ml in the placebo group (P=0.44). Transfusion rate was seven/50 (14%) in the tranexamic group vs 12/50 (24%) in the placebo group (P=0.20). No thrombosis was recorded. In a post hoc analysis, postoperative blood loss was reduced in the tranexamic group both at 4 h (60 [40-80] ml vs 100 [60-140] ml, P<0.001) and 24 h (180 [120-275] vs 275 [190-395] ml, P=0.003) after surgery. At 1 yr, three patients were dead, all in the placebo group (P=0.24) and all after 28 days. CONCLUSIONS: Tranexamic acid did not reduce intraoperative blood loss or blood transfusions in open AAA repair, although it may reduce postoperative blood loss without increasing adverse effects. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT02335359.
Asunto(s)
Antifibrinolíticos/uso terapéutico , Aneurisma de la Aorta/cirugía , Pérdida de Sangre Quirúrgica/prevención & control , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Cardíacos/métodos , Ácido Tranexámico/uso terapéutico , Anciano , Antifibrinolíticos/efectos adversos , Aneurisma de la Aorta/mortalidad , Pérdida de Sangre Quirúrgica/estadística & datos numéricos , Transfusión Sanguínea/estadística & datos numéricos , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Cardíacos/mortalidad , Método Doble Ciego , Transfusión de Eritrocitos , Femenino , Humanos , Infusiones Intravenosas , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Tromboembolia/epidemiología , Tromboembolia/prevención & control , Ácido Tranexámico/efectos adversosRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To investigate the effects of the administration of 4% albumin on lactated Ringer's, when compared with lactated Ringer's alone, in the early phase of sepsis in cancer patients. DESIGN: Single-center, randomized, double-blind, controlled-parallel trial. SETTING: A tertiary care university cancer hospital. PATIENTS: Cancer patients with severe sepsis or septic shock. INTERVENTIONS: Between October 2014 and December 2016, patients were randomly assigned to receive either bolus of albumin in a lactated Ringer's solution or lactated Ringer's solution alone during the first 6 hours of fluid resuscitation after intensive care medicine (ICU) admission. Primary outcome was defined as death from any cause at 7 days. Secondary outcomes were defined as death from any cause within 28 days, change in Sequence Organ Failure Assessment scores from baseline to day 7, days alive and free of mechanical ventilation, days alive and free of vasopressor, renal replacement therapy during ICU stay, and length of ICU and hospital stay. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: A total of 360 patients were enrolled in the trial. At 7 days, 46 of 180 patients (26%) died in the albumin group and 40 of 180 (22%) died in the lactated Ringer's group (p = 0.5). At 28 days, 96 of 180 patients (53%) died in the albumin group and 83 of 180 (46%) died in the lactated Ringer's group (p = 0.2). No significant differences in secondary outcomes were observed. CONCLUSIONS: Adding albumin to early standard resuscitation with lactated Ringer's in cancer patients with sepsis did not improve 7-day survival.
Asunto(s)
Albúminas/administración & dosificación , Fluidoterapia , Lactato de Ringer/administración & dosificación , Sepsis/terapia , Anciano , Método Doble Ciego , Quimioterapia Combinada , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Neoplasias/complicaciones , Proyectos Piloto , Prevención Secundaria , Sepsis/complicacionesRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: Open repair of thoraco-abdominal aortic aneurysm (TAAA) is a challenging procedure, associated with high rates of peri-operative bleeding and blood product transfusions. A large intra-operative volume transfusion has been associated with higher in hospital mortality and prolonged mechanical ventilation. A propensity score matched study was carried out to assess whether the introduction of a rotational thromboelastometry (ROTEM) based transfusion strategy reduces allogenic blood transfusion and affects morbidity in patients undergoing open TAAA repair. METHODS: All patients undergoing open TAAA repair at the San Raffaele Scientific Institute between 2009 and 2017 were included. Until 2016, a protocol based on estimated blood loss and conventional coagulation tests was used. After March 2016 a ROTEM guided transfusion protocol was developed and adopted. To account for selection bias, propensity score matching was performed. RESULTS: Five hundred and forty-seven consecutive patients were included. After propensity score matching, 77 patients in the ROTEM algorithm group were successfully matched with 77 patients in the standard algorithm group. Patients managed with ROTEM received fewer red blood cells units (3.5 [range 0-11] vs. 4 [range 0-17]; p = .026) and a lower volume of fresh frozen plasma (286 ± 496 vs. 2,050 ± 1,120; p < .001). In addition, fewer patients received fresh frozen plasma (35% vs. 97%; p < .001). Patients in the ROTEM group showed a significant decrease in the occurrence of pulmonary complications (44% vs. 83%; p = .01). Cost analysis showed a relevant reduction of per-patient expense after the introduction of ROTEM (834 ± 577 vs. 1,285 ± 851; p < .001) CONCLUSION: A ROTEM guided transfusion strategy significantly limited the quantity of transfused blood products during open TAAA repair, improving clinical outcomes while reducing costs, allowing for better resource distribution in a setting where blood loss is relevant.
Asunto(s)
Aneurisma de la Aorta Torácica/cirugía , Pérdida de Sangre Quirúrgica , Transfusión de Eritrocitos , Complicaciones Intraoperatorias/terapia , Plasma , Tromboelastografía/métodos , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Vasculares/efectos adversos , Protocolos Clínicos , Análisis Costo-Beneficio , Transfusión de Eritrocitos/economía , Transfusión de Eritrocitos/métodos , Transfusión de Eritrocitos/estadística & datos numéricos , Femenino , Humanos , Italia , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Selección de Paciente , Puntaje de Propensión , Resultado del Tratamiento , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Vasculares/métodosRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To assess the beneficial effects of noninvasive ventilation in treating postoperative pulmonary complications in patients undergoing thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm (TAAA) open repair surgery. DESIGN: Randomized controlled trial. SETTING: University tertiary-care hospital. PARTICIPANTS: Forty patients who underwent elective TAAA open repair. INTERVENTIONS: Patients were randomized to the "noninvasive ventilation" group, receiving 2-hour cycles of noninvasive ventilation every 8 hours for at least 3 days in addition to the best available postoperative treatment currently in use at the authors' institution versus the "standard" group, not receiving noninvasive ventilation treatment MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: The primary outcome of clinical worsening, described as a composite outcome of need for therapeutic noninvasive ventilation, need for mechanical ventilation owing to respiratory causes, need for intensive care unit admission owing to respiratory causes, and in-hospital mortality, occurred in 2 (11%) patients in the noninvasive ventilation group versus 12 (57%) in the standard group (pâ¯=â¯0.002; relative risk 0.18; 95% confidence interval 0.047-0.72). CONCLUSION: Noninvasive ventilation is a promising, affordable, and easy-to-use tool to prevent postoperative respiratory complications after TAAA open surgical repair.
Asunto(s)
Aneurisma de la Aorta Torácica/cirugía , Ventilación no Invasiva/métodos , Cuidados Posoperatorios/métodos , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/prevención & control , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Torácicos/métodos , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Mortalidad Hospitalaria/tendencias , Humanos , Incidencia , Unidades de Cuidados Intensivos , Italia/epidemiología , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Proyectos Piloto , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/epidemiología , Estudios Retrospectivos , Tasa de Supervivencia/tendenciasRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To identify reliable predictors of periprocedural intensive care unit (ICU) admission after transvenous lead extraction (LE) in a high-volume center. DESIGN: Retrospective observational study. SETTING: University tertiary-care hospital. PARTICIPANTS: All patients undergoing LE at San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy, from 2005 to 2015. INTERVENTIONS: LE procedures were performed in the electrophysiology laboratories with a cardiac operating room on standby between the end of the morning surgical case and before the start of the afternoon surgical case. Most procedures were conducted with the patient under procedural sedation and analgesia. After LE, patients were admitted either to the ward or to the ICU. Medical history and intraprocedural data were recorded. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Of the 389 procedures performed during the study period, 50 patients (13%) were admitted to the ICU owing to persistent hemodynamic instability or intraoperative complications requiring endotracheal intubation. Complete procedural success was achieved in 370 patients (95%), and the clinical success rate was 98.4%. No deaths were recorded. Five complications requiring emergency surgery (1.3%) were reported. Preprocedural right ventricular dysfunction (odds ratio (OR) 7.41; confidence interval 1.85-29.7; p < 0.01) and the need for general anesthesia (OR 12; confidence interval 1.49-97.06; pâ¯=â¯0.019) were independent predictors of ICU admission. CONCLUSIONS: Preoperative identification of patients who need ICU admission after LE is crucial to increase patient safety and decrease hospital costs. Severe right ventricular dysfunction and need for general anesthesia identify patients with low cardiac reserve who are at increased risk for ICU admission after the procedure.
Asunto(s)
Remoción de Dispositivos/efectos adversos , Ecocardiografía Transesofágica , Unidades de Cuidados Intensivos , Marcapaso Artificial , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Desfibriladores Implantables , Femenino , Hospitales de Alto Volumen , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Admisión del Paciente , Estudios RetrospectivosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Pain management after surgery is crucial to decrease perioperative morbidity and mortality. Acute pain services (APS) are multidisciplinary teams that represent a modern strategy to address pain inside hospitals. The APS defines and applies pain treatment protocols specific for each surgery. To evaluate the performance of the APS at our institute, we performed a large retrospective cohort study focusing on complications of epidural analgesia and IV opiates. METHODS: Data from the 10 years of activity of the APS were collected. Pain was assessed using the VAS at rest (VASr) and during movement (VASm) at each daily visit; the presence of side effects and complications was also assessed. RESULTS: A total of 17,913 adult patients were followed by APS during the study period. Epidural analgesia was used in 7,776 cases (43%), while 9,239 (52%) patients used IV patient-controlled analgesia (PCA). A combination of the 2 was used in 87 patients (0.5%). A total of 456 perineural catheters (2.6%) were placed, while 442 patients(2.5%) used other analgesic techniques. We recorded 163 dural punctures during catheter placement, with no epidural hematoma, epidural abscess, or meningitis, and no permanent modification in sensitive or motor functions. CONCLUSIONS: In our large case series, APS was confirmed safe and effective in treating postoperative pain, using both epidural analgesia and IV PCA with morphine.
Asunto(s)
Analgesia Epidural/efectos adversos , Analgésicos Opioides/efectos adversos , Clínicas de Dolor , Manejo del Dolor/efectos adversos , Manejo del Dolor/métodos , Adulto , Analgesia Epidural/métodos , Analgésicos Opioides/uso terapéutico , Anestesia Epidural/efectos adversos , Anestesia Epidural/métodos , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Dolor Postoperatorio/tratamiento farmacológico , Estudios RetrospectivosRESUMEN
Bispectral Index Scale (BIS)-guided closed-loop delivery of anesthetics has been extensively studied. We performed a meta-analysis of all the randomized clinical trials comparing efficacy and performance between BIS-guided closed-loop delivery and manually controlled administration of total IV anesthesia. Scopus, PubMed, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Central Register of clinical trials were searched for pertinent studies. Inclusion criteria were random allocation to treatment and closed-loop delivery systems versus manually controlled administration of total IV anesthesia in any surgical setting. Exclusion criteria were duplicate publications and nonadult studies. Twelve studies were included, randomly allocating 1284 patients. Use of closed-loop anesthetic delivery systems was associated with a significant reduction in the dose of propofol administered for induction of anesthesia (mean difference [MD] = 0.37 [0.17-0.57], P for effect <0.00001, P for heterogeneity = 0.001, I = 74%) and a significant reduction in recovery time (MD = 1.62 [0.60-2.64], P for effect <0.0001, P for heterogeneity = 0.06, I = 47%). The target depth of anesthesia was preserved more frequently with closed-loop anesthetic delivery than with manual control (MD = -15.17 [-23.11 to -7.24], P for effect <0.00001, P for heterogeneity <0.00001, I = 83%). There were no differences in the time required to induce anesthesia and the total propofol dose. Closed-loop anesthetic delivery performed better than manual-control delivery. Both median absolute performance error and wobble index were significantly lower in closed-loop anesthetic delivery systems group (MD = 5.82 [3.17-8.46], P for effect <0.00001, P for heterogeneity <0.00001, I = 90% and MD = 0.92 [0.13-1.72], P for effect = 0.003, P for heterogeneity = 0.07, I = 45%). When compared with manual control, BIS-guided anesthetic delivery of total IV anesthesia reduces propofol requirements during induction, better maintains a target depth of anesthesia, and reduces recovery time.
Asunto(s)
Anestesia Intravenosa/instrumentación , Anestesia Intravenosa/métodos , Anestésicos Intravenosos/administración & dosificación , Anestesia por Circuito Cerrado , Monitores de Conciencia , Humanos , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como AsuntoRESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: Postoperative pulmonary complications (PPC) are among the most common complications after noncardiac surgery. Men, smokers, and elderly patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease or heart failure are more likely to experience PPC. The majority of patients undergoing vascular surgery belong in these categories and are at higher risk of developing PPC. Moreover, the surgical site is one of the most important risk factors associated with PPC, and aortic surgery carries the highest risk. The aim of this systematic review was to obtain an additional understanding of the real incidence of PPC after open abdominal aortic surgery and the impact of PPC on survival. DESIGN: Systematic review and meta-analysis. SETTING: Hospitals PARTICIPANTS: Patients who underwent open abdominal aortic surgery. INTERVENTIONS: None. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: A literature search was performed on BioMedCentral, PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Register of clinical trials. All prospective or retrospective studies reporting data on PPC after open abdominal aortic surgery were included. Co-primary endpoints were the PPC rate and the correlation between PPC and perioperative mortality. The secondary endpoint was the difference in the PPC rate and mortality between elective and urgent surgery. Data on 269,637 patients from 213 studies were analyzed. The overall median incidence of PPC was 10.3% (interquartile range 5.55%-19.1%). Pneumonia, respiratory insufficiency, prolonged mechanical ventilation, need for unplanned mechanical ventilation, atelectasis, acute respiratory distress syndrome, pulmonary edema, and pleural effusions were the most common PPC reported in the literature. Occurrence of PPC was associated with postoperative mortality (r = 0.65, p<0.01) and was significantly higher in urgent procedures (p<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Incidence of PPC after open abdominal aortic surgery is high and is associated with increased postoperative morbidity and mortality.
Asunto(s)
Aorta Abdominal/cirugía , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/diagnóstico , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/epidemiología , Trastornos Respiratorios/diagnóstico , Trastornos Respiratorios/epidemiología , Humanos , Estudios Prospectivos , Insuficiencia Respiratoria/diagnóstico , Insuficiencia Respiratoria/epidemiología , Estudios RetrospectivosRESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: Methylene blue commonly is used as a dye or an antidote, but also can be used off label as a vasopressor. Serotonin toxicity is a potentially lethal and often misdiagnosed condition that can result from drug interaction. Mild serotonin toxicity previously was reported in settings in which methylene blue was used as a dye. The authors report 3 cases of life-threatening serotonin toxicity in patients undergoing chronic selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI) therapy who also underwent cardiac surgery and received methylene blue to treat vasoplegic syndrome. DESIGN: An observational study. SETTING: A cardiothoracic intensive care unit (ICU) in a teaching hospital. PARTICIPANTS: Three patients who received methylene blue after cardiac surgery, later discovered to be undergoing chronic SSRI therapy. INTERVENTIONS: None. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: All 3 patients received high doses of fentanyl during general anesthesia. They all developed vasoplegic syndrome and consequently were given methylene blue in the ICU. All 3 patients developed serotonin toxicity, including coma, after this administration and diagnostic tests were negative for acute intracranial pathology. Coma lasted between 1 and 5 days. Two patients were discharged from the ICU shortly after awakening, whereas the third patient experienced a complicated postoperative course for concomitant refractory low-cardiac-output syndrome. CONCLUSIONS: Patients undergoing chronic SSRI therapy should not be administered methylene blue to treat vasoplegic syndrome.
Asunto(s)
Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Cardíacos/efectos adversos , Coma/etiología , Azul de Metileno/efectos adversos , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/etiología , Inhibidores Selectivos de la Recaptación de Serotonina/efectos adversos , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Electroencefalografía , Femenino , HumanosRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: Carotid endarterectomy is the most effective treatment for reducing the risk of stroke in patients with significant carotid stenosis. Few studies have focused on the failure rate of regional anesthesia. METHODS: Data of all patients undergoing carotid endarterectomy (June 2009 to December 2014) in a single center were collected. Combined deep and superficial cervical plexus block or superficial plexus block alone was used according to the attending anesthesiologist's choice and the patient's characteristics (eg, dual antiplatelet or anticoagulation therapy). Intraoperative remifentanil (0.025-0.05 µg/kg/min) was administered to maintain an adequate level of comfort, responsiveness, and cooperation. General anesthesia was planned only in the case of major contraindications or the patient's refusal of locoregional anesthesia. The primary end point of our study was the incidence of intraoperative conversion from locoregional to general anesthesia. RESULTS: A total of 2463 carotid endarterectomies were included in the analysis. Regional anesthesia was initially chosen in 2439 patients, whereas 24 patients received planned general anesthesia. In seven cases, regional anesthesia was converted to general anesthesia because of severe agitation of the patient (before clamping in four cases, after carotid clamping in two cases, and after declamping in one case). A shunt was used in 302 patients (12.3%) because of neurologic deterioration at the carotid clamping test. Intraoperative complications were emergent repeated surgical procedures in 13 cases (0.53%) because of acute neurologic deterioration, 1 intraoperative acute myocardial infarction (0.04%), and 3 cases (0.04%) of hemodynamically relevant supraventricular tachyarrhythmia. No intraoperative death occurred. In-hospital mortality was 0.12% (three patients). Major stroke occurred in 23 patients (0.93%); minor stroke occurred in 16 patients (0.65%). The combined stroke and death rate was 1.62% (40 patients). CONCLUSIONS: In our practice, carotid endarterectomy under regional anesthesia is safe and associated with a very low rate of conversion to general anesthesia.