Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 6 de 6
Filtrar
1.
Intensive Care Med ; 48(1): 78-91, 2022 Jan.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34904190

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: Etomidate and ketamine are hemodynamically stable induction agents often used to sedate critically ill patients during emergency endotracheal intubation. In 2015, quality improvement data from our hospital suggested a survival benefit at Day 7 from avoidance of etomidate in critically ill patients during emergency intubation. In this clinical trial, we hypothesized that randomization to ketamine instead of etomidate would be associated with Day 7 survival after emergency endotracheal intubation. METHODS: A prospective, randomized, open-label, parallel assignment, single-center clinical trial performed by an anesthesiology-based Airway Team under emergent circumstances at one high-volume medical center in the United States. 801 critically ill patients requiring emergency intubation were randomly assigned 1:1 by computer-generated, pre-randomized sealed envelopes to receive etomidate (0.2-0.3 mg/kg, n = 400) or ketamine (1-2 mg/kg, n = 401) for sedation prior to intubation. The pre-specified primary endpoint of the trial was Day 7 survival. Secondary endpoints included Day 28 survival. RESULTS: Of the 801 enrolled patients, 396 were analyzed in the etomidate arm, and 395 in the ketamine arm. Day 7 survival was significantly lower in the etomidate arm than in the ketamine arm (77.3% versus 85.1%, difference - 7.8, 95% confidence interval - 13, - 2.4, p = 0.005). Day 28 survival rates for the two groups were not significantly different (etomidate 64.1%, ketamine 66.8%, difference - 2.7, 95% confidence interval - 9.3, 3.9, p = 0.294). CONCLUSION: While the primary outcome of Day 7 survival was greater in patients randomized to ketamine, there was no significant difference in survival by Day 28.


Asunto(s)
Etomidato , Ketamina , Enfermedad Crítica , Etomidato/efectos adversos , Humanos , Intubación Intratraqueal , Ketamina/uso terapéutico , Estudios Prospectivos
2.
J Clin Anesth ; 54: 19-24, 2019 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30391445

RESUMEN

STUDY OBJECTIVE: Morbid obesity is associated with adverse airway events including desaturation during deep sedation. Prior works have suggested that proprietary high-flow nasal cannula devices generate positive pressure to all airway structures and may be superior to standard (low-flow) nasal cannula for prevention of desaturation. We hypothesized that, at a similar fraction of inspired oxygen (FiO2), use of a High-Flow Nasal Cannula (HFNC) at maximum flow rate would result in a lower incidence of intra-procedural desaturation episodes in morbidly obese patients compared to standard nasal cannula (SNC) during deep sedation with propofol. DESIGN: This is a pragmatic, prospective, randomized clinical trial at one hospital (NCT03148262, UTSW#112016-058). Morbidly obese patients were randomized to HFNC during propofol sedation for colonoscopy. HFNC was performed using maximum flow rates of 60 liters per minute (LPM) and FiO2 of 0.36-0.40, whereas SNC was performed at 4LPM. The primary endpoint was incidence of arterial oxygen desaturation <90% measured by pulse oximetry. At midpoint enrollment the Data Monitoring Committee (DMC) performed a pre-planned O'Brien and Fleming futility test. MAIN RESULTS: Patients were randomized to HFNC (n = 28) or SNC (n = 31). Interim analysis of the primary endpoint showed that the desaturation rates in the HFNC group (39.3%) and the SNC group (45.2%) were not significantly different (p = 0.79). The DMC halted the trial at that point due to futility. CONCLUSION: At similar FiO2, HFNC was not significantly different from SNC for prevention of arterial oxygen desaturation in morbidly obese patients undergoing propofol sedation for colonoscopy.


Asunto(s)
Colonoscopía/efectos adversos , Sedación Profunda/efectos adversos , Hipoxia/prevención & control , Ventilación no Invasiva/instrumentación , Obesidad Mórbida/complicaciones , Anciano , Cánula , Femenino , Humanos , Hipoxia/etiología , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Oxígeno/análisis , Dolor Asociado a Procedimientos Médicos/prevención & control , Propofol/administración & dosificación , Propofol/efectos adversos , Estudios Prospectivos , Resultado del Tratamiento
4.
Curr Clin Pharmacol ; 12(2): 92-98, 2017.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28578646

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Ultrasound-guided supraclavicular brachial plexus block (USSB) provides excellent postoperative analgesia after upper extremity surgery. Dexamethasone and clonidine have been added to local anesthetics to enhance and prolong the duration of analgesia. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this randomized prospective study is to evaluate the efficacy of dexamethasone, clonidine, or combination of both as adjuvants to ropivacaine on the duration of USSB for postoperative analgesia. METHODS: Patients receiving USSB for postoperative pain control for upper extremity surgery were randomized to one of four groups; ropivacaine 0.5%, ropivacaine 0.5% with 4 mg dexamethasone, ropivacaine 0.5% with 100 mcg clonidine , or ropivacaine 0.5% with 4 mg dexamethasone and 100 mcg clonidine. Pain scores, sensory and motor function were evaluated at post anesthesia care unit (PACU), discharge and at 24 h postoperatively. RESULTS: The duration of sensory and motor blocks was significantly longer in clonidine groups when compared to ropivacaine alone [Sensorial analgesia: ropivacaine alone 13.4±6, Ropivacaine- Clonidine 17.4±6; Ropivacaine-Dexamethasone-Clonidine 18.8±6.2; Motor blocks: Ropivacaine 12±5, Ropivacaine-Clonidine 16.8±5.2, Ropivacaine-Dexamethasone-Clonidine 18.2±5.7]. In clonidine groups, there was significant prolongation of motor and sensory block when compared to ropivacaine group alone. CONCLUSION: The results demonstrated that clonidine significantly prolongs the duration of ropivacaine effects for the postoperative analgesia in patient underwent upper arm surgeries.


Asunto(s)
Bloqueo del Plexo Braquial/métodos , Clonidina/administración & dosificación , Dexametasona/administración & dosificación , Dolor Postoperatorio/prevención & control , Ropivacaína/administración & dosificación , Adulto , Anciano , Analgésicos/administración & dosificación , Anestésicos Locales/administración & dosificación , Quimioterapia Combinada , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Dimensión del Dolor , Estudios Prospectivos , Factores de Tiempo , Ultrasonografía Intervencional/métodos , Extremidad Superior/cirugía
5.
Pain Res Treat ; 2011: 934932, 2011.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22110935

RESUMEN

Although the number of U.S. hospitals offering an acute pain service (APS) is increasing, the typical structure remains unknown. This survey was undertaken to describe the structure and function of the APS in U.S. hospitals only. We contacted 200 non-teaching and 101 teaching U.S. hospitals. The person in charge of postoperative pain management completed and returned the survey. Seventy-four percent of responding hospitals had an organized APS. An APS was significantly more formally organized in academic/teaching hospitals when compared to non-teaching hospitals. Pain assessments included "pain at rest" (97%), "pain on activity" (63%), and reassessment after pain therapy intervention (88.8%). Responding hospitals utilized postoperative pain protocols significantly more commonly in teaching hospitals when compared to non-teaching and VA hospitals. Intravenous patient controlled analgesia (IV-PCA) was managed most commonly by surgeons (75%), while epidural analgesia and peripheral nerve block infusions were exclusively managed by anesthesiologists. For improved analgesia, 62% allowed RNs to adjust the IV-PCA settings within set parameters, 43% allowed RN adjustment of epidural infusion rates, and 21% allowed RN adjustment of peripheral nerve catheter local anesthetic infusion rates.

6.
Anesthesiol Clin ; 28(1): 117-37, 2010 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20400044
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA