Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 33
Filtrar
Más filtros

Bases de datos
Tipo del documento
País de afiliación
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Am J Perinatol ; 41(13): 1767-1778, 2024 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38408480

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to evaluate trends, risk factors, and outcomes associated with infections and sepsis during delivery hospitalizations in the United States. STUDY DESIGN: The 2000-2020 National Inpatient Sample was used for this repeated cross-sectional analysis. Delivery hospitalizations of patients aged 15 to 54 with and without infection and sepsis were identified. Common infection diagnoses during delivery hospitalizations analyzed included (i) pyelonephritis, (ii) pneumonia/influenza, (iii) endometritis, (iv) cholecystitis, (v) chorioamnionitis, and (vi) wound infection. Temporal trends in sepsis and infection during delivery hospitalizations were analyzed. The associations between sepsis and infection and common chronic health conditions including asthma, chronic hypertension, pregestational diabetes, and obesity were analyzed. The associations between clinical, demographic, and hospital characteristics, and infection and sepsis were determined with unadjusted and adjusted logistic regression models with unadjusted odds ratio (OR) and adjusted odds ratios with 95% confidence intervals as measures of association. RESULTS: An estimated 80,158,622 delivery hospitalizations were identified and included in the analysis, of which 2,766,947 (3.5%) had an infection diagnosis and 32,614 had a sepsis diagnosis (4.1 per 10,000). The most common infection diagnosis was chorioamnionitis (2.7% of deliveries) followed by endometritis (0.4%), and wound infections (0.3%). Infection and sepsis were more common in the setting of chronic health conditions. Evaluating trends in individual infection diagnoses, endometritis and wound infection decreased over the study period both for patients with and without chronic conditions, while risk for pyelonephritis and pneumonia/influenza increased. Sepsis increased over the study period for deliveries with and without chronic condition diagnoses. Risks for adverse outcomes including mortality, severe maternal morbidity, the critical care composite, and acute renal failure were all significantly increased in the presence of sepsis and infection. CONCLUSION: Endometritis and wound infections decreased over the study period while risk for sepsis increased. Infection and sepsis were associated with chronic health conditions and accounted for a significant proportion of adverse obstetric outcomes including severe maternal morbidity. KEY POINTS: · Sepsis increased over the study period for deliveries with and without chronic condition diagnoses.. · Endometritis and wound infection decreased over the study period.. · Infection and sepsis accounted for a significant proportion of adverse obstetric outcomes..


Asunto(s)
Endometritis , Hospitalización , Sepsis , Humanos , Femenino , Adulto , Estados Unidos/epidemiología , Embarazo , Sepsis/epidemiología , Hospitalización/estadística & datos numéricos , Estudios Transversales , Persona de Mediana Edad , Adulto Joven , Adolescente , Factores de Riesgo , Endometritis/epidemiología , Corioamnionitis/epidemiología , Complicaciones Infecciosas del Embarazo/epidemiología , Parto Obstétrico , Modelos Logísticos , Pielonefritis/epidemiología , Neumonía/epidemiología
2.
Am J Perinatol ; 2023 Feb 15.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36608699

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: Sociodemographic factors such as race/ethnicity and socioeconomic status affect primary cesarean delivery rates. Language is associated with disparate health care outcomes but has not been well studied in obstetrics. We examined the association between primary unscheduled cesarean delivery rate and preferred patient language. STUDY DESIGN: A retrospective cohort study was conducted at an urban medical center between January 2017 and January 2020. Nulliparous women with early or full-term gestation and having no obstetric or medical contraindication to vaginal delivery were included. We used multivariable linear and logistic regressions to evaluate language differences in cesarean delivery odds and indication for cesarean. RESULTS: Of the 1,314 eligible women, 76.8% of patients preferred English, 17.8% Spanish, and 5.4% other languages. Overall cesarean delivery rate was 27.6%. Controlling for age, race/ethnicity, body mass index, insurance, gravidity, pregnancy comorbidities, labor induction, and infant birth weight, Spanish- and other language-speaking women had significantly higher odds of undergoing cesarean compared with English-speaking women (adjusted odds ratio [OR]: 1.75; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.25, 2.46). Relative proportions of indications for cesarean did not differ by language group. Documented interpreter use was an effect modifier on the relationship between language preference and cesarean (OR with interpreter use: 2.89, 95% CI: 1.90, 4.39). CONCLUSION: Primary cesarean delivery rates were significantly higher among nulliparous women who prefer languages other than English. This difference may reflect lack of communication, provider bias or discrimination, or other factors, and should be further studied. Interpreter services should be routinely utilized and documented effectively. KEY POINTS: · Women who prefer languages other than English had higher odds of cesarean.. · Indication for cesarean did not differ by language.. · Interpreter use did not reduce risk for cesarean..

3.
Am J Perinatol ; 2023 Jun 06.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37279788

RESUMEN

Based on years of review and analysis of severe maternal morbidity and maternal mortality cases, it is clear that the high rates of maternal mortality in this country are due to more than obstetrical emergencies gone awry. Many nonmedical factors contribute to these poor outcomes including complex and ineffectual health care systems, poor coordination of care, and structural racism. In this article we discuss what physicians can and cannot accomplish on their own, the role of race and racism, and barriers built into the manner in which health care is delivered. We conclude that while obstetricians must continue to focus on the area where their expertise lies, reducing deaths by educating and training physicians to deal with the downstream consequences of upstream events, they must also focus increased attention on educating themselves and their trainees about the effect of racism, social disadvantage, and poor coordination of care on health, as well as their role in resolving these issues. Physicians must also reach out to their representatives in government to partner with them. Those leaders must recognize that when they hear about disparities in maternal mortality, focusing only on events in hospitals ignores the more dispositive issues that put Black women at risk in the first instance. KEY POINTS: · Structural racism contributes to maternal deaths.. · Coordination of postpartum care is critically important.. · U.S. health care system is complex and not patient friendly..

4.
Gynecol Oncol ; 165(3): 560-567, 2022 06.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35606067

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: Low-grade serous carcinoma (LGSOC) is a rare epithelial ovarian/peritoneal cancer characterized by younger age at diagnosis, relative chemoresistance, prolonged overall survival (OS), and mutations in the mitogen activated protein kinase (MAPK) pathway compared to high-grade serous carcinoma. We describe the genomic profile of LGSOC by next generation sequencing (NGS) and evaluated its potential relationship to clinical outcomes. METHODS: The study included 215 women with LGSOC with: 1) pathologically confirmed LGSOC, 2) availability of NGS data, and 3) adequate clinical data. Clinical subgroups were compared for progression-free survival (PFS) and OS. Multivariable Cox regression analysis was performed. RESULTS: Median age at diagnosis was 46.6 years. The majority had a stage III ovarian primary. One or more mutations were identified in 140 (65.1%) cases; 75 (34.9%) had none. The most common mutations were KRAS (n = 71; 33.0%), NRAS (n = 24; 11.2%), and BRAF (n = 18; 8.4%). Patients with MAPK-mutated tumors (n = 113) (52.6%) had a significantly longer OS compared to those with tumors lacking MAPK pathway mutations (n = 102) (47.4%) [median OS, 147.8 months (95% CI,119.0-176.6) versus 89.5 months (95% CI, 61.4-117.7) (p = 0.01)], respectively. Median OS for patients with MAPK-mutated tumors was also significantly better than for patients whose tumors had no mutations (n = 75) [median OS, 147.8 months (95% CI, 119.0-176.6) versus 78.0 months (95% CI, 57.6-98.3)], respectively (p = 0.001). Median OS for patients with non-MAPK-mutated tumors (n = 27) was 125.1 months (95% CI, 83.9-166.3). In multivariable analysis, having a MAPK mutation was associated with improved OS. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with MAPK-mutated tumors have a significantly improved OS compared to those without MAPK-mutated tumors.


Asunto(s)
Cistadenocarcinoma Papilar , Cistadenocarcinoma Seroso , Neoplasias Ováricas , Neoplasias Peritoneales , Carcinoma Epitelial de Ovario/genética , Cistadenocarcinoma Seroso/patología , Femenino , Genómica , Humanos , Mutación , Neoplasias Ováricas/patología , Neoplasias Peritoneales/genética , Neoplasias Peritoneales/patología
5.
Am J Perinatol ; 39(15): 1622-1632, 2022 11.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35709742

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to assess whether concordance with our proposed labor induction algorithm is associated with an increased rate of vaginal delivery within 24 hours. STUDY DESIGN: We conducted a retrospective review of 287 induction of labors (IOLs) at a single urban, tertiary, academic medical center which took place before we created an evidence-based IOL algorithm. We then compared the IOL course to the algorithm to assess for concordance and outcomes. Patients age 18 years or over with a singleton, cephalic pregnancy of 366/7 to 420/7 weeks' gestation were included. Patients were excluded with a Bishop's score >6, contraindication to misoprostol or cervical Foley catheter, major fetal anomalies, or intrauterine fetal death. Patients with 100% concordance were compared with <100% concordant patients, and patients with ≥80% concordance were compared with <80% concordant patients. Adjusted hazard ratios (AHRs) were calculated for rate of vaginal delivery within 24 hours, our primary outcome. Competing risk's analysis was conducted for concordant versus nonconcordant groups, using vaginal delivery as the outcome of interest, with cesarean delivery (CD) as a competing event. RESULTS: Patients with 100% concordance were more likely to have a vaginal delivery within 24 hours, n = 66 of 77 or 85.7% versus n = 120 of 210 or 57.1% (p < 0.0001), with an AHR of 2.72 (1.98, 3.75, p < 0.0001) after adjusting for delivery indication and scheduled status. Patients with 100% concordance also had shorter time from first intervention to delivery (11.9 vs. 19.4 hours). Patients with ≥80% concordance had a lower rate of CD (11/96, 11.5%) compared with those with <80% concordance (43/191 = 22.5%; p = 0.0238). There were no differences in neonatal outcomes assessed. CONCLUSION: Our IOL algorithm may offer an opportunity to standardize care, improve the rate of vaginal delivery within 24 hours, shorten time to delivery, and reduce the CD rate for patients undergoing IOL. KEY POINTS: · Studies on IOL have focused on individual steps. A labor induction algorithm allows for standardization.. · Algorithm concordance is associated with decreased time to delivery.. · Algorithm concordance is associated with decreased CD rate..


Asunto(s)
Misoprostol , Oxitócicos , Embarazo , Recién Nacido , Femenino , Humanos , Adolescente , Administración Intravaginal , Trabajo de Parto Inducido , Parto Obstétrico , Algoritmos
6.
Am J Perinatol ; 39(12): 1261-1268, 2022 09.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35240711

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to examine the association between severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection and preterm birth, cesarean birth, and composite severe maternal morbidity by studying women with and without SARS-CoV-2 infection at the time of delivery hospitalization from similar residential catchment areas in New York City. STUDY DESIGN: This was a retrospective cohort study of pregnant women with laboratory-confirmed or laboratory-denied SARS-CoV-2 on nasopharyngeal swab under universal testing policies at the time of admission who gave birth between March 13 and May 15, 2020, at two New York City medical centers. Demographic and clinical data were collected and follow-up was completed on May 30, 2020. Groups were compared for the primary outcome and preterm birth, in adjusted (for age, race/ethnicity, nulliparity, body mass index) and unadjusted analyses. RESULTS: Among this age-matched cohort, 164 women were positive and 247 were negative for SARS-CoV-2. Of the positive group, 52.4% were asymptomatic and 1.2% had critical coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). The groups did not differ by race and ethnicity, body mass index, or acute or chronic comorbidities. Women with SARS-CoV-2 were more likely to be publicly insured. Preterm birth, cesarean birth, and severe maternal morbidity did not differ between groups. Babies born to women with SARS-CoV-2 were more likely to have complications of prematurity or low birth weight (7.7 vs. 2%, p = 0.01). CONCLUSION: Preterm and cesarean birth did not differ between women with and without SARS-CoV-2 across disease severity in adjusted and unadjusted analysis among this cohort during the pandemic peak in New York City.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Complicaciones Infecciosas del Embarazo , Nacimiento Prematuro , COVID-19/epidemiología , Estudios de Cohortes , Femenino , Humanos , Recién Nacido , Ciudad de Nueva York/epidemiología , Embarazo , Complicaciones Infecciosas del Embarazo/epidemiología , Resultado del Embarazo/epidemiología , Mujeres Embarazadas , Nacimiento Prematuro/epidemiología , Estudios Retrospectivos , SARS-CoV-2
7.
Am J Perinatol ; 33(12): 1182-90, 2016 10.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27455399

RESUMEN

Background The World Health Organization's Surgical Safety Checklist has demonstrated significant reduction in surgical morbidity. The American Congress of Obstetricians and Gynecologists District II Safe Motherhood Initiative (SMI) safety bundles include eclampsia and postpartum hemorrhage (PPH) checklists. Objective To determine whether use of the SMI checklists during simulated obstetric emergencies improved completion of critical actions and to elicit feedback to facilitate checklist revision. Study Design During this randomized controlled trial, teams were assigned to use a checklist during one of two emergencies: eclampsia and PPH. Raters scored teams on critical step completion. Feedback was elicited through structured debriefing. Results In total, 30 teams completed 60 scenarios. For eclampsia, trends toward higher completion were noted for blood pressure and airway management. For PPH, trends toward higher completion rates were noted for PPH stage assessment and fundal massage. Feedback resulted in substantial checklist revision. Participants were enthusiastic about using checklists in a clinical emergency. Conclusion Despite trends toward higher rates of completion of critical tasks, teams using checklists did not approach 100% task completion. Teams were interested in the application of checklists and provided feedback necessary to substantially revise the checklists. Intensive implementation planning and training in use of the revised checklists will result in improved patient outcomes.


Asunto(s)
Lista de Verificación , Eclampsia/terapia , Obstetricia/métodos , Hemorragia Posparto/terapia , Adulto , Anciano , Actitud del Personal de Salud , Urgencias Médicas , Retroalimentación , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Cuerpo Médico de Hospitales , Persona de Mediana Edad , Personal de Enfermería en Hospital , Grupo de Atención al Paciente , Embarazo , Entrenamiento Simulado , Análisis y Desempeño de Tareas , Adulto Joven
8.
Postgrad Med J ; 91(1082): 685-91, 2015 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26508720

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Benefits of exposure to global health training during medical education are well documented and residents' demand for this training is increasing. Despite this, it is offered by few US obstetrics and gynaecology (OBGYN) residency training programmes. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate interest, perceived importance, predictors of global health interest and barriers to offering global health training among prospective OBGYN residents, current OBGYN residents and US OGBYN residency directors. METHODS: We designed two questionnaires using Likert scale questions to assess perceived importance of global health training. The first was distributed to current and prospective OBGYN residents interviewing at a US residency programme during 2012-2013. The second questionnaire distributed to US OBGYN programme directors assessed for existing global health programmes and global health training barriers. A composite Global Health Interest/Importance score was tabulated from the Likert scores. Multivariable linear regression was performed to assess for predictors of Global Health Interest/Importance. RESULTS: A total of 159 trainees (77%; 129 prospective OBGYN residents and 30 residents) and 69 (28%) programme directors completed the questionnaires. Median Global Health Interest/Importance score was 7 (IQR 4-9). Prior volunteer experience was predictive of a 5-point increase in Global Health Interest/Importance score (95% CI -0.19 to 9.85; p=0.02). The most commonly cited barriers were cost and time. CONCLUSION: Interest and perceived importance of global health training in US OBGYN residency programmes is evident among trainees and programme directors; however, significant financial and time barriers prevent many programmes from offering opportunities to their trainees. Prior volunteer experience predicts global health interest.


Asunto(s)
Competencia Clínica/normas , Salud Global , Ginecología/educación , Internado y Residencia , Obstetricia/educación , Médicos , Estudiantes , Salud de la Mujer/normas , Curriculum , Salud Global/normas , Humanos , Estudios Prospectivos , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Estados Unidos
9.
Matern Child Health J ; 19(9): 1949-55, 2015 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25652061

RESUMEN

To evaluate the effectiveness of decentralizing ambulatory reproductive and intrapartum services to increase rates of antenatal care (ANC) utilization and skilled attendance at birth (SAB) in Rwanda. A prospective cohort study was implemented with one control and two intervention sites: decentralized ambulatory reproductive healthcare and decentralized intrapartum care. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed with primary outcome of lack of SAB and secondary outcome of ≥3 ANC visits. 536 women were entered in the study. Distance lived from delivery site significantly predicted SAB (p = 0.007), however distance lived to ANC site did not predict ≥3 ANC visits (p = 0.81). Neither decentralization of ambulatory reproductive healthcare (p = 0.10) nor intrapartum care (p = 0.40) was significantly associated with SAB. The control site had the greatest percentage of women receive ≥3 ANC visits (p < 0.001). Receiving <3 ANC visits was associated with a 3.98 times greater odds of not having SAB (p = 0.001). No increase in adverse outcomes was found with decentralization of ambulatory reproductive health care or intrapartum care. The factors that predict utilization of physically accessible services in rural Africa are complex. Decentralization of services may be one strategy to increase rates of SAB and ANC utilization, but selection biases may have precluded accurate analysis. Efforts to increase ANC utilization may be a worthwhile investment to increase SAB.


Asunto(s)
Competencia Clínica/normas , Conocimientos, Actitudes y Práctica en Salud , Servicios de Salud Materna/normas , Parto , Atención Prenatal/normas , Población Rural , Adolescente , Estudios de Cohortes , Femenino , Humanos , Servicios de Salud Materna/estadística & datos numéricos , Política , Embarazo , Atención Prenatal/estadística & datos numéricos , Estudios Prospectivos , Rwanda , Adulto Joven
10.
Am J Perinatol ; 31(6): 529-34, 2014 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24000107

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To study the impact of a prenatal electronic medical record (EMR) on the adequacy of documentation. STUDY DESIGN: The authors reviewed paper prenatal records (historical control arm and contemporaneous control arm), and prenatal EMRs (study arm). A prenatal quality index (PQI) was developed to assess adequacy of documentation; the prenatal record was assigned a score (range, -1 to 2 for each element, maximum score = 30). A PQI raw score and PQI ratio-that controlled for which elements of care were indicated for a patient-were calculated and compared between the study arm versus historical control arm and then the study arm versus contemporaneous control arm. RESULTS: The median PQI raw score was significantly lower in the study arm compared with historical control arm; however, the PQI ratios were similar between these groups. The PQI raw score was similar in both the study arm and contemporaneous control arm; however the PQI ratio was significantly higher in the study arm when compared with the contemporaneous control arm. CONCLUSION: Implementation of this prenatal EMR did not have a significant impact on completeness of documentation when compared with a standardized paper prenatal record. Adequacy of documentation seems to be related to the type of practice.


Asunto(s)
Documentación/normas , Registros Electrónicos de Salud , Atención Prenatal , Mejoramiento de la Calidad , Servicios Urbanos de Salud/organización & administración , Adulto , Femenino , Humanos , Embarazo , Adulto Joven
11.
Obstet Gynecol ; 143(3): 346-354, 2024 Mar 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37944152

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the prevalence, timing, clinical risk factors, and adverse outcomes associated with postpartum readmissions for maternal sepsis. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of delivery hospitalizations and 60-day postpartum readmissions for females aged 15-54 years with and without sepsis using the 2016-2020 Nationwide Readmissions Database. Temporal trends in sepsis diagnoses during delivery hospitalizations and 60-day postpartum readmissions were analyzed with the National Cancer Institute's Joinpoint Regression Program to estimate the average annual percent change with 95% CIs. Logistic regression models were fit to determine whether delivery hospitalization characteristics were associated with postpartum sepsis readmissions, and unadjusted and adjusted odds ratios with 95% CIs were reported. Adverse outcomes associated with sepsis during delivery hospitalization and readmission were described, including death, severe morbidity, a critical care composite, and renal failure. RESULTS: Overall, 15,268,190 delivery hospitalizations and 256,216 associated 60-day readmissions were included after population weighting, of which 16,399 (1.1/1,000 delivery hospitalizations) had an associated diagnosis of sepsis at delivery, and 20,130 (1.3/1,000 delivery hospitalizations) had an associated diagnosis of sepsis with postpartum readmission. A sepsis diagnosis was present in 7.9% of all postpartum readmissions. Characteristics associated with postpartum sepsis readmission included younger age at delivery, Medicaid insurance, lowest median ZIP code income quartile, and chronic medical conditions such as obesity, pregestational diabetes, and chronic hypertension. Postpartum sepsis readmissions were associated with infection during the delivery hospitalization, including intra-amniotic infection or endometritis, wound infection, and delivery sepsis. Sepsis diagnoses were associated with 24.4% of maternal deaths at delivery and 38.4% postpartum, 2.2% cases of nontransfusion severe morbidity excluding sepsis at delivery and 13.6% postpartum, 15.6% of critical care composite diagnoses at delivery and 30.1% postpartum, and 11.1% of acute renal failure diagnoses at delivery and 36.4% postpartum. CONCLUSION: Sepsis accounts for a significant proportion of postpartum readmissions and is a major contributor to adverse outcomes during delivery hospitalizations and postpartum readmissions.


Asunto(s)
Infección Puerperal , Sepsis , Embarazo , Femenino , Estados Unidos/epidemiología , Humanos , Infección Puerperal/epidemiología , Readmisión del Paciente , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Riesgo , Hospitalización , Periodo Posparto , Sepsis/epidemiología
12.
Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM ; 6(7): 101386, 2024 07.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38761887

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Placenta accreta spectrum is associated with significant maternal and neonatal morbidity and mortality. There is limited established data on healthcare inequities in the outcomes of patients with placenta accreta spectrum. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to investigate health inequities in maternal and neonatal outcomes of pregnancies with placenta accreta spectrum. STUDY DESIGN: This multicentered retrospective cohort study included patients with a histopathological diagnosis of placenta accreta spectrum at 4 regional perinatal centers between January 1, 2013, and June 30, 2022. Maternal race and ethnicity were categorized as either Hispanic, non-Hispanic Black, non-Hispanic White, or Asian or Pacific Islander. The primary outcome was a composite adverse maternal outcome: transfusion of ≥4 units of packed red blood cells, vasopressor use, mechanical ventilation, bowel or bladder injury, or mortality. The secondary outcomes were a composite adverse neonatal outcome (Apgar score of <7 at 1 minute, morbidity, or mortality), gestational age at placenta accreta spectrum diagnosis, and planned delivery by a multidisciplinary team. Multivariable logistic regression was used to estimate the associations of race and ethnicity with maternal and neonatal outcomes. RESULTS: A total of 408 pregnancies with placenta accreta spectrum were included. In 218 patients (53.0%), the diagnosis of placenta accreta spectrum was made antenatally. Patients predominantly self-identified as non-Hispanic White (31.6%) or non-Hispanic Black (24.5%). After adjusting for institution, age, body mass index, income, and parity, there was no difference in composite adverse maternal outcomes among the racial and ethnic groups. Similarly, adverse neonatal outcomes, gestational age at prenatal diagnosis, rate of planned delivery by a multidisciplinary team, and cesarean hysterectomy were similar among groups. CONCLUSION: In our multicentered placenta accreta spectrum cohort, race and ethnicity were not associated with inequities in composite maternal or neonatal morbidity, timing of diagnosis, or planned multidisciplinary care. This study hypothesized that a comparable incidence of individual risk factors for perinatal morbidity and geographic proximity reduces potential inequities that may exist in a larger population.


Asunto(s)
Disparidades en Atención de Salud , Placenta Accreta , Adulto , Femenino , Humanos , Recién Nacido , Embarazo , Cesárea/estadística & datos numéricos , Etnicidad/estadística & datos numéricos , Edad Gestacional , Disparidades en Atención de Salud/etnología , Placenta Accreta/diagnóstico , Placenta Accreta/epidemiología , Resultado del Embarazo/epidemiología , Estudios Retrospectivos , Grupos Raciales/estadística & datos numéricos
13.
Int J Womens Health ; 15: 905-926, 2023.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37283995

RESUMEN

Refractory postpartum hemorrhage (PPH) affects 10-20% of patients with PPH when they do not respond adequately to first-line treatments. These patients require second-line interventions, including three or more uterotonics, additional medications, transfusions, non-surgical treatments, and/or surgical intervention. Multiple studies have suggested that patients with refractory PPH have different clinical characteristics and causes of PPH when compared to patients who respond to first-line agents. This review highlights current insights into therapeutic approaches for the management of refractory PPH. Early management of refractory PPH relies on both hypovolemic resuscitation and achievement of hemostasis, with an emphasis on early blood product replacement and massive transfusion protocols. Transfusion needs can be more rapidly and accurately identified through point-of-care tests such as thromboelastography. Medical therapies for the treatment of refractory PPH involve treatment of both uterine atony as well as the underlying coagulopathy, with the use of tranexamic acid and adjunct therapies such as factor replacement. The principles guiding the management of refractory PPH include restoring normal uterine and pelvic anatomy, through the evaluation and management of retained products of conception, uterine inversion, and obstetric lacerations. Intrauterine vacuum-induced hemorrhage control devices are novel methods for the treatment of refractory PPH secondary to uterine atony, in addition to other uterine-sparing surgical procedures that are under investigation. Resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta can be considered for cases of critical refractory PPH, to prevent or decrease ongoing blood loss while definitive surgical interventions are performed. Finally, for patients with critical hemorrhage resulting in hemorrhagic shock, damage control resuscitation (a staged surgical approach focused on restoring normal physiologic recovery and maximizing tissue oxygenation prior to proceeding with definitive surgical management) has been shown to successfully control refractory PPH, with an overall mortality decrease for obstetric patients.

14.
JAMA Netw Open ; 6(3): e235428, 2023 03 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36988955

RESUMEN

Importance: Reducing rates of unnecessary cesarean deliveries is both a national and a global health objective. However, there are limited national US data on trends in indications for low-risk cesarean delivery. Objective: To determine temporal trends in and indications for cesarean delivery among patients at low risk for the procedure over a 20-year period. Design, Setting, and Participants: This cross-sectional study analyzed 2000 to 2019 delivery hospitalizations using the National Inpatient Sample. Births at low risk for cesarean delivery were identified using a definition from the Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine and additional criteria. Temporal trends in cesarean birth were analyzed using joinpoint regression to estimate the average annual percentage change (AAPC) with 95% CIs. Data analysis was performed from August 2022 to January 2023. Exposure: This analysis evaluated cesarean birth trends in a population at low risk for this procedure over a 20-year period. Main Outcomes and Measures: In addition to overall cesarean birth risk, cesarean deliveries for nonreassuring fetal status and labor arrest were individually analyzed. Results: Of an estimated 76.7 million delivery hospitalizations, 21.5 million were excluded according to the Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine definition, and 14.7 million were excluded according to additional criteria. Of the estimated 40 517 867 deliveries included, 12.1% (4 885 716 deliveries) were by cesarean delivery. Cesarean deliveries among patients at low risk for the procedure increased from 9.7% to 13.9% between 2000 and 2009, plateaued, and then decreased from 13.0% to 11.1% between 2012 and 2019. The AAPC for cesarean delivery was 6.4% (95% CI, 5.2% to 7.6%) from 2000 to 2005, 1.2% from 2005 to 2009 (95% CI, -1.2% to 3.7%), and -2.2% from 2009 to 2019 (95% CI, -2.7% to -1.8%). Cesarean delivery for nonreassuring fetal status increased from 3.4% of all deliveries in 2000 to 5.1% in 2019 (AAPC, 2.1%; 95% CI, 1.7% to 2.5%). Cesarean delivery for labor arrest increased from 3.6% in 2000 to a peak of 4.8% in 2009 before decreasing to 2.7% in 2019. Cesarean deliveries for labor arrest increased during the first half of the study (2000-2009) for the active phase (from 1.5% to 2.1%), latent phase (from 1.1% to 1.5%), and second stage (from 0.9% to 1.3%) and then decreased from 2010 to 2019, from 2.1% to 1.7% for the active phase, from 1.5% to 1.2% for the latent phase, and from 1.2% to 0.9% for the second stage. Conclusions and Relevance: Cesarean deliveries among patients at low risk for cesarean birth appeared to decrease over the latter years of the study period, with cesarean deliveries for labor arrest becoming less common.


Asunto(s)
Sufrimiento Fetal , Trabajo de Parto , Embarazo , Femenino , Humanos , Estudios Transversales , Cesárea , Parto
15.
AJP Rep ; 13(4): e85-e88, 2023 Jul.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38033602

RESUMEN

Postpartum hemorrhage (PPH) remains a leading cause of maternal morbidity. Pregnancy-associated acquired hemophilia A (AHA) caused by autoantibodies against factor VIII can present with recurrent episodes of postpartum bleeding. Case 1 A 50-year-old G2P0112 presented with vaginal bleeding 22 days postcaesarean. She underwent dilation and curettage, hysterectomy, and interventional radiology (IR) embolization before AHA diagnosis. She was hospitalized for 32 days and received 23 units of blood product. She remains without relapse of AHA after 5 years. Case 2 A 48-year-old G3P1021 presented with vaginal bleeding 8 days postcaesarean. She underwent three surgeries and IR embolization before AHA diagnosis. She was hospitalized for 18 days and received 39 units of blood product. Prednisone and cyclophosphamide were continued after discharge. AHA is a rare cause of PPH. An isolated prolonged activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT) should prompt further workup in postpartum patients with refractory bleeding. Rapid recognition of AHA can prevent significant morbidity related to hemorrhage, massive transfusion, and multiple surgeries.

16.
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med ; 35(26): 10324-10329, 2022 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36170981

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to determine the incidence and characteristics of stillbirths during the initial wave of the Coronavirus 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic and whether or not this differed from the incidence and characteristics of stillbirths that occurred in the pre-pandemic period. STUDY DESIGN: This was a single-center retrospective cohort study of pregnant individuals who delivered stillbirths during two different time periods: March-September in 2017, 2018, and 2019 (pre-COVID-19 pandemic period) and March-September 2020 (COVID-19 pandemic period). RESULTS: No difference in the rate of stillbirths was found between the two time periods. The women who experienced a stillbirth during the pre-pandemic period attended on average more prenatal visits than women who experienced a stillbirth during the pandemic period (p < .05). During the pandemic period, a higher proportion of stillbirths were suspected to be due to poorly controlled hypertension (p = .04). CONCLUSIONS: The incidence of stillbirth during the pandemic period was similar to that during the pre-pandemic period; however, there were more stillbirths that occurred due to poorly controlled hypertension, a potentially preventable cause of stillbirth, during the pandemic period when compared to those of the pre-pandemic period. While the impact of the disease process of COVID-19 on stillbirth remains uncertain, the change in the provision of prenatal care during the pandemic period may have had unintended consequences with respect to the prevention and management of hypertension and the risk of potentially preventable stillbirths.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Hipertensión , Embarazo , Humanos , Femenino , Mortinato/epidemiología , Pandemias , Estudios Retrospectivos , Incidencia , Factores de Riesgo , COVID-19/epidemiología , Hipertensión/epidemiología
17.
J Low Genit Tract Dis ; 15(4): 296-302, 2011 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21959573

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: : In 2006, the American Society for Colposcopy and Cervical Pathology updated evidence-based guidelines recommending screening intervals for women with abnormal cervical cytology diagnosis. In our low-income inner-city population, we sought to improve performance by uniformly applying the guidelines to all patients. We report the prospective performance of a comprehensive tracking, evidence-based algorithmically driven call back, and appointment scheduling system for cervical cancer screening in a resource-limited inner-city population. MATERIALS AND METHODS: : Outreach efforts were formalized with algorithm-based protocols for triage to colposcopy, with universal adherence to evidence-based guidelines. During implementation from August 2006 to July 2008, we prospectively tracked performance using the electronic medical record with administrative and pathology reports to determine performance variables such as the total number of Pap tests, colposcopy visits, and the distribution of abnormal cytology and histology results, including all cervical intraepithelial neoplasia 2, 3 diagnoses. RESULTS: : A total of 86,257 gynecologic visits and 41,527 Pap tests were performed system-wide during this period of widespread and uniform implementation of standard cervical cancer screening guidelines. The number of Pap tests performed per month varied little. The incidence of CIN 1 significantly decreased from 117 (68.4%) of 171 during the first tracked month to 52 (54.7%) of 95 during the last tracked month (p = 0.04). The monthly incidence rate of CIN 2, 3, including incident cervical cancers, did not change. The total number of colposcopy visits declined, resulting in a 50% decrease in costs related to colposcopy services and approximately a 12% decrease in costs related to excisional biopsies. CONCLUSIONS: : Adherence to cervical cancer screening guidelines reduced the number of unnecessary colposcopies without increasing numbers of potentially missed CIN 2, 3 lesions, including cervical cancer. Uniform implementation of administrative-based performance initiatives for cervical cancer screening minimizes differences in provider practices and maximizes performance of screening while containing cervical cancer screening costs.


Asunto(s)
Detección Precoz del Cáncer/métodos , Displasia del Cuello del Útero/diagnóstico , Neoplasias del Cuello Uterino/diagnóstico , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Citas y Horarios , Femenino , Adhesión a Directriz , Hospitales Urbanos , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Guías de Práctica Clínica como Asunto , Adulto Joven
18.
Int J Gynaecol Obstet ; 152(2): 236-241, 2021 Feb.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32839965

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To create, implement, and evaluate the effectiveness of a cesarean delivery checklist on maternal and neonatal outcomes in a rural African hospital. METHODS: Based on input from local authorities, WHO's Safe Surgical Checklist was modified for cesarean delivery and adapted for use in low-resource settings. Retrospective chart review between April and August 2013 in Kibogora Hospital, Nyamasheke, Rwanda, included the first 100 women undergoing cesarean after checklist implementation and the last 100 women undergoing cesarean before implementation. Checklist utilization was determined and degree of completeness assessed. Outcomes were compared between patients for whom the checklist was utilized and patients for whom the checklist was not utilized, in both pre and post-implementation groups. RESULTS: Checklist utilization rate was 83.0% (83/100). Checklist utilization was associated with significant increases in documentation of estimated blood loss (91.6% [76/83] vs 0.9% [1/117], P<0.001) and antibiotic administration before incision (96.4% [80/83] vs 30.8% [36/117], P<0.001). It was also associated with decreased rates of hospitalization longer than the standard 4 days (19.3% [16/83] vs 70.1% [82/117], P<0.001). CONCLUSION: Implementation of a cesarean delivery checklist via a culturally specific and resource-specific strategy resulted in high utilization rates and improved performance in key best practices by healthcare providers.


Asunto(s)
Cesárea/métodos , Lista de Verificación , Tiempo de Internación , Adulto , Femenino , Hospitales , Humanos , Embarazo , Estudios Retrospectivos , Rwanda
19.
Int J Gynaecol Obstet ; 148(1): 87-95, 2020 Jan.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31560131

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To determine the rates of urinary tract infection (UTI) in adolescent users of menstrual pads versus non-users in a rural area of Rwanda. METHODS: An interventional prospective cohort study was conducted at four secondary schools in the Western Province of Rwanda from May 12, 2017 to October 20, 2017. Inclusion criteria were female students aged 18-24 who were menstruating and volunteered to participate in the study. In total, 240 adolescent participants were assigned to two cohorts; 120 received menstrual pads for 6 months and the other 120 did not use pads. Baseline symptoms and urine cultures were obtained. Symptoms and methods of menstrual hygiene management were assessed and urine cultures were obtained every 2 months. The primary outcome was the presence of UTI diagnosed by positive urine culture. Secondary outcomes were symptoms of UTI, vulvovaginal symptoms, sexual activity, dyspareunia, and self-reported sexually transmitted infection. Generalized estimating equations with nesting were used to assess associations of pad use with study outcomes. RESULTS: A total of 209 participants completed the study. There was no difference in rates of positive urine culture. A decreased odds of vulvovaginal symptoms was found in self-reported "always" versus "never" pad users (odds ratio [OR] 0.64, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.43-0.96; P=0.031). CONCLUSIONS: Despite not finding any difference in rates of UTI, the present study showed a decreased rate of vulvovaginal symptoms in users of menstrual pads. Further research investigating rates of genital infections in this population is thus necessary.


Asunto(s)
Productos para la Higiene Menstrual/efectos adversos , Infecciones Urinarias/etiología , Adolescente , Salud del Adolescente , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Femenino , Conocimientos, Actitudes y Práctica en Salud , Humanos , Higiene , Menstruación/fisiología , Estudios Prospectivos , Rwanda , Autoinforme , Adulto Joven
20.
Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM ; 2(3): 100154, 2020 08.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32838260

RESUMEN

The novel coronavirus disease 2019 caused by the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 has become a pandemic. It has quickly swept across the globe, leaving many clinicians to care for infected patients with limited information about the disease and best practices for care. Our goal is to share our experiences of caring for pregnant and postpartum women with novel coronavirus disease 2019 in New York, which is the coronavirus disease 2019 epicenter in the United States, and review current guidelines. We offer a guide, focusing on inpatient management, including testing policies, admission criteria, medical management, care for the decompensating patient, and practical tips for inpatient antepartum service management.


Asunto(s)
Prueba de COVID-19 , COVID-19 , Parto Obstétrico , Atención Posnatal , Complicaciones Infecciosas del Embarazo , Atención Prenatal , Adulto , COVID-19/sangre , COVID-19/diagnóstico , COVID-19/epidemiología , COVID-19/terapia , Prueba de COVID-19/métodos , Parto Obstétrico/métodos , Parto Obstétrico/tendencias , Femenino , Humanos , Transmisión Vertical de Enfermedad Infecciosa/prevención & control , New York , Servicio de Ginecología y Obstetricia en Hospital/organización & administración , Servicio de Ginecología y Obstetricia en Hospital/tendencias , Manejo de Atención al Paciente/métodos , Manejo de Atención al Paciente/organización & administración , Manejo de Atención al Paciente/tendencias , Atención Posnatal/métodos , Atención Posnatal/normas , Guías de Práctica Clínica como Asunto , Embarazo , Complicaciones Infecciosas del Embarazo/sangre , Complicaciones Infecciosas del Embarazo/epidemiología , Complicaciones Infecciosas del Embarazo/terapia , Complicaciones Infecciosas del Embarazo/virología , Atención Prenatal/métodos , Atención Prenatal/normas , SARS-CoV-2/aislamiento & purificación
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA