Volatile versus propofol sedation after cardiac valve surgery: a single-center prospective randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Optimal intensive care of patients undergoing valve surgery is a complex balancing act between sedation for monitoring and timely postoperative awakening. It remains unclear, if these requirements can be fulfilled by volatile sedations in intensive care medicine in an efficient manner. Therefore, this study aimed to assess the time to extubation and secondary the workload required. METHODS: We conducted a prospective randomized single-center trial at a tertiary university hospital to evaluate the postoperative management of open valve surgery patients. The study was randomized with regard to the use of volatile sedation compared to propofol sedation. Sedation was discontinued 60 min after admission for critical postoperative monitoring. RESULTS: We observed a significantly earlier extubation (91 ± 39 min vs. 167 ± 77 min; p < 0.001), eye-opening (86 ± 28 min vs. 151 ± 71 min; p < 0.001) and command compliance (93 ± 38 min vs. 164 ± 75 min; p < 0.001) using volatile sedation, which in turn was associated with a significantly increased workload of a median of 9:56 min (± 4:16 min) set-up time. We did not observe any differences in complications. Cardiopulmonary bypass time did not differ between the groups 101 (IQR 81; 113) versus 112 (IQR 79; 136) minutes p = 0.36. CONCLUSIONS: Using volatile sedation is associated with few minutes additional workload in assembling and enables a significantly accelerated evaluation of vulnerable patient groups. Volatile sedation has considerable advantages and emerges as a safe sedation technique in our vulnerable study population. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinical trials registration (NCT04958668) was completed on 1 July 2021.

Use of cell salvage in obstetrics in Germany: analysis of national database of 305 610 cases with peripartum haemorrhage.

BACKGROUND: One of the leading causes of maternal death worldwide is severe obstetric haemorrhage after childbirth. Use of intraoperative cell salvage is strongly recommended by international guidelines on patient blood management. Recent data provide strong evidence that use of cell salvage in obstetrics is effective and safe in women with postpartum haemorrhage resulting in fewer transfusion-related adverse events and shorter hospital stay. We retrospectively analysed the use of cell salvage in bleeding women during delivery for a period of 10 yr in German hospitals. METHODS: Data from the German Federal Statistical Office were used that covers all in-hospital birth deliveries from 2011 to 2020. Prevalence of peripartum haemorrhage (pre-, intra-, and post-partum haemorrhage), comorbidities, peripartum complications, administration of blood products, and use of cell salvage were analysed. RESULTS: Of 6 356 046 deliveries in Germany, 305 610 women (4.8%) suffered from peripartum haemorrhage. Of all women with peripartum haemorrhage, postpartum haemorrhage was the main cause for major obstetric haemorrhage (92.33%). Cell salvage was used in only 228 (0.07%) of all women with peripartum haemorrhage (cell salvage group). In women undergoing Caesarean delivery with postpartum haemorrhage, cell salvage was used in only 216 out of 70 450 women (0.31%). CONCLUSION: Cell salvage during peripartum haemorrhage is rarely used in Germany. There is tremendous potential for the increased use of cell salvage in peripartum haemorrhage nationwide.

Effect of using smaller blood volume tubes and closed blood collection devices on total blood loss in patients undergoing major cardiac and vascular surgery.

BACKGROUND: Diagnostic laboratory tests are an integral part of managing hospitalized patients. In particular, patients in the intensive care units (ICUs) can experience a concerning amount of blood loss due to diagnostic testing, which can increase the risk developing iatrogenic anemia. Several interventions exist to curtail avoidable blood loss, for example computerized decision support, smaller phlebotomy tubes, and other blood conservation devices. Nevertheless, use of these interventions is not standardized. Therefore, the objective of our study was to quantify the daily phlebotomy volume taken from patients who had undergone major cardiac or vascular surgery. METHODS: We estimated the number of blood analyses and volumes of drawn blood of 400 consecutive patients (≥ 18 yr) undergoing major cardiac or vascular surgery. The amount of blood saved using small-volume tubes and in combination with blood conservation device rather than standard-volume tubes was estimated for serum chemistry (serum), ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA) tubes, sodium citrate coagulation (SCC) tubes, and arterial blood gas (ABG) analysis. RESULTS: The mean total blood loss due to phlebotomy drawing using standard-volume tubes during hospitalization was 167.9 mL (95% confidence interval [CI], 158.0 to 177.8), 255.6 mL (95% CI, 226.5 to 284.6), and 695.3 mL (95% CI, 544.1 to 846.4) for patients undergoing cardiac surgery with a hospital length of stay (LOS) of 0-10, 11-20, and ≥ 21 days, respectively. The mean total blood loss due to phlebotomy during hospitalization was 80.5 mL (95% CI, 70.5 to 90.6), 225.0 mL (95% CI, 135.1 to 314.8 mL) and 470.3 mL (95% CI, 333.5 to 607.1) for vascular surgery patients with LOS 0-10, 11-20, and ≥ 21 days, respectively. Patients with at least a two-day stay at the ICU had a mean blood loss of 146.6 mL (95% CI, 134.6 to 158.6 mL) and those with ≥ 11 days incurred a loss of 1,428 mL (95% CI, 1,117.8 to 1,739.2). The use of closed blood collection device and small-volume tubes (serum, EDTA, SCC, and ABG) reduced blood loss by 82.8 mL for patients with an ICU stay of 2 days and up to 824.0 mL for patients with a ICU stay of ≥ 11 days. CONCLUSION: Diagnostic laboratory tests are associated with significant patient blood loss, but are a modifiable risk factor. The use of small-volume tubes and closed blood collection devices decreases the volume of patient blood drawn for analysis and prevents blood waste.

RéSUMé: CONTEXTE: Les tests diagnostiques de laboratoire font partie intégrante de la prise en charge des personnes hospitalisées. Plus spécifiquement, la patientèle des unités de soins intensifs (USI) peut perdre une quantité inquiétante de sang en raison des tests de diagnostic, ce qui peut augmenter le risque d'anémie iatrogène. Plusieurs interventions existent pour réduire les pertes de sang évitables, par exemple une aide à la décision informatisée, des tubes de phlébotomie plus petits et d'autres dispositifs de conservation du sang. Néanmoins, le recours à ces interventions n'est pas normalisé. Par conséquent, l'objectif de notre étude était de quantifier le volume quotidien de phlébotomie prélevée chez des patient·es ayant bénéficié d'une chirurgie cardiaque ou vasculaire majeure. MéTHODE: Nous avons estimé le nombre d'analyses sanguines et les volumes de sang prélevés de 400 personnes consécutives (≥ 18 ans) bénéficiant d'une chirurgie cardiaque ou vasculaire majeure. La quantité de sang économisée à l'aide de tubes de petit volume et en combinaison avec un dispositif de conservation du sang plutôt que des tubes de volume standard a été estimée pour la chimie sérique (sérum), les tubes d'acide éthylène-diamine-tétra-acétique (EDTA), les tubes de coagulation au citrate de sodium (CCS) et l'analyse des gaz du sang artériel (GSA). RéSULTATS: La perte sanguine totale moyenne due au prélèvement de phlébotomie à l'aide de tubes de volume standard pendant l'hospitalisation était de 167,9 mL (intervalle de confiance [IC] à 95 %, 158,0 à 177,8), 255,6 mL (IC 95 %, 226,5 à 284,6) et 695,3 mL (IC 95 %, 544,1 à 846,4) chez les patient·es bénéficiant d'une chirurgie cardiaque avec une durée de séjour à l'hôpital de 0 à 10, 11 à 20, et ≥ 21 jours, respectivement. La perte sanguine totale moyenne due à la phlébotomie pendant l'hospitalisation était de 80,5 mL (IC 95 %, 70,5 à 90,6), 225,0 mL (IC 95 %, 135,1 à 314,8 mL) et 470,3 mL (IC 95 %, 333,5 à 607,1) chez les patient·es ayant bénéficié d'une chirurgie vasculaire avec des durées de séjour de 0-10, 11-20 et ≥ 21 jours, respectivement. Les patient·es ayant séjourné au moins deux jours à l'USI ont eu une perte de sang moyenne de 146,6 mL (IC 95 %, 134,6 à 158,6 mL) et celles et ceux ayant séjourné ≥ 11 jours ont subi une perte de 1428 mL (IC 95 %, 1117,8 à 1739,2). L'utilisation d'un dispositif de prélèvement sanguin fermé et de tubes de petit volume (sérum, EDTA, SCC et gsa) a réduit la perte de sang de 82,8 mL pour les patient·es ayant séjourné à l'USI 2 jours et jusqu'à 824,0 mL pour les patient·es ayant séjourné en USI ≥ 11 jours. CONCLUSION: Les tests de laboratoire diagnostiques sont associés à une perte de sang importante chez les patient·es, mais constituent un facteur de risque modifiable. L'utilisation de tubes de petit volume et de dispositifs fermés de prélèvement sanguin diminue le volume de sang prélevé pour analyse et prévient le gaspillage de sang.

Current concepts in the use of cell salvage in obstetrics.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: The worldwide leading cause of maternal death is severe maternal hemorrhage. Maternal hemorrhage can be profound leading to an entire loss of blood volume. In the past two decades, Patient Blood Management has evolved to improve patient's care and safety. In surgeries with increased blood loss exceeding 500 ml, the use of cell salvage is strongly recommended in order to preserve the patient's own blood volume and to minimize the need for allogeneic red blood cell (RBC) transfusion. In this review, recent evidence and controversies of the use of cell salvage in obstetrics are discussed. RECENT FINDINGS: Numerous medical societies as well as national and international guidelines recommend the use of cell salvage during maternal hemorrhage. SUMMARY: Intraoperative cell salvage is a strategy to maintain the patient's own blood volume and decrease the need for allogeneic RBC transfusion. Historically, cell salvage has been avoided in the obstetric population due to concerns of iatrogenic amniotic fluid embolism (AFE) or induction of maternal alloimmunization. However, no definite case of AFE has been reported so far. Cell salvage is strongly recommended and cost-effective in patients with predictably high rates of blood loss and RBC transfusion, such as women with placenta accreta spectrum disorder. However, in order to ensure sufficient practical experience in a multiprofessional obstetric setting, liberal use of cell salvage appears advisable.

Current concepts in postpartum anemia management.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Postpartum anemia (PPA) is common in women after childbirth and affects about 50-80% of all women worldwide. Iron deficiency (ID) is the main cause for anemia and constitutes a potentially preventable condition with great impact on the mother's physical and mental condition after delivery. In most cases, PPA is associated with antenatal ID and peripartum blood losses. Numerous published studies confirmed the positive effect of PPA diagnosis and treatment. RECENT FINDINGS: Iron deficiency as well as iron deficiency anemia (IDA) are common in the postpartum period and represent significant health problems in women of reproductive age. SUMMARY: Important movements towards early detection and therapy of postpartum anemia have been observed. However, postpartum anemia management is not implemented on a large scale as many healthcare professionals are not aware of the most recent findings in the field. Diagnosis and therapy of PPA, particularly iron supplementation in ID and IDA, has proven to be highly effective with a tremendous effect on women's wellbeing and outcome.

Treatment of very elderly glioblastoma patients ≥ 75 years of age: whom to treat.

PURPOSE: The prognosis of patients ≥ 75 years suffering from glioblastoma is poor. Novel therapies are usually reserved for patients ≤ 70 years. In an aging population, treatment of very elderly patients remains a challenge. METHODS: Between 2010 and 2018, a total of 977 glioblastoma patients were treated at our institution. Of these, 143 patients were ≥ 75 years at diagnosis. Primary procedure was surgical resection or biopsy followed by adjuvant treatment, whenever possible. We retrospectively investigated overall survival (OS) and potential prognostic factors influencing survival, including Karnofsky Performance Status (KPS), surgical therapy, adjuvant therapy as well as MGMT promotor status. RESULTS: In very elderly patients, median age was 79 years (range: 75-110). Biopsy only was performed in 104 patients; resection was performed in 39 patients. Median OS for the entire cohort was 5.9 months. Univariate analysis showed that KPS at presentation (≥ 70 vs. ≤60), surgery vs. biopsy, adjuvant chemotherapy and adjuvant radiotherapy were significantly associated with OS (6 vs. 3, p < 0.0111; 12 vs. 4, p = 0.0011; 11 vs. 4, p = 0.0003 and 10 vs. 1.5 months, p < 0.0001, respectively). Multivariate analysis confirmed adjuvant radiotherapy (p < 0.0001) and chemotherapy (p = 0.0002) as independent factors influencing OS. CONCLUSION: For very elderly patients, the natural course of disease without treatment is devastating. These patients benefit from multimodal treatment including adjuvant radiotherapy and chemotherapy. A beneficial effect of resection has not been demonstrated. Treatment options and outcomes should be thoughtfully discussed before treatment decisions are made.

Rise of public e-learning opportunities in the context of COVID-19 pandemic-induced curtailment of face-to-face courses, exemplified by epidural catheterization on YouTube.

BACKGROUND: In the context of the coronavirus pandemic, countless face-to-face events as well as medical trainings were cancelled or moved to online courses, which resulted in increased digitalization in many areas. In the context of medical education, videos provide tremendous benefit for visualizing skills before they are practised. METHODS: Based on a previous investigation of video material addressing epidural catheterization available on the YouTube platform, we aimed to investigate new content produced in the context of the pandemic. Thus, a video search was conducted in May 2022. RESULTS: We identified twelve new videos since the pandemic with a significant improvement in the new content in terms of procedural items (p = 0.03) compared to the prepandemic video content. Video content released in the course of the COVID-19 pandemic was more often created by private content creators and were significantly shorter in total runtime than those from university and medical societies (p = 0.04). CONCLUSION: The profound changes in the learning and teaching of health care education in relation to the pandemic are largely unclear. We reveal improved procedural quality of predominantly privately uploaded content despite a shortened runtime compared to the prepandemic period. This might indicate that technical and financial hurdles to producing instructional videos by discipline experts have decreased. In addition to the teaching difficulties caused by the pandemic, this change is likely to be due to validated manuals on how to create such content. The awareness that medical education needs to be improved has grown, so platforms offer specialized sublevels for high-quality medical videos.

Current concepts in preoperative anemia management in obstetrics.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: The purpose of this article is to provide an overview of currently recommended treatment approaches for anemia during pregnancy, with a special focus on iron deficiency and iron deficiency anemia (IDA). RECENT FINDINGS: As consistent patient blood management (PBM) guidelines in obstetrics are still lacking, recommendations regarding the timing of anemia screening and the treatment recommendations for iron deficiency and IDA during pregnancy are still controversial. Based on increasing evidence, early screening for anemia and iron deficiency should be recommended at the beginning of each pregnancy. To reduce maternal and fetal burden, any iron deficiency, even without anemia, should be treated as early as possible during pregnancy. While oral iron supplements administered every other day are the standard treatment in the first trimester, the use of intravenous iron supplements is increasingly suggested from the second trimester onwards. SUMMARY: The treatment of anemia, and more specifically iron deficiency anemia during pregnancy, holds many possibilities for improvement. The fact that the period of risk is known well in advance and thus there is a long optimization phase is per se an ideal prerequisite for the best possible therapy of treatable causes of anemia. Standardization of recommendations and guidelines for screening and treatment of IDA in obstetrics is required for the future. In any case, a multidisciplinary consent is the precondition for a successfully implementation of anemia management in obstetrics to establish an approved algorithm easily enabling detection and treatment of IDA during pregnancy.

[Obstetric Anesthesia]. / Geburtshilfliche Anästhesie.

Patient safety and reduction of possible complications are the top priorities for anesthesiologists in everyday clinical practice. Thus, interdisciplinary early assessment and optimization of patient specific medical conditions and risk factors are crucial. In obstetrics, regional anesthesia and general anesthesia are routinely being performed. To ensure maternal and fetal safety, knowledge regarding physiological changes during pregnancy is highly important. Regional anesthesia, particularly epidural analgesia, has its main field of application in the context of natural birth in the delivery room. Spinal anesthesia, as well as epidural and combined spinal-epidural anesthesia (CSE) are widely used for caesarean section. In this context, special attention should be paid to possible bleeding disorders. The combination of risk stratification and strategies to improve the patient's preoperative medical status is capable to reduce maternal and fetal complications.

Physician's Subjective Increase in Awareness towards Perioperative Anaemia, Patient's Blood Resource, and Transfusion after the Implementation of Patient Blood Management: A Nationwide Multicentre Survey.

INTRODUCTION: Patient blood management (PBM) is a clinical and multidisciplinary, 3-pillar concept. The aim of this study was to detect the subjective increase in physician's awareness towards perioperative anaemia, patient's blood resource, and transfusion after the implementation of PBM in German hospitals. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A survey among 56 hospitals from the German PBM Network group was conducted from October 27 to December 19, 2020. An electronic questionnaire with 28 questions was sent to the local PBM coordinator for the distribution at the hospital level. For assessment of the physician's subjective increase in awareness, numeric rating scales (0 [no increase] - 10 [maximum increase]) were used. RESULTS: In total, 404 clinicians from 56 hospitals completed the survey. The mean (±standard deviation) time of an existing PBM program was 4.8 (±2.2) years. The physician's subjective increase in awareness towards anaemia (8.2 [±2.0]), patient's blood resource (7.6 [±2.5]), and transfusion (8.1 [±1.9]) was the highest in physicians from hospitals with ≥21 implemented PBM measures. In addition, a subjective increase in awareness towards anaemia (6.6 [±3.3]), patient's blood resource (7.0 [±3.3]), and transfusion (6.6 [±3.4]) was the highest in physicians with daily PBM contact. CONCLUSION: Results suggest that physician's awareness towards perioperative anaemia, patient's blood resource, and transfusion has increased, depending on the hospital's number of implemented PBM measures and physician's PBM contact in everyday clinical practice.

Preoperative anaemia and red blood cell transfusion in patients with aneurysmal subarachnoid and intracerebral haemorrhage - a multicentre subanalysis of the German PBM Network Registry.

PURPOSE: Anaemia is common in patients presenting with aneurysmal subarachnoid (aSAH) and intracerebral haemorrhage (ICH). In surgical patients, anaemia was identified as an idenpendent risk factor for postoperative mortality, prolonged hospital length of stay (LOS) and increased risk of red blood cell (RBC) transfusion. This multicentre cohort observation study describes the incidence and effects of preoperative anaemia in this critical patient collective for a 10-year period. METHODS: This multicentre observational study included adult in-hospital surgical patients diagnosed with aSAH or ICH of 21 German hospitals (discharged from 1 January 2010 to 30 September 2020). Descriptive, univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to investigate the incidence and association of preoperative anaemia with RBC transfusion, in-hospital mortality and postoperative complications in patients with aSAH and ICH. RESULTS: A total of n = 9081 patients were analysed (aSAH n = 5008; ICH n = 4073). Preoperative anaemia was present at 28.3% in aSAH and 40.9% in ICH. RBC transfusion rates were 29.9% in aSAH and 29.3% in ICH. Multivariate analysis revealed that preoperative anaemia is associated with a higher risk for RBC transfusion (OR = 3.25 in aSAH, OR = 4.16 in ICH, p < 0.001), for in-hospital mortality (OR = 1.48 in aSAH, OR = 1.53 in ICH, p < 0.001) and for several postoperative complications. CONCLUSIONS: Preoperative anaemia is associated with increased RBC transfusion rates, in-hospital mortality and postoperative complications in patients with aSAH and ICH. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov , NCT02147795, https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02147795.

Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation in coronavirus disease 2019: A nationwide cohort analysis of 4279 runs from Germany.

BACKGROUND: In the context of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, many retrospective single-centre or specialised centre reports have shown promising mortality rates with the use of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) therapy. However, the mortality rate of an entire country throughout the COVID-19 pandemic remains unknown. OBJECTIVES: The primary objective is to determine the hospital mortality in COVID-19 patients receiving venovenous ECMO (VV-ECMO) and veno-arterial ECMO (VA-ECMO) therapy. Secondary objectives are the chronological development of mortality during the pandemic, the analysis of comorbidities, age and complications. DESIGN: Cohort study. SETTING: Inpatient data from January 2020 to September 2021 of all hospitals in Germany were analysed. PARTICIPANTS: All COVID-19-positive patients who received ECMO therapy were analysed according to the appropriate international statistical classification of diseases and related health problem codes (ICDs) and process key codes (OPSs). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcome was the hospital mortality. RESULTS: In total, 4279 COVID-19-positive patients who received ECMO therapy were analysed. Among 404 patients treated with VA-ECMO and 3875 treated with VV-ECMO, the hospital mortality was high: 72% (n = 291) for VA-ECMO and 65.9% (n = 2552) for VV-ECMO. A total of 43.2% (n = 1848) of all patients were older than 60 years with a hospital mortality rate of 72.7% (n = 172) for VA-ECMO and 77.6% (n = 1301) for VV-ECMO. CPR was performed in 44.1% (n = 178) of patients with VA-ECMO and 16.4% (n = 637) of patients with VV-ECMO. The mortality rates widely varied from 48.1 to 84.4% in individual months and worsened from March 2020 (59.2%) to September 2021 (78.4%). CONCLUSION: In Germany, a large proportion of elderly patients with COVID-19 were treated with ECMO, with an unacceptably high hospital mortality. Considering these data, the unconditional use of ECMO therapy in COVID-19 must be carefully considered and advanced age should be considered as a relative contraindication.

[Preoperative Assessment and Improvement of Patient's Medical Conditions]. / Outcome-relevante Anästhesiologie: präoperative Vorbereitung und Optimierung.

Patient safety and reduction of postoperative complications are the top priorities for anaesthesiologists in everyday clinical practice. Therefore, preoperative assessment and optimization of patient specific risk factors are crucial for reduction of postoperative morbidity and mortality. Understanding the patient's medical history and clinical examination represent the two most important aspects of preoperative patient evaluation by the anaesthesiologist. In addition, there are several clinical scores to specify the patient's individual perioperative risk according to the existing comorbidities. These specific assessment tools are easily accessible and have proven effective in everyday clinical practice. Special attention should be paid to preoperative cardiac, respiratory and metabolic conditions. The combination of risk stratification and strategies to improve the patient's preoperative medical status are capable to reduce complications in the postoperative period.

The visually estimated blood volume in scaled canisters based on a simulation study.

BACKGROUND: The most common technique used worldwide to quantify blood loss during an operation is the visual assessment by the attending intervention team. In every operating room you will find scaled suction canisters that collect fluids from the surgical field. This scaling is commonly used by clinicians for visual assessment of intraoperative blood loss. While many studies have been conducted to quantify and improve the inaccuracy of the visual estimation method, research has focused on the estimation of blood volume in surgical drapes. The question whether and how scaling of canisters correlates with actual blood loss and how accurately clinicians estimate blood loss in scaled canisters has not been the focus of research to date. METHODS: A simulation study with four "bleeding" scenarios was conducted using expired whole blood donations. After diluting the blood donations with full electrolyte solution, the sample blood loss volume (SBL) was transferred into suction canisters. The study participants then had to estimate the blood loss in all four scenarios. The difference to the reference blood loss (RBL) per scenario was analyzed. RESULTS: Fifty-three anesthetists participated in the study. The median estimated blood loss was 500 ml (IQR 300/1150) compared to the RBL median of 281.5 ml (IQR 210.0/1022.0). Overestimations up to 1233 ml were detected. Underestimations were also observed in the range of 138 ml. The visual estimate for canisters correlated moderately with RBL (Spearman's rho: 0.818; p < 0.001). Results from univariate nonparametric confirmation statistics regarding visual estimation of canisters show that the deviation of the visual estimate of blood loss is significant (z = - 10.95, p < 0.001, n = 220). Participants' experience level had no significant influence on VEBL (p = 0.402). CONCLUSION: The discrepancies between the visual estimate of canisters and the actual blood loss are enormous despite the given scales. Therefore, we do not recommend estimating the blood loss visually in scaled suction canisters. Colorimetric blood loss estimation could be a more accurate option.

Comparison of common perioperative blood loss estimation techniques: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Estimating intraoperative blood loss is one of the daily challenges for clinicians. Despite the knowledge of the inaccuracy of visual estimation by anaesthetists and surgeons, this is still the mainstay to estimate surgical blood loss. This review aims at highlighting the strengths and weaknesses of currently used measurement methods. A systematic review of studies on estimation of blood loss was carried out. Studies were included investigating the accuracy of techniques for quantifying blood loss in vivo and in vitro. We excluded nonhuman trials and studies using only monitoring parameters to estimate blood loss. A meta-analysis was performed to evaluate systematic measurement errors of the different methods. Only studies that were compared with a validated reference e.g. Haemoglobin extraction assay were included. 90 studies met the inclusion criteria for systematic review and were analyzed. Six studies were included in the meta-analysis, as only these were conducted with a validated reference. The mixed effect meta-analysis showed the highest correlation to the reference for colorimetric methods (0.93 95% CI 0.91-0.96), followed by gravimetric (0.77 95% CI 0.61-0.93) and finally visual methods (0.61 95% CI 0.40-0.82). The bias for estimated blood loss (ml) was lowest for colorimetric methods (57.59 95% CI 23.88-91.3) compared to the reference, followed by gravimetric (326.36 95% CI 201.65-450.86) and visual methods (456.51 95% CI 395.19-517.83). Of the many studies included, only a few were compared with a validated reference. The majority of the studies chose known imprecise procedures as the method of comparison. Colorimetric methods offer the highest degree of accuracy in blood loss estimation. Systems that use colorimetric techniques have a significant advantage in the real-time assessment of blood loss.

Severe bleeding in the ICU.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Severe bleeding events, which require blood transfusions, are a challenge faced by many critical care physicians on a daily basis. Current transfusion guidelines generally recommend rather strict transfusion thresholds and strategies, which can appear opposing to a patient in need for urgent transfusion at first sight. Moreover, applied guidelines are lacking evidence and specificity for the typical ICU patient population and its comorbidities. Transfusion decisions, which are pivotal for clinical outcome, are often unsatisfactorily based on hemoglobin levels only. RECENT FINDINGS: Recent publications generally support previous studies that a strict transfusion regimen is superior to a liberal one for the majority of cases. Newly developed and easily feasible techniques are currently in clinical trials and have the potential to become a valuable supplementation to hemoglobin-guided decision-making. In addition to the choice of the ideal transfusion strategy, physiological status and comorbidities were found to have a major impact on the outcome of severe bleedings in the ICU. SUMMARY: The body of evidence for ICU-specific transfusion guidelines is scarce. Critical care physicians should properly evaluate their patient's comorbidities and consider extended point-of-care testing for transfusion decisions in indistinct anemic situations. A strict transfusion strategy should, however, be applied whenever possible.

Current concepts in the evaluation and management of preoperative anemia.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: In the past years, patient blood management (PBM) has evolved to improve patient's care and safety. Anemia is one of the most common medical diseases in the world and is an independent risk factor for morbidity and mortality. Iron deficiency is the main cause for anemia and constitutes a potentially preventable condition with a great impact on surgical outcome. However, preoperative anemia management is not yet established in most hospitals. Changing workflows and re-thinking is challenging. Numerous published studies confirmed the positive effect of preoperative anemia diagnosis and treatment recently. RECENT FINDINGS: Iron supplementation in iron-deficient anemic (IDA) patients reduce the need for allogenic blood transfusion thereby improving perioperative outcome. SUMMARY: Since the introduction of PBM programs, important movements towards early detection and therapy of preoperative anemia have been observed. However, preoperative anemia management is not implemented on a large scale as many healthcare professionals are not aware of the most recent findings in the field. Preoperative anemia management, particularly iron supplementation in IDA patients, has proven to be highly effective and has a tremendous effect on patient safety and outcome.

Implementation of an anaemia walk-in clinic: Feasibility and preliminary data from the Orthopedic University Hospital.

BACKGROUND: Approximately one in three patients suffers from preoperative anaemia. Even though haemoglobin is measured before surgery, anaemia management is not implemented in every hospital. OBJECTIVE: Here, we demonstrate the implementation of an anaemia walk-in clinic at an Orthopedic University Hospital. To improve the diagnosis of iron deficiency (ID), we examined whether reticulocyte haemoglobin (Ret-He) could be a useful additional parameter. MATERIAL AND METHODS: In August 2019, an anaemia walk-in clinic was established. Between September and December 2019, major orthopaedic surgical patients were screened for preoperative anaemia. The primary endpoint was the incidence of preoperative anaemia. Secondary endpoints included Ret-He level, red blood cell (RBC) transfusion rate, in-hospital length of stay and anaemia at hospital discharge. RESULTS: A total of 104 patients were screened for anaemia. Preoperative anaemia rate was 20.6%. Intravenous iron was supplemented in 23 patients. Transfusion of RBC units per patient (1.7 ± 1.2 vs. 0.2 ± 0.9; p = 0.004) and hospital length of stay (13.1 ± 4.8 days vs. 10.6 ± 5.1 days; p = 0.068) was increased in anaemic patients compared to non-anaemic patients. Ret-He values were significantly lower in patients with ID anaemia (33.3 pg [28.6-40.2 pg]) compared to patients with ID (35.3 pg [28.9-38.6 pg]; p = 0.015) or patients without anaemia (35.4 pg [30.2-39.4 pg]; p = 0.001). CONCLUSION: Preoperative anaemia is common in orthopaedic patients. Our results proved the feasibility of an anaemia walk-in clinic to manage preoperative anaemia. Furthermore, our analysis supports the use of Ret-He as an additional parameter for the diagnosis of ID in surgical patients.