The Durability of Atrial Fibrillation Ablation Using an Oesophageal Temperature Cut-Off of 38°C.

BACKGROUND: A lower cut-off of the oesophageal temperature (ET) during catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation (AF) should be safer, but its durability may become in question. We evaluated an ET cut-off of 38°C with an output of 25W on the posterior wall. METHODS: In 636 consecutive patients (age: 60±10years, male: 542, paroxysmal AF: 405, CHADS2 score: 0.7±0.9), an ET probe was utilised in 303 patients (259 pulmonary vein isolations [PVIs] and 44 simultaneous isolations of the posterior wall and all PVs box isolations [BOXIs]). When the ET increased to >38°C, the radiofrequency delivery was switched off and the ablation point was tagged as an "EsoTag" by the CARTO™ system (Biosense Webster, Irvine, CA, USA). We analysed the characteristics of the ablation lesions at the EsoTags with respect to the dormant conduction, gaps in the redo-session, and ablation outcome. RESULTS: EsoTags were identified in 94.6% of the left PVIs and all BOXIs, and dormant conduction at the EsoTags was identified in 12.0% and 6.8%, respectively. In 10,796 ablation points, the ablation at the EsoTags that were associated with dormant conduction had a significantly shorter duration, smaller force-time integral, and smaller Δimpedance. The duration of an ET of >38°C was significantly and positively correlated with the body mass index and negatively with the left atrial appendage flow velocity. During the redo-sessions in a 10.5±6.0months of follow-up (PVI: 14.7%, BOXI: 11.4%), reconnections at the EsoTags with dormant conduction were observed only in two patients after the PVI. The AF survival rate did not significantly differ in the presence of dormant conduction at the EsoTags (83.1% vs. 75.0%, p=0.696). There were no patients hospitalised for gastroparesis. CONCLUSIONS: Atrial fibrillation ablation utilising an oesophageal temperature cut-off of 38°C might be safe and durable.

Diagnostic Accuracy of Commercially Available Automated External Defibrillators.

BACKGROUND: Although automated external defibrillators (AEDs) have contributed to a better survival of out-of-hospital cardiac arrests, there have been reports of their malfunctioning. We investigated the diagnostic accuracy of commercially available AEDs using surface ECGs of ventricular fibrillation (VF), ventricular tachycardia (VT), and supraventricular tachycardia (SVT). METHODS AND RESULTS: ECGs(VF 31, VT 48, SVT 97) were stored during electrophysiological studies and transmitted to 4 AEDs, the LifePak CR Plus (CR Plus), HeartStart FR3 (FR3), and CardioLife AED-2150 (CL2150) and -9231 (CL9231), through the pad electrode cables. For VF, the CL2150 and CL9231 advised shocks in all cases, and the CR Plus and FR3 advised shocks in all but one VF case. For VTs faster than 180 bpm, the ratios for advising shocks were 79%, 36%, 89%, and 96% for the CR Plus, FR3, CL2150, and CL9231, respectively. The FR3 and CR Plus did not advise shocks for narrow QRS SVTs, whereas the CL9231 tended to treat high-rate tachycardias faster than 180 bpm even with narrow QRS complexes. The characteristics of the shock advice for the FR3 differed from that for the CL9231 (kappa coefficient [κ]=0.479, P<0.001), and the CR Plus and CL2150 had characteristics somewhere between the 2 former AEDs (κ=0.818, P<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Commercially available AEDs diagnosed VF almost always correctly. For VT and SVT diagnoses, a discrepancy was evident among the 4 investigated AEDs. The differences in the arrhythmia diagnosis algorithms for differentiating SVT from VT were thought to account for these differences.

Predictive factors of lead failure in patients implanted with cardiac devices.

INTRODUCTION: Lead failures (LFs) are one of the most common complications in patients implanted with cardiovascular implantable electronic devices. LFs often cause serious secondary complications such as inappropriate ICD shocks or asystole. This study aimed to identify the clinical factors associated with the occurrence of LFs. METHODS: A total of 735 consecutive device implantations (mean age 67±15years, males 64%) performed at a single university hospital setting from 1997 to 2014 were included. The implanted devices consisted of 421 pacemakers, 250 implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICD), 9 cardiac resynchronization therapy pacemakers (CRT-P), and 55 CRT defibrillators (CRT-D). The primary endpoint was the development of an LF. RESULTS: During a mean duration of 5.8±4.3years, 38 LFs developed in 31 patients (mean age 56±14years). LFs included 32 ICD (7 Sprint Fidelis, 2 Riata), and 6 pacing leads. Nine patients received inappropriate ICD shocks and 1 had syncope due to an LF. All patients underwent lead reinsertions with device replacements. Eight patients required opposite site implantations due to venous occlusions. The predictive factors of LFs were the age, male sex, taller body length, ICD vs. pacemaker, lesser lead number, extra-thoracic puncture of the axillary vein vs. a cut-down of the cephalic vein, use of recalled leads and patients with idiopathic ventricular fibrillation (IVF) and Brugada syndrome (BrS). CONCLUSION: LFs occurred mainly with ICD leads. A lesser age, the puncture method, lead model, and diagnosis of IVF/BrS were associated with the development of LFs.

Operator-blinded contact force monitoring during pulmonary vein isolation using conventional and steerable sheaths.

BACKGROUND: We performed contact force (CF) monitoring during pulmonary vein (PV) isolation to evaluate CF according to sheath type, catheter position, and inadequate ablation. METHODS: Thirty consecutive patients (paroxysmal atrial fibrillation, 23; CHADS2 score, 0.5 ± 0.7; age, 56 ± 10 years) who underwent PV isolation using a CF-sensing catheter were included. Data for operator-blinded CF, impedance, and duration of the "first touch" (first round of ablation in each PV) was collected. We compared the CF, maximum CF, force-time integral, average impedance, and impedance drop (Δ impedance) between different sheaths (Swartz™ vs. Agilis™) in 12 different catheter positions, and in inadequate first touches requiring additional ablation. RESULTS: A total of 1283 ablation points (Swartz™, 620 points; Agilis™, 663 points) were evaluated. The average CF was significantly higher in the Agilis™ group (17.8 ± 13.0 g) than the Swartz™ group (15.0 ± 12.4 g; P < 0.001), especially in the anterior, inferior-anterior, and inferior-posterior sections of the right PV, and the top of the roof, and calina of the left PV. The Δ impedance showed a mildly significant negative relationship with the average CF (r=-0.206; P<0.001) and with the force-time integral (r = -0.279; P < 0.001). Compared to first touches, the average CF and Δ impedance were significantly smaller in inadequate first touches in the Swartz™ group, but not in the Agilis™ group. CONCLUSIONS: CF for PV isolation was significantly different depending on the position of the catheter and the type of sheath.