Usefulness of risk scores and predictors of atrial fibrillation recurrence after elective electrical cardioversion.

INTRODUCTION: Electrical cardioversion (ECV) is a frequently used procedure for restoring sinus rhythm in atrial fibrillation (AF); however, the rate of recurrence is high. The identification of patients at high risk of recurrence could influence the decision-making process. The present study evaluates the predictive value of risk scores in atrial fibrillation recurrence after elective electrical cardioversion. METHODS: Unicentric, observational, and prospective study of adult patients who have undergone an elective ECV as rhythm control strategy between July 2017 and September 2022. RESULTS: From the 283 analyzed patients (mean age 63.95 ± 10.76212, 74.9% male); 99 had paroxysmal AF (35%) and 159 (59%) presented AF recurrence during a follow-up of 6 months. In patients with post-ECV AF recurrence, the period of time from diagnosis until the performance of the procedure was longer (393 ± 891 vs. 195 ± 527, p = .02). No paroxysmal AF (71.3% vs. 57.8%, p = .02) and LA dilatation with >40 mL/m2 (35.9% vs. 23.3%, p = .02) volumes were more frequent within these patients. AF recurrence was more frequent in patients who had previous ECV (HR = 1.32; 95% CI: 1.12-2.35; p = .01) and more than 1 shock to recover sinus rhythm (HR = 1.62; 95% CI: 1.07-1.63; p = .01). The SLAC, ALARMEc, ATLAS, and CAAP-AF scores were statistically significant, although with a moderate predictive capacity for post-ECV recurrence. CONCLUSIONS: Risk scores analyzed showed a modest value predicting AF recurrence after ECV. Previous ECV, and greater difficulty in restoring SR were independent predictors of recurrence.

Paradoxical interatrial conduction recovery after cavotricuspid isthmus ablation: A case report.

We present a case of a patient with advanced interatrial block who was admitted for cavotricuspid isthmus ablation as treatment of typical atrial flutter. A baseline advanced interatrial block pattern turned into partial interatrial block pattern and prolonged PR interval after the procedure. We discuss the mechanism underlying that change.

[Red flags of cardiac amyloidosis in patients with spinal stenosis and yellow ligament hypertrophy]. / «Banderas rojas¼ de amiloidosis cardiaca en pacientes con estenosis de canal lumbar e hipertrofia de ligamento amarillo.

INTRODUCTION: Studies addressing the prevalence of cardiac amyloidosis (CA) among patients with spinal stenosis (SS) are lacking. The identification of the red flags (RF) of CA could lead to early detection of cases of CA. The primary objective of this study was to address the prevalence of RF of CA among patients with SS. METHODS: Transversal study including consecutive cases with SS and yellow ligament hypertrophy (YLH). A clinical assessment that included electrocardiogram, echocardiogram and urine and blood test was performed. A clinical suspicion of CA was defined by the presence of left ventricular hypertrophy plus any RF. RESULTS: One hundred and three patients with SS and YLH were assessed. The prevalence of RF was high: heart failure: 18.4%; aortic stenosis: 1.9%; carpal tunnel syndrome: 7.8%; bicipital tendon rupture: 1.9%; arterial hypotension: 17.4%; polyneuropathy symptoms: 51.5%; pseudoinfarction pattern: 3.9%; low voltages: 15.5%; conduction abnormalities: 15.5%; decreased longitudinal strain: 25.3%; apical sparing pattern: 3.9%. The 57.3% of the cohort met the CA suspicion criteria. CONCLUSION: The prevalence of RF of CA is high among patients with SS and YLH. A high proportion of patients met the CA suspicion criteria.

Timing of coronary angiography and use of antiplatelet pretreatment in patients with NSTEACS in Spain.

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES: The optimal timing of coronary angiography in patients admitted with non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome (NSTEACS) as well as the need for pretreatment are controversial. The main objective of the IMPACT-TIMING-GO registry was to assess the proportion of patients undergoing an early invasive strategy (0-24hours) without dual antiplatelet therapy (no pretreatment strategy) in Spain. METHODS: This observational, prospective, and multicenter study included consecutive patients with NSTEACS who underwent coronary angiography that identified a culprit lesion. RESULTS: Between April and May 2022, we included 1021 patients diagnosed with NSTEACS, with a mean age of 67±12 years (23.6% women). A total of 87% of the patients were deemed at high risk (elevated troponin; electrocardiogram changes; GRACE score>140) but only 37.8% underwent an early invasive strategy, and 30.3% did not receive pretreatment. Overall, 13.6% of the patients underwent an early invasive strategy without pretreatment, while the most frequent strategy was a deferred angiography under antiplatelet pretreatment (46%). During admission, 9 patients (0.9%) died, while major bleeding occurred in 34 (3.3%). CONCLUSIONS: In Spain, only 13.6% of patients with NSTEACS undergoing coronary angiography received an early invasive strategy without pretreatment. The incidence of cardiovascular and severe bleeding events during admission was low.

Influence of sex on the timing of coronary angiography and the prescription of antiplatelet therapy in patients with nonST-segment elevation myocardial infarction. / Impacto del sexo en los tiempos de cateterismo y en el uso de pretratamiento antiagregante plaquetario en pacientes con síndrome coronario agudo sin elevación del segmento ST (SCASEST).

OBJECTIVES: To assess differences in the clinical management of nonST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI), including in-hospital events, according to biological sex. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Prospective observational multicenter study of patients diagnosed with NSTEMI and atherosclerosis who underwent coronary angiography. RESULTS: We enrolled 1020 patients in April and May 2022; 240 (23.5%) were women. Women were older than men on average (72.6 vs 66.5 years, P .001), and more women were frail (17.1% vs 5.6%, P .001). No difference was observed in pretreatment with any P2Y12 inhibitor (prescribed in 68.8% of women vs 70.2% of men, P = .67); however, more women than men were prescribed clopidogrel (56% vs 44%, P = .009). Women prescribed clopidogrel were more often under the age of 75 years and not frail. Coronary angiography was performed within 24 hours less corooften in women (29.8% vs 36.9%, P = .03) even when high risk was recognized. Frailty was independently associated with deferring coronary angiography in the adjusted analysis; biological sex by itself was not related. The frequency and type of revascularization were the same in both sexes, and there were no differences in in-hospital cardiovascular events. CONCLUSION: Women were more often prescribed less potent antithrombotic therapy than men. Frailty, but not sex, correlated independently with deferral of coronary angiography. However, we detected no differences in the frequency of coronary revascularization or in-hospital events according to sex.

OBJETIVO: Evaluar las diferencias en el manejo clínico y eventos intrahospitalarios en una cohorte de pacientes con síndrome coronario agudo sin elevación del segmento ST (SCASEST) en función del sexo. METODO: Estudio observacional, prospectivo y multicéntrico que incluyó pacientes consecutivos con diagnóstico de SCASEST sometidos a coronariografía con enfermedad ateroesclerótica responsable. RESULTADOS: Entre abril y mayo de 2022 se incluyeron 1.020 pacientes; de ellos, 240 eran mujeres (23,5%). En comparación con los hombres, las mujeres fueron mayores (72,6 años vs 66,5 años; p 0,001) y más frágiles (17,1% vs 5,6%; p 0,001). No hubo diferencias en el pretratamiento con un inhibidor del receptor P2Y12 (68,8% vs 70,2%, p = 0,67), aunque las mujeres recibieron más pretratamiento con clopidogrel (56% vs 44%, p = 0,009), principalmente aquellas de edad 75 años y sin fragilidad. En las mujeres se realizaron menos coronariografías precoces (# 24 h) (29,8% vs 36,9%; p = 0,03) a pesar de presentar la misma indicación (criterios de alto riesgo). En el análisis ajustado, la fragilidad, pero no el sexo, se asoció de forma independiente con la realización de una coronariografía diferida. La tasa y el tipo de revascularización fue igual en ambos sexos, y no hubo diferencias en los eventos cardiovasculares intrahospitalarios. CONCLUSIONES: Las mujeres recibieron con mayor frecuencia un tratamiento antitrombótico menos potente. La fragilidad y no el sexo se asoció con la realización de coronariografía diferida. Sin embargo, no hubo diferencias en la tasa de revascularización coronaria ni en los eventos intrahospitalarios en función del sexo.

Cardiac amyloidosis in patients with spinal stenosis and yellow ligament hypertrophy.

BACKGROUND: Spinal stenosis (SS) is a manifestation associated with cardiac amyloidosis (CA). However, there is a lack of studies assessing the prevalence of CA among patients with SS. We aimed to address the prevalence of CA among patients with SS and YLH. METHODS: We performed a cross-sectional study of consecutive patients older than 65 years with SS and yellow ligament hypertrophy (YLH). All the patients were assessed with an electrocardiogram, echocardiogram and biohumoral evaluation. Patients with CA red flags was further studied with cardiac magnetic resonance and 99mTc-DPD scintigraphy. A cohort of patients with confirmed CA and SS was used to assess clinical features associated with CA. RESULTS: 105 patients (75.0 ± 6.6 years old; 45.7% males) with SS and YLH [5.5 [5-7] mm] were screened. Prevalence of red flags of CA was high and 58 patients presented clinical suspicion of CA. One patient (0.95%) was finally diagnosed of CA. Patients with confirmed CA presented a more expressive phenotype than the screened population. Patients with suspected CA had greater YLH than patients without suspicion of CA (6.4 ± 1.3 vs. 5.0 ± 0.8 mm; p < 0.001) and patients with confirmed CA presented greater YLH than the screening population (6.7 ± 1.8 vs. 5.7 ± 1.2 mm; p = 0.018). CONCLUSION: Despite red flags of CA are common among patients with SS, the prevalence of confirmed CA was low in our sample of screened patients.

[Cardiovascular disease after COVID-19 infection in elderly patients. Results of annual follow-up of a cohort of survivors]. / Enfermedad cardiovascular tras infección por SARS-CoV-2 en pacientes ancianos. Resultados del seguimiento anual de una cohorte de supervivientes.

INTRODUCTION: Although the effects of SARS-CoV-2 infection on the cardiovascular system is well known in the acute phase, the cardiovascular impact of the elderly population surviving COVID-19 respiratory infection after 1 year of follow-up has not been sufficiently studied. METHODS: Observational registry of 240 elderly patients (75 years or older), consecutively admitted for COVID-19 respiratory infection and survivors of the same, between March 1 and April 30, 2020, at the Hospital General Universitario de Ciudad Real. The incidence of major cardiovascular events [MACE] (cardiovascular death [CD], acute coronary syndrome [ACS], cerebrovascular disease [CVD], venous thromboembolic disease [VTE] and heart failure [HF]) was prospectively analysed. RESULTS: The mean age was 83.75±5.75 years. After a mean follow-up of 352.2±70.4 days, 13.8% of patients died and 9.6% had MACE, the most frequent being heart failure, with no differences in severity or overall course of acute illness. In the multivariate Cox regression model, the risk of developing MACE was higher in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and (HR 4.29; 95%CI 1.62-11.39; P=.003) and loop diuretic (HR 2.99; 95%CI 1.27-7.07; P=.01). CONCLUSIONS: In elderly COVID-19 survivors, the incidence of MACE after one year of follow-up is high, the main manifestation being heart failure.

[Differences among renin-angiotensin system inhibitor drugs in prognosis of hypertense patients with COVID-19]. / Diferencias entre fármacos inhibidores del sistema renina-angiotensina en pacientes hipertensos ingresados por COVID-19.

Introduction: Concerns have been raised about Renin-angiotensin system inhibitors (RASi) in patients with COVID-19. Although recent trials have proved its security, evidence regarding intrinsic differences between RASi is lacking, especially in patients with arterial hypertension. Our objective was to analyse the prognosis of hypertense patients who received angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEi) or angiotensin-2 receptor blockers (ARBs) and were hospitalized due to COVID-19. Materials and methods: 392 consecutive patients with hypertension and COVID-19 were analyse. Incidence of the combined event (death or mechanical ventilation need) was the primary endpoint. Secondary, incidence of each event and time to event were analysed. Results: 155 received ACEi and 237 ARBs. During the hospitalization, the combined event was observed in the 31,6 % of patients. No differences were observed between those previously treated with ACEi and ARBs (33.5 vs. 30.9%; p = 0.51). In the survival analysis, no differences were observed regarding time to combined event (p = 0.91). In-hospital mortality was similar in both groups (32.3 vs. 29.1%; p = 0.51), as well as the need of mechanical ventilation (3.2 vs. 5.9%; p = 0.23). Conclusions: The type of RASi was not associated with in-hospital major events in patients with arterial hypertension hospitalized due to COVID-19.

Introducción: Han surgido dudas sobre la seguridad de los fármacos inhibidores del sistema renina-angiotensina (SRA) en pacientes con enfermedad por coronavirus 2019 (COVID-19). Aunque estudios recientes han demostrado la seguridad de este grupo de fármacos, la evidencia sobre la comparativa de los diferentes fármacos inhibidores del SRA es escasa, sobre todo en pacientes hipertensos. Nuestro objetivo fue analizar el pronóstico de los pacientes hipertensos tratados con inhibidores de la enzima convertidora de angiotensina (IECA) o antagonistas del receptor de angiotensina II (ARA II) que presentaron COVID-19. Materiales y métodos: Se analizaron 582 pacientes hipertensos con COVID-19. Se registró la incidencia del evento combinado de muerte o necesidad de ventilación mecánica invasiva (VMI) durante la hospitalización. De forma secundaria, se analizó la incidencia de eventos de manera independiente y se realizó un análisis de supervivencia para analizar el tiempo hasta los eventos. Resultados: 155 pacientes recibían tratamiento previo con IECA y 237 con ARA II. Durante la hospitalización por COVID-19, se observó una incidencia del evento combinado del 31.6%. No se detectaron diferencias entre los pacientes que recibían tratamiento con IECA y los tratados con ARA II (33.5 vs. 30.9%; p = 0.51). En el análisis de supervivencia, no se hallaron diferencias en el tiempo hasta el evento combinado (p = 0.91). La mortalidad intrahospitalaria fue similar en ambos grupos (32.3 vs. 29.1%; p = 0.51), así como la necesidad de VMI (3.2 vs. 5.9%; p = 0.23). Conclusiones: El tipo de inhibidor del SRA no se asoció a diferencias pronósticas significativas entre los pacientes hipertensos ingresados con COVID-19.

Impact of the creation of specialized units for patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy.

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES: According to current international guidelines, hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) patients should be managed in specialized units. However, there is lack of data on the impact of the creation of these units in the management of HCM patients. Our goal was to assess the impact of the creation of an Inherited Inherited Diseases Cardiac Unit (ICDU) in the current management of patients with HCM. METHODS: We analyzed 114 consecutive patients (62.6±8 years old, 70.2% males) with HCM. Variables related to optimal management of HCM patients and their family study were recorded, as well as guidance on the risk of sudden death. We analyzed whether patients were assessed by the ICDU or at a general cardiology consultation (GCC). RESULTS: 50 patients were assessed in the IDCU and 64 in the GCC. Familial screening was more frequent in patients assessed by the IDCU (45.3% vs. 4%; p<0.01), requesting more genetic studies of the index case (70.3% vs. 14%; p<0.01) and cardiac magnetic resonance (53.1% vs. 18%; p<0.01). Sudden death risk score was performed more frequently in patients after the creation of an IDCU (67.2% vs. 28%; p<0.01). Treatment with beta-blockers was similar in both groups (72% vs. 78.1%; p=0.24). An implantable cardiac defibrillator was indicated similarly in both groups (12.5% in ICDU and 6% in GC; p=0.24). CONCLUSIONS: The implementation of an IDCU improved the quality of the medical care for HCM patients by performing a better study of the patients and their families.

Percutaneous Intervention in Diffuse Coronary Disease: Overlapping Versus Single Very Long Stent Technique. Results From the OVERLONG Registry.

BACKGROUND: Both stent length and stent overlap are associated with worse outcomes in the percutaneous treatment of diffuse coronary artery disease (dCAD). However, evidence comparing these issues is scarce. We aimed to compare the results between the use of single very long stent (VLS) and ≥2 overlapping stents (OS) in the treatment of dCAD. METHODS: Seven hundred twenty-four consecutive lesions were included: 275 treated with a single VLS (≥40 mm) and 449 with ≥2 OS. Procedural characteristics were assessed, and survival analysis was performed to compare the incidence of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE; composite of cardiovascular death, nonfatal myocardial infarction, target lesion revascularization [TLR], or stent thrombosis) during a median follow-up of 31 months. RESULTS: Procedures with VLS required less contrast volume (268 ± 122 vs 302 ± 113 cm3; P < .01), fluoroscopy time (16 ± 8 vs 21 ± 16 minutes; P < .01), and procedure duration (37 ± 18 vs 47 ± 27 minutes; P < .01) than the OS procedures. The VLS group showed lower incidence of MACE (4.4% vs 10.7%; P < .01), driven mainly by lower TLR rate (1.1% vs 4.7%; P < .01). The use of OS was an independent predictor of MACE. CONCLUSIONS: In this study, the use of VLS for the treatment of dCAD was associated with better outcomes compared to OS.

[Mortality and associated prognostic factors in elderly and very elderly hospitalized patients with respiratory disease COVID-19]. / Mortalidad y factores pronósticos asociados en pacientes ancianos y muy ancianos hospitalizados con infección respiratoria COVID-19.

INTRODUCTION: Elderly patients with COVID-19 has a worse clinical evolution, being more susceptible to develop serious manifestations. The differences between the elderly and very elderly population, mortality and associated prognostic factors of SARS-CoV-2 infection have not been enough studied yet. METHODS: An observational study of 416 elderly patients admitted consecutively to Hospital General Universitario de Ciudad Real for COVID-19 respiratory infection from March 1st to April 30th, 2020. Data were collected including patient demographic information, medical history, clinical characteristics, laboratory data, therapeutic interventions and clinical outcomes during the hospitalization and after discharge, until June 15, 2020 with the aim of analyzing mortality, and associated prognostic factors. RESULTS: The mean age was 84.43±5.74 years old; elderly patients (75-84 years) were 50.2% of the sample and very elderly (≥85 years) the remaining 49.8%. In Cox regression model, mortality rate was higher in very elderly group (HR = 2.58; 95% CI: 1.23-5.38; P = .01), hypertensive (HR = 3, 45; 95% CI: 1.13-10.5; P = .03) and chronic kidney disease patients (HR = 3.86; 95% CI: 1.3-11.43; P = .02). In contrast, calcium antagonists (HR = 0.27; 95% CI: 0.12-0.62; P = .002) and anticoagulant therapy during hospitalization (HR = 0.26; 95% CI: 0.08 0, 83; P = .02) were associated with a longer time free of mortality. CONCLUSIONS: Mortality rate was higher in very eldery patients compared with eldery; and in hypertensive and chronic kidney disease patients. Anticoagulation therapy and calcium chanel bloquers treatment during hospitalization were associated with a higher survival in the short-term follow-up in patients hospitalized with COVID-19.

Impact of Treatment with Renin-Angiotensin System Inhibitors on Clinical Outcomes in Hypertensive Patients Hospitalized with COVID-19.

INTRODUCTION: Concerns have been raised about the possible harmfulness of angiotensin-converter enzyme inhibitors (ACEi) and aldosterone receptor blockers (ARB) in patients with COVID-19. However, few data from a European population have been published, especially from hypertensive patients. AIM: To study the association between ACEi or ARB treatments and major adverse outcomes during hospitalisation in COVID-19 patients. METHODS: We studied 545 consecutive hypertensive patients admitted to our institution due to COVID-19 with respiratory involvement. We analysed the incidence of combined event (death or mechanical ventilatory support) during hospitalisation, as well as the time to independent events. RESULTS: 188 (34.5%) patients presented the combined endpoint. 182 (33.4%) patients died, and 21 (3.9%) needed mechanical ventilatory support. Patients with previous treatment with ACEi or ARB presented similar incidence of the combined endpoint during hospitalisation (31.6% vs. 41.8%; p = 0.08), with a lower all-cause mortality rate (30.4% vs. 41.2%; p = 0.03) compared with those without prior treatment. Use of ACEi or ARB was not independently associated with lower incidence of the combined endpoint [Adjusted OR 0.675 (95% CI 0.298-1.528; p = 0.146)], but it was associated with lower mortality [Adjusted OR 0.550 (95% CI 0.304-0.930; p = 0.047)]. CONCLUSIONS: The use of ACEi or ARB was associated with less incidence of all-cause death during hospitalisation among hypertensive patients admitted with COVID-19 respiratory infection.

[Comparative analysis between the use of renin-angiotensin system antagonists and clinical outcomes of hospitalized patients with COVID-19 respiratory infection]. / Análisis de la relación entre los inhibidores del sistema renina-angiotensina y la evolución de pacientes hospitalizados por infección respiratoria COVID-19.

INTRODUCTION: Hypertension has been associated with worse outcomes in patients with COVID-19 infection, so concerns have been raised about the possibility that inhibitors of the renin-angiotensin system (RAS) could influence the prognosis of these patients. METHODS: This is an observational study of 921 consecutive patients admitted with COVID-19 respiratory infection to Hospital General Universitario Ciudad Real from March 1 to April 30, 2020. Following data were collected including patient demographic information, medical history, clinical characteristics, laboratory data, therapeutic interventions during the hospitalization and clinical outcomes. RESULTS: The mean age was 78years, and 59.2% of patients had a history of hypertension. Patients with previous treatment with RAS inhibitor (42.4%) showed lower risk of the primary composite endpoint (mortality or need for invasive mechanical ventilation). Treatment with RAS inhibitor (both outpatient treatment and during hospitalization) had neither effect on mortality nor need for invasive ventilation. There were no differences in time-to-event analysis between groups. CONCLUSIONS: RAS inhibitor treatment prior to admission in patients with COVID-19 respiratory infection was associated with lower risk of the primary composite endpoint and did not show neither impact on mortality nor need for invasive mechanical ventilation, even if these drugs were prescribed during hospitalization.

Comparative analysis between the use of renin-angiotensin system antagonists and clinical outcomes of hospitalized patients with COVID-19 respiratory infection.

INTRODUCTION: Hypertension has been associated with worse outcomes in patients with COVID-19 infection, so concerns have been raised about the possibility that inhibitors of the renin-angiotensin system (RAS) could influence the prognosis of these patients. METHODS: This is an observational study of 921 consecutive patients admitted with COVID-19 respiratory infection to Hospital General Universitario Ciudad Real from March 1 to April 30, 2020. Following data were collected including patient demographic information, medical history, clinical characteristics, laboratory data, therapeutic interventions during the hospitalization and clinical outcomes. RESULTS: The mean age was 78 years, and 59.2% of patients had a history of hypertension. Patients with previous treatment with RAS inhibitor (42.4%) showed lower risk of the primary composite endpoint (mortality or need for invasive mechanical ventilation). Treatment with RAS inhibitor (both outpatient treatment and during hospitalization) had neither effect on mortality nor need for invasive ventilation. There were no differences in time-to-event analysis between groups. CONCLUSIONS: RAS inhibitor treatment prior to admission in patients with COVID-19 respiratory infection was associated with lower risk of the primary composite endpoint and did not show neither impact on mortality nor need for invasive mechanical ventilation, even if these drugs were prescribed during hospitalization.

INTRODUCCIÓN: La presencia de hipertensión arterial se asocia con peor pronóstico en pacientes con COVID-19, y se ha sugerido que el uso de inhibidores del eje renina-angiotensina puede influir en el pronóstico de los pacientes. MÉTODOS: Registro observacional de 921 pacientes consecutivos ingresados por infección respiratoria COVID-19 entre el 1 de marzo y el 30 abril de 2020 en el Hospital General Universitario de Ciudad Real. Se registraron datos clínicos y analíticos, intervenciones terapéuticas y desarrollo de eventos durante el ingreso hospitalario. RESULTADOS: La mediana de edad fue de 78 años y el 59,2% tenían hipertensión arterial. Aunque el perfil clínico fue más desfavorable en el grupo de pacientes con prescripción previa de IECA o ARA2 respecto al resto, los primeros presentaron menor riesgo de desarrollo del evento primario combinado (mortalidad total o necesidad de soporte ventilatorio invasivo). Asimismo, el empleo previo al ingreso o durante el mismo de estos fármacos mostró un efecto neutro sobre la mortalidad total y sobre la necesidad de ventilación mecánica invasiva. En el análisis de supervivencia no se observó mayor riesgo de presentar más precozmente ninguno de los eventos registrados. CONCLUSIONES: La prescripción previa al ingreso por infección respiratoria COVID-19 de inhibidores del eje renina-angiotensina se asoció a un menor riesgo de desarrollo del evento primario combinado y a un efecto neutro sobre la mortalidad total y sobre la necesidad de ventilación mecánica invasiva.

Clinical Prognosis Associated With the Use of Overlapping Stents With Homogenous Versus Heterogeneous Pharmacological Characteristics for the Treatment of Diffuse Coronary Artery Disease.

BACKGROUND: The clinical impact of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and implantation of overlapping stents (OS) using platforms with the same versus different pharmacological characteristics is unknown. Our objective was to compare the outcomes of PCI with OS according to their pharmacological characteristics. METHODS: In this observational single-center registry, we included all PCI performed from April 2014 to December 2018 in which overlapping drug-eluting stents were implanted. Two groups were created according to whether the stents release the same drug [homogeneous: (HO)] or different [heterogeneous: (HE)]. The primary endpoint was the need for target lesion revascularization (TLR). Clinical assessment was performed after the procedure, bianually and at the end of follow-up (June 2019). RESULTS: 381 lesions with OS (HO: 209; HE: 172) were included (75.1% male, 66.7 ±â€¯11.6 years). Clinical presentation was stable coronary artery disease in 49.9%. Syntax score was 23.7 ±â€¯13.3. The number of OS implanted was 2.2 ±â€¯0.5 and the total stent length was 59.5 ±â€¯20.1 mm (HE: 61.5 ±â€¯21.6 vs. HO: 57.8 ±â€¯18.8 mm; p < 0.01). After a median follow-up of 21 months, the HE group showed a lower TLR rate than the HO group (HE:2.3% vs HO:7.2%; p = 0.03). The rates of cardiac death (p = 0.44), myocardial infarction (p = 0.36) and stent thrombosis (p = 0.85) were similar between groups. In the multivariate analysis, the OS with homogeneous-drug devices was an independent predictor of a higher rate of TLR. CONCLUSIONS: PCI using OS with homogeneous pharmacological characteristics was associated with a higher rate of TLR in comparison with the implantation of OS with heterogeneous pharmacological characteristics.

Tiempos de cateterismo y uso de pretratamiento antiagregante plaquetario en pacientes con SCASEST en España / Timing of coronary angiography and use of antiplatelet pretreatment in patients with NSTEACS in Spain

Introducción y objetivos El momento óptimo para un cateterismo en el síndrome coronario agudo sin elevación del segmento ST (SCASEST) y la necesidad de pretratamiento son motivo de controversia. El objetivo principal del registro IMPACT-TIMING-GO es conocer el porcentaje de pacientes examinados con una coronariografía precoz (0-24 h) y que no recibieron doble antiagregación plaquetaria antes del cateterismo (estrategia sin pretratamiento) en España. Métodos Estudio observacional, prospectivo y multicéntrico, que incluyó a pacientes consecutivos con diagnóstico de SCASEST sometidos a cateterismo en los que se evidenció enfermedad coronaria ateroesclerótica causal. Resultados Entre abril y mayo de 2022 se incluyó a 1.021 pacientes (media de edad, 67±12 años; el 23,6% mujeres). El 86,8% de los pacientes cumplían criterios de alto riesgo (elevación de troponina, cambios electrocardiográficos o puntuación GRACE>140); sin embargo, únicamente el 37,8% se sometió a una estrategia invasiva precoz, y el 30,3% no recibió pretratamiento. Globalmente, solo el 13,6% de los pacientes se sometieron a una estrategia invasiva precoz sin un segundo antiagregante plaquetario, y la estrategia diferida con pretratamiento fue la más utilizada (46%). Durante el ingreso, 9 pacientes (0,9%) fallecieron y 34 (3,3%) presentaron una hemorragia grave. Conclusiones En España, solo el 13,6% de los pacientes con SCASEST sometidos a cateterismo reciben una estrategia invasiva precoz sin pretratamiento. La incidencia de eventos cardiovasculares y hemorragias graves en el ingreso es baja. (AU)

Introduction and objectives The optimal timing of coronary angiography in patients admitted with non–ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome (NSTEACS) as well as the need for pretreatment are controversial. The main objective of the IMPACT-TIMING-GO registry was to assess the proportion of patients undergoing an early invasive strategy (0-24hours) without dual antiplatelet therapy (no pretreatment strategy) in Spain. Methods This observational, prospective, and multicenter study included consecutive patients with NSTEACS who underwent coronary angiography that identified a culprit lesion. Results Between April and May 2022, we included 1021 patients diagnosed with NSTEACS, with a mean age of 67±12 years (23.6% women). A total of 87% of the patients were deemed at high risk (elevated troponin; electrocardiogram changes; GRACE score>140) but only 37.8% underwent an early invasive strategy, and 30.3% did not receive pretreatment. Overall, 13.6% of the patients underwent an early invasive strategy without pretreatment, while the most frequent strategy was a deferred angiography under antiplatelet pretreatment (46%). During admission, 9 patients (0.9%) died, while major bleeding occurred in 34 (3.3%). Conclusions In Spain, only 13.6% of patients with NSTEACS undergoing coronary angiography received an early invasive strategy without pretreatment. The incidence of cardiovascular and severe bleeding events during admission was low. (AU)