RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The first surge of the COVID-19 pandemic entirely altered healthcare delivery. Whether this also altered the receipt of high- and low-value care is unknown. OBJECTIVE: To test the association between the April through June 2020 surge of COVID-19 and various high- and low-value care measures to determine how the delivery of care changed. DESIGN: Difference in differences analysis, examining the difference in quality measures between the April through June 2020 surge quarter and the January through March 2020 quarter with the same 2 quarters' difference the year prior. PARTICIPANTS: Adults in the MarketScan® Commercial Database and Medicare Supplemental Database. MAIN MEASURES: Fifteen low-value and 16 high-value quality measures aggregated into 8 clinical quality composites (4 of these low-value). KEY RESULTS: We analyzed 9,352,569 adults. Mean age was 44 years (SD, 15.03), 52% were female, and 75% were employed. Receipt of nearly every type of low-value care decreased during the surge. For example, low-value cancer screening decreased 0.86% (95% CI, -1.03 to -0.69). Use of opioid medications for back and neck pain (DiD +0.94 [95% CI, +0.82 to +1.07]) and use of opioid medications for headache (DiD +0.38 [95% CI, 0.07 to 0.69]) were the only two measures to increase. Nearly all high-value care measures also decreased. For example, high-value diabetes care decreased 9.75% (95% CI, -10.79 to -8.71). CONCLUSIONS: The first COVID-19 surge was associated with receipt of less low-value care and substantially less high-value care for most measures, with the notable exception of increases in low-value opioid use.
Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Anciano , Adulto , Femenino , Humanos , Estados Unidos/epidemiología , Masculino , COVID-19/epidemiología , COVID-19/terapia , Pandemias , Analgésicos Opioides/uso terapéutico , Medicare , Atención AmbulatoriaRESUMEN
Objectives Vital to implementation of the World Health Organization (WHO) Safe Childbirth Checklist (SCC), designed to improve delivery of 28 essential birth practices (EBPs), is the availability of safe birth supplies: 22 EBPs on the SCC require one or more supplies. Mapping availability of these supplies can determine the scope of shortages and need for supply chain strengthening. Methods A cross-sectional survey on the availability of functional and/or unexpired supplies was assessed in 284 public-sector facilities in 38 districts in Uttar Pradesh, India. The twenty-three supplies were categorized into three non-mutually exclusive groups: maternal (8), newborn (9), and infection control (6). Proportions and mean number of supplies available were calculated; means were compared across facility types using t-tests and across districts using a one-way ANOVA. Log-linear regression was used to evaluate facility characteristics associated with supply availability. Results Across 284 sites, an average of 16.9 (73.5%) of 23 basic childbirth supplies were available: 63.4% of maternal supplies, 79.1% of newborn supplies, and 78.7% of infection control supplies. No facility had all 23 supplies available and only 8.5% had all four medicines assessed. Significant variability was observed by facility type and district. In the linear model, facility type and distance from district hospital were significant predictors of higher supply availability. Conclusions for Practice In Uttar Pradesh, more remote sites, and primary and community health centers, were at higher risk of supply shortages. Supply chain management must be improved for facility-based delivery and quality of care initiatives to reduce maternal and neonatal harm.
Asunto(s)
Lista de Verificación , Parto Obstétrico/instrumentación , Parto Obstétrico/normas , Equipos y Suministros/provisión & distribución , Análisis de Varianza , Estudios Transversales , Femenino , Adhesión a Directriz/normas , Instituciones de Salud/economía , Instituciones de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , India , Modelos Lineales , Embarazo , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Organización Mundial de la Salud/organización & administraciónRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate whether the perception of safety of surgical practice among operating room (OR) personnel is associated with hospital-level 30-day postoperative death. BACKGROUND: The relationship between improvements in the safety of surgical practice and benefits to postoperative outcomes has not been demonstrated empirically. METHODS: As part of the Safe Surgery 2015: South Carolina initiative, a baseline survey measuring the perception of safety of surgical practice among OR personnel was completed. We evaluated the relationship between hospital-level mean item survey scores and rates of all-cause 30-day postoperative death using binomial regression. Models were controlled for multiple patient, hospital, and procedure covariates using supervised principal components regression. RESULTS: The overall survey response rate was 38.1% (1793/4707) among 31 hospitals. For every 1 point increase in the hospital-level mean score for respect [adjusted relative risk (aRR) 0.78, 95% CI 0.65-0.93, P = 0.0059], clinical leadership (aRR 0.86, 95% CI 0.74-0.9932, P = 0.0401), and assertiveness (aRR 0.71, 95% CI 0.54-0.93, P = 0.01) among all survey respondents, there were associated decreases in the hospital-level 30-day postoperative death rate after inpatient surgery ranging from 14% to 29%. Higher hospital-level mean scores for the statement, "I would feel safe being treated here as a patient," were associated with significantly lower hospital-level 30-day postoperative death rates (aRR 0.83, 95% CI 0.70-0.97, P = 0.02). Although most findings seen among all OR personnel were seen among nurses, they were often absent among surgeons. CONCLUSIONS: Perception of OR safety of surgical practice was associated with hospital-level 30-day postoperative death rates.
Asunto(s)
Actitud del Personal de Salud , Mortalidad Hospitalaria , Quirófanos/normas , Seguridad del Paciente/normas , Personal de Hospital/psicología , Adolescente , Adulto , Femenino , Encuestas de Atención de la Salud , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Mejoramiento de la Calidad , South Carolina , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To determine whether completion of a voluntary, checklist-based surgical quality improvement program is associated with reduced 30-day postoperative mortality. BACKGROUND: Despite evidence of efficacy of team-based surgical safety checklists in improving perioperative outcomes in research trials, effective methods of population-based implementation have been lacking. The Safe Surgery 2015 South Carolina program was designed to foster state-wide engagement of hospitals in a voluntary, collaborative implementation of a checklist program. METHODS: We compared postoperative mortality rates after inpatient surgery in South Carolina utilizing state-wide all-payer discharge claims from 2008 to 2013, linked with state vital statistics, stratifying hospitals on the basis of completion of the checklist program. Changes in risk-adjusted 30-day mortality were compared between hospitals, using propensity score-adjusted difference-in-differences analysis. RESULTS: Fourteen hospitals completed the program by December 2013. Before program launch, there was no difference in mortality trends between the completion cohort and all others (P = 0.33), but postoperative mortality diverged thereafter (P = 0.021). Risk-adjusted 30-day mortality among completers was 3.38% in 2010 and 2.84% in 2013 (P < 0.00001), whereas mortality among other hospitals (n = 44) was 3.50% in 2010 and 3.71% in 2013 (P = 0.3281), reflecting a 22% difference between the groups on difference-in-differences analysis (P = 0.0021). CONCLUSIONS: Despite similar pre-existing rates and trends of postoperative mortality, hospitals in South Carolina completing a voluntary checklist-based surgical quality improvement program had a reduction in deaths after inpatient surgery over the first 3 years of the collaborative compared with other hospitals in the state. This may indicate that effective large-scale implementation of a team-based surgical safety checklist is feasible.
Asunto(s)
Lista de Verificación/métodos , Mortalidad Hospitalaria/tendencias , Seguridad del Paciente/normas , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/mortalidad , Mejoramiento de la Calidad/tendencias , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Operativos/normas , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Lista de Verificación/normas , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Seguridad del Paciente/estadística & datos numéricos , Evaluación de Programas y Proyectos de Salud , Puntaje de Propensión , Mejoramiento de la Calidad/estadística & datos numéricos , Ajuste de Riesgo , South Carolina , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Operativos/mortalidadRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Surgical procedures in the United States are increasingly performed in the ambulatory setting, including freestanding ambulatory surgery centers (ASCs). However, there is a lack of research and tracking of surgical outcomes in this setting. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We analyzed data from a state all-payer claims database to produce a retrospective cohort study on the rate of acute care use (emergency department [ED] visits and inpatient admissions) within 7 d after operations performed in freestanding ASCs in South Carolina. Two-level reliability-adjusted generalized linear mixed models accounting for random facility-level effects were used to adjust for patient-level and facility-level characteristics. RESULTS: A total of 1,328,708 procedures were performed in 86 freestanding ASCs in South Carolina from 2006-2013. The overall rate of postoperative acute care per 1000 procedures within 7 d was 17.3 (95% confidence interval [CI], 15.3-19.5). Patient characteristics associated with the highest postoperative acute care use within 7 d included Medicaid insurance (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 1.79; 95% CI, 1.70-1.90), lowest median household income (aOR, 1.36; 95% CI, 1.30-1.43), and preoperative Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) score 3+ (aOR, 4.14; 95% CI, 3.95-4.34). Total charges for postoperative ED visits (n = 14,682) and inpatient admissions (n = 8945) within 7 d were approximately $51.4 and $361.1 million, respectively from 2006-2013. CONCLUSIONS: Acute care use within 7 d was commonly ≥10 per 1000 procedures performed in freestanding ASCs in South Carolina. These measures may be targets for quality and cost improvement and innovation. Patients at risk for acute care utilization may benefit from improvements in postoperative follow-up after procedures in ASCs.
Asunto(s)
Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Ambulatorios , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital/estadística & datos numéricos , Cuidados Posoperatorios/estadística & datos numéricos , Centros Quirúrgicos , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Hospitalización/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Modelos Lineales , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Evaluación de Resultado en la Atención de Salud , Estudios Retrospectivos , South Carolina , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Although human papillomavirus (HPV)-associated oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (OPSCC) tends to present at an advanced nodal stage (N stage), the prognosis is generally better than that for HPV-negative OPSCC. Prior work has demonstrated the increasing incidence of HPV-related OPSCC in the United States. This study was designed to determine whether the changing epidemiology of OPSCC is reflected in changes in the prognostic significance of the tumor stage (T stage) and the N stage in a population-based cohort. METHODS: The Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results program was used to identify 13,328 patients who were 18 years old or older and were diagnosed with OPSCC from 1997 to 2008. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate head and neck cancer-specific survival. Cox proportional hazards models were used to evaluate the associations between head and neck cancer-specific mortality (HNCSM) and T and N stages and the interaction of variables with the year of diagnosis. RESULTS: With a median follow-up of 67 months, there were 4099 head and neck cancer deaths. There was a significant interaction between the T stage and time (P for interaction = .01), with the effect of the T stage on HNCSM increasing from 1997 to 2008. The T stage retained a linear relationship with HNCSM. The effect of the N stage on HNCSM declined over time (P for interaction = .0004). The current American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) staging system did not subdivide distinct prognostic subgroups for HNCSM by overall stage. CONCLUSIONS: In this population-based study of OPSCC, the effect of the N stage on cancer-specific mortality decreased over time as the impact of the T stage increased. The current AJCC staging system did not distinguish prognostic subgroups. These changes may reflect the increasing prevalence of HPV-related OPSCC. Further study in HPV-defined cohorts is needed to tailor the AJCC staging system to better reflect HNCSM risk. Cancer 2015;121:2594-2602. © 2015 American Cancer Society.
Asunto(s)
Carcinoma de Células Escamosas/diagnóstico , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas/virología , Ganglios Linfáticos/patología , Neoplasias Orofaríngeas/diagnóstico , Neoplasias Orofaríngeas/virología , Papillomaviridae/aislamiento & purificación , Infecciones por Papillomavirus/complicaciones , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas/patología , Estudios de Cohortes , Diagnóstico Diferencial , Femenino , Humanos , Metástasis Linfática , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estadificación de Neoplasias , Neoplasias Orofaríngeas/patología , Valor Predictivo de las Pruebas , Pronóstico , Programa de VERF , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The primary goal of an operation for rectal cancer is to cure cancer and, where possible, preserve continence. A wide range of sphincter preservation rates have been reported. This study evaluated hospital variation in the use of low anterior resection (LAR), local excision (LE), and abdominoperineal resection (APR) in the treatment of elderly rectal cancer patients. METHODS: Using Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results-Medicare linked data, we identified 4959 patients older than 65 y with stage I-III rectal cancer diagnosed from 2000-2005 who underwent operative intervention at one of 370 hospitals. We evaluated the distribution of hospital-specific procedure rates and used generalized mixed models with random hospital effects to examine the influence of patient characteristics and hospital on operation type, using APR as a reference. RESULTS: The median hospital performed APR on 33% of elderly patients with rectal cancer. Hospital was a stronger predictor of LAR receipt than any patient characteristic, explaining 32% of procedure choice, but not a strong predictor of LE, explaining only 3.8%. Receipt of LE was primarily related to tumor size and tumor stage, which combined explained 31% of procedure variation. CONCLUSIONS: Receipt of LE is primarily determined by patient characteristics. In contrast, the hospital where surgery is performed significantly influences whether a patient undergoes an LAR or APR. Understanding the factors that cause this institutional variation is crucial to ensuring equitable availability of sphincter preservation.
Asunto(s)
Canal Anal/cirugía , Hospitales/estadística & datos numéricos , Tratamientos Conservadores del Órgano/estadística & datos numéricos , Neoplasias del Recto/epidemiología , Neoplasias del Recto/cirugía , Programa de VERF/estadística & datos numéricos , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Comorbilidad , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos del Sistema Digestivo/métodos , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Estadificación de Neoplasias , Perineo/cirugía , Valor Predictivo de las Pruebas , Grupos Raciales/estadística & datos numéricos , Neoplasias del Recto/patología , Factores SocioeconómicosRESUMEN
Aim: Nusinersen, administered by intrathecal injection at a dose of 12 mg, is indicated across all ages for the treatment of spinal muscular atrophy (SMA). Evidence on real-world healthcare resource use (HRU) and costs among patients taking nusinersen remains limited. This study aimed to evaluate real-world HRU and costs associated with nusinersen use through US claims databases. Patients & methods: Using the Merative™ MarketScan® Research Databases, patients with SMA receiving nusinersen were identified from commercial (January 2017 to June 2020) and Medicaid claims (January 2017 to December 2019). Those likely to have complete information on the date of nusinersen initiation and continuous enrollment 12 months pre- and post-index (first record of nusinersen treatment) were retained. Number and costs (US$ 2020) of inpatient admissions and emergency department (ED) visits, unrelated to nusinersen administration, were evaluated for 12 months pre- and post-nusinersen initiation and stratified by age: pediatric (<18 years) and adult (≥18 years). Results: Overall, 103 individuals treated with nusinersen were retained: 59 were pediatric (mean age [range]: 9 [1-17] years), and 44 were adults (30 [18-63] years). Inpatient admissions decreased by 41% for pediatrics and 67% for adults in the 12 months post-treatment versus the 12 months pre-treatment. Average inpatient admission costs per patient for the pediatric cohort decreased by 63% ($22,903 vs $8466) and by 79% ($13,997 vs $2899) for the adult cohort when comparing the 12 months pre-index with the 12 months post-index period. Total ED visits and ED visit costs decreased by 8% and 35%, respectively, for the overall cohort over the 12-month period pre- and post-index. Conclusion: Using US claims databases, nusinersen treatment in pediatric and adult patients was associated with reductions in HRU and costs over a 12-month period post-treatment initiation relative to the pre-treatment period.
RESUMEN
Importance: Patients with limited English proficiency (LEP) face multiple barriers and are at risk for worse health outcomes compared with patients with English proficiency (EP). In sepsis, a major cause of mortality in the US, the association of LEP with health outcomes is not widely explored. Objective: To assess the association between LEP and inpatient mortality among patients with sepsis and test the hypothesis that LEP would be associated with higher mortality rates. Design, Setting, and Participants: This retrospective cohort study of hospitalized patients with sepsis included those who met the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's sepsis criteria, received antibiotics within 24 hours, and were admitted through the emergency department. Data were collected from the electronic medical records of a large New England tertiary care center from January 1, 2016, to December 31, 2019. Data were analyzed from January 8, 2021, to March 2, 2023. Exposures: Limited English proficiency, gathered via self-reported language preference in electronic medical records. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was inpatient mortality. The analysis used multivariable generalized estimating equation models with propensity score adjustment and analysis of covariance to analyze the association between LEP and inpatient mortality due to sepsis. Results: A total of 2709 patients met the inclusion criteria, with a mean (SD) age of 65.0 (16.2) years; 1523 (56.2%) were men and 327 (12.1%) had LEP. Nine patients (0.3%) were American Indian or Alaska Native, 101 (3.7%) were Asian, 314 (11.6%) were Black, 226 (8.3%) were Hispanic, 38 (1.4%) were Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander or of other race or ethnicity, 1968 (72.6%) were White, and 6 (0.2%) were multiracial. Unadjusted mortality included 466 of 2382 patients with EP (19.6%) and 69 of 327 with LEP (21.1%). No significant difference was found in mortality odds for the LEP compared with EP groups (odds ratio [OR], 1.12 [95% CI, 0.88-1.42]). When stratified by race and ethnicity, odds of inpatient mortality for patients with LEP were significantly higher among the non-Hispanic White subgroup (OR, 1.76 [95% CI, 1.41-2.21]). This significant difference was also present in adjusted analyses (adjusted OR, 1.56 [95% CI, 1.02-2.39]). No significant differences were found in inpatient mortality between LEP and EP in the racial and ethnic minority subgroup (OR, 0.99 [95% CI, 0.63-1.58]; adjusted OR, 0.91 [95% CI, 0.56-1.48]). Conclusions and Relevance: In a large diverse academic medical center, LEP had no significant association overall with sepsis mortality. In a subgroup analysis, LEP was associated with increased mortality among individuals identifying as non-Hispanic White. This finding highlights a potential language-based inequity in sepsis care. Further studies are needed to understand drivers of this inequity, how it may manifest in other diverse health systems, and to inform equitable care models for patients with LEP.
Asunto(s)
Dominio Limitado del Inglés , Sepsis , Estados Unidos/epidemiología , Masculino , Humanos , Anciano , Femenino , Etnicidad , Estudios Retrospectivos , Grupos MinoritariosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Professional societies recommend posttreatment surveillance for colorectal cancer (CRC) survivors. This study describes the use of surveillance over time, with a particular focus on racial/ethnic disparities, and also examines the role of area characteristics, such as capacity for CRC screening, on surveillance. METHODS: Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER)-Medicare data were used to identify individuals aged 66 to 85 years who were diagnosed with CRC from 1993 to 2005 and treated with surgery. The study examined factors associated with subsequent receipt of a colonoscopy, carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) testing, primary care (PC) visits, and a composite measure of overall surveillance. RESULTS: Of eligible subjects, 61.0% had a colonoscopy, 68.0% had CEA testing, 77.1% had PC visits, and 43.0% received overall surveillance. After adjustment, blacks were less likely than whites to undergo colonoscopy (odds ratio [OR] 0.76, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.69-0.83) and to receive CEA testing and overall surveillance, whereas white/Hispanic rates did not differ. Rates for all outcomes increased from 1993 to 2005, but black/white disparities remained. Individuals in areas with greatest capacity for CRC screening were more likely (OR = 1.09, 95% CI = 1.02-1.18) to receive colonoscopy, and those in areas with the greatest percentage of blacks were less likely (OR = 0.89, 95% CI = 0.83-0.95) to receive colonoscopy. Those living in areas with shortage of PC were less likely to receive PC visits (OR = 0.55, 95% CI = 0.48-0.64) and overall surveillance (OR = 0.83, 95% CI = 0.71-0.98). CONCLUSIONS: Many CRC survivors do not get recommended surveillance, and black/white disparities in rates of surveillance have not improved. Characteristics of the area where an individual lives contribute to the use of surveillance.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Colorrectales/terapia , Disparidades en Atención de Salud , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Población Negra , Antígeno Carcinoembrionario/análisis , Colonoscopía , Neoplasias Colorrectales/etnología , Neoplasias Colorrectales/cirugía , Femenino , Accesibilidad a los Servicios de Salud , Hispánicos o Latinos , Humanos , Masculino , Sobrevivientes , Población BlancaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Regardless of their age, women who choose to undergo postmastectomy reconstruction report improved quality of life as a result. However, actual use of reconstruction decreases with increasing age. Whereas this may reflect patient preference and clinical factors, it may also represent age-based disparity. METHODS: Women aged 65 years or older who underwent mastectomy for DCIS/stage I/II breast cancer (2000-2005) were identified in the SEER-Medicare database. Overall and institutional rates of reconstruction were calculated. Characteristics of hospitals with higher and lower rates of reconstruction were compared. Pseudo-R² statistics utilizing a patient-level logistic regression model estimated the relative contribution of institution and patient characteristics. RESULTS: A total of 19,234 patients at 716 institutions were examined. Overall, 6 % of elderly patients received reconstruction after mastectomy. Institutional rates ranged from zero to >40 %. Whereas 53 % of institutions performed no reconstruction on elderly patients, 5.6 % performed reconstructions on more than 20 %. Although patient characteristics (%ΔR² = 70 %), and especially age (%ΔR² = 34 %), were the primary determinants of reconstruction, institutional characteristics also explained some of the variation (%ΔR² = 16 %). This suggests that in addition to appropriate factors, including clinical characteristics and patient preferences, the use of reconstruction among older women also is influenced by the institution at which they receive care. CONCLUSIONS: Variation in the likelihood of reconstruction by institution and the association with structural characteristics suggests unequal access to this critical component of breast cancer care. Increased awareness of a potential age disparity is an important first step to improve access for elderly women who are candidates and desire reconstruction.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias de la Mama/cirugía , Carcinoma in Situ/cirugía , Carcinoma Ductal de Mama/cirugía , Mamoplastia/estadística & datos numéricos , Factores de Edad , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Femenino , Accesibilidad a los Servicios de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Hospitales/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Modelos Logísticos , Mastectomía , Análisis Multivariante , Calidad de Vida , Factores Socioeconómicos , Estados UnidosRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: For low-lying rectal cancers, proximal diversion can reduce anastomotic leak after sphincter-preserving surgery; however, evidence suggests that such temporary diversions are often not reversed. We aimed to evaluate nonreversal and delayed stoma reversal in elderly patients undergoing low anterior resection (LAR). DESIGN: SEER-Medicare-linked analysis from 1991-2007. SETTINGS AND PARTICIPANTS: A total of 1179 primary stage I-III rectal cancer patients over age 66 who underwent LAR with synchronous diverting stoma. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: (1) Stoma creation and reversal rates; (2) time to reversal; (3) characteristics associated with reversal and shorter time to reversal. RESULTS: Within 18 mo of LAR, 51% of patients (603/1179) underwent stoma reversal. Stoma reversal was associated with age <80 y (P < 0.0001), male sex (P = 0.018), fewer comorbidities (P = 0.017), higher income (quartile 4 versus 1; P = 0.002), early tumor stage (1 versus 3; P < 0.001), neoadjuvant radiation (P < 0.0001), rectal tumor location (versus rectosigmoid; P = 0.001), more recent diagnosis (P = 0.021), and shorter length of stay on LAR admission (P = 0.021). Median time to reversal was 126 d (interquartile range: 79-249). Longer time to reversal was associated with older age (P = 0.031), presence of comorbidities (P = 0.014), more advanced tumor stage (P = 0.007), positive lymph nodes (P = 0.009), receipt of adjuvant radiation therapy (P = 0.008), more recent diagnosis (P = 0.004), and longer length of stay on LAR admission (P < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: Half of elderly rectal cancer patients who undergo LAR with temporary stoma have not undergone stoma reversal by 18 mo. Identifiable risk factors predict both nonreversal and longer time to reversal. These results help inform preoperative discussions and promote realistic expectations for elderly rectal cancer patients.
Asunto(s)
Adenocarcinoma/cirugía , Neoplasias del Recto/cirugía , Estomas Quirúrgicos/estadística & datos numéricos , Anciano , Femenino , Hospitales/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Masculino , Estudios Retrospectivos , Programa de VERFRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Spinal muscular atrophy (SMA) is a rare neuromuscular disease characterized by progressive muscular atrophy and weakness. Nusinersen was the first treatment approved for SMA. Per the US label, the nusinersen administration schedule consists of three loading doses at 14-day intervals, a fourth loading dose 30 days later, and maintenance doses every 4 months thereafter. Using two large US databases, we evaluated real-world adherence to nusinersen with its unique dosing schedule among generalizable populations of patients with SMA. METHODS: Patients with SMA treated with nusinersen, likely to have complete information on date of treatment initiation, were identified in the Optum® de-identified electronic health records (EHR) database (7/2017-9/2019), and in the Merative™ MarketScan® Research Databases from commercial (1/2017-6/2020) and Medicaid claims (1/2017-12/2019). Baseline demographics, number of nusinersen administrations on time, and distribution of inter-dose intervals were summarized. RESULTS: Totals of 67 and 291 patients were identified in the EHR and claims databases, respectively. Most nusinersen doses were received on time (93.9% EHR, 80.5% claims). Adherence was higher during the maintenance phase (90.6%) than the loading phase (71.1%) in the claims analysis, in contrast with the EHR analysis (95.5% and 92.6%, respectively), suggesting that not all loading doses of nusinersen may be accurately captured in claims. Inter-dose intervals captured in both databases aligned with the expected dosing schedule. CONCLUSION: Most nusinersen doses were received on time, consistent with the recommended schedule. Our findings also highlight the importance of careful methodological approaches when using real-world administrative databases for evaluation of nusinersen treatment patterns.
Adherence to medicines in the real world is important for patients with chronic disease to see long-term benefits of treatment. This study shows the importance and challenges of measuring adherence using real-world administrative data sources. This is especially important for drugs given through lumbar puncture with unique dosing schedules, such as nusinersen for the treatment of spinal muscular atrophy. In this study, most patients with spinal muscular atrophy received their nusinersen doses on time.
Asunto(s)
Fuentes de Información , Atrofia Muscular Espinal , Estados Unidos , Humanos , Atrofia Muscular Espinal/tratamiento farmacológico , Oligonucleótidos/uso terapéutico , Revisión de Utilización de SegurosRESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: We assessed how clinician satisfaction with a vendor electronic health record (EHR) changed over time in the 4 years following the transition from a homegrown EHR system to identify areas for improvement. METHODS: We conducted a multiyear survey of clinicians across a large health care system after transitioning to a vendor EHR. Eligible clinicians from the first institution to transition received a survey invitation by email in fall 2016 and then eligible clinicians systemwide received surveys in spring 2018 and spring 2019. The survey included items assessing ease/difficulty of completing tasks and items assessing perceptions of the EHR's value, usability, and impact. One item assessing overall satisfaction and one open-ended question were included. Frequencies and means were calculated, and comparison of means was performed between 2018 and 2019 on all clinicians. A multivariable generalized linear model was performed to predict the outcome of overall satisfaction. RESULTS: Response rates for the surveys ranged from 14 to 19%. The mean response from 3 years of surveys for one institution, Brigham and Women's Hospital, increased for overall satisfaction between 2016 (2.85), 2018 (3.01), and 2019 (3.21, p < 0.001). We found no significant differences in mean response for overall satisfaction between all responders of the 2018 survey (3.14) and those of the 2019 survey (3.19). Systemwide, tasks rated the most difficult included "Monitoring patient medication adherence," "Identifying when a referral has not been completed," and "Making a list of patients based on clinical information (e.g., problem, medication)." Clinicians disagreed the most with "The EHR helps me focus on patient care rather than the computer" and "The EHR allows me to complete tasks efficiently." CONCLUSION: Survey results indicate room for improvement in clinician satisfaction with the EHR. Usability of EHRs should continue to be an area of focus to ease clinician burden and improve clinician experience.
Asunto(s)
Atención a la Salud , Registros Electrónicos de Salud , Humanos , Femenino , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Atención al Paciente , Satisfacción PersonalRESUMEN
PURPOSE: To examine the feasibility of integrating a symptom management platform into the electronic health record (EHR) using electronic patient-reported outcomes (ePROs) during oral cancer-directed therapy (OCDT) and explore the impact of prompting oncology nurse navigators (ONNs) to respond to severe symptomatic adverse events (SAEs). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Adults prescribed OCDT at Dana-Farber Cancer Institute were consecutively invited to participate. Participants received weekly messages to complete ePROs. The first half enrolled in a passive (P) group where ePROs responses could be viewed anytime, but outreach was not expected. The second half enrolled in an active (A) group where severe SAEs prompted emails to ONNs for outreach within 1 business day. Feasibility was the proportion of participants completing ≥2 ePROs during the first 30 days. Participants were followed for up to 90 days. RESULTS: From June 25, 2019, to August 18, 2021, 100 participants enrolled, and 96 remained enrolled for at least 30 days. Overall, average age was 59 years, 80% female, and 9% used the platform in Spanish. Twenty-two A (45%) and 27 P (57%) participants met the feasibility threshold (P = .26). ePROs returned at 30 days were similar (P = .50): 0 ePROs 17 A, 13 P; 1 ePRO 10 A, 7 P; 2 ePROs 3 A, 5 P; 3 ePROs 1 A, 4 P; 4 ePROs 7 A, 8 P; and 5 ePROs 11 A, 10 P. Documented telephone encounters at 30 days were similar (109 A, 101 P; P = .86). CONCLUSION: EHR-embedded ePROs administered weekly for people on OCDT was feasible, although many went incomplete. ePRO completion was not clearly affected by nursing calls for severe SAEs. Future efforts will investigate improving engagement and addressing symptoms proactively.
Asunto(s)
Registros Electrónicos de Salud , Neoplasias de la Boca , Adulto , Humanos , Femenino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Masculino , Estudios de Factibilidad , Medición de Resultados Informados por el Paciente , Neoplasias de la Boca/terapia , Programas InformáticosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: A study was undertaken to determine the survival benefit of postoperative chemoradiation therapy for elderly patients with resected gastric adenocarcinoma. METHODS: The authors identified 1023 individuals aged 65 years and older (median = 76) who underwent gastrectomy for nonmetastatic stage IB-IV gastric adenocarcinoma diagnosed between 2000 and 2002 in the linked Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results-Medicare database. They examined factors associated with receiving postoperative chemoradiation and analyzed the survival benefit associated with receiving postoperative chemoradiation. RESULTS: Thirty percent of patients received adjuvant chemoradiation. On multivariate analysis, younger age (P < .0001), lymph node involvement (P < .0001), and more recent diagnosis (P = .0284) were associated with receiving chemoradiation. There was a trend toward increased use among patients with less comorbidity (P = .0515). The median follow-up was 25.5 months, and 62% died. On multivariate survival analysis, older patients (P < .0001) and those with lymph node involvement (P < .0001), T3 or T4 disease (P = .0472), higher grade disease (P = .0355), and more comorbidity (P = .0411) were more likely to die. After adjustment for other factors, receipt of adjuvant chemoradiation therapy did not significantly increase survival (hazard ratio, 0.90; 95% confidence interval, 0.72-1.12; P = .3453) and did not increase survival in a multivariate analysis that included propensity scores (P = .2090). CONCLUSIONS: The authors did not detect a survival benefit, suggesting that some elderly patients with resected gastric adenocarcinoma may not gain a survival benefit from the administration of adjuvant chemoradiation. The analysis had limitations, and the results are hypothesis generating. Future gastric cancer trials should enroll more elderly patients and stratify patients by age to better understand the impact of treatment regimens on older patients.
Asunto(s)
Adenocarcinoma/cirugía , Quimioterapia Adyuvante , Radioterapia Adyuvante , Neoplasias Gástricas/cirugía , Adenocarcinoma/tratamiento farmacológico , Adenocarcinoma/mortalidad , Adenocarcinoma/radioterapia , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Terapia Combinada , Supervivencia sin Enfermedad , Femenino , Gastrectomía , Humanos , Masculino , Pronóstico , Programa de VERF , Neoplasias Gástricas/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias Gástricas/mortalidad , Neoplasias Gástricas/radioterapiaRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: We sought to evaluate differences in guideline concordance between National Cancer Institute (NCI)-designated and other centers and determine whether the level of available evidence influences the degree of variation in concordance. BACKGROUND: The National Cancer Institute recognizes centers of excellence in the advancement of cancer care. These NCI-designated cancer centers have been shown to have better outcomes for cancer surgery; however, little work has compared surgical process measures. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was conducted using Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results registry linked to Medicare claims data. Fee-for-service Medicare patients with a definitive surgical resection for breast, colon, gastric, rectal, or thyroid cancers diagnosed between 2000 and 2005 were identified. Claims data from 1999 to 2006 were used. Our main outcome measure was guideline concordance at NCI-designated centers compared to other institutions, stratified by level of evidence as graded by National Comprehensive Cancer Network guideline panels. RESULTS: All centers achieved at least 90%, and often 95%, concordance with guidelines based on level 1 evidence. Concordance rates for guidelines with lower-level evidence ranged from 30% to 97% and were higher at NCI-designated centers. The adjusted concordance ratios for category 1 guidelines were between 1.02 and 1.08, whereas concordance ratios for guidelines with lower-level evidence ranged from 0.97 to 2.19, primarily favoring NCI-designated centers. CONCLUSIONS: When strong evidence supports a guideline, there is little variation in practice between NCI-designated centers and other hospitals, suggesting that all are providing appropriate care. Variation in care may exist, however, for guidelines that are based on expert consensus rather than strong evidence. This suggests that future efforts to generate needed evidence on the optimal approach to care may also reduce institutional variation.
Asunto(s)
Instituciones Oncológicas/normas , Adhesión a Directriz/estadística & datos numéricos , Neoplasias/cirugía , Evaluación de Resultado en la Atención de Salud , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina/normas , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Neoplasias de la Mama/cirugía , Neoplasias del Colon/cirugía , Femenino , Humanos , Técnicas In Vitro , Escisión del Ganglio Linfático/normas , National Cancer Institute (U.S.) , Neoplasias del Recto/cirugía , Programa de VERF , Nivel de Atención , Neoplasias de la Tiroides/cirugía , Estados UnidosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: As ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) is a risk factor for invasive breast cancer, ongoing annual mammography is important for cancer control, yet little is known about racial/ethnic and other disparities in use among older women with DCIS. METHODS: SEER-Medicare data was used to identify women age 65-85 years, diagnosed with DCIS from 1992 to 2005 and treated with surgery, but not bilateral mastectomy. We examined factors associated with receipt of an initial mammogram within 1 year of treatment and subsequent annual mammograms for 3 and 5 years. We examined whether follow-up care, by a primary care physician or cancer specialist, or neighborhood characteristics mediated disparities in mammography use. RESULTS: Overall, 91.3% of women had an initial mammogram. After adjustment, blacks and Hispanics were less likely than whites to receive an initial mammogram (odds ratio (OR) 0.74, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.55-0.99 and OR 0.65, CI 0.46-0.93, respectively, as were women of lower socioeconomic status (SES), women who had a mastectomy or breast conserving surgery without radiation therapy, and women who did not have a physician visit. Overall rates of annual mammography decreased over time. Disparities by SES, initial treatment type, and physician visit did not diminish over time. Physician visits had a modest effect on reducing initial racial/ethnic disparities. CONCLUSIONS: Annual mammography among women age 65 to 85 with DCIS declines as women get further from diagnosis. Interventions should focus on reducing disparities in the use of initial surveillance mammography, and increasing surveillance over time.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias de la Mama/diagnóstico por imagen , Carcinoma Intraductal no Infiltrante/diagnóstico por imagen , Mamografía/estadística & datos numéricos , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Etnicidad , Femenino , Disparidades en Atención de Salud , Humanos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Riesgo , Clase SocialRESUMEN
Little is known about referrals from primary care providers (PCPs) for suspected hematologic malignancies, including their clinical triggers and frequency. A random sample of 190 Massachusetts PCPs were presented with a vignette concerning a patient with a new finding of moderate anemia, asked how they would respond, and then asked what they would do if the patient returned with persistent anemia plus one additional sign or symptom. We also asked about referral behaviors for suspected hematologic malignancies during the prior year. A total of 134 (70.5%) PCPs responded. At first anemia presentation,only 3.8% reported referring to hematology. The development of a second sign or symptom yielded higher referral rates: pancytopenia 588.7%, leukopenia 5 63.9%, thrombocytopenia 5 63.9%, lymphadenopathy 5 42.9%, leukocytosis 5 37.6%, night sweats 5 25.6%, and weight loss 5 23.3%. The median yearly number (interquartile range) of patients PCPs reported suspecting of having hematologic malignancy was 5 (3, 10), and the median formally referred was 5 (3, 10). We conclude that anemia plus signs and symptoms suggestive of myelodysplasia or leukemia (compared with those suggestive of lymphoma) are more likely to prompt hematology referral. In addition, given their rarity,the numbe
Asunto(s)
Anemia/etiología , Neoplasias Hematológicas/diagnóstico , Médicos de Atención Primaria , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina/estadística & datos numéricos , Derivación y Consulta/estadística & datos numéricos , Anemia/epidemiología , Recuento de Células Sanguíneas , Diagnóstico Diferencial , Endoscopía/estadística & datos numéricos , Hemorragia Gastrointestinal/diagnóstico , Encuestas de Atención de la Salud , Neoplasias Hematológicas/sangre , Neoplasias Hematológicas/complicaciones , Neoplasias Hematológicas/epidemiología , Humanos , Enfermedades Linfáticas/etiología , Massachusetts , Síndromes Mielodisplásicos/sangre , Síndromes Mielodisplásicos/complicaciones , Síndromes Mielodisplásicos/diagnóstico , Síndromes Mielodisplásicos/epidemiología , Práctica Profesional/estadística & datos numéricos , Muestreo , Sudoración , Pérdida de PesoRESUMEN
Systems to address follow-up testing of clinically positive surveillance colonoscopy results are lacking. The impact of an ambulatory safety net (ASN) intervention on rates of colonoscopy completion was assessed. The ASN team identified patients using an electronic registry, conducted patient outreach, coordinated care, and tracked colonoscopy completion. In all, 701 patients were captured in the ASN program: 58.1% (407/701) had possible barriers to follow-up colonoscopy completion, with rates of 80.1% (236/294) if no barrier, and 40.9% (287/701) overall. Colonoscopy completion likelihood increased with prior polypectomy (odds ratio [OR], 1.6; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.1-2.3), and decreased with White race (OR, 0.5; 95% CI, 0.3-0.9), increased inpatient visits (OR, 0.6; 95% CI, 0.4-0.9), more outreach attempts (OR, 0.6; 95% CI, 0.5-0.7), and fair/poor/inadequate preparation (OR, 0.4; 95% CI, 0.2-0.7) in logistic regression models. An ASN model for quality improvement promotes colonoscopy completion rates and identifies patient barriers.